This post has been self-published on Youth Ki Awaaz by Abhishek Jha. Just like them, anyone can publish on Youth Ki Awaaz.

Javed Akhtar Wants Vulgarity And Obscenity Away From Music, Here’s Why His Advice Is Irrational

More from Abhishek Jha

By Abhishek Jha:

Sahitya Akademi awardee, Javed Akhtar has called for an official body to censor lyrics, demanding that ‘vulgarity, obscenity, and perversion‘ be kept out of the realm of music. Akhtar, who locked horns with music companies over the issue of copyright, surprises us with his advice, which if heeded could only stifle a lyricist or musician. Regulation is necessary for creating and upholding a society. Democratic societies, in particular, come into being when they agree upon a set of norms and values. In such a society, a ruling on the violation of a norm not shared by everyone can be arrived at, only after the subjective evaluation of the particular scenario. The norm will have to be debated in the context of the particular violation. Vulgarity, obscenity, and perversion are fluid abstractions that vary from door to door. In the cultural amalgamation that is India, this is even more likely.

Javed Akhtar

In February 2013, the first all-girl rock band from Kashmir disbanded not because they were being threatened but because “they respected the cleric’s decision“, as told by a band member to CNN-IBN. A year earlier, in 2012, Salman Rushdie called the Muslim leaders who protested against him, “religious extremists“. He was disappointed most by “decline in public standards, and in the liberty of ordinary Indian citizens to engage in discourse, to hear differing points of view“. It is an instance of how far disjunctive the notions of propriety of two people can be even though one might like to lump them together on grounds of ethnicity, caste, class, or nationality. A society which agrees on a democratic framework for justice will allow these pluralities to co-exist, not hammer them out of existence. But such subjective evaluation of particular cases poses a problem for the state, which has to go into overdrive to protect such pluralities. The British Government provided Salman with the best security possible, while allowing demonstrators to protest against his book. If instead, it could be decided by a law acceptable to both the parties whether The Satanic Verses was vulgar or not, the state’s work would have been much simpler.

Therefore, it would not be surprising if the state asked for such a regulatory body for censoring songs. It would make its task simpler. There would not be any conflict because anything that could be disagreeable to anybody would be either emended or expurgated.

I ask Varun Grover- whose work in movies like Gangs of Wasseypur, Katiyabaaz, Aankhon Dekhi, etc. has been appreciated both by the public and the critics- to clear a few cobwebs in my brain. A lot of people feel patriotic when they listen to the national anthem; some may not, but even when they dislike it, they are engaging with it. We engage with songs on a daily basis, extolling or berating them as we please. When it does form a part of our life, I ask, would it not be good if art was reformatory? He nails it in almost a single sentence: “Art is a personal expression“. If you have been paying attention until now, that should sum up everything for you. However, generous as he is, Varun explains in a manner that is both intelligent and lucid: “An artist can have purpose, and every artist is free to choose his own purpose (reform, money, fame, expression, madness, anarchy, etc.) The whole confusion is when people call an artist’s purpose as art’s purpose. Art is abstract, it’s a concept. Even when it turns into a painting or a film, it remains abstract in the sense that it could mean different things to different people. And to assign purpose to art is like trying to find amoeba that look like elephant.”

When we assign value to any artistic endeavour, we bring in our context that determination, our lives and our experiences. How then can we have an overarching meter for it? One may suggest, for a compromise, having a body with equal representation from all communities. But here we are not talking of just arriving at an evaluation of a text, where the result obtained can still be debated by other people. Even such an equally-represented board can only perpetuate the majority; the obscene swept under the rug, the minority does not get any right to become the majority. How can it be decided that a text will not be available to anybody unless everybody has evaluated it for himself/herself? How can one hold the text from posterity? In fact, Varun says its stupid even to criticise something for being lewd, “I don’t think any song can be criticized for lewdness. They just make us look like fools a few years later when the standards of society change. ‘Sexy sexy sexy mujhe log bolein’ was banned in 1994. In 2007 film ‘Cheeni Kum’, a 6-year old girl was called ‘Sexy’ throughout. Nothing is lewd enough (or even original enough) in absolute terms. We need to learn to let go or accept, whatever is easier. Whatever gets created (music, cinema, lyrics) is not coming out of a vacuum — it’s being created by people who are living in our times and they must have had some experiences, and we can debate their IQ and quality of their sensitivity that resulted in these particular specimens of art and culture. If nothing else, these lewd songs or Honey Singh songs are a great timestamp for future generations. And that alone is reason enough to let them survive, flourish, or rule.”

Values not only vary spatially but over time too. They are not something set in stone. If there are people (there are a lot of such people) who think that any text can only be explored until aporia, after which it is just an entangled mess of contradictions, they can be lent maximum credibility with words that we use for denoting values. Such words (signifiers), everyone will agree, mean different things to different people. As Derrida would have it, words- which are what any value system is- not only depend on difference but also on deferring, thus becoming a function of everything that has been said or will be said, in addition to that of what is being said. These values or the lack of them are what Varun calls “an eco-system of centuries of ‘thinking’, of consumers and creators alike.”

The plague that Javed Akhtar is alarmed of could appear as a plague to a lot of people. It does not matter whether or not they are artists. If they wish to purvey their ideas, they can do so any which way they want. But what appears just and proper in his opinion will continue to be unjust in the other’s opinion as long as he continues to pride himself on creating the other. Artifice is practised by other myth making institutions like religion and the state to make the populace homogeneous, to keep societies intact. The people, who tend to poke at the boundaries of this homogeneous circle, happen to create anew. As a society gradually understands gender, oppression of particular genders, etc., we get back in time to the point where the new unspeakable is created. Once the propagandist shell of a word is broken, when it ceases to oppress a particular gender (by equal usage by all genders), I believe it is art to explore other facets of those words. Freedom is the key here. When everything is available, one will only choose what is best in the cornucopia. What is collectively known by everybody to be wrong will get inundated in the deluge of what is known by the homogeneous moiety as right. We gave little thought to people accused of terrorism, because we, as a whole, had terrorism before and collectively rejected it. As time moved forth, we ourselves have seen again that they can be as much a helpless victim as we are. Hence, ‘Human Rights Watch’. Our values changed over time to make us understand the context that could have made the person participate in terrorism. Bhagat Singh was a terrorist to a lot of people for a long time! We are fighting the binary divisions here that we are quick to settle for the sake of simplicity and ease.

To call for a music that does not reflect its audience is irrational. The artist is part of a society and does not have the singular identity of an artist. “Swear-words with misogynistic tones are not the problem; they are the symptoms of a much bigger problem. Just like Sheela ki Jawani is just one gaseous compound of an ecosystem which runs way beyond just the film industry,” Varun offers as a rejoinder when I talk to him about the aforementioned ‘propagandist shell’. The license to hold someone else’s freedom is about power and authority. Censorship will ensure that nobody fights for their right to power, nobody is allowed the right to promote their agendas to the public until a supreme body authorises it: hegemony is what we are talking about.

And, for the sake of myself and my fellow beings, I hope we, the audience, own a fair share of this power.

You must be to comment.
  1. amen

    This article makes a lot of sense..we cannot argue for freedom of expression and censor at the same time simply because it’s such a subjective matter..who is to decide what is to be censored and how much is to be censored..on what basis should such authority be given to a single person or body..we should not forget that “one man’s trash is another man’s treasure”..a quote that can be applied to complex,nuanced issues regarding morality and ethics which also tend to lie outside the purview of rules and regulations that tend to be mostly black and whit in nature

    1. Abhishek Jha

      True, amen. We relinquish power only in exchange for security. If, however, one’s tastes and values are invaded by the self-same power, one has to work towards creating checks and balances for bringing everyone on a level ground.

  2. mahigala7

    Great to see such articles which promote rational thinking. I second the opinion of the author completely. Who are we to decide which lyrics is lewd and which is not. It’s a subjective decision and thus cannot be put under the ambit of central censorship body. But then hey, why do we have a central Movie Censorship board? Wouldn’t it defy the basic theme of this article?

    1. Abhishek Jha

      If the people had really wanted a stake in that decision making process, they should have fought for it. If one wants that power now, one can still fight for it. Perhaps people don’t fight that authority because they have found ways (read internet) to circumvent it. And that is why perhaps people won’t fight if Javed Akhtar’s advice is taken and acted upon. We hope that they do fight after reading this.

More from Abhishek Jha

Similar Posts

By joshua daniel

By malvika

By Riddhi Morkhia

Wondering what to write about?

Here are some topics to get you started

Share your details to download the report.

We promise not to spam or send irrelevant information.

Share your details to download the report.

We promise not to spam or send irrelevant information.

An ambassador and trained facilitator under Eco Femme (a social enterprise working towards menstrual health in south India), Sanjina is also an active member of the MHM Collective- India and Menstrual Health Alliance- India. She has conducted Menstrual Health sessions in multiple government schools adopted by Rotary District 3240 as part of their WinS project in rural Bengal. She has also delivered training of trainers on SRHR, gender, sexuality and Menstruation for Tomorrow’s Foundation, Vikramshila Education Resource Society, Nirdhan trust and Micro Finance, Tollygunj Women In Need, Paint It Red in Kolkata.

Now as an MH Fellow with YKA, she’s expanding her impressive scope of work further by launching a campaign to facilitate the process of ensuring better menstrual health and SRH services for women residing in correctional homes in West Bengal. The campaign will entail an independent study to take stalk of the present conditions of MHM in correctional homes across the state and use its findings to build public support and political will to take the necessary action.

Saurabh has been associated with YKA as a user and has consistently been writing on the issue MHM and its intersectionality with other issues in the society. Now as an MHM Fellow with YKA, he’s launched the Right to Period campaign, which aims to ensure proper execution of MHM guidelines in Delhi’s schools.

The long-term aim of the campaign is to develop an open culture where menstruation is not treated as a taboo. The campaign also seeks to hold the schools accountable for their responsibilities as an important component in the implementation of MHM policies by making adequate sanitation infrastructure and knowledge of MHM available in school premises.

Read more about his campaign.

Harshita is a psychologist and works to support people with mental health issues, particularly adolescents who are survivors of violence. Associated with the Azadi Foundation in UP, Harshita became an MHM Fellow with YKA, with the aim of promoting better menstrual health.

Her campaign #MeriMarzi aims to promote menstrual health and wellness, hygiene and facilities for female sex workers in UP. She says, “Knowledge about natural body processes is a very basic human right. And for individuals whose occupation is providing sexual services, it becomes even more important.”

Meri Marzi aims to ensure sensitised, non-discriminatory health workers for the needs of female sex workers in the Suraksha Clinics under the UPSACS (Uttar Pradesh State AIDS Control Society) program by creating more dialogues and garnering public support for the cause of sex workers’ menstrual rights. The campaign will also ensure interventions with sex workers to clear misconceptions around overall hygiene management to ensure that results flow both ways.

Read more about her campaign.

MH Fellow Sabna comes with significant experience working with a range of development issues. A co-founder of Project Sakhi Saheli, which aims to combat period poverty and break menstrual taboos, Sabna has, in the past, worked on the issue of menstruation in urban slums of Delhi with women and adolescent girls. She and her team also released MenstraBook, with menstrastories and organised Menstra Tlk in the Delhi School of Social Work to create more conversations on menstruation.

With YKA MHM Fellow Vineet, Sabna launched Menstratalk, a campaign that aims to put an end to period poverty and smash menstrual taboos in society. As a start, the campaign aims to begin conversations on menstrual health with five hundred adolescents and youth in Delhi through offline platforms, and through this community mobilise support to create Period Friendly Institutions out of educational institutes in the city.

Read more about her campaign. 

A student from Delhi School of Social work, Vineet is a part of Project Sakhi Saheli, an initiative by the students of Delhi school of Social Work to create awareness on Menstrual Health and combat Period Poverty. Along with MHM Action Fellow Sabna, Vineet launched Menstratalk, a campaign that aims to put an end to period poverty and smash menstrual taboos in society.

As a start, the campaign aims to begin conversations on menstrual health with five hundred adolescents and youth in Delhi through offline platforms, and through this community mobilise support to create Period Friendly Institutions out of educational institutes in the city.

Find out more about the campaign here.

A native of Bhagalpur district – Bihar, Shalini Jha believes in equal rights for all genders and wants to work for a gender-equal and just society. In the past she’s had a year-long association as a community leader with Haiyya: Organise for Action’s Health Over Stigma campaign. She’s pursuing a Master’s in Literature with Ambedkar University, Delhi and as an MHM Fellow with YKA, recently launched ‘Project अल्हड़ (Alharh)’.

She says, “Bihar is ranked the lowest in India’s SDG Index 2019 for India. Hygienic and comfortable menstruation is a basic human right and sustainable development cannot be ensured if menstruators are deprived of their basic rights.” Project अल्हड़ (Alharh) aims to create a robust sensitised community in Bhagalpur to collectively spread awareness, break the taboo, debunk myths and initiate fearless conversations around menstruation. The campaign aims to reach at least 6000 adolescent girls from government and private schools in Baghalpur district in 2020.

Read more about the campaign here.

A psychologist and co-founder of a mental health NGO called Customize Cognition, Ritika forayed into the space of menstrual health and hygiene, sexual and reproductive healthcare and rights and gender equality as an MHM Fellow with YKA. She says, “The experience of working on MHM/SRHR and gender equality has been an enriching and eye-opening experience. I have learned what’s beneath the surface of the issue, be it awareness, lack of resources or disregard for trans men, who also menstruate.”

The Transmen-ses campaign aims to tackle the issue of silence and disregard for trans men’s menstruation needs, by mobilising gender sensitive health professionals and gender neutral restrooms in Lucknow.

Read more about the campaign here.

A Computer Science engineer by education, Nitisha started her career in the corporate sector, before realising she wanted to work in the development and social justice space. Since then, she has worked with Teach For India and Care India and is from the founding batch of Indian School of Development Management (ISDM), a one of its kind organisation creating leaders for the development sector through its experiential learning post graduate program.

As a Youth Ki Awaaz Menstrual Health Fellow, Nitisha has started Let’s Talk Period, a campaign to mobilise young people to switch to sustainable period products. She says, “80 lakh women in Delhi use non-biodegradable sanitary products, generate 3000 tonnes of menstrual waste, that takes 500-800 years to decompose; which in turn contributes to the health issues of all menstruators, increased burden of waste management on the city and harmful living environment for all citizens.

Let’s Talk Period aims to change this by

Find out more about her campaign here.

Share your details to download the report.

We promise not to spam or send irrelevant information.

A former Assistant Secretary with the Ministry of Women and Child Development in West Bengal for three months, Lakshmi Bhavya has been championing the cause of menstrual hygiene in her district. By associating herself with the Lalana Campaign, a holistic menstrual hygiene awareness campaign which is conducted by the Anahat NGO, Lakshmi has been slowly breaking taboos when it comes to periods and menstrual hygiene.

A Gender Rights Activist working with the tribal and marginalized communities in india, Srilekha is a PhD scholar working on understanding body and sexuality among tribal girls, to fill the gaps in research around indigenous women and their stories. Srilekha has worked extensively at the grassroots level with community based organisations, through several advocacy initiatives around Gender, Mental Health, Menstrual Hygiene and Sexual and Reproductive Health Rights (SRHR) for the indigenous in Jharkhand, over the last 6 years.

Srilekha has also contributed to sustainable livelihood projects and legal aid programs for survivors of sex trafficking. She has been conducting research based programs on maternal health, mental health, gender based violence, sex and sexuality. Her interest lies in conducting workshops for young people on life skills, feminism, gender and sexuality, trauma, resilience and interpersonal relationships.

A Guwahati-based college student pursuing her Masters in Tata Institute of Social Sciences, Bidisha started the #BleedwithDignity campaign on the technology platform, demanding that the Government of Assam install
biodegradable sanitary pad vending machines in all government schools across the state. Her petition on has already gathered support from over 90000 people and continues to grow.

Bidisha was selected in’s flagship program ‘She Creates Change’ having run successful online advocacy
campaigns, which were widely recognised. Through the #BleedwithDignity campaign; she organised and celebrated World Menstrual Hygiene Day, 2019 in Guwahati, Assam by hosting a wall mural by collaborating with local organisations. The initiative was widely covered by national and local media, and the mural was later inaugurated by the event’s chief guest Commissioner of Guwahati Municipal Corporation (GMC) Debeswar Malakar, IAS.

Sign up for the Youth Ki Awaaz Prime Ministerial Brief below