Iran and Nukes: The Never Ending Controversies

Posted on February 24, 2012 in Politics at Play

By Prerna Tyagi:

Iran, a major reservoir of oil and natural gas, has been in the news for all the wrong reasons ever since its much-delayed first nuclear reactor Bushehr 1 was completed and officially opened on 12 September 2011. Following the development, the nuclear energy monitoring body IAEA rebuked Iran and presented a detailed report claiming that Iran had undertaken research and experiments geared to developing a nuclear weapon capability. The report outlines that the country’s detonator development, the multi-point initiation of high explosives, and experiments involving nuclear payload integration into a missile delivery vehicle. IAEA has been very vocal claiming that Iran is secretly carrying a nuclear program for generating Weapons of Mass Destruction (WMD) which has not only jolted the major powers but has also given birth to the common fear of the much debated nuclear war. The US and its close ally, Israel, are the major opponents of Iran’s nuclear program, with the European Union nations singing along.

According to the norms of IAEA, 5% and less enrichment of uranium, LEU (Low Enriched Uranium) is meant to produce fuel used for power needs like generation of electricity, etc, and enrichment of uranium above 5%, HEU (Highly Enriched Uranium), produces fuel for making nuclear weapons. The facts that, traces of HEU have been found to be present near a Nuclear Facility in Iran and its hesitance to comply with the rules and regulations of IAEA have strengthened the fears of Iran’s alleged involvement in generating WMD.

Iran, however, continues to shun the claims of IAEA and has gone to the extent of accusing the agency of pro-western bias and has threatened to reduce its co-operation with it. It states that the purpose of its nuclear program is the generation of power and that any other use would be a violation of the NPT (Nuclear Proliferation Treaty), of which it is a signatory. It claims that nuclear power is necessary for its booming population and rapid industrialization that it is undergoing. It questions, why it shouldn’t be allowed to diversify its sources of energy amid the fear of its oil fields eventually being depleted.

Back in 2006, the UN Security Council had imposed sanctions against Iran, which were later tightened, because Iran refused to accept its demand to suspend its enrichment program. Iran’s representative to the UN argued that the sanctions compelled it to abandon its right under Nuclear Non- Proliferation treaty to peaceful nuclear technology.

The NAM (Non- Aligned Movement), of which India is also one of the members along with Iran, has since been a mediator between UN and Iran and had called on both sides to work through the IAEA for a solution. NAM has, however, said that the present situation whereby Nuclear Weapon States monopolize the right to possess nuclear weapons is ‘highly discriminatory’ and has further pushed for steps to accelerate the process of nuclear disarmament.

Amid all these developments, the recent bombings in New Delhi and Bangkok have once again cornered Iran. As the blame game continues, it is to be seen if Iran would be able to proceed with its nuclear enrichment program as it is currently at the receiving end and the clouds of controversies do not seem to fade away and hover over it for quite some time.

Youth Ki Awaaz

India's largest platform for young people to express themselves on critical issues - making best use of new media and online journalism.

Submit Your Story


You must be logged in to comment.

If you sign up with Google, Twitter or Facebook, we’ll automatically import your bio which you will be able to edit/change after logging in. Also, we’ll never post to Twitter or Facebook without your permission. We take privacy very seriously. For more info, please see Terms.

  • Iran and Nukes | Youth Ki Awaaz « NadanParindey
  • Sami, the bedouin.

    If one were to base their convictions and opinions on the propagated talking points in the western media, and accept their delusional contextualization of the Iranian issue, one would think that the Iranian state is a menace and an existential threat to, not only the U.S. and Israel, but the entire world. If one was sufficiently convinced that Iran posed a direct threat to their security, in such a state of fear, one might even support a preemptive attack. This contextualization is so twisted and backwards that while laughable, is also extremely dangerous as it could possibly lead to the death of hundreds of thousands of human beings.

    10 years ago, Brian Whitaker wrote in The Guardian that “One of the oldest tricks in the run-up to a war is to spread terrifying stories of things that the enemy may be about to do. Government officials plant these tales, journalists water them and the public, for the most part, swallow them.” This was, as we all know now, the method used to justify the murder of Iraqi civilians and the destruction of their nation by the Bush and Obama administrations. It was a pack of lies – weapons of Mass Destruction, ties with Al Qaeda etc. – destined to occupy Iraq, steal its wealth and keep it under control, regardless of “civilian casualties”

    Similar Posts


    Submit your story