This post has been self-published on Youth Ki Awaaz by Edwin Thomas. Just like them, anyone can publish on Youth Ki Awaaz.

Donald Trump’s Views On LGBTQ Rights Are Very, Very Confusing

More from Edwin Thomas

To say that Donald Trump is an interesting political figure is to believe that Pepe the frog is mildly provocative. To many, Pepe symbolises how conservatism in the United States has translated into systemic xenophobia, sexism, racism, Islamophobia, homophobia and transphobia based on which Trump has run his campaign. Both have managed to insult large groups of people but only one is running to be President of the United States as the Republican nominee.

However, in this crazy election season, one thing still stands. Putting it mildly, the Republican Party has not been a friend to America’s LGBTQ population. Despite recent victories like nationwide marriage equality, persistent discrimination exists at the local and state-level largely perpetuated currently by the Republicans. While the Democrats took their time on this, it is now front-and-center on the party’s platform. Hillary Clinton, the Democratic presidential nominee, is in full support of measures supporting LGBTQ Americans. Having evolved from supporting traditional marriage over the years to supporting marriage equality she now has the the support of 72% of LGBTQ Americans.

But Trump, who is at 20%, has received attention for being ‘better‘ for LGBTQ rights than an establishment Republican candidate would be perhaps because he’s from liberal New York. The following will seek to explore his stance:

1. Same-Sex Marriage

By 1999, it had been three years since the Defence of Marriage Act had been signed into law by then President Bill Clinton, but Trump’s views on it were still unclear. However, a year later, he made up his mind. “I think the institution of marriage should be between a man and a woman. I think it’s important for gay couples who are committed to each other to not be hassled when it comes to inheritance, insurance benefits, and other simple everyday rights.” This argument essentially denotes the importance of the institution of marriage by giving LGBTQ Americans second-class status through civil unions. While he expressed support for a friend, Elton John on his then-impending wedding to David Furnish in 2005, four years later, he went back into the grey area by calling it a “complicated question.” It took two years for him after that to reaffirm his traditional stance against marriage equality and equal benefits as well.

In 2011, he had this to say in reference to President Barack Obama’s impending endorsement of gay marriage. “We have other problems in this country. And I don’t think a president should be elected on gay marriage or not gay marriage because we have some very big problems.” He also went back on civil unions by citing that he hadn’t “totally formed” his opinion.

“I think I’m evolving, and I think I’m a very fair person, but I have been for traditional marriage” said Trump in 2013. Not an uncommon thing to say at that time, because public opinion was gradually shifting. But that didn’t last long when he became a Republican candidate in the primaries and stuck to party line. “I am traditional. I am for traditional, and it’s a changing format, but I am very much for traditional marriage.”

However, looking to the 2016 general election, Trump sought to shift from a divisive standpoint to a more unity approach. “We have to bring all people together. And if we don’t, we’re not going to have a country anymore.”

Verdict: Considering that same-sex marriage has been the most prominent issue of the LGBTQ discourse in America; Trump, when he was sure of his stance, has been consistent in his support of only ‘traditional’ marriage – between a man and a woman.

2. Court Decisions

Following the 2015 Supreme Court landmark ruling on same-sex marriage, Trump surprised many with comments that seemed to suggest that as President he wouldn’t force an amendment on ‘protecting’ marriage through Congress or otherwise.

With many typically conservative Republicans saying that they will fight the Supreme Court on the issue of marriage equality by passing an act through Congress, Trump decided to be “realistic about it” and seemed to suggest that people let it be even though he “would have liked to have seen the decision differently.”

But Trump had some choice words for the judges who decided on the landmark ruling. “We have some very terrible Supreme Court justices, and frankly, they should have at least had that [same-sex marriage case] as a state’s right issue.” And in 2016, he said that he would “strongly consider” appointing justices to the SC who would overturn the ruling.

Verdict: While he has stressed repeatedly that the SC ruling wasn’t right because it should have been left to individual states to decide on (an easy argument used by many politicians who don’t want to seem offensive), his support in appointing non-LGBT friendly justices to the Supreme Court is indeed worrying for the progress made. As President, Trump seems like he would support the decision to have a socially conservative Supreme Court taking LGBTQ rights back by at least a decade.

3. Trans Issues

Trans issues have become a major talking point for both of the major parties and as expected, the Republicans have time and again demonised and targeted trans Americans. But Trump has a different story. In the 2012 Miss Universe Canada competition, Jenna Talackova, a male-to-female trans contestant was initially disqualified before being eventually allowed to participate. Trump, owner of Miss Universe Organisation at the time, had since stated that he intends to create a rule allowing trans contestants to participate regardless of individual country rules.

But on the political front, when North Carolina’s discriminatory HB2 Bill (popularly known as the ‘bathroom bill’) had become a major national issue, he was against it at first. “North Carolina, what they’re going through with all the business that’s leaving, and all the strife – that’s on both sides, leave it the way it is. There have been very few complaints the way it is. People go. They use the bathroom that they feel is appropriate. There has been so little trouble.” But Trump has since switched his position and has stated, after being pressed several times, that he hadn’t formed a personal opinion over the controversial bill, he once again, felt that it was a state issue to be decided on.

He also plans to rescind the directives released by President Obama protecting them from discrimination.

Verdict: With his strong support to leave it to (Republican) states to decide over trans issues, Trump leaves trans rights in the limbo. And while he may not significantly oppose trans rights, he doesn’t seem too politically motivated to support them either. Trump has made it clear he would not enforce federal civil rights laws to protect trans Americans.

4. Anti-Discrimination Law And Hate Crime Law

In 1999, Trump stated his mild opposition to ‘Don’t Ask Don’t Tell’. the controversial military law that would fire openly gay people who serve in the military. “It would not disturb me. I mean, hey, I lived in New York City and Manhattan all my life, OK? So, you know, my views are a little bit different than if I lived in Iowa, perhaps.” However, he did not mince words at then presidential hopeful George Bush in 2000 when it came to a lack of hate crime legislation. “He had the opportunity in Texas to show national leadership by passing a hate-crimes bill but didn’t — presumably from pressure from the Christian right. When somebody is victimised because of their ethnicity, the colour of their skin, or their sexual orientation, that must carry a harsh penalty.”

Unlike the Trump we know now, Y2K Trump had some pretty strong words in support of anti-discrimination law, that were consistent with his New York values. “I like the idea of amending the Civil Rights Act to include a ban on discrimination based on sexual orientation. We don’t need to rewrite the laws currently on the books, although I do think we need to address hate-crimes legislation. But amending the Civil Rights Act would grant the same protection to gay people that we give to other Americans – it’s only fair.” Moreover, Trump has shown a preference for merit rather than identity markers which is a good sign. Apparently, in a Trump administration, being LGBTQ would not be a problem.

However, in 2011, Donald switched gears when he stated that he didn’t believe that civil unions should have the same benefits as marriage. But he was also against private companies being able to fire employees based on sexual orientation.

Verdict: Trump scores the most points in this section. As President, he may not go after undoing discrimination law that already exists, but his support for it is currently unclear. On that note, Trump won’t be horrible for anti-discrimination law if you’re not counting religious liberty.

5. Religious Liberty

As LGBTQ rights have progressed in the country, religious liberty has often been used as a reason to block the momentum. Kim Davis, the infamous county clerk who refused to sign marriage licenses for same-sex couples, had to go to jail for not abiding by the law. Trump had a different approach to the ‘culture war’ argument that conservative Christians had. “It was too bad that she had to be put in jail. And I’m a very, very strong believer in Christianity and religion, but I will say that this was not the right job for her because we had a ruling from the Supreme Court and we are a country of laws, and you have to do what the Supreme Court ultimately — whether you like the decision or not.”

But his practicality goes right out of the window with his support for the First Amendment Defense Act – a bill that he has promised will be signed into law that would enable people to use their religion to discriminate against LGBTQ people (by denying services or firing them) without being penalised by the federal government. Moreover, when asked whether religious liberty would be a litmus test for appointing Supreme Court justices, he said he would support that. Considering it has been the courts who are at the forefront of protecting LGBTQ rights, this would have a huge impact for decades.

Verdict: His score on anti-discrimination quickly falters in the face of religious liberty as he courts the Republican Party’s most loyal voter base. As President, his support for the Act and conservative Supreme Court justices would be highly consequential for the LGBTQ community.

Apart from anti-discrimination law (if you’re not counting religious liberty), Trump has pretty much carried the Republican standard position on most LGBTQ issues. While his cultural outlook is evidently different leading to perhaps more progressive views on this matter, there is one thing that should not be forgotten: Trump in the Oval Office, surrounded by an overtly homophobic team including his Vice Presidential pick Mike Pence and his current campaign manager Steve Bannon, would be far more harsh at least due to political reasons, if not personal.

Final Verdict: Rhetoric may not matter as much as actions but Trump is bound to harm.

You must be to comment.

More from Edwin Thomas

Similar Posts

By Meghna Mehra

By Rahul Sen

By Sas3 Tranimal

Wondering what to write about?

Here are some topics to get you started

Share your details to download the report.









We promise not to spam or send irrelevant information.

Share your details to download the report.









We promise not to spam or send irrelevant information.

An ambassador and trained facilitator under Eco Femme (a social enterprise working towards menstrual health in south India), Sanjina is also an active member of the MHM Collective- India and Menstrual Health Alliance- India. She has conducted Menstrual Health sessions in multiple government schools adopted by Rotary District 3240 as part of their WinS project in rural Bengal. She has also delivered training of trainers on SRHR, gender, sexuality and Menstruation for Tomorrow’s Foundation, Vikramshila Education Resource Society, Nirdhan trust and Micro Finance, Tollygunj Women In Need, Paint It Red in Kolkata.

Now as an MH Fellow with YKA, she’s expanding her impressive scope of work further by launching a campaign to facilitate the process of ensuring better menstrual health and SRH services for women residing in correctional homes in West Bengal. The campaign will entail an independent study to take stalk of the present conditions of MHM in correctional homes across the state and use its findings to build public support and political will to take the necessary action.

Saurabh has been associated with YKA as a user and has consistently been writing on the issue MHM and its intersectionality with other issues in the society. Now as an MHM Fellow with YKA, he’s launched the Right to Period campaign, which aims to ensure proper execution of MHM guidelines in Delhi’s schools.

The long-term aim of the campaign is to develop an open culture where menstruation is not treated as a taboo. The campaign also seeks to hold the schools accountable for their responsibilities as an important component in the implementation of MHM policies by making adequate sanitation infrastructure and knowledge of MHM available in school premises.

Read more about his campaign.

Harshita is a psychologist and works to support people with mental health issues, particularly adolescents who are survivors of violence. Associated with the Azadi Foundation in UP, Harshita became an MHM Fellow with YKA, with the aim of promoting better menstrual health.

Her campaign #MeriMarzi aims to promote menstrual health and wellness, hygiene and facilities for female sex workers in UP. She says, “Knowledge about natural body processes is a very basic human right. And for individuals whose occupation is providing sexual services, it becomes even more important.”

Meri Marzi aims to ensure sensitised, non-discriminatory health workers for the needs of female sex workers in the Suraksha Clinics under the UPSACS (Uttar Pradesh State AIDS Control Society) program by creating more dialogues and garnering public support for the cause of sex workers’ menstrual rights. The campaign will also ensure interventions with sex workers to clear misconceptions around overall hygiene management to ensure that results flow both ways.

Read more about her campaign.

MH Fellow Sabna comes with significant experience working with a range of development issues. A co-founder of Project Sakhi Saheli, which aims to combat period poverty and break menstrual taboos, Sabna has, in the past, worked on the issue of menstruation in urban slums of Delhi with women and adolescent girls. She and her team also released MenstraBook, with menstrastories and organised Menstra Tlk in the Delhi School of Social Work to create more conversations on menstruation.

With YKA MHM Fellow Vineet, Sabna launched Menstratalk, a campaign that aims to put an end to period poverty and smash menstrual taboos in society. As a start, the campaign aims to begin conversations on menstrual health with five hundred adolescents and youth in Delhi through offline platforms, and through this community mobilise support to create Period Friendly Institutions out of educational institutes in the city.

Read more about her campaign. 

A student from Delhi School of Social work, Vineet is a part of Project Sakhi Saheli, an initiative by the students of Delhi school of Social Work to create awareness on Menstrual Health and combat Period Poverty. Along with MHM Action Fellow Sabna, Vineet launched Menstratalk, a campaign that aims to put an end to period poverty and smash menstrual taboos in society.

As a start, the campaign aims to begin conversations on menstrual health with five hundred adolescents and youth in Delhi through offline platforms, and through this community mobilise support to create Period Friendly Institutions out of educational institutes in the city.

Find out more about the campaign here.

A native of Bhagalpur district – Bihar, Shalini Jha believes in equal rights for all genders and wants to work for a gender-equal and just society. In the past she’s had a year-long association as a community leader with Haiyya: Organise for Action’s Health Over Stigma campaign. She’s pursuing a Master’s in Literature with Ambedkar University, Delhi and as an MHM Fellow with YKA, recently launched ‘Project अल्हड़ (Alharh)’.

She says, “Bihar is ranked the lowest in India’s SDG Index 2019 for India. Hygienic and comfortable menstruation is a basic human right and sustainable development cannot be ensured if menstruators are deprived of their basic rights.” Project अल्हड़ (Alharh) aims to create a robust sensitised community in Bhagalpur to collectively spread awareness, break the taboo, debunk myths and initiate fearless conversations around menstruation. The campaign aims to reach at least 6000 adolescent girls from government and private schools in Baghalpur district in 2020.

Read more about the campaign here.

A psychologist and co-founder of a mental health NGO called Customize Cognition, Ritika forayed into the space of menstrual health and hygiene, sexual and reproductive healthcare and rights and gender equality as an MHM Fellow with YKA. She says, “The experience of working on MHM/SRHR and gender equality has been an enriching and eye-opening experience. I have learned what’s beneath the surface of the issue, be it awareness, lack of resources or disregard for trans men, who also menstruate.”

The Transmen-ses campaign aims to tackle the issue of silence and disregard for trans men’s menstruation needs, by mobilising gender sensitive health professionals and gender neutral restrooms in Lucknow.

Read more about the campaign here.

A Computer Science engineer by education, Nitisha started her career in the corporate sector, before realising she wanted to work in the development and social justice space. Since then, she has worked with Teach For India and Care India and is from the founding batch of Indian School of Development Management (ISDM), a one of its kind organisation creating leaders for the development sector through its experiential learning post graduate program.

As a Youth Ki Awaaz Menstrual Health Fellow, Nitisha has started Let’s Talk Period, a campaign to mobilise young people to switch to sustainable period products. She says, “80 lakh women in Delhi use non-biodegradable sanitary products, generate 3000 tonnes of menstrual waste, that takes 500-800 years to decompose; which in turn contributes to the health issues of all menstruators, increased burden of waste management on the city and harmful living environment for all citizens.

Let’s Talk Period aims to change this by

Find out more about her campaign here.

Share your details to download the report.









We promise not to spam or send irrelevant information.

A former Assistant Secretary with the Ministry of Women and Child Development in West Bengal for three months, Lakshmi Bhavya has been championing the cause of menstrual hygiene in her district. By associating herself with the Lalana Campaign, a holistic menstrual hygiene awareness campaign which is conducted by the Anahat NGO, Lakshmi has been slowly breaking taboos when it comes to periods and menstrual hygiene.

A Gender Rights Activist working with the tribal and marginalized communities in india, Srilekha is a PhD scholar working on understanding body and sexuality among tribal girls, to fill the gaps in research around indigenous women and their stories. Srilekha has worked extensively at the grassroots level with community based organisations, through several advocacy initiatives around Gender, Mental Health, Menstrual Hygiene and Sexual and Reproductive Health Rights (SRHR) for the indigenous in Jharkhand, over the last 6 years.

Srilekha has also contributed to sustainable livelihood projects and legal aid programs for survivors of sex trafficking. She has been conducting research based programs on maternal health, mental health, gender based violence, sex and sexuality. Her interest lies in conducting workshops for young people on life skills, feminism, gender and sexuality, trauma, resilience and interpersonal relationships.

A Guwahati-based college student pursuing her Masters in Tata Institute of Social Sciences, Bidisha started the #BleedwithDignity campaign on the technology platform Change.org, demanding that the Government of Assam install
biodegradable sanitary pad vending machines in all government schools across the state. Her petition on Change.org has already gathered support from over 90000 people and continues to grow.

Bidisha was selected in Change.org’s flagship program ‘She Creates Change’ having run successful online advocacy
campaigns, which were widely recognised. Through the #BleedwithDignity campaign; she organised and celebrated World Menstrual Hygiene Day, 2019 in Guwahati, Assam by hosting a wall mural by collaborating with local organisations. The initiative was widely covered by national and local media, and the mural was later inaugurated by the event’s chief guest Commissioner of Guwahati Municipal Corporation (GMC) Debeswar Malakar, IAS.

Sign up for the Youth Ki Awaaz Prime Ministerial Brief below