The Uncertain Future Of Singur And Mamata Banerjee

Posted on June 25, 2012 in Politics at Play

By Bhawani Sahoo:

In 2007, when the left front government was in power it had leased 997 acres of land at Singur to Tata motors for production of ‘nano cars’. The land was acquired from 13,000 landowners and farmers and 2,000 of them did not accept compensation for their 400 acres of land.

Last year during election, Mamata Banerjee promised to return the land which was forcefully acquired –this was a major agenda of the campaign leading to her victory.

After becoming the chief minister, she wanted to pass the Singur land rehabilitation and development Act 2011, which made provisions for her government to reclaim 400 acres of land belonging to “unwilling farmers” from Tata Motors.

On 21st June 2012, the Calcutta High Court ruled that the Act introduced by Trinamool Congress is void and unconstitutional as it does not have the President’s assent. Secondly, returning land to their original owners is not done in public interest. And finally, the act did not have any provision for compensation to Tata Motors for the losses they suffered. Mamata Banerjee, who is already at a disadvantage over her stance in the Presidential Polls and her failure to enforce her law, now has an added insult to her injury.

The High Court’s judgement can even bear a negative impact on the existence of her party in the rural election to be held next year. The ongoing legal fight between Mamata Banarjee and Ratan Tata has definitely raised questions on the political efficiency of the West Bengal leader. But this fight has pushed Singur and its farmers’ future into darkness and has equally spoiled the industrial prospect of the state.

On one hand, the “willing farmers” who sold their land for a dream of industrialization and prosperity were disheartened by the political turmoil which shattered their dreams, when in 2008, Tata Motors moved out of Singur. On the other hand the “unwilling farmers” who are still fighting for their land have achieved nothing and have also lost their hope in this hyped legal fight.

Whether willing or unwilling, the ultimate sufferers are these poor, landless farmers who have neither land nor any work to sustain their living.

The present scenario at Singur is another example of political parties and industrialists exploiting ‘the poor’ for the sake of their vote banks selfish desires.

Youth Ki Awaaz

India's largest platform for young people to express themselves on critical issues - making best use of new media and online journalism.

Submit Your Story


You must be logged in to comment.

If you sign up with Google, Twitter or Facebook, we’ll automatically import your bio which you will be able to edit/change after logging in. Also, we’ll never post to Twitter or Facebook without your permission. We take privacy very seriously. For more info, please see Terms.

samirbaran das

History of Bengal after independence is divided into two periods; period of famine (1947 – 1977) and the period of delayed success (1977 – till date). There was famine in 1959, 1966, and 1974. Famines were mainly due to non-cultivation of land under jotedar ownership. Agriculture is not much profitable for them. After 1977, due to land reform, food production is up and famine problem is solved. There was one potential famine in 1978 (due to big flood), but panchayat and co-ordination committee avoided a famine like situation. So the new period of delayed success started. Haldia is delayed by 12 yrs; Bakreswar by 8 yrs. Singur may come one day after some delay like Haldia. Delayed success is better than famine. However now, famine period may come back due to wrong choice of people in the last election. Irrationalism practiced by media and many people is to be paid by famine.

Similar Posts


Submit your story