This post has been self-published on Youth Ki Awaaz by Chetan Gnanesh. Just like them, anyone can publish on Youth Ki Awaaz.

You Should Know What 13 Mental Health Experts Told The SC About Section 377

By Chetan Gnanesh:

In light of the Mental Health Awareness Week, I reflected upon the stand of Indian mental health professionals against the Supreme Court 2013 judgement upholding Section 377 thus ruling against the rights of LGBT citizens in India. This resulted from a petition filed by religious and ‘intolerant’ establishments against the Delhi High Court judgement which took down Section 377 in July 2009.

The respondents, of course, were mainly the Naz Foundation who had fought ardently in the High Court against the law in the first place. Besides them, a number of groups intervened in support of the High Court judgement. Needless to mention, the petitioners in the Supreme Court (who were against the High Court judgement) made illogical, unreasonable points as the case took its course. In December 2013 the Supreme Court ruled in favour of these petitioners thus overruling the High Court decision and re-criminalising same-sex coitus in modern democratic India.

During this case, a very strange event took course when the Supreme Court cut short the counsel appearing on behalf of a very significant group of interveners. This group consisted of 13 mental health professionals, highly sought after and reputed ones, from different parts of the country.

This group was significant because it had valid reasons to prove the unconstitutionality of Section 377 while reproaching illogical claims made by the petitioners. In this group of mental health professionals, 10 out of 13 of whom were leading psychiatrists who have come across LGBT individuals time and again, and were arguably, better judges of the mental health risks the discriminatory law subjected those individuals to.

The first of these interveners was the outspoken Dr Shekhar Seshadri of the National Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences (NIMHANS), in Bangalore, who is one of its leading child and adolescent psychiatrists. It is said that he has assisted many LGBT individuals to embrace their sexual orientation or gender identity.

Another intervener was the internationally renowned psychiatrist, Vikram Patel – author of the book “Where There is No Psychiatrist”, a highly influential figure in global mental health and the co-founder of the award-winning NGO Sangath in Goa. Two years after his intervention in the Supreme Court, he was listed by TIME magazine as one of 100 most influential people in our world. Clearly, in 2013, he wasn’t influential enough to the Supreme Court.

Yet another intervener was Dr Alok Sarin, who is a member of the Indian Medical Association and the government-established Mental Health Policy Group. He wrote reproachfully in the Indian Journal of Medical Ethics, dissenting from the Supreme Court judgement, expressing annoyance in the way the Supreme Court “summarily brushed aside” the medical opinion offered by his group of professionals. Other interveners comprised of psychiatrists and psychotherapists based in Kolkata, Pune and Mumbai – some of whom are members of the Indian Psychiatric Society – with experiences in dealing with a large number of LGBT patients.

They argued that homosexuality was a natural variant of human sexuality and not a mental disorder or disease. Citing latest scientific data, they averred that homosexuality was most likely “caused by a combination of genetic and prenatal environmental factors” and that it “cannot ‘spread’ from one to another.” More significantly, they argued that homosexuality was not ‘unnatural,’ citing documentation of such behaviour among over five hundred species of the animal kingdom, particularly in bonobos.

Reaffirming credible researches conducted in the turn of this century, they suggested that an estimated 5-7% of our population may be considered non-heterosexual. This implies that between 6.6 and 9.2 crores (66 and 92 million) Indians are not heterosexual. Considering the lower figure, it is more than the entire population of the UK. Add Australia to that number, and it is still a few millions shy of the higher figure! This estimation is considered valid across the world however much our government disclaims it. (In 2009, the government submitted a report that said that the male gay population in India was 0.1% when, in fact, 0.1% of the country’s population may just be the gay men of Mumbai.)

They urged that homosexual individuals had no choice in their attraction to members of their own gender – “Just as one cannot choose to be homosexual one cannot choose to abandon homosexual desire.” I ask, why does it become the law makers’ business to keep us from expressing our desires when we do so only to people who reciprocate them? Celibate as some of our leaders may be, what our country needs is a step-change in its attitude toward sex. This is the true meaning of progress. Sex makes me happy. Not having it makes me cranky. Being happy makes me productive, being cranky makes me lazy. See, Parliament, see the science? Huh, Supreme Court?

The interveners reiterated this by arguing that criminalising consensual same-sex intercourse causes “enormous mental and psychological distress to LGBT persons placing them at a significantly higher risk of psychiatric morbidity and fatal outcomes like suicide.” They further state that mental health problems in homosexual persons are not inherent, rubbishing some of the petitioners’ claims and that instead, they result from heteronormativity, indignity and societal disapproval – all three, as they rightly point out, perpetrated by Section 377. They added that Section 377 forces persons of the LGBT community to lead ‘closeted’ lives thus concealing their identities which, they further stated, has deleterious effects on their mental health.

They threw light on recurring cases of double suicide among same-sex couples – especially female. In its unjust judgement, the Supreme Court stated that two people may identify as homosexual or bisexual but may not have sexual intercourse or enjoy such legal rights as heterosexual couples. In my opinion, that judgement is discriminatory and pathetic!

The puritanical approach which disregards sex at the heart of a person’s identity is of an absurd kind since the core of most ‘sexual’ orientations is the act of sex itself! The Delhi High Court acknowledged this in 2009. In 2013, the Supreme Court failed to.

In concluding their arguments, the interveners submitted that Section 377 “violates the constitutional protection embodied in Articles 14 and 21,” and that it is unreasonable that the Section targets individuals for a characteristic “that is innate, unchangeable and a natural variant of human sexuality.” They upheld the Delhi High Court judgement that only constitutional morality, and not public morality, could be a valid ground to restrict fundamental rights under our Constitution.

In fact, in 2016 in India, it is not even public morality that demands certain communities of our society be restricted of their fundamental rights. In fact, the public sympathises with us. In 2016, it is solely religious morality which pushes to discriminate against us when, in fact, by law, religion must take no stand to dictate the Constitution of a supposedly secular nation.


Image source: Adnan Abidi/REUTERS, Arun Sharma/Hindustan Times
You must be to comment.

More from Chetan Gnanesh

Similar Posts

By Prajakta Khedkar

By Jyotsna Richhariya

By shreya ghosh

Wondering what to write about?

Here are some topics to get you started

Share your details to download the report.

We promise not to spam or send irrelevant information.

Share your details to download the report.

We promise not to spam or send irrelevant information.

An ambassador and trained facilitator under Eco Femme (a social enterprise working towards menstrual health in south India), Sanjina is also an active member of the MHM Collective- India and Menstrual Health Alliance- India. She has conducted Menstrual Health sessions in multiple government schools adopted by Rotary District 3240 as part of their WinS project in rural Bengal. She has also delivered training of trainers on SRHR, gender, sexuality and Menstruation for Tomorrow’s Foundation, Vikramshila Education Resource Society, Nirdhan trust and Micro Finance, Tollygunj Women In Need, Paint It Red in Kolkata.

Now as an MH Fellow with YKA, she’s expanding her impressive scope of work further by launching a campaign to facilitate the process of ensuring better menstrual health and SRH services for women residing in correctional homes in West Bengal. The campaign will entail an independent study to take stalk of the present conditions of MHM in correctional homes across the state and use its findings to build public support and political will to take the necessary action.

Saurabh has been associated with YKA as a user and has consistently been writing on the issue MHM and its intersectionality with other issues in the society. Now as an MHM Fellow with YKA, he’s launched the Right to Period campaign, which aims to ensure proper execution of MHM guidelines in Delhi’s schools.

The long-term aim of the campaign is to develop an open culture where menstruation is not treated as a taboo. The campaign also seeks to hold the schools accountable for their responsibilities as an important component in the implementation of MHM policies by making adequate sanitation infrastructure and knowledge of MHM available in school premises.

Read more about his campaign.

Harshita is a psychologist and works to support people with mental health issues, particularly adolescents who are survivors of violence. Associated with the Azadi Foundation in UP, Harshita became an MHM Fellow with YKA, with the aim of promoting better menstrual health.

Her campaign #MeriMarzi aims to promote menstrual health and wellness, hygiene and facilities for female sex workers in UP. She says, “Knowledge about natural body processes is a very basic human right. And for individuals whose occupation is providing sexual services, it becomes even more important.”

Meri Marzi aims to ensure sensitised, non-discriminatory health workers for the needs of female sex workers in the Suraksha Clinics under the UPSACS (Uttar Pradesh State AIDS Control Society) program by creating more dialogues and garnering public support for the cause of sex workers’ menstrual rights. The campaign will also ensure interventions with sex workers to clear misconceptions around overall hygiene management to ensure that results flow both ways.

Read more about her campaign.

MH Fellow Sabna comes with significant experience working with a range of development issues. A co-founder of Project Sakhi Saheli, which aims to combat period poverty and break menstrual taboos, Sabna has, in the past, worked on the issue of menstruation in urban slums of Delhi with women and adolescent girls. She and her team also released MenstraBook, with menstrastories and organised Menstra Tlk in the Delhi School of Social Work to create more conversations on menstruation.

With YKA MHM Fellow Vineet, Sabna launched Menstratalk, a campaign that aims to put an end to period poverty and smash menstrual taboos in society. As a start, the campaign aims to begin conversations on menstrual health with five hundred adolescents and youth in Delhi through offline platforms, and through this community mobilise support to create Period Friendly Institutions out of educational institutes in the city.

Read more about her campaign. 

A student from Delhi School of Social work, Vineet is a part of Project Sakhi Saheli, an initiative by the students of Delhi school of Social Work to create awareness on Menstrual Health and combat Period Poverty. Along with MHM Action Fellow Sabna, Vineet launched Menstratalk, a campaign that aims to put an end to period poverty and smash menstrual taboos in society.

As a start, the campaign aims to begin conversations on menstrual health with five hundred adolescents and youth in Delhi through offline platforms, and through this community mobilise support to create Period Friendly Institutions out of educational institutes in the city.

Find out more about the campaign here.

A native of Bhagalpur district – Bihar, Shalini Jha believes in equal rights for all genders and wants to work for a gender-equal and just society. In the past she’s had a year-long association as a community leader with Haiyya: Organise for Action’s Health Over Stigma campaign. She’s pursuing a Master’s in Literature with Ambedkar University, Delhi and as an MHM Fellow with YKA, recently launched ‘Project अल्हड़ (Alharh)’.

She says, “Bihar is ranked the lowest in India’s SDG Index 2019 for India. Hygienic and comfortable menstruation is a basic human right and sustainable development cannot be ensured if menstruators are deprived of their basic rights.” Project अल्हड़ (Alharh) aims to create a robust sensitised community in Bhagalpur to collectively spread awareness, break the taboo, debunk myths and initiate fearless conversations around menstruation. The campaign aims to reach at least 6000 adolescent girls from government and private schools in Baghalpur district in 2020.

Read more about the campaign here.

A psychologist and co-founder of a mental health NGO called Customize Cognition, Ritika forayed into the space of menstrual health and hygiene, sexual and reproductive healthcare and rights and gender equality as an MHM Fellow with YKA. She says, “The experience of working on MHM/SRHR and gender equality has been an enriching and eye-opening experience. I have learned what’s beneath the surface of the issue, be it awareness, lack of resources or disregard for trans men, who also menstruate.”

The Transmen-ses campaign aims to tackle the issue of silence and disregard for trans men’s menstruation needs, by mobilising gender sensitive health professionals and gender neutral restrooms in Lucknow.

Read more about the campaign here.

A Computer Science engineer by education, Nitisha started her career in the corporate sector, before realising she wanted to work in the development and social justice space. Since then, she has worked with Teach For India and Care India and is from the founding batch of Indian School of Development Management (ISDM), a one of its kind organisation creating leaders for the development sector through its experiential learning post graduate program.

As a Youth Ki Awaaz Menstrual Health Fellow, Nitisha has started Let’s Talk Period, a campaign to mobilise young people to switch to sustainable period products. She says, “80 lakh women in Delhi use non-biodegradable sanitary products, generate 3000 tonnes of menstrual waste, that takes 500-800 years to decompose; which in turn contributes to the health issues of all menstruators, increased burden of waste management on the city and harmful living environment for all citizens.

Let’s Talk Period aims to change this by

Find out more about her campaign here.

Share your details to download the report.

We promise not to spam or send irrelevant information.

A former Assistant Secretary with the Ministry of Women and Child Development in West Bengal for three months, Lakshmi Bhavya has been championing the cause of menstrual hygiene in her district. By associating herself with the Lalana Campaign, a holistic menstrual hygiene awareness campaign which is conducted by the Anahat NGO, Lakshmi has been slowly breaking taboos when it comes to periods and menstrual hygiene.

A Gender Rights Activist working with the tribal and marginalized communities in india, Srilekha is a PhD scholar working on understanding body and sexuality among tribal girls, to fill the gaps in research around indigenous women and their stories. Srilekha has worked extensively at the grassroots level with community based organisations, through several advocacy initiatives around Gender, Mental Health, Menstrual Hygiene and Sexual and Reproductive Health Rights (SRHR) for the indigenous in Jharkhand, over the last 6 years.

Srilekha has also contributed to sustainable livelihood projects and legal aid programs for survivors of sex trafficking. She has been conducting research based programs on maternal health, mental health, gender based violence, sex and sexuality. Her interest lies in conducting workshops for young people on life skills, feminism, gender and sexuality, trauma, resilience and interpersonal relationships.

A Guwahati-based college student pursuing her Masters in Tata Institute of Social Sciences, Bidisha started the #BleedwithDignity campaign on the technology platform, demanding that the Government of Assam install
biodegradable sanitary pad vending machines in all government schools across the state. Her petition on has already gathered support from over 90000 people and continues to grow.

Bidisha was selected in’s flagship program ‘She Creates Change’ having run successful online advocacy
campaigns, which were widely recognised. Through the #BleedwithDignity campaign; she organised and celebrated World Menstrual Hygiene Day, 2019 in Guwahati, Assam by hosting a wall mural by collaborating with local organisations. The initiative was widely covered by national and local media, and the mural was later inaugurated by the event’s chief guest Commissioner of Guwahati Municipal Corporation (GMC) Debeswar Malakar, IAS.

Sign up for the Youth Ki Awaaz Prime Ministerial Brief below