This post has been self-published on Youth Ki Awaaz by siddharth sharma. Just like them, anyone can publish on Youth Ki Awaaz.

Privacy: A Notion too Intrinsic

More from siddharth sharma

“Those who can give up essential liberty for obtaining a little temporary security, deserves neither security nor liberty” – Benjamin Franklin


In a society like ours, where the most individual of decisions like marriage and child bearing are being taken under societal or family pressures, it surely makes privacy an alien concept. Before elucidating on the Right to Privacy (RTP), let me first define the word “Privacy”. It is a state of being let alone, or away from other people’s attention. It shall not be taken at par or confused with the word ‘secrecy’. Many a times, the government or even common people say that if there is nothing to hide, why to worry about privacy. They cannot be more wrong. I mean to take an example, we all know that we have our private parts in our body, so there shall be no need to hide them, yet we wear clothes. Another example would be like we all know a newly married couple will engage in copulation, so there shall be no privacy. And for God’s sake, why is there the concept of Private Property?? Are houses built as abodes of  privacy, or because of secret missions of national security?? Why are there exclusive private members’ clubs?? For an ephemeral space to be left alone or as dens of terrorism?? These examples goes on to show that privacy, as opposed to secrecy is too intrinsic for human existence. Also, it proves that we have climbed high the civilizational ladder, where in apart from being social animals, we also possess private desires.

 Presently, the discussion has been triggered by the government’s act of making the Aadhar mandatory for the people in availing of public services of any kind. This act of imposition has magnified the larger issue of privacy, which has consequences beyond Aadhar. For this particular reason the Supreme Court (SC) has constituted a ‘9 judges bench’ to decide into the larger issue of privacy and stating that individual cases like the Aadhar will be dealt with separately on its own merits. However, the privacy verdict will have significant impact on it.

To be clear at the outset, the word ‘privacy’ is mentioned nowhere explicitly in the Constitution. This is the basic argument being put forth by the government that our Constitution makers deliberately kept it out of scope for necessary reasons. However, in today’s day and age, this argument seems anachronistic as the Constitution has evolved and travelled a great distance from its original form.

With more than a hundred amendments and with the doctrines of “basic structure” and “judicial review” well intact, we can well dive into the analysis of the issue. The Centre argued in the court that privacy was discarded by the SC in two very early cases ‘M P Sharma and others Vs Satish Chandra, 1954’ by a majority decision of the eight  judges bench and ‘Kharak Singh Vs State of Uttar Pradesh, 1962’ by a majority decision of the six judges bench. It is pertinent to note here that both these decisions were majority decisions and not unanimous ones. Dissenting voices were very much there. For instance, Justice Subbarao (a member of the bench) said in the Kharak Singh case that even though the right to privacy was not expressly recognized as a fundamental right, it was an essential ingredient of personal liberty under Article 21. He also held all surveillance measures to be unconstitutional.

The current petitioners of the RTP on the other hand, have replied by stating that those were narrow and pedantic views taken by the SC. It is noteworthy here that the jurisprudence of the Supreme Court broadened a lot since the 1970s, especially after the “Maneka Gandhi Case” of 1978, where in it was established that Articles 14, 19 and 21 ran in conjunction to each other through a golden thread of  the principles of natural justice and due process of law. The landmark SC Case of “Kesavananda Bharati Vs State of Kerela, 1973” was a major paradigm shift in the jurisprudential history of this country, where in the principle of “Basic Structure” was introduced for the first time. It was evidenced ever since by numerous judgements in favour of the RTP, most prominently in the SC Case Unni Krishnan Vs State of Andhra Pradesh, 1993, where in it was mentioned that Right to Privacy is to be considered under Article 21 of Right to Life and personal liberty, which is considered a part of the basic structure of the Constitution. The only hindrance till now was the size of the bench in all subsequent cases post M P Sharma and Kharak Singh. This issue is being taken care of now in the current hearing, where a larger bench of nine judges has been constituted.

Despite the lack of Constitutional definition of privacy, we do have global precedents. Like the Article 12 of the Declaration of  Human Rights, Article 17 of International Covenant of Civil and Political Rights, 1966 which India ratified on April 10, 1979 without any reservation. Also, Article 7 and 8 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, 2012 recognises the RTP in a very broad manner. Article 8 particularly speaks about data protection and consent of the person and institutional backing for any action taken thereof. As far back as in 1890, two legal scholars from Harvard Law, Warren and Brandeis wrote in the Harvard Law Review (then only three years old) about the intrinsic nature of privacy to human existence.

In the light of things, the government has begun to concede grounds. It is now saying that RTP may be fundamental, but not absolute. Well, but then no rights are absolute. Earlier, the attorney from the Government side was considering Privacy to be a common law right and not a Constitutional right (which by the way, was well established even in the Kharak Singh Case). But, in today’s day and age where it is said that “Data is the New Oil”(quoted by Clive Humbey), it becomes pertinent to explicitly mention the Right to Privacy to be a fundamental right. For then, it will have the backing of the Constitutional remedies of “writs” under Article 32. The victim of infringement by the State will then not have to face the lengthy procedure of justice and daily hustle bustle from  the lowest to the highest strands of the judiciary. Frankly, it will reduce the burden of the judiciary significantly, which is already over burdened by cases. It will also go a long way in restraining the State authorities from surveiling at will and to go through the ‘due process of law’.  

As for the argument by the Attorney General, regarding the desire of the Constitution makers, they clearly stated that the Constitution is a living document, flexible in nature, and there shall be enough scope to amend it with the demands of changing times. Else, there wouldn’t have been article 368 in place.

 These are the times of Big Data. Large private corporations in the digital sector already possesses a lot of personal data. They do influence our lives. But, even advertisers try to do the same, to borrow the term from Noam Chomsky “manufacturing consent”.  Just imagine what will happen when the might of the state will be behind us. Internet-of-things and artificial intelligence are knocking at the door. Without proper backup of a strong “data protection law” and preemptive strike by the Supreme Court, the Frankenstein’s Monster will devour us all. In the demand of current times, it has become imperative to explicitly define RTP as a Fundamental Right, with reasonable restrictions and scope of evolution for the future. Also, ideals in our Preamble like liberty, freedom, justice cannot be enjoyed without privacy. As a result, the very spirit of the Constitution will be defeated. However, proper codification and contours of the law so to be formed from this right shall be well defined along with the back-up of proper institutional mechanism which is of utmost importance to give spine to the law. Also, it is pertinent to note here that the chief architect of the Aadhar project, Mr Nandan Nilekani is himself a prime advocate of a strong data protection law.

The concept of “Nanny State” in itself is distasteful in the first place. When it takes the dangerous turn to become a “Frankenstein State”, alarm bells must ring, civil society must wake up and the whistle must be blown.

Youth Ki Awaaz is an open platform where anybody can publish. This post does not necessarily represent the platform's views and opinions.

You must be to comment.
  1. siddharth sharma

    Hello Everyone
    I am open to all questions, criticisms and counter views here

More from siddharth sharma

Similar Posts

By shakeel ahmad

By Ghanshyam Dahal

By bigbull

    If you do not receive an email within the next 5 mins, please check your spam box or email us at

      If you do not receive an email within the next 5 mins, please check your spam box or email us at

        If you do not receive an email within the next 5 mins, please check your spam box or email us at

        Wondering what to write about?

        Here are some topics to get you started

        Share your details to download the report.

        We promise not to spam or send irrelevant information.

        Share your details to download the report.

        We promise not to spam or send irrelevant information.

        An ambassador and trained facilitator under Eco Femme (a social enterprise working towards menstrual health in south India), Sanjina is also an active member of the MHM Collective- India and Menstrual Health Alliance- India. She has conducted Menstrual Health sessions in multiple government schools adopted by Rotary District 3240 as part of their WinS project in rural Bengal. She has also delivered training of trainers on SRHR, gender, sexuality and Menstruation for Tomorrow’s Foundation, Vikramshila Education Resource Society, Nirdhan trust and Micro Finance, Tollygunj Women In Need, Paint It Red in Kolkata.

        Now as an MH Fellow with YKA, she’s expanding her impressive scope of work further by launching a campaign to facilitate the process of ensuring better menstrual health and SRH services for women residing in correctional homes in West Bengal. The campaign will entail an independent study to take stalk of the present conditions of MHM in correctional homes across the state and use its findings to build public support and political will to take the necessary action.

        Saurabh has been associated with YKA as a user and has consistently been writing on the issue MHM and its intersectionality with other issues in the society. Now as an MHM Fellow with YKA, he’s launched the Right to Period campaign, which aims to ensure proper execution of MHM guidelines in Delhi’s schools.

        The long-term aim of the campaign is to develop an open culture where menstruation is not treated as a taboo. The campaign also seeks to hold the schools accountable for their responsibilities as an important component in the implementation of MHM policies by making adequate sanitation infrastructure and knowledge of MHM available in school premises.

        Read more about his campaign.

        Harshita is a psychologist and works to support people with mental health issues, particularly adolescents who are survivors of violence. Associated with the Azadi Foundation in UP, Harshita became an MHM Fellow with YKA, with the aim of promoting better menstrual health.

        Her campaign #MeriMarzi aims to promote menstrual health and wellness, hygiene and facilities for female sex workers in UP. She says, “Knowledge about natural body processes is a very basic human right. And for individuals whose occupation is providing sexual services, it becomes even more important.”

        Meri Marzi aims to ensure sensitised, non-discriminatory health workers for the needs of female sex workers in the Suraksha Clinics under the UPSACS (Uttar Pradesh State AIDS Control Society) program by creating more dialogues and garnering public support for the cause of sex workers’ menstrual rights. The campaign will also ensure interventions with sex workers to clear misconceptions around overall hygiene management to ensure that results flow both ways.

        Read more about her campaign.

        MH Fellow Sabna comes with significant experience working with a range of development issues. A co-founder of Project Sakhi Saheli, which aims to combat period poverty and break menstrual taboos, Sabna has, in the past, worked on the issue of menstruation in urban slums of Delhi with women and adolescent girls. She and her team also released MenstraBook, with menstrastories and organised Menstra Tlk in the Delhi School of Social Work to create more conversations on menstruation.

        With YKA MHM Fellow Vineet, Sabna launched Menstratalk, a campaign that aims to put an end to period poverty and smash menstrual taboos in society. As a start, the campaign aims to begin conversations on menstrual health with five hundred adolescents and youth in Delhi through offline platforms, and through this community mobilise support to create Period Friendly Institutions out of educational institutes in the city.

        Read more about her campaign. 

        A student from Delhi School of Social work, Vineet is a part of Project Sakhi Saheli, an initiative by the students of Delhi school of Social Work to create awareness on Menstrual Health and combat Period Poverty. Along with MHM Action Fellow Sabna, Vineet launched Menstratalk, a campaign that aims to put an end to period poverty and smash menstrual taboos in society.

        As a start, the campaign aims to begin conversations on menstrual health with five hundred adolescents and youth in Delhi through offline platforms, and through this community mobilise support to create Period Friendly Institutions out of educational institutes in the city.

        Find out more about the campaign here.

        A native of Bhagalpur district – Bihar, Shalini Jha believes in equal rights for all genders and wants to work for a gender-equal and just society. In the past she’s had a year-long association as a community leader with Haiyya: Organise for Action’s Health Over Stigma campaign. She’s pursuing a Master’s in Literature with Ambedkar University, Delhi and as an MHM Fellow with YKA, recently launched ‘Project अल्हड़ (Alharh)’.

        She says, “Bihar is ranked the lowest in India’s SDG Index 2019 for India. Hygienic and comfortable menstruation is a basic human right and sustainable development cannot be ensured if menstruators are deprived of their basic rights.” Project अल्हड़ (Alharh) aims to create a robust sensitised community in Bhagalpur to collectively spread awareness, break the taboo, debunk myths and initiate fearless conversations around menstruation. The campaign aims to reach at least 6000 adolescent girls from government and private schools in Baghalpur district in 2020.

        Read more about the campaign here.

        A psychologist and co-founder of a mental health NGO called Customize Cognition, Ritika forayed into the space of menstrual health and hygiene, sexual and reproductive healthcare and rights and gender equality as an MHM Fellow with YKA. She says, “The experience of working on MHM/SRHR and gender equality has been an enriching and eye-opening experience. I have learned what’s beneath the surface of the issue, be it awareness, lack of resources or disregard for trans men, who also menstruate.”

        The Transmen-ses campaign aims to tackle the issue of silence and disregard for trans men’s menstruation needs, by mobilising gender sensitive health professionals and gender neutral restrooms in Lucknow.

        Read more about the campaign here.

        A Computer Science engineer by education, Nitisha started her career in the corporate sector, before realising she wanted to work in the development and social justice space. Since then, she has worked with Teach For India and Care India and is from the founding batch of Indian School of Development Management (ISDM), a one of its kind organisation creating leaders for the development sector through its experiential learning post graduate program.

        As a Youth Ki Awaaz Menstrual Health Fellow, Nitisha has started Let’s Talk Period, a campaign to mobilise young people to switch to sustainable period products. She says, “80 lakh women in Delhi use non-biodegradable sanitary products, generate 3000 tonnes of menstrual waste, that takes 500-800 years to decompose; which in turn contributes to the health issues of all menstruators, increased burden of waste management on the city and harmful living environment for all citizens.

        Let’s Talk Period aims to change this by

        Find out more about her campaign here.

        Share your details to download the report.

        We promise not to spam or send irrelevant information.

        A former Assistant Secretary with the Ministry of Women and Child Development in West Bengal for three months, Lakshmi Bhavya has been championing the cause of menstrual hygiene in her district. By associating herself with the Lalana Campaign, a holistic menstrual hygiene awareness campaign which is conducted by the Anahat NGO, Lakshmi has been slowly breaking taboos when it comes to periods and menstrual hygiene.

        A Gender Rights Activist working with the tribal and marginalized communities in india, Srilekha is a PhD scholar working on understanding body and sexuality among tribal girls, to fill the gaps in research around indigenous women and their stories. Srilekha has worked extensively at the grassroots level with community based organisations, through several advocacy initiatives around Gender, Mental Health, Menstrual Hygiene and Sexual and Reproductive Health Rights (SRHR) for the indigenous in Jharkhand, over the last 6 years.

        Srilekha has also contributed to sustainable livelihood projects and legal aid programs for survivors of sex trafficking. She has been conducting research based programs on maternal health, mental health, gender based violence, sex and sexuality. Her interest lies in conducting workshops for young people on life skills, feminism, gender and sexuality, trauma, resilience and interpersonal relationships.

        A Guwahati-based college student pursuing her Masters in Tata Institute of Social Sciences, Bidisha started the #BleedwithDignity campaign on the technology platform, demanding that the Government of Assam install
        biodegradable sanitary pad vending machines in all government schools across the state. Her petition on has already gathered support from over 90000 people and continues to grow.

        Bidisha was selected in’s flagship program ‘She Creates Change’ having run successful online advocacy
        campaigns, which were widely recognised. Through the #BleedwithDignity campaign; she organised and celebrated World Menstrual Hygiene Day, 2019 in Guwahati, Assam by hosting a wall mural by collaborating with local organisations. The initiative was widely covered by national and local media, and the mural was later inaugurated by the event’s chief guest Commissioner of Guwahati Municipal Corporation (GMC) Debeswar Malakar, IAS.

        Sign up for the Youth Ki Awaaz Prime Ministerial Brief below