Dear Salman Khan fans,
It hasn’t been 72 hours since the judgement for your beloved “Bhai” has been out. He had reportedly killed two blackbucks back in 1998 and since then it has been twenty years, I wonder what took one simple plain decision twenty years. It was clear. The witnesses, the proof of gunshots etc. but what wasn’t in favour was the profile and status of the criminal, after all, he is “Bhai”.
What I don’t understand is, what makes you people stand by him and his “humanitarian” work, which I honestly feel is crap.
The last time when he was questioned for the same crime, it was back in 2006-2007. He had witnessed various ups and downs until then, which included his hit-and-run case and the poaching case too. He had allegedly ran over five people back in 2002 and was out clean for it, even if I agree with you people that it wasn’t him, (which I don’t want to!) let’s get down to some facts which does make sense and questions every good and bad act of his.
When in 1998, he had killed two blackbucks, which is not allowed under the Wildlife Protection Act of 1972. He dragged on until 2006, when the next hearing took place, amidst which, in 2002 he went down in the famous hit and run case. Before that I wonder, if he was influenced by any “acts of kindness or charity”. I wonder if he was always like this or was this entirely a propaganda to clean his image in the public eye.
His NGO, “Being Human”, was started in 2007. The moment when he realised that this could wash off his sins. Innumerable people around the world, get arrested and jailed for such acts. And had it been anyone but him, the person would’ve definitely not been bailed out of either of the two acts and certainly not on such lame humanitarian grounds that he is doing good to the society because wake up people, he’s just doing it for himself.
He is fully equipped to understand that he can fool people around him. That it’s easier to wash hands which are bloodstained by saving another life but what he needs to know is, it doesn’t happen that way. It isn’t about the blackbucks or the people, it’s about life. One cannot replace one life by saving another. It’s insane, to think like that, or make someone else believe in it, pleading for bail over this stance is unethical because, in the end, life is irreplaceable. You cannot, after all, kill a black buck and then save a dying dog and declare that you saved a life.
Wake up people, because under his veil of being an humanitarian he’s just building up a platform for bailing him from his crimes, one should never let that happen because even if he did a mistake, he cannot escape from punishment, just like nobody else can.
So, under the Indian Penal Code, let’s treat a crime, like a crime, and a criminal like a criminal and not God