Doesn’t The ‘Educated’ Youth Discriminate On The Basis Of Caste?

Posted on June 18, 2013 in Society

By Nicky Collins:

When I started writing on this topic, I couldn’t help thinking about how oxymoron-ic it sounded. The youth of ‘today’ signify modernity while caste prejudices are supposed to be invariably archaic in both origin and existence, isn’t it? I was convinced that caste prejudices are a thing of the past. I believe that caste discrimination simply cannot infect my generation. Or can it?


While we have really made excellent progress towards establishing an unbiased society, it is regretful that caste is still used to judge a person. Anybody who disagrees with me needs to only turn to the matrimonial column of any daily to understand what I am talking about. Almost every column starts with a classification based on caste. In fact, caste based preference is even more popular than that based on professions. And these are not the stereotypical lathi wielding, conservative old guys depicted in Bollywood movies. We are talking about young people with LLMs and MBAs who still believe that a spouse from the same caste would be better for them! And of course, if family pressure is the grand excuse, there is nothing very ‘educated’ about letting your parents and grandparents decide who you spend the rest of your life with.

With the admission season going on, many students seeking private accommodations frequently come across landlords who ask for their caste first before declaring their rates. Now, it could be argued that since the landlords are not exactly young people, this does not exemplify caste prejudices in the educated youth. However, I assert that turning a blind eye to an evil is possibly worse than committing that evil itself. There is no point in carrying the ‘educated youth’ tag if we do not have the guts to stand up against something that is so inherently wrong — even if it is doing something as ordinary as refusing to state your caste to a biased landlord.


Nicky Collins

I am a very regular person in some ways and quite eccentric in many ways (almost bordering on psychotic or at least that is what my friends say). I have a lot of weaknesses but also a few strengths. People around me say I am a good debater ( and many judges in the competitions I have taken part in agree). But my English teacher says that my greatest strong point is my ability to laugh at myself. I have never doubted the veracity of the saying 'The pen is mightier than the sword'. But writing for me is not just a platform to make my views heard. It is also a source of pure joy. Moreover, writing is an unbiased platform - your reader judges you not on the basis of your color, looks or accent but only on the basis of your thoughts. I am presently interning with YKA because I like to make myself heard. And so far, I have had a great time.

Submit Your Story


You must be logged in to comment.

Veer Subhash

I Understand Your Pain. But if there is such discrimination existing, it isn’t one sided, it exists from both sides.
1) There are Laws and Commission in constitution which can simply put me behind bar if they feel anything offensive in my writings. I, belonging to a free country, cannot speak my mind, just because I may be charged for insulting even though I may not do any such things.
Remember, you (if you from those Castes) can speak as much you want, against whomsoever, you will never be put behind bars like me.

2) Some of my friends were really poor. They could nt afford a B TEch Degree. They had to be contended with a local BSc degree. They were meritorious but still cant pay the fees. But there are no scholarship for them. Furthermore, they were ineligible for half of the seats. I joined a B Tech college. Lot of my friends who used to get scholarships just because of their caste certificates, they were not at all poor and had more money than an average middle class Indian.

Do you think an educated middle class person from upper castes remain unbiased after such unfortunate things ?

And more ever, marriage is completely a person opinion. You can never force your thoughts there.

And now about the land lord owners. It is because of certain sterotypes attached to some caste persons because of politicians who divide people on caste lines. Mayawati and Laloo, their followers, , openly used to say – Brahmin ke sar par joote maaro. I can show you so many pro Dalit educated youth abusing brahmins on Facebook. Do nt you think it would have any reverse effect ? and due to those special laws, no body want to mess up with those caste people because of fear of the laws being misused.

What discrimination has happened thousands years ago, was very unfortunate, and I condemn it. But today, we have started doing the opposite discrimination which I think is wrong. No nody is born caste sensitive, Its only the environment which fills such venom in the minds.

Nicky Collins

Hi Veer

Your arguments against my article are more or less correct and I really cannot disagree with what you say. But the gist is the same and I think we are both on the same side. Bias is inherently wrong, whether it is in favor of a caste or against it.

1) Even I am distressed about the fact that while India claims to be a free country, anything deemed as offensive is banned, ranging from movies to cartoons to articles.The real issue is lack of tolerance and caste is only a small facet of this issue.

2) I am sorry about your friends but it is a stark reality that the inherited burden of your caste does condemn you to financial instability. I agree that usually the creamy layer of scheduled groups do get away with most of the benefits but that does not mean that the really needy are left out.

3) Land lord owners should not reciprocate bias with bias because as the adage goes, ‘an eye for an eye leaves the whole world blind’.

I agree, Veer, that it is the environment that fills your heart with venom and hatred but hatred destroys its subject as much as its object.

Similar Posts