By Shreyasi Ghosh:
India is a country which is divided in opinion on almost every imaginable issue. So it doesn’t really come as a surprise that a few names in the list of Padma Shri awardees for the year 2010 have triggered off a nationwide debate over their candidature and whether they really deserve it or not. Most notable among these names is actor Saif Ali Khan’s; he himself had expressed surprise at the announcement and was quoted saying that there are many others out in the world who make far more deserving candidates than him.
His recommendation had sparked vehement protests Rajasthan, mainly among the Bishnoi community along with many wildlife activists who feel that his felicitation is sending a wrong message to the people of the nation because the actor had previously been accused of killing black bucks in 1998 in Jodhpur and has a case pending against him in the court. They feel that if a popular actor and prominent public figure like Khan can get away with illegally killing animals in forest reserves and be treated with honor and given an award as prestigious as the Padma Shri, then people, especially the impressionable lot, will take to flouting the laws of the land like the celebrities they adore and look up to for inspiration. They cannot be blamed for these grave misgivings. After all, it is known for a fact that Khan has a huge fan following and the mere concept of a breakup party shown in his film “Love Aaj Kal” has set the ball rolling for many such parties to take place all across the country.
Saif Ali Khan is one name amongst many other people who, according to most people, are undeserving candidates who haven’t made any significant social contribution.
People, general public and the Indian media alike, had also questioned the sanctity of the award after some other big names in the film industry, namely Aishwarya Rai Bachchan and Akshay Kumar were conferred the awards in 2009. The former has been credited for taking the Indian film and fashion industry to the global map, after having represented India in many an international event, film festivals, fashion shows etc. But according to most people, she has not done her bit for the society and hence doesn’t deserve this award. Many have been heard complaining that influential people with reach in the political circles of Delhi can easily lobby for these civilian awards and get names shortlisted. Some of these announcements are highly politically motivated decisions that, they fear, will diminish the sanctity and reputation of these awards which will then stand to lose their credibility.
These agitations are quite justified in more ways than one. By dancing around trees, parroting lines written by others, parading in fashionable clothes, hobnobbing with the glitterati and the likes, one cannot be deemed worthy of an award of the stature of the Padma Shri. Has their activities resulted in any real social progress? If an actress receives this award, does this pave an easy road for the emancipation of women in this country? If a person who has made his/her way to the list of awardees using all his/her political contacts, then what example is he/she setting for a nation of more than one billion?
That it is okay to forget one’s social responsibilities and pursue individual goals? Moreover the hedonistic lifestyle of these celebrities, their bad behavior and tendency to break laws, the glitz and glamour of the tinsel town that they project as a way of life has resulted in more unfortunate incidents than one, with people foolishly running after cheap fame and money to put themselves in the same bracket as their favorite celebs.
So now, if our government decides to award these people in the name of significant contribution in the fields of art, then what greater purpose does it serve apart from massaging the already inflated egos of these celebs and catering to the demands of the power corridors of Delhi who favor them? And it is not that all of the names in the list of these awards have actually achieved any substantial goals to write home about-few runaway hits, few projects which bombed at the box office; that’s about it. So this does make the candidature of these celebrities for some of the highest civilian awards of the country very questionable indeed.
Another grave, if not unexpected trend is that mostly cricketers are usually considered for this award from the realms of sports. There have been sportsmen like Vijender Singh and Sushil Kumar who have been overlooked for the Padma Shri award in 2009 despite having won laurels at the Olympics, while Mahendra Singh Dhoni and Harbhajan Singh were awarded. The athletes have been graceful enough to not grudge them this honor but have expressed disappointment for not winning. Akhil Kumar, Commonwealth Games gold medalist, voices the opinion of many an athlete who are not cricketers – that only in India, one sport enjoys nationwide media and public attention while other sports are categorically overlooked. Abhinav Bindra, who had been awarded the Padma Bhushan joins in solidarity with these athletes, blaming the nation for only supporting cricketers despite the efforts of players in other sports to bring home the glory.
That said,Â the definition of social contribution also depends on how you look at it. No one can deny the unifying power of Indian cinema or cricket. When a Sachin Tendulkar hits a sixer, the entire nation, irrespective of religion, cheers for him. There are films which find resonance in the context of India’s social structure and portray the struggles of the common people, try to shed some light on various social evils and make people aware of the country’s glorious traditions and sow the seeds of hope for a better future in the nation.
Many celebrities have also used their fame and power to promote social solidarity and various other causes which had inspired the common mass to come forward in their missions. And one cannot deny that celebrities, cricketers and film stars alike, are indeed doing a good job of representing India in the global platform. To many non-Indians, India is synonymous with its films and film stars like Shah Rukh Khan and Amitabh Bachchan. The justification behind this philosophy might be questionable, but the spirit is undoubtedly appreciated.
When state governments, central ministries etc recommend the names of the celebrities in the Award Committee, it is the duty of the Home Minister and ultimately the President’s office to ensure that only truly deserving people from different fields are awarded, the operative word here being ‘different’. Genuinely inspiring people, people whoÂ actually do something substantial for the country should be considered first. Or the awards stand to lose their gravitas.
The need of such data, divisive in nature, needs to be questioned, because the responsibility of the authorities does not end with releasing the figures.Read More >
“I agree with some of the points you make and disagree with some. Perhaps you have not quite understood where I’m coming from and why I bring up what I do.”Read More >
Couples, stop embarrassing yourselves. Don’t squander away your or your family’s savings for a festival thrown to celebrate your social contract.Read More >
Youth Ki Awaaz speaks to young voters and leaders in West Bengal amidst the ongoing Assembly elections.Read More >
I am now stuck in my office in Srinagar for the past two weeks due to the unrest. But I see that there’s a deep wound in the Kashmiri psyche.Read More >