This post has been self-published on Youth Ki Awaaz by Dushyant Arora. Just like them, anyone can publish on Youth Ki Awaaz.

The NJAC Act – The Devil Lies In The Details

By Dushyant Arora:

The provisions of the Constitution (99th Amendment) Act 2014 (hereinafter ‘the amendment act’) and of the National Judicial Appointments Commission Act 2014 (hereinafter ‘the Act’) have been brought into force from April 13, 2015. The amendment act has inter alia inserted Art. 124 A in the Constitution of India establishing the National Judicial Appointments Commission (hereinafter “the commission”). The Commission is a six member body comprising of the Chief Justice of India, two other senior Judges of the Supreme Court next to the Chief Justice of India, the Union Minister in charge of Law and Justice, and two eminent persons to be nominated by a committee consisting of the Prime Minister, the Chief Justice of India and the Leader of Opposition in the House of the People or where there is no such Leader of Opposition, then, the Leader of single largest Opposition Party in the House of the People.


Eminent jurists stand divided with many of them hailing the aforementioned statutes to be a panacea for all the ills which plagued the Collegium system, while many others opine that these statutes severely compromise the independence of the Judiciary.

Any system of appointment of judges should:

i) Appoint judges in a transparent manner;

ii) Appoint judges on the criteria of merit and integrity;

iii) Should be free from any undue and extraneous influence including but not limited to nepotism etc.

iv) Be in conformity with the doctrine/principle of Separation of Powers.

Does the act achieve these objectives? Popular discourse is plagued with attempts to answer this question by listing the drawbacks or the advantages of the Collegium System. This manner of examining/analysing the act is most illogical because the Collegium System and the system devised by the act as it stands today are not the only possible ways of appointing Judges. This piece attempts to examine whether the act fulfils the aforementioned four objectives.

1. Do the Doctrine of Separation of Powers and the independence of the Judiciary stand compromised by the enactment of the act read with the amendment act?

At the outset it needs to be understood that the independence of an institution or a functionary is determined by several factors including the appointing authority. Some other factors are tenure, allowances/compensation etc., which have sufficient constitutional safeguards and have been left untouched by the Act and the Amendment Act. As far as the change in appointing authority by virtue of the constitution of the act is concerned, unfortunately most attempts at answering the aforementioned question have placed excessive focus on whether Judicial Members have a numerical majority/equality. The devil however lies in the details:

i) Section 10(1) of the NJAC Act states: “10. (1) The Commission shall have the power to specify, by regulations, the procedure for the discharge of its functions.

Critical factors such as the quorum of the National Judicial Appointments Commission, the parameters of assessing the suitability of judges as well as the criteria for appointing ‘eminent persons’ have been left to the regulations under Section 10 of the Act, which at first glance seem to fall within the domain of the NJAC.

ii) Thereafter, Section 11 of the same act states “(1) The Central Government may, by notification in the Official Gazette, make rules to carry out the provisions of this Act.

iii) Section 12(1) mandates that the regulations made by the NJAC must be consistent/comply with the rules made by the Central Government under Section 11. The regulations framed by the NJAC would therefore be subservient to the rules framed by the Central Government.

iv) Section 13 of the Act at first glance seems to stipulate that the aforementioned rules and regulations would be mandatorily placed before both houses of the Parliament which would have the final authority on the matter. Section 13 of the act is as follows:

13. Every rule and regulation made under this Act shall be laid, as soon as may be after it is made, before each House of Parliament, while it is in session, for a total period of thirty days, which may be comprised in one session or in two or more successive sessions, and if, before the expiry of the session immediately following the session or the successive sessions aforesaid, both Houses agree in making any modification in the rule or regulation or both Houses agree that the rule or regulation should not be made, the rule or regulation shall thereafter have effect only in such modified form or be of no effect, as the case may be; so, however, that any such modification or annulment shall be without prejudice to the validity of anything previously done under that rule or regulation.

A more detailed perusal of the provision however reveals that the Central Government has completely reserved with itself the power to decide the procedure and ‘regulations’ of the NJAC. It is important to pay attention to the following part of Section 13 of the NJAC Act: “…..however, that any such modification or annulment shall be without prejudice to the validity of anything previously done under that rule or regulation.

Ergo, the Central Government has unchecked power to enact rules while Parliament is not in session and practically run NJAC until Parliament meets again at which juncture both houses of the Parliament will theoretically have the option of modifying/removing the rule in question. The Parliament will however have no power to undo the decisions taken by the Central Government while the Parliament was not in session. It is also important to note that there is no stipulation in respect of the nature of majority (whether simple or absolute) that will be required to modify/approve/annul such a rule made by the Central Government.

v) Articles 112 (3) (d) (i) and 202 (2) (d)(iii)of the Constitution of India mandate that the Salaries, allowances and pension payable to the Judges of Supreme Court of India and High Court of each state respectively shall be charged to the Consolidated fund of India and Consolidated fund of each state respectively. The significance of these provisions is that any expenditure charged to the respective consolidated funds cannot be made subject to the votes of the Parliament or the Legislative Assembly as the case may be. Similarly, Article 125(2) and 221 (2) of the Constitution of India mandate that the salaries, allowances and pension payable to the Judges of the Supreme Court and High Courts respectively cannot be varied to the disadvantage of the Judges. These provisions go a long way in securing the independence of the Judges of the High Courts and the Supreme Court of India. However, the salary of the ‘Eminent Persons’ who are proposed to be the members of the Commission have been left at the whim and fancy of the Central Government vide Section 11 (2) (a) of the act. The remunerative benefits of these Eminent Persons should be regulated by the Parliament and provisions analogous to Articles 112 (3) (d) (i), 202 (2) (d)(iii), 125(2) and 221 (2) need to be inserted in the Constitution of India sans which the NJAC can never be an independent body.

2. Is the process of appointment of Judges under the Act more transparent than it was under the Collegium System?

Sadly, no. While the draft rules of the act have not been made public yet, a perusal of the Act reveals that as under the Collegium System, the appointment of judges under the Act will continue to be behind closed doors. There is no provision in the Act which stipulates that the reasons behind the appointment of a judge and/or the rejection of any name under consideration will be made public. This is a critical drawback as any process which is opaque will remain susceptible to extraneous influence and nepotism.

Therefore the act is prima facie violative of the basic structure of the Constitution of India. The appointment of Judges prior to the enactment of the Act was concentrated in the hands of Judges. This Act is not an attempt to check that concentration of power, but to simply shift that concentration of power from the Judiciary to the Executive.

Dushyant Arora is an Advocate practising at the Supreme Court of India and the High Court of Delhi. He tweets at @atti_cus.

You must be to comment.
  1. Martanda

    The last para says, NJAC changes the concentration of power from Judiciary to Executive. Really? NJAC consists of 3 judges (CJI + 2 SCJs), Law minister, 2 eminent personalities (selected by PM, CJI, LOP). Even if we were to ‘assume’ that the law minister and other 2 eminent personalities consists of the ‘executive’ as implied from the last paragraph, 3 members of judiciary still remain on board, therefore allowing for possibilities of dissent to exist. So to jump to the conclusion that concentration of power is not checked is unfair. I think the commission will do 2 important things, 1. Kick out the possibilities of favoritism that hitherto the judiciary was accussed of and 2. Chose meritoricity over seniority.

More from Dushyant Arora

Similar Posts

By Ananya Bhuyan

By Shabeena Anjum

By Arya Jha

Wondering what to write about?

Here are some topics to get you started

Share your details to download the report.

We promise not to spam or send irrelevant information.

Share your details to download the report.

We promise not to spam or send irrelevant information.

An ambassador and trained facilitator under Eco Femme (a social enterprise working towards menstrual health in south India), Sanjina is also an active member of the MHM Collective- India and Menstrual Health Alliance- India. She has conducted Menstrual Health sessions in multiple government schools adopted by Rotary District 3240 as part of their WinS project in rural Bengal. She has also delivered training of trainers on SRHR, gender, sexuality and Menstruation for Tomorrow’s Foundation, Vikramshila Education Resource Society, Nirdhan trust and Micro Finance, Tollygunj Women In Need, Paint It Red in Kolkata.

Now as an MH Fellow with YKA, she’s expanding her impressive scope of work further by launching a campaign to facilitate the process of ensuring better menstrual health and SRH services for women residing in correctional homes in West Bengal. The campaign will entail an independent study to take stalk of the present conditions of MHM in correctional homes across the state and use its findings to build public support and political will to take the necessary action.

Saurabh has been associated with YKA as a user and has consistently been writing on the issue MHM and its intersectionality with other issues in the society. Now as an MHM Fellow with YKA, he’s launched the Right to Period campaign, which aims to ensure proper execution of MHM guidelines in Delhi’s schools.

The long-term aim of the campaign is to develop an open culture where menstruation is not treated as a taboo. The campaign also seeks to hold the schools accountable for their responsibilities as an important component in the implementation of MHM policies by making adequate sanitation infrastructure and knowledge of MHM available in school premises.

Read more about his campaign.

Harshita is a psychologist and works to support people with mental health issues, particularly adolescents who are survivors of violence. Associated with the Azadi Foundation in UP, Harshita became an MHM Fellow with YKA, with the aim of promoting better menstrual health.

Her campaign #MeriMarzi aims to promote menstrual health and wellness, hygiene and facilities for female sex workers in UP. She says, “Knowledge about natural body processes is a very basic human right. And for individuals whose occupation is providing sexual services, it becomes even more important.”

Meri Marzi aims to ensure sensitised, non-discriminatory health workers for the needs of female sex workers in the Suraksha Clinics under the UPSACS (Uttar Pradesh State AIDS Control Society) program by creating more dialogues and garnering public support for the cause of sex workers’ menstrual rights. The campaign will also ensure interventions with sex workers to clear misconceptions around overall hygiene management to ensure that results flow both ways.

Read more about her campaign.

MH Fellow Sabna comes with significant experience working with a range of development issues. A co-founder of Project Sakhi Saheli, which aims to combat period poverty and break menstrual taboos, Sabna has, in the past, worked on the issue of menstruation in urban slums of Delhi with women and adolescent girls. She and her team also released MenstraBook, with menstrastories and organised Menstra Tlk in the Delhi School of Social Work to create more conversations on menstruation.

With YKA MHM Fellow Vineet, Sabna launched Menstratalk, a campaign that aims to put an end to period poverty and smash menstrual taboos in society. As a start, the campaign aims to begin conversations on menstrual health with five hundred adolescents and youth in Delhi through offline platforms, and through this community mobilise support to create Period Friendly Institutions out of educational institutes in the city.

Read more about her campaign. 

A student from Delhi School of Social work, Vineet is a part of Project Sakhi Saheli, an initiative by the students of Delhi school of Social Work to create awareness on Menstrual Health and combat Period Poverty. Along with MHM Action Fellow Sabna, Vineet launched Menstratalk, a campaign that aims to put an end to period poverty and smash menstrual taboos in society.

As a start, the campaign aims to begin conversations on menstrual health with five hundred adolescents and youth in Delhi through offline platforms, and through this community mobilise support to create Period Friendly Institutions out of educational institutes in the city.

Find out more about the campaign here.

A native of Bhagalpur district – Bihar, Shalini Jha believes in equal rights for all genders and wants to work for a gender-equal and just society. In the past she’s had a year-long association as a community leader with Haiyya: Organise for Action’s Health Over Stigma campaign. She’s pursuing a Master’s in Literature with Ambedkar University, Delhi and as an MHM Fellow with YKA, recently launched ‘Project अल्हड़ (Alharh)’.

She says, “Bihar is ranked the lowest in India’s SDG Index 2019 for India. Hygienic and comfortable menstruation is a basic human right and sustainable development cannot be ensured if menstruators are deprived of their basic rights.” Project अल्हड़ (Alharh) aims to create a robust sensitised community in Bhagalpur to collectively spread awareness, break the taboo, debunk myths and initiate fearless conversations around menstruation. The campaign aims to reach at least 6000 adolescent girls from government and private schools in Baghalpur district in 2020.

Read more about the campaign here.

A psychologist and co-founder of a mental health NGO called Customize Cognition, Ritika forayed into the space of menstrual health and hygiene, sexual and reproductive healthcare and rights and gender equality as an MHM Fellow with YKA. She says, “The experience of working on MHM/SRHR and gender equality has been an enriching and eye-opening experience. I have learned what’s beneath the surface of the issue, be it awareness, lack of resources or disregard for trans men, who also menstruate.”

The Transmen-ses campaign aims to tackle the issue of silence and disregard for trans men’s menstruation needs, by mobilising gender sensitive health professionals and gender neutral restrooms in Lucknow.

Read more about the campaign here.

A Computer Science engineer by education, Nitisha started her career in the corporate sector, before realising she wanted to work in the development and social justice space. Since then, she has worked with Teach For India and Care India and is from the founding batch of Indian School of Development Management (ISDM), a one of its kind organisation creating leaders for the development sector through its experiential learning post graduate program.

As a Youth Ki Awaaz Menstrual Health Fellow, Nitisha has started Let’s Talk Period, a campaign to mobilise young people to switch to sustainable period products. She says, “80 lakh women in Delhi use non-biodegradable sanitary products, generate 3000 tonnes of menstrual waste, that takes 500-800 years to decompose; which in turn contributes to the health issues of all menstruators, increased burden of waste management on the city and harmful living environment for all citizens.

Let’s Talk Period aims to change this by

Find out more about her campaign here.

Share your details to download the report.

We promise not to spam or send irrelevant information.

A former Assistant Secretary with the Ministry of Women and Child Development in West Bengal for three months, Lakshmi Bhavya has been championing the cause of menstrual hygiene in her district. By associating herself with the Lalana Campaign, a holistic menstrual hygiene awareness campaign which is conducted by the Anahat NGO, Lakshmi has been slowly breaking taboos when it comes to periods and menstrual hygiene.

A Gender Rights Activist working with the tribal and marginalized communities in india, Srilekha is a PhD scholar working on understanding body and sexuality among tribal girls, to fill the gaps in research around indigenous women and their stories. Srilekha has worked extensively at the grassroots level with community based organisations, through several advocacy initiatives around Gender, Mental Health, Menstrual Hygiene and Sexual and Reproductive Health Rights (SRHR) for the indigenous in Jharkhand, over the last 6 years.

Srilekha has also contributed to sustainable livelihood projects and legal aid programs for survivors of sex trafficking. She has been conducting research based programs on maternal health, mental health, gender based violence, sex and sexuality. Her interest lies in conducting workshops for young people on life skills, feminism, gender and sexuality, trauma, resilience and interpersonal relationships.

A Guwahati-based college student pursuing her Masters in Tata Institute of Social Sciences, Bidisha started the #BleedwithDignity campaign on the technology platform, demanding that the Government of Assam install
biodegradable sanitary pad vending machines in all government schools across the state. Her petition on has already gathered support from over 90000 people and continues to grow.

Bidisha was selected in’s flagship program ‘She Creates Change’ having run successful online advocacy
campaigns, which were widely recognised. Through the #BleedwithDignity campaign; she organised and celebrated World Menstrual Hygiene Day, 2019 in Guwahati, Assam by hosting a wall mural by collaborating with local organisations. The initiative was widely covered by national and local media, and the mural was later inaugurated by the event’s chief guest Commissioner of Guwahati Municipal Corporation (GMC) Debeswar Malakar, IAS.

Sign up for the Youth Ki Awaaz Prime Ministerial Brief below