How The Government Is Failing Democracy By Muting Dissent

Posted by Raju Chalwadi in Politics, Society
February 25, 2017

Our plural society is going through one of its most fragile phases; the very notion of its multi-identity is under threat. The irony is that the threat is not from outsiders but from its own citizens who are trying to impose their version of history, culture and nationalism on “others.”

Since the coming of the new pro-Hindutva government at the Centre, the self-proclaimed nationalists have awakened. Hero worship has increased, which if not controlled, will ultimately lead to dictatorship. This is followed by the rise of orthodox individuals/groups that have direct/indirect backing from the current regime’s ideology. The issues of national importance have been sidelined, those who dare to dissent with the current regime are termed as anti-BJP or pro-Congress if not anti-nationals.

A party has been represented as a group of soldier who is fighting for the well-being of the masses. State policies are being termed as ‘nation building policy’ hence critics are not welcomed. A party instead of being a channel to fulfill the promise to the nationals claims to be the nation in itself.

The victims of current regimes are largely those who had faced discriminations since ages. Now we are so obsessed with the question of national and anti-nationals that we seldom talk about social inequality in general and gender, caste, religious, ethnic and economic inequality in particular. The ideas of growth, development, investment, employment generation has been proved as mere rhetoric. And the ground reality, especially of the countryside (for instance Maharashtra has recorded highest farmer suicide in last 16 years), is been overshadowed by discussions on the lofty rhetoric of changing India.

All the leaders/members of opposition parties have been reduced to a mere bunch of peoples who have self-interested political goals, whereas only the ruling political elites are toiling day and night for building a ‘Ram Rajya’. Had Ambedkar, Bhagat Singh, Rabindranath Tagore and Phule been alive, they too would have been termed as those who are doing conspiracy against the government as their idea did not match with the current regime.

For Ambedkar, caste is anti-national, and Hindu Raj is dangerous; for Bhagat Singh, God is an imagination of human being, and we must fight the narrow conception of religion; for Tagore, humanity is greater than patriotism and freedom of mind is essential; for Phule, Hinduism is not a legitimate religion but a superstition, a bag of tricks and a weapon of domination.

The prevailing ideology has created blind soldiers who are ready to fight to safeguard the national (religious) interest at any cost. The same soldiers fought in 1992 to demolish Babri Masjid, and the same soldiers fought in Gujarat in 2004. We are reminded of 2001 parliament attack, but we seldom remember 1966’s attack on parliament which was led by the people of the same ideology, who today are no less than an avatar of God. The same ideology which until yesterday, used to cherish the writings of Manu has now taken solace in Ambedkar.

Now, it seems clear who are responsible for dividing this country and destroying the social fabrics of this country. It is better to remind ourselves of the great leaders who fought for uniting the country based on a single identity of humanity, for whom religion, caste, ethnicity, God have no role to play in individual’s life, for instance, Buddha.

We are living with contradictions, the constitution of this country has demanded certain fundamental duties from its citizens, the most important among it – is promoting scientific temper. How can this duty be fulfilled, if the government promotes myth and unscientific views? For instance, Prime Minister’s attributes Ganesha’s elephant head to the practice of plastic surgery in ancient India. He thinks Karna’s birth was because of the presence of genetic science.

The institutional murder of a bright University of Hyderabad’s scholar Rohith Vemula, killings of Dalit’s and Muslims in the name of protection of gau mata, missing of Najeeb after clash with a student group members, Murder of Aklaq, Ghar wapsi camps and harassment of couples and family in the name of love jihad and other such instances have fuelled the dissent among the oppressed against the present ideology because of government’s inaction or defense of such acts. There is a real danger in promoting myth and defending such acts by undermining the welfare of masses, as this will force the particular section of society to disbelief if not rebel against the state in the long term.

Democracy is not just a political system it is a system of sharing values, pains in the time of distress and protecting each individual when necessary. The chief architect of the India’s constitution chose Buddha over Marx; because he found two faults in Marx’s way, first it demands bloody revolution and second, dictatorship. It is a common experience that if the masses especially the oppressed are not treated equally, if not provided with an equal opportunity, they will resort to bloody revolution and starts believing in overthrowing of the oppressive regime. What we are doing today is suppressing the aspiration of minorities and oppressed sections of society which will be forced to rebel if not given a share in resources and same security.

We need to remind ourselves the fear which Ambedkar raised in his last speech in the constituent assembly. He said, “will Indians place the country above their creed or will they place creed above country? I do not know. But this much is certain that if the parties place creed above country, our independence will be put in jeopardy a second time and probably be lost forever”. Further, he had said, “Bhakti in religion may be a road to the salvation of the soul. But in politics, Bhakti or hero-worship is a sure road to degradation and eventual dictatorship”. There is no doubt that today the present regime is or has already placed creed above the country and hero-worship of a political leader is no doubt at its peak.

We have what Granville Austin called a social document in the form of our constitution which if followed in letter and spirit would undoubtedly lead our country towards what Buddha called – “Bahujana Hitaya Bahujana Sukhaya.”