India’s Stand Towards Pak: Constrictive?

Posted on May 24, 2011 in Editor's Picks, Exclusive, Featured

By Srishti Chauhan:

It is not news to anybody that Pakistan has occupied a certain portion of Kashmir, now labeled as POK (Pakistan occupied Kashmir) in maps all over the world. It is also not news to anybody that a certain part of northern India is under forceful control of China. Nor is it of surprise any longer that Arunachal Pradesh is shown to be a part of China in the Chinese maps.

India has been seen as an essentially spineless country for decades. It is a very famous observation that states that the only man in Indian politics was Indira Gandhi. The lady, in her regime, took many unpopular steps and did not yield to pressure. She was known to speak and act her mind. After her regime, India has been ruled by a series of politicians who have more than often succumbed to pressure from other countries as well as from people within the country. The above examples of how India has been occupied unlawfully by other countries emphasizes this fact quite clearly.

After being elected as the Prime Minister, Manmohan Singh has carried out a well-planned and intelligent strategy where the promotion of India economically is concerned. By projecting India to be a stable and terrorism opposing country, India has experienced an inflow of investment like hardly any other south east Asian country. Moreover, India enjoys a status different from that of other countries. The visas of most people in Pakistan, Bangladesh, Nepal and Bhutan are continually rejected by the powerful nations like the Great Britain and USA. This, however, is not the case for India. Indian students find it a lot easier to study and work abroad.

The thinking of the prime Minister- an economist himself- is not only empowering the citizens, it is also leading to a sustained economic growth. Unlike China, where the growth has been so exponential that analysts are waiting for the bubble to burst, the growth in India has been both positive and sustained to quite a level.

The other side of the promotion of the country has, however, been completely neglected by the ruling party. India, after signing the nuclear deal which prohibits it to test any more nuclear weapons, has made itself weak in terms of military. The military general of India has been known to have commented that China’s army, once a match for India’s, is now 3 times as large and powerful as the Indian army.

This, and the fact that India is promoting itself to be an abiding and peaceful nation, has stopped India from declaring war on Pakistan and China and regaining the lost territory. Is this the correct approach?

Experts are of the opinion that waging a war on Pakistan is not a good idea because Pak has China as an ally- both countries together by sharing the mutual interest of hampering India’s growth. True is the fact that India may not be a match for the armies of the 2 countries together. But is that reason enough for us to continually keep losing parts of our nations to other countries? India has projected itself to be a weak nation even in the eyes of the terrorists. The terrorists attacks have increased to such an intensity but corresponding punishing of the accused is still at an infant stage.

The fact that India cannot do an “Osama” to get its culprits of 26/11 is so sure that most people are not even finding it a topic worth discussion. “India does not have the guts to do what USA did. All we know is how to get attacked and then spend lakhs of tax payer’s money on protecting the victims- just what we did in Kasab’s case”– says the blog of a person who goes by the name of “Mirror”.

Is economic growth the only thing that counts? Are we losing touch of ground realities in parts of the country where economic growth is still an alien concept and where people would more prefer to have a stable lifestyle not marred by insurgents and terrorists alike?

Is our PM’s strategy good? Not really! Ask yourself- how many of us expect Pak to occupy the whole of Kashmir? And how many of us think that Arunachal Pradesh will indeed officially become China like Tibet more or less has?

The writer is a Senior Correspondent of Youth Ki Awaaz and a student of University of Delhi.


Youth Ki Awaaz

India's largest platform for young people to express themselves on critical issues - making best use of new media and online journalism.

Submit Your Story


You must be logged in to comment.

If you sign up with Google, Twitter or Facebook, we’ll automatically import your bio which you will be able to edit/change after logging in. Also, we’ll never post to Twitter or Facebook without your permission. We take privacy very seriously. For more info, please see Terms.


Can only by invading a country we prove our strength ? When we talk about India in global perspective ,we need to give it a comprehensive look, not just only the moves we find befitting to solve the immediate problem.We need to take into account the fact that by force ,in present circumstances India can not solve neither its border issues nor the problem of  external terrorism. We are a fastly emerging economy ,any war at this juncture will only hider our economic progress. This economic progress is our biggest strength, if now we are able to garner international support on terrorism it primarily owes to our emerging economic strength and India ‘s global image as a peace loving nation.In this changed global economic and political equations the best mean India has to solve their international issues is by making himself more economically  strong and defensively advanced. We are yet not enough strong economically and internationally to take an aggressive stance on issues related with China. And regarding the  issues with Pakistan, even if we invade and win a war against Pakistan we will never be able to eliminate terrorism on their soil because this terrorism is religion driven. The terrorists are laying the lives to ” book a seat in Jannat” unless this false notion is erased from their minds its very difficult to eliminate terrorism from this region.India alone cant solve the problem of external terrorism , this problem can only be solved by putting global pressure on Pakistan which is already taking place.

Historical perspective is very important in analyzing the problems with China and Pakistan.   

    Srishti Chauhan

    You know what….u should really read that article again! I have said that India is developing economically and stuff. BUT- the question that this article raises is whether it is okay to let yourself be defeated in terms of land areas and in terms of military power at the cost of growing economically. And regarding the point of mustering international support- How long has it been since India has projected itself to be a peace loving nation? For how many years have you been hearing that America is against terrorism in Pakistan and other similar statements? What is the result of all this? The answer is for you to see. Had diplomatic talks been the solution, America would not have killed Osama the way it did.
    Look beyond the image that is being projected to you! And another thing- our Prime Minister is an economist. It’s his job to project himself as a successful policy-maker. 

Similar Posts


Submit your story