ByÂ Karmanye Thadani:
This letter is in connection with your remark accusing the RSS and BJP for actually training saffron terrorists in their camps. I am neither a member of the RSS, nor the BJP, nor am I a subscriber of the RSS ideology, nor am I a blind supporter or ardent critic of any of India’s political parties. In fact, not too long ago, I wrote an articleÂ criticizing the BJP for blocking legislative debates in parliament, and I am writing a series of articles on anti-Muslim prejudices, the first article of which has already been published. In another article, I even appealed to fellow citizens to protest for meting out justice to victims (irrespective of religion) of human rights violations by militants and even our soldiers in Kashmir, and I earnestly request you to take steps to alleviate their pain (perhaps by amending the AFSPA and Public Safety Act).
That being said, as much as many Islamists (Islamism, Zionism and Hindutva are obviously not to be equated with Islam, Judaism and Hinduism respectively) and Muslim-sympathetic left-liberal friends may despise me for saying this, it is indeed the most convenient mode of silencing voices by simply delegitimizing them (by conflating the loonie fringe elements with the entire corpus of people), and by depriving a certain section of the intellectual spectrum a reasonable opportunity of being heard, whether by the force of law or by creating the impression by means of propaganda that their views must necessarily be trashed, and the pseudo-secular brigade has actually achieved the same to quite an extent. I am writing this open letter, knowing that many would doubt my secular credentials. Yes, without any sense of shame or guilt, I would like to say that the RSS, an organization that is not legally a banned organization and makes demands for the rights of Kashmiri Hindus, discontinuing Haj subsidy, abrogating Article 370 of the Indian constitution or for a uniform civil code (I don’t see how any of this is communal), being baselessly labelled as a terrorist organization by you is a matter of concern for me as a citizen of this country, in spite of my having several differences of opinion with the Sangh on several issues, as I have outlined later in this letter. Yes, the RSS has also raised demands which have a religious colour to them, such as banning cow slaughter, and it has tried to insist that Muslims and Christians in India must embrace the national song, Vande Mataram. It also demanded that a Ram temple be constructed in Ayodhya on the site where the Babri Masjid stood. But again, none of this amounts to hate speech, the likes of which we witnessed recently in the case of Akbaruddin Owaisi and earlier, Varun Gandhi. Stifling voices we disagree with is not the way forward, nor is delegitimizing a voice by making baseless accusations (Pakistani liberals are sought to be delegitimized by the Islamists there by labelling the former as CIA/RAW/Mossad agents). As Voltaire said — “I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it.”
Undeniably, some members of the RSS have been involved in communal riots, which must be condemned in the strongest terms, but so have some members of the Congress, not only in the 1984 anti-Sikh riots but others as well. The VHP, an organization that affiliates itself to the Sangh, has been involved in gruesome violence against innocent Muslims and Christians as also acts of moral policing, especially its youth wing, the Bajrang Dal. But the Sangh per se, has been held ‘not guilty’ time and again by various commissions. The Sangh comprises people cutting across generations who meet at shakhas, discuss socio-political issues concerning the country and carry out physical exercises. The RSS even has strongly committed Muslim and Christian members, who see no problem in taking pride in India’s Vedic heritage, acknowledging their Hindu ancestry or singing Vande Mataram, nor do they have an issue with a uniform civil code or a cow slaughter ban. In fact, RSS Muslims have created their own organization affiliated to the Sangh, called the Rashtrvadi Muslim Morcha (RMM). I have known many RSS members who are humanistic to the core, with friends of diverse faiths, though in my opinion jingoistic about India’s Hindu heritage and axiomatically believing in India’s morality in foreign policy (except on the issue of Indo-Israeli relations when they don’t see India as being friendly enough to Israel), only alleging its naivetÃ© or passivity, but that is merely a matter of opinion, and everyone is entitled to his/her own. RSS-run schools, coaching centres and relief activities reach out to all, irrespective of faith. The very same Golwalkar who said that Muslims and Christians must give up all extra-territorial loyalties and identify with India’s ancient heritage also went on record to say —
“In service, no distinction should be made between man and man. We have to serve all, be he a Christian or a Muslim, or a human being of any other persuasion; for calamities, distress and misfortunes make no such distinction but afflict all alike. And in serving to relieve the sufferings of man, let it not be in a spirit of condescension or mere compassion, but in the true spirit of our dharma of surrendering our all in the humble service of Lord who abides in the hearts of all beings.”
In that spirit, RSS workers donated blood to save the lives of Christian priests who were victims of a truck accident in the Sambalpur district of Odisha in 2005, and a madrasa alumnus studied in an RSS-run coaching centre to crack the UPSC exam in 2008. The RSS even opposed the VHP move to appeal against the Allahabad High Court verdict conferring one-third of the disputed site to the Muslims.
That being said, I differ with the RSS on its portrayal of rulers like Rana Pratap as “national heroes”, since he only fought to protect his kingdom, or even Shivaji, for his was a case of Marathi nationalism and his concept of levying taxes outside his kingdom for no plunder seems quite unsophisticated to me even for that period of history, brave warriors as they undoubtedly were. I disagree with the RSS trying to portray the Abrahamic faiths’ exclusivist truth claims as necessarily making only them faiths that have produced extremists engaging in mass murders or demolition of places of worship of other faith communities, when Hindu rulers like Mihirakula and Pushyamitra Shunga too meted out the same treatment to the Buddhists (there were some Taooist rulers in China too who exhibited similar maltreatment to Buddhists), though overall, the anti-Buddhist intolerance of Hindu rulers may not have matched the anti-Hindu intolerance of Muslim rulers later in our history. I differ with the RSS on its demand for prohibiting cow slaughter, its desire for the abrogation of Article 370 of the Indian constitution and insistence on Indian Muslims and Christians singing Vande Mataram. I disagree with its trying to suggest that the insurgencies in Tripura, Nagaland, Manipur and Meghalaya primarily have to do with Christian fanaticism. I disagree with its supporting seemingly strong but easy-to-misuse anti-terrorism statutes.
But I am not against the Sangh’s demand for a uniform civil code, its demand for putting a stop to conferring citizens’ rights to illegal immigrants from Bangladesh when the Chakma refugees were denied of the same for decades or turning our attention to Hindu victims of ethnic cleansing, like those displaced from Kashmir, and indeed, only the RSS has made noise on these subjects of concern. I agree with the RSS when it condemns financially incentivized conversions to Christianity (in this context, I’d recommend one and all to read with an open mind Arun Shourie’s thoroughly well researched book Missionaries in India) and I see no problem with its appealing to such Christians to reconvert to Hinduism, and I may mention that I have several Christian friends, both Indian and of other nationalities (with whom I have discussed these issues, but that in no way ever became an obstacle to the friendship).
Just because some members of an organization have committed some condemnable activities certainly doesn’t justify stereotyping the organization. If some RSS members have been involved in any violence of any kind, they should be brought to book and punished as per the law, but to blame all RSS members for the same makes no sense. That way, members of the Jamaat-e-Islami-Hind have also been found to be involved in riots; why don’t you brand that organization the same way? Pragya Thakur, Purohit and others allegedly involved in acts of terrorism have not been proved to have had any conspiracy with the RSS leadership to commit these acts of terrorism. On the other hand, according to the police, they were plotting to kill senior RSS leaders, including Mohan Bhagwat, who these terrorists felt were “not doing enough for Hindutva”!
The worst is how the RSS is blamed time and again by your party for Gandhiji’s assassination, even though Godse had quit the Sangh before he killed the father of the nation. He had even written an article, which stated that the RSS was a bunch of “impotent” Hindus not standing up to Muslims. If the RSS can be blamed for the actions of an ex-member, then as the Bhagat Singh Kranti Sena has pointed out, why not the Congress for Jinnah’s communal politics and mobilizing anti-Hindu riots (the Dirtect Action day riots), for Jinnah too had indeed been a Congressman earlier, and in fact, a senior leader!
Now, coming to the BJP, to say that the strongest opposition party in India promotes terrorism in its camps is to make a sham of Indian democracy. Even Digvijay Singh, with all his RSS-bashing, had to concede that blaming the BJP made no sense, for then, if you have any evidence, you ought to submit it to the Election commission and have the BJP deregistered. I am quite sure that Jaswant Singh (with his balanced views on Jinnah), Arun Jaitley, Shahnawaz Hussain, Muqtar Abbas Naqvi and Nirmala Sitaraman are not members of a saffron terror outfit! Yes, the BJP has elements that have been convicted for communal violence, but just like the 1984 anti-Sikh riots do not alone define the Congress, nor do the 2002 Gujarat riots or 2008 Kandhamal riots define the BJP. In fact, the criminalization of politics, whether communal, regionalist (as in the case of the MNS), casteist or even generally, has unfortunately made its presence felt in all major political parties in our country.
Rather than defending these ridiculous and baseless remarks that have won you the vocal admiration of 26/11 mastermind Hafeez Saeed who got yet another opportunity to wash his hands off the dastardly crime and float ludicrous conspiracy theories, it’s time you took your job as home minister more seriously. Else, future historians will never forgive you for damaging the national cause.
A concerned citizen
British journalist Mehdi Hasan went Head to Head with Ram Madav, National General Secretary of the BJP, and the interview has already made headlines.Read More >
The need for citizens to become more meaningfully engaged in the political and policy choices of their country is greater than ever before.Read More >
Given Kiran Bedi’s disastrous performance in the 2015 Delhi elections as the chief ministerial candidate, her political relevance is questionable.Read More >
By avoiding a serious political narrative in Kashmir during his recent visit, Modi again proved the insincerity of the Indian state towards Kashmir.Read More >
Development is, without a doubt, very necessary in today’s age but the Central and State governments should make sure that it is not done at the cost of citizens.Read More >