This post has been self-published on Youth Ki Awaaz by Youth Ki Awaaz. Just like them, anyone can publish on Youth Ki Awaaz.

The One Thing Nobody Is Talking About Regarding The Dimapur Lynching

More from Youth Ki Awaaz

By Aurighno Gupto:

In a response to Eric Voeglin’s criticism of ‘The Origins of Totalitarianism’, Hannah Arendt made an astute observation on the lack of proper scholarship on anti-semitism. She wrote:

‘The reason why this whole literature is so extraordinarily poor in terms of scholarship is that the historians […] had to write the history of a subject which they did not want to conserve; they had to write in a destructive way and to write history for the purposes of destruction is somehow a contradiction in terms.’


Arendt’s reflections are worth thinking over in the context of the current discourse on free speech and activism. As we stand a little overwhelmed by the literature on extremities, such as shooting and stabbing of artists, banning of documentaries and lynching of suspected criminals, many fundamental questions remain unanswered about the reactive discourses.

In this article, I wish to present self-reflexive criticism along with Arendt’s suggestion as ways of engaging in the dialogue about such discourses. I will discuss the public lynching at Dimapur and present an alternate, albeit provocative, viewpoint. The aim would be to look at these issues with indignation, yet engage in a critique that is not aimed primarily at destroying the object of critique.

The choice of writing on the Dimapur incident arose from the nature of the reactions garnered by the event. It appears, from a cursory reading, that the incident at Dimapur was either looked upon as a spontaneous act of vigilantism, or as an abhorrent act, which is not worthy of being placed along the progressive steps taken, if any, after the December 2012 movement. Few have contextualized it along the lines of the contemporary regional politics. The point of this article is also to critique the ‘contemporaenity’ of discourses; an assumption that a current event is only explicable within familiar temporality.

Let us, then, consider the elements of the crisis. The mob gathered in large numbers. They broke in, hunted him down, overwhelmed the police, and paraded the victim before killing him. The behaviour of the mob suggests, right from its inception, that the act was a conscious one, and the plan kept rolling as the act unfolded.

From the various reports and commentaries, it appears that the killing was an enactment – of a hunt. It was meant to be a spectacle; this is particularly reflected in the choice of a public space for carrying it out and the choice of using digital media for recording it.

When it becomes a question of choice, it follows that there is an end goal of such acts. If seen closely, the end was neither just a spontaneous outburst of anger, nor was it only a release of the built up ethnic or communal pressures in the region. The choice of a public space transformed the act from a mere outburst to a ritual performance of a hunt.

Why a hunt?

The anthropological readings of ‘hunt’ suggest that elements of vigour, exuberance, and power are displayed along with the act of killing. The act of killing is always a secondary act, which is preceded by exuberant preparations for the ritual murder. A very similar explanation is given for the ‘act of war’ as an act of performance that is different from the war itself. It is because of the assertion of all of these in the act of killing that makes this mass performance a hunt. It will also be explained how the abstraction of power by the state leads communities to perform a spectacular act of resistance.

In the Dimapur incident, the public space became an area where multiple authorities, such as – patriarchy and sovereignty – were contesting for dominance. In other words right from the beginning, the purpose of the performance was supra-legal, and it would be extremely faulty to single out the spontaneity of it. The act of breaking the doors of the prison circumvented the legal authority, and created a different sphere of authority – a separate realm – if one may call it that.

This realm is different from vigilantism. Vigilantism involves taking the law into one’s own hand.

The lynching involved falling back on the traditional forms of legality. It is important to state that this is not suggesting that a community was asserting a pre-modern identity by any means; this is merely a critique of the modern forms of legality. One is reminded of the description – by Clifford Geertz in the book Negara: The Theatre State in 19th Century Bali – of a certain chief in Bali walking out unarmed with his family to face the Dutch guns in the battlefield. It was not an act of submission. It was an act of performance aimed at asserting the sovereign pre-modern space, which was about to be violently displaced by the modern space.

The modern colonial (and post-colonial) state is marked by its monopoly in the sphere of violence and revenue collection, amongst other things. Along similar lines, one is reminded of the increase in human sacrifice practiced by the Konds in central India, right when human sacrifice was banned by the colonial state. The increase in this incident was precisely because their sphere of authority was forcibly broken down by an interventionist state with different notions of legality, progress, and morality.

It is with the modern forms of authority that push legality through AFSPA in the North East which necessitates such performative acts to arrive as a mode of resistance. The terms – barbaric and the vigilante – have been created by the modern structure of authority. The state, in the North-East, in Ananya Vajpeyi’s words ‘neither wins nor loses’, but the people are defeated daily.

Let us briefly consider the precedents of resistance and the role of performance in them. Mass actions often rely on behaviours that are rational only to the participants. These acts of performances appear to be completely bizarre to a layman, such as a certain community (Xhosa) in colonial South Africa which killed its cattle to fight the British state, or the stripping of Manipuri mothers in Imphal in 2004 to protest against the rape and murder of Thangjam Manorama. They may be situated in very different contexts, but they reveal the relationship between the state and the people.

It is the semiotics of these which creates a separate realm of contestation against an authority that cannot be fought on equal terms. There is a political element embedded in them. Therefore, communities or masses have a different sense of rationality of their acts, which manifested in a spectacular performance of a ritual murder in this case. Whether these are morally, ethically, or legally right is not of relevance. The argument here is of a rational choice implicit in the otherwise assumed lumpen and demonized masses. In Sanjib Baruah’s words, ‘One has to consider the pleasures of agency’, while reading what he calls ‘war discourses’.

This particular performance was aimed as a spectacle for the state, and a visibly political one at that. This was unique, and I will present the second argument here. As Albert Camus argues on the spectacle of the death penalty in Reflections of Guillotine, the death penalty is only prolonged because it is carried out in private, and because public executions would evoke widespread condemnation and disturbance.

Michel Foucault’s Discipline and Punish, which is widely read in this context, also puts forward the idea of reforms in penal regimes of the modern state and exposes what would otherwise remain hidden from the visible world. Power is intimidated by spectacle. Then, it is worth considering that the point of a public space here was a complete antithesis of what the state carries out in hanging/executing convicts. This was meant to attract attention, as an act of self assertion. This was also aimed at breaking down the monopoly of the state in the sphere of death penalty.

State’s monopoly of violence has pushed certain communities to the periphery of the legal space – into a space of extra legality as a consequence of the transformation of the non state spaces into state space. This extra legal zone is where mass murders and rapes cannot even be brought into a legal framework. Therefore, it is not very surprising that this reaction was exercised in a peripheral legal space through an act of extra legality. This sets apart this act from the other acts of lynching in terms of its contextual rationality.

As was suggested, this article was meant to present a given case along somewhat different lines from the ongoing discourse. In no way does it serve to justify sacrifice, killing, or lynching. But where do we stand, if all that emerges out of the dialogues are mere binaries of reflection? Again, using Hannah Arendt’s ideas, how far do we succeed in writing about an act with indignation, yet be able to contextualize and read for and against the grain at the same time?

You must be to comment.
  1. Ra’s al Ghul

    Innocent man lynched and no one gives a damn – because he was a man. No outcry, no documentary, nothing. Because he was a man. Will the woman who accused him falsely of rape be punished?

  2. ABs

    This article is well-written, as it is the only one that I have read that views the Incident objectively and scientifically. Good Work.

  3. sudipto bhattacharjee

    Indeed a very exhaustive review, u highlighted an overlooked aspect ,extralegality for assertion of identity,it is also important to focus on the programme coordinators too . . . A mob without guidance leadership strategy coordination command, will leave some peripheral effects during protest . . .not in this case . .who were the actors ?. . What was the real motive? . . Was the outcome unwanted for the MischiefMongers themselves . . .?this incident deserves a deep review . . Only review based a particular aspect may bury the topic from discussions

More from Youth Ki Awaaz

Similar Posts

By Imran Khan

By swonshutaa dash

By Hariaksh Kamal

Wondering what to write about?

Here are some topics to get you started

Share your details to download the report.

We promise not to spam or send irrelevant information.

Share your details to download the report.

We promise not to spam or send irrelevant information.

An ambassador and trained facilitator under Eco Femme (a social enterprise working towards menstrual health in south India), Sanjina is also an active member of the MHM Collective- India and Menstrual Health Alliance- India. She has conducted Menstrual Health sessions in multiple government schools adopted by Rotary District 3240 as part of their WinS project in rural Bengal. She has also delivered training of trainers on SRHR, gender, sexuality and Menstruation for Tomorrow’s Foundation, Vikramshila Education Resource Society, Nirdhan trust and Micro Finance, Tollygunj Women In Need, Paint It Red in Kolkata.

Now as an MH Fellow with YKA, she’s expanding her impressive scope of work further by launching a campaign to facilitate the process of ensuring better menstrual health and SRH services for women residing in correctional homes in West Bengal. The campaign will entail an independent study to take stalk of the present conditions of MHM in correctional homes across the state and use its findings to build public support and political will to take the necessary action.

Saurabh has been associated with YKA as a user and has consistently been writing on the issue MHM and its intersectionality with other issues in the society. Now as an MHM Fellow with YKA, he’s launched the Right to Period campaign, which aims to ensure proper execution of MHM guidelines in Delhi’s schools.

The long-term aim of the campaign is to develop an open culture where menstruation is not treated as a taboo. The campaign also seeks to hold the schools accountable for their responsibilities as an important component in the implementation of MHM policies by making adequate sanitation infrastructure and knowledge of MHM available in school premises.

Read more about his campaign.

Harshita is a psychologist and works to support people with mental health issues, particularly adolescents who are survivors of violence. Associated with the Azadi Foundation in UP, Harshita became an MHM Fellow with YKA, with the aim of promoting better menstrual health.

Her campaign #MeriMarzi aims to promote menstrual health and wellness, hygiene and facilities for female sex workers in UP. She says, “Knowledge about natural body processes is a very basic human right. And for individuals whose occupation is providing sexual services, it becomes even more important.”

Meri Marzi aims to ensure sensitised, non-discriminatory health workers for the needs of female sex workers in the Suraksha Clinics under the UPSACS (Uttar Pradesh State AIDS Control Society) program by creating more dialogues and garnering public support for the cause of sex workers’ menstrual rights. The campaign will also ensure interventions with sex workers to clear misconceptions around overall hygiene management to ensure that results flow both ways.

Read more about her campaign.

MH Fellow Sabna comes with significant experience working with a range of development issues. A co-founder of Project Sakhi Saheli, which aims to combat period poverty and break menstrual taboos, Sabna has, in the past, worked on the issue of menstruation in urban slums of Delhi with women and adolescent girls. She and her team also released MenstraBook, with menstrastories and organised Menstra Tlk in the Delhi School of Social Work to create more conversations on menstruation.

With YKA MHM Fellow Vineet, Sabna launched Menstratalk, a campaign that aims to put an end to period poverty and smash menstrual taboos in society. As a start, the campaign aims to begin conversations on menstrual health with five hundred adolescents and youth in Delhi through offline platforms, and through this community mobilise support to create Period Friendly Institutions out of educational institutes in the city.

Read more about her campaign. 

A student from Delhi School of Social work, Vineet is a part of Project Sakhi Saheli, an initiative by the students of Delhi school of Social Work to create awareness on Menstrual Health and combat Period Poverty. Along with MHM Action Fellow Sabna, Vineet launched Menstratalk, a campaign that aims to put an end to period poverty and smash menstrual taboos in society.

As a start, the campaign aims to begin conversations on menstrual health with five hundred adolescents and youth in Delhi through offline platforms, and through this community mobilise support to create Period Friendly Institutions out of educational institutes in the city.

Find out more about the campaign here.

A native of Bhagalpur district – Bihar, Shalini Jha believes in equal rights for all genders and wants to work for a gender-equal and just society. In the past she’s had a year-long association as a community leader with Haiyya: Organise for Action’s Health Over Stigma campaign. She’s pursuing a Master’s in Literature with Ambedkar University, Delhi and as an MHM Fellow with YKA, recently launched ‘Project अल्हड़ (Alharh)’.

She says, “Bihar is ranked the lowest in India’s SDG Index 2019 for India. Hygienic and comfortable menstruation is a basic human right and sustainable development cannot be ensured if menstruators are deprived of their basic rights.” Project अल्हड़ (Alharh) aims to create a robust sensitised community in Bhagalpur to collectively spread awareness, break the taboo, debunk myths and initiate fearless conversations around menstruation. The campaign aims to reach at least 6000 adolescent girls from government and private schools in Baghalpur district in 2020.

Read more about the campaign here.

A psychologist and co-founder of a mental health NGO called Customize Cognition, Ritika forayed into the space of menstrual health and hygiene, sexual and reproductive healthcare and rights and gender equality as an MHM Fellow with YKA. She says, “The experience of working on MHM/SRHR and gender equality has been an enriching and eye-opening experience. I have learned what’s beneath the surface of the issue, be it awareness, lack of resources or disregard for trans men, who also menstruate.”

The Transmen-ses campaign aims to tackle the issue of silence and disregard for trans men’s menstruation needs, by mobilising gender sensitive health professionals and gender neutral restrooms in Lucknow.

Read more about the campaign here.

A Computer Science engineer by education, Nitisha started her career in the corporate sector, before realising she wanted to work in the development and social justice space. Since then, she has worked with Teach For India and Care India and is from the founding batch of Indian School of Development Management (ISDM), a one of its kind organisation creating leaders for the development sector through its experiential learning post graduate program.

As a Youth Ki Awaaz Menstrual Health Fellow, Nitisha has started Let’s Talk Period, a campaign to mobilise young people to switch to sustainable period products. She says, “80 lakh women in Delhi use non-biodegradable sanitary products, generate 3000 tonnes of menstrual waste, that takes 500-800 years to decompose; which in turn contributes to the health issues of all menstruators, increased burden of waste management on the city and harmful living environment for all citizens.

Let’s Talk Period aims to change this by

Find out more about her campaign here.

Share your details to download the report.

We promise not to spam or send irrelevant information.

A former Assistant Secretary with the Ministry of Women and Child Development in West Bengal for three months, Lakshmi Bhavya has been championing the cause of menstrual hygiene in her district. By associating herself with the Lalana Campaign, a holistic menstrual hygiene awareness campaign which is conducted by the Anahat NGO, Lakshmi has been slowly breaking taboos when it comes to periods and menstrual hygiene.

A Gender Rights Activist working with the tribal and marginalized communities in india, Srilekha is a PhD scholar working on understanding body and sexuality among tribal girls, to fill the gaps in research around indigenous women and their stories. Srilekha has worked extensively at the grassroots level with community based organisations, through several advocacy initiatives around Gender, Mental Health, Menstrual Hygiene and Sexual and Reproductive Health Rights (SRHR) for the indigenous in Jharkhand, over the last 6 years.

Srilekha has also contributed to sustainable livelihood projects and legal aid programs for survivors of sex trafficking. She has been conducting research based programs on maternal health, mental health, gender based violence, sex and sexuality. Her interest lies in conducting workshops for young people on life skills, feminism, gender and sexuality, trauma, resilience and interpersonal relationships.

A Guwahati-based college student pursuing her Masters in Tata Institute of Social Sciences, Bidisha started the #BleedwithDignity campaign on the technology platform, demanding that the Government of Assam install
biodegradable sanitary pad vending machines in all government schools across the state. Her petition on has already gathered support from over 90000 people and continues to grow.

Bidisha was selected in’s flagship program ‘She Creates Change’ having run successful online advocacy
campaigns, which were widely recognised. Through the #BleedwithDignity campaign; she organised and celebrated World Menstrual Hygiene Day, 2019 in Guwahati, Assam by hosting a wall mural by collaborating with local organisations. The initiative was widely covered by national and local media, and the mural was later inaugurated by the event’s chief guest Commissioner of Guwahati Municipal Corporation (GMC) Debeswar Malakar, IAS.

Sign up for the Youth Ki Awaaz Prime Ministerial Brief below