In case you don’t know, there are riots going on in Nagaland since last week. According to a PTI feed, “Nagaland Chief Minister TR Zeliang on February 2 rejected the demand for his government’s resignation following the death of two persons in anti-ULB poll agitation in Dimapur and appealed to the people to stop violence and not fall prey to rumour mongers.”
The protesters are demanding a removal of 33% reservation for women in the urban local bodies, a body of governance for the state. These protesters include the traditionalist tribal groups such as the Central Naga Tribal Council. Just a month back, the President of the tribal group had categorically explained to Firstpost, their problem with the reservation. Hold your breath for this. “In Naga society, a woman is not considered to be equal to men. She is not even allowed to speak in Panchayat until and unless she is summoned by it. Providing 33% reservation to women amounts to giving her the same status as men and it gives men inferiority complex.”
So, no sugar-coating, no pseudo talks about how opportunities should be equal for all. According to him, women must not be given added importance. Point blank answer. In your face. Maintaining that his organisation has no other problem with the Municipal Act passed by the government of Nagaland except the provision of 33% reservation for women, he also said, “In India, men are considered to be superior to women as per customs and that has to be taken very seriously.”
Generally, when riots happen in the mainland and other sensitive areas of the country, like Kashmir, Manipur, Mizoram, Assam, Nagaland, etc., we try and shut our eyes to it and wonder if it is a tricky situation that has no solution. In some instances, the naxalites and the stone pelters seem to be right, and in other instances, the policemen/army men seem to be right. But this one is not one of those cases. This is very much black and white.
In effect, the Nagaland State Assembly does not have a single woman as its member. The Naga Mothers’ Association (NMA) believes that reservation is essential to promote gender equity in the customary law. NMA says that over the years, only men spoke and only men were heard.
It is 2017 and we are still debating whether women need reservation in politics or not. I am not sure if these people are looking at women around them and how they think it’s not required. In most cases, the point of ‘merit’ is brought out. Like any other reservation, the problem with this idea of ‘merit’ is that the other person needs to be well placed to compete with you. It is years of discrimination and patriarchy practised by Naga tribal men, that a woman will have to break, to even file a nomination.
Everyone opposing reservation should first ensure a discrimination free society. The purpose of law is not equality. It is equity. When two genders are not treated equally, there is no point of equality. In this case, we need equity.
You must have looked at this illustration before. This clearly explains the case of equality vs equity.
This question reminds me of a recent session I attended at the Jaipur Literature Festival. Mrs. Mrinal Pande, a television personality, journalist and author, who was awarded a Padma Shri in 2006, said, “When I go to some of the events on gender equality, I witness this royal divide. There are women who are supremely articulated in English, speaking about women empowerment, women’s issues and then there are rural women there too. In one of the instances I asked a rural woman, do you know what’s happening here? She said, “It seems like they are talking about us but we don’t know what. “The only difference between them and us is that they smoke cigarettes and we smoke beedis.”
In another session regarding North East, Teresa Rehman, author and activist, pointed out that, “Disputes and the political discourse in the North-East have always been too masculine. Women had no voices.”
As far as feminism is concerned, we’ll all have to check our privilege before we talk. Feminism is not just about upper caste, urban women. We will have to look across our troubled states and cities and help women over there too. The worst affected women are the tribal women. Feminism cannot be just about writing their stories and speaking about them. They will have to be given the mic, pen and paper. Their words will have to be translated and brought out.
Before you say that women don’t need reservation, who are these women you are talking about? Are you talking about yourself or your friends? What do you know about the tribals and the other rural and urban poor women who do not come with a silver spoon? We will have to ask some uncomfortable questions to ourselves before we make a judgement. At times, I find debates on cultures pointless. A debate where the only answer to injustice to a particular gender or community’s human rights is ‘our culture’ is deemed to be pointless.
The Naga tribal head can say that women are not equal to men in the culture they practise, but that just means we need to question that culture now. Irrespective of whether a culture, past actions, mythology consider women as equal or not; today we need to move forward.
It is 2017 already. When you use statements like ‘women don’t reach that position because they are not capable enough’ as a defence; you are indeed questioning your own system. Well, women across the world are getting/taking equal representations at various parliaments and political boards. You are saying that your women aren’t good enough. Who’s at fault in that case? Is it something to be proud of?
This is obviously not a point of rivalry because of years of seeing men at the forefront. Men who are not patriarchal and who don’t see women as inferior have no worry whatsoever. The problem with all men panels, committees and boards is that no single gender is adequate enough to address problems, concerns and issues of all genders. We will need adequate representation of all genders to make decision-making bodies that are capable of doing good for all. And this in no way can be ‘harmful for the future’.
Image for representational purposes only.