A Short Look At The Liaison Between Science And Religion

Posted on June 12, 2012 in Inter-faith

By Ankit Varma:

“Science has made us gods even before we are worthy of being men”
                                                                                                                           -Jean Rostand

Science is the melting pot of curiosity, imagination and human endurance. The laws of the science played a pivotal role in unfolding the secrets of nature and understanding the working forces behind the miracles of nature. Our technological powers have given us control over almost all aspects of our life. It has changed the way we travel, talk and probably the way we think. Science is about data, logic and observation. It’s all about putting a method to the madness. Human mind doesn’t work this way, the inherent nature of the mind certainly is to be logical but at the same time there is no instrument which measures belief. Similarly the scientific community outright rejects the presence of god.

In my opinion god is a higher being, a force behind the universe. Gods’ divinity and presence are two very different things. The fact that god exists does not mean that it is necessarily a divine entity. For instance, there seems to be nothing ‘unscientific’ about existence of a human being called Ram. His divinity is a matter of faith and his heroics, a matter of belief. Every religion around the world is centred on life of such human beings with inhuman capabilities. But ironically these so called ‘unscientific assumptions’ continue to be a part of almost all the individuals of the earth. The reason for this is that religion is not all about holiness of a person or place, it is about the teachings of compassion and love which are the fundamentals of every religion. If a woman inspired by her god can sacrifice her whole to share the pain of the orphans and caring for the homeless, I don’t think we have any right to question the source of her inspiration.

We see with our eyes, feel through the skin and think with the brain. But who is the witness? Science disregards the presence of a soul, drawing a technical analogy- consider a computer, it is an assembly of electro-mechanical parts but is it what makes it a computer? In my opinion the presence of a human entity or popularly called the user is what gives complete sense to the computer. On similar lines an assembly of organic parts along with a soul makes us human beings. Soul is the witness.

Someone once said that science was brilliant at answering ‘how’ but becomes terribly confused when it is asked ‘why’. For instance, science is still discussing the origins of the life. It has been ‘concluded’ that the first cell was nothing but a mere coincidental collision between molecules in a pool of amino acid which resulted in DNA. Going further into pre-history, the event responsible for existence of that pool was the Big Bang. The universe in its earliest form was a point. So did the point just appear from nothing? If we discount the fact that god exists we come to the conclusion that everything came from noting. From the perspective of pure logic everything comes from something, so god is that something. So, as far as I’m concerned god is logic apart from being a matter of belief.

Youth Ki Awaaz

YouthKiAwaaz.com is an award winning, India's largest online and mobile platform for young people to express themselves on issues of critical importance. This article has been written by a Youth Ki Awaaz Journalist/Contributor. You can submit a contribution too. Click here to write for Youth Ki Awaaz, or submit a photo or video.

Submit Your Story


You must be logged in to comment.

If you sign up with Google, Twitter or Facebook, we’ll automatically import your bio which you will be able to edit/change after logging in. Also, we’ll never post to Twitter or Facebook without your permission. We take privacy very seriously. For more info, please see Terms.

Raashi Wadhwa

Well a very biased article. probably a product of the writers need to justify belief and a little illiteracy about the history of religions and a lot of illiteracy about science. As Nietzsche said – “A casual stroll through the lunatic asylum shows that faith does not prove anything.”

What i would say is that i believe in a divine being. I do not believe in the authority that religion claims over that knowledge.

It makes me sad how this article is proclaiming science to be arrogant. And your falsified logic would be appreciated by the religious apologists. While it was science that said that the earth is round, and it revolves around the sun,the church went nuts and declared capital punishment for blasphemy. Even today the pope says not to use condoms in the country like Africa where AIDS is rampant because it is against their religion. Being uneducated about science that you are, please do not use this platform to provide justifications for your beliefs by displaying science in a low light. Religion is about money, and political control. And by religion, i mean abrahamic religions, and not zoroastrianism, buddism, jainism and sanatan dharm which are more about spiritual development of the self. Even sanatan dharm doesn’t proclaims the existence of a god, and so is the case with buddhism.

One of the things that is wrong with religion is that it teaches us to be satisfied with answers which are not really answers at all. I agree with your point that we do not know what happened before the big bang, or what caused the big bang. But just because we do not know it, is no justification to fill that vacuum with a socially accepted lie.

And please open up a little more to the current affairs and whats happening in the world before you claim that Religion is about love , peace and compassion. Remember the history lessons about the christian crusades? that was In The Name Of God. Go watch the movie Kingdom Of Heaven if you haven’t yet .Do you even know about taliban, and the al-queda? religion is filled with hatred against non believers.


Submit your story