Was Lalu a Better Railway Minister than Mamata Banerjee?

Posted on July 25, 2010 in Politics at Play

By Roli Verma:

Railways are very significant for any country, as it forms the backbone of an economy. Our country India is endowed with an extensive rail network of about 65569 kms. However, our railways have a pathetic safety record. It failed to meet targets it had set for itself in its corporate safety plan [2003-2013] revealing low priority given to passenger safety according to the CAG report. We still need to modernize signaling equipment, anti-collision devices, maintain assets and fill-up safety related jobs…

Just a few days back while going through the safety records, a thought came to my mind. Was Laloo Prasad Yadav a better Railway Minister than Mamata Banerjee? Here’s what we think:

Mamata banerjee aka didi:

Our railway minister Mamata banerjee aka Bengal’s didi is facing flak from all sides due the recent spate of accidents. Since her appointment as the railway minister there have been 200 accidents in 14 months. Her negligence is held responsible for the dismal record of accidents.

In November 2009, 6 mishaps occurred followed by 3 mishaps in January 2010 taking away innocent lives. This wasn’t enough, the derailment of Mumbai bound Gyaneshwar express in May killed 150 people and injured several others! It is seen that she gives over importance to West Bengal politics over her ministry of railways.

Adding to the scathing indictment, the latest rail accident at Sainthia, which occurred on 19th July instantly killed 67 people and injured hundreds. At Sainthia, there was a collision between Sealdah bound Uttarbanga express and Uttranchal bound Vanachal express in Bhirbhum district of West Bengal. This has raised serious doubts about Banerjee and her capabilities in providing safety to the railways.

However, she refuses to take any responsibility of the accident at Sainthia on moral grounds. Gone are those days when Lal Bahadur Shastri took moral responsibility of the accident in 1956!! Didi professes CPI’s hand behind these mishaps with an aim to tarnish her image.

Surprisingly, she has not even shown a bit of remorse. After 48 hrs of the Sainthia accident, didi joined a combined rally resuming her usual Bengal politics, leaving the railways behind as if nothing had happened. Rather than taking stock of the situation and functioning of the dept at the right place and right time, she has been pro-active in ‘announcing’ compensation to victims and ‘directing’ senior officials from Delhi to rush to the accident site! This has given enough ammunition to her opponents to question her callous behaviour. Her over indulgence in the Bengal politics — dislodging the left front — is killing railways. She rides two horses and is unable to strike the right balance between the two. No advanced country compromises on safety grounds like this.  Our government is also silent as if nothing has happened.

She had promised to start new trains in her railway budget 2009. Though she has started a few, now she complains that the ‘harmads’ (CPI’s goons ) have conspired to upset her plans and derail her mission of development.

Whatever justification she might give now, it is a well known fact now that mamata tops the list of ‘absentee’ ministers and the rail bhavan has to recognize it.

Lalu Prasad Yadav

Lalu Prasad yadav was the railway minister from 2004 to 2009 in the ruling UPA govt. When he took over the railways when it was in a ‘bankruptcy’ state.

However, he turned this loss making organization into a profit making department by making a total profit of Rs. 25000 crore in 4 years. Therefore, he was responsible for the financial turnaround of the railway department.

He left passenger fares untouched and found several other profitable sources of revenues for railways. With him, the net revenues experienced a robust upward trend. He replaced the plastic cups with kulhads (earthern cups) to generate rural employment and introduced cushion seats in all unreserved compartments.

In June 2004 he boarded the train from the Patna railway station at mid night to inspect the railway problems himself. During his regime, there was a remarkable improvement in railway safety and steep reduction in the number of accidents. The number of accidents came down from 325 in 2004-2005 to 194 in 2007-2009. He was accused of using his position to help his relatives acquire land. Other railway ministers doubt Lalu’s achievements.

Undoubtedly he gave a stellar performance in the span of 5 yrs as a railway minister. Certainly there were problems then and there are problems now, but safety was not compromised.

What do you think? Was Laloo Prasad Yadav a better Railway Minister than Mamata Banerjee? Voice yourself by commenting below or tweet us @YouthKiAwaaz. You can also email us at [email protected]

Youth Ki Awaaz

India's largest platform for young people to express themselves on critical issues - making best use of new media and online journalism.

Submit Your Story

Comments

You must be logged in to comment.

If you sign up with Google, Twitter or Facebook, we’ll automatically import your bio which you will be able to edit/change after logging in. Also, we’ll never post to Twitter or Facebook without your permission. We take privacy very seriously. For more info, please see Terms.

Atiya

We can make as much fun of him as we want, But Laloo is Laloo and he was doing a much better job.

saurav

Contributing to the article, it is surely true that Lalu was a better railway minister than the present railway minister Mamata Banerjee. In the regime of lalu there had been less accidents and a turnaroud in the profits. Getting the underneath facts, iwould like to shed light on this turnaround of profitability. Just before the Lalu’s regime the present chief minister of Bihar, Nitish kumar was the railway minister and it was his vision and policy formulation and strategies which were started. It was only after his end of tenure these strategies and policies started reaping benefits.

rajindian

one comment in respect to the number of accidents… At lalu’s regime the number of accidents was 194 in 12 months, whereas in Ms. Banerjee’s 14-month long ministry it was 200 in 14 months (stats are taken from the above writing only). I didnot understand which one is worse,..??

Similar Posts

#StartTheChange

Submit your story