This post has been self-published on Youth Ki Awaaz by Aditya Sharma. Just like them, anyone can publish on Youth Ki Awaaz.

Assam Mob Violence: Why Does An Act Of Lynching Become An Issue Of Ethnic Conflict?

More from Aditya Sharma

Ethnicity, religion, caste, gender are sanctioned categories of identification under the Modern State. We identify ourselves with these categories because of what social theorist Michel Foucault calls as the process of normalisation: the art of governmentality which disciplines us under categories for order and capacities of space.

In Assam, two youths were lynched by a mob. The victims were suspected to be child abductors based on rumours spread on social media. I am appalled at the news of the incident and sorry for the loss of human life. I discourage having a mob mentality. The law must hold the offenders accountable for their action. The issue now has become a matter of tension involving the possibility of violence between two groups of people: the group of the mob and the group of the men who were killed. Hate speech, targeted against the group of the slayer, is already doing rounds on social media.

In a few sentences, I have explained in brief the incident that currently grips Assam in tension. People fear possible violence, and a sense of anxiousness looms in the state. Three paragraphs over, I have not had the need to mention terms like ‘Assamese’ and ‘Karbi’ who are parties to the incident. Although a contested term, for the purpose of this writing, I take ‘Assamese’ to be the state identity of the people who live in Assam. The ‘Karbi’ people belong to the Karbi Anglong district of Assam. I have not had the need to identify the slain and the slayer with an identity that is territorialised and cultured. I do not intend to do so through the course of my writing. But why is everyone else doing so? Why does an act of lynching become an issue of ethnic conflict? Is our concept of ‘identity’ too narrow or too broad?

Nilotpal Das and Abhijeet Nath who were lynched to death in Karbi Anglong
Nilotpal Das and Abhijeet Nath who were lynched to death in Karbi Anglong.

In the Foucaldian sense, the State – not the apparatus of the government – conditions human life and endeavour in terms that it seems fit for its functionality. 18th century France conditioned its people through the architectural designs of its cities. The French built their cities in a manner that served the army. The roads and bridges are wide, serving the purpose of an instant army mobilisation in the event of an invasion. State protection became an integral part of their state ideology. 21st century America conditions its people through its mass media. Linguist Noam Chomsky has been a major proponent of the idea that America both manufactures consent and dissent through mass media. Commodity consumption conditions the West to lead global lifestyles. While piety drives the Middle East.

The Indian state, I argue, conditions its people through ‘identity’. It is an integral part of the state bureaucracy. The modern Indian state inherits its fragmented sense of ‘identity’ from a colonial past that founded its bureaucracy on the basis of divided identities of caste, tribe, and religion. The idea of the modern state finds strength in disciplining bodies in space and organising space for governmentality. Making categories and labels eases this process. The Census is an apt example of the essence of the Modern State which requires to survey people and resources in categories. The Census or identity cards issued by the government is one of the ways in which we are conditioned to identify ourselves by our ethnicities, by our tribes, by our regions, by religion, by our cities etc. The State used these categories to recognise us. Our identification is external to our awareness of the ‘self’ and the body.

‘Identity’, as I see it, is an empty term that waits to be given meaning. It finds meaning, for instance, in government records that legalize citizenship and give identity. For example, a community seeking Scheduled Tribe status may be only deemed a tribe if the State declares it to be, irrespective of its own sense of living that qualify the community to be one. The media and the economy use the State categorization because of its legitimacy and coherence with the State. ‘Identity’, thus, we may say, adds and loses meaning with historical continuity. However, it is applied to use without a thought in everyday language. We identify ourselves with State-sanctioned categories, not because the institutions that render it holds us together. We use ‘identity’, following the Colonial practice, to distinguish us from the ‘Other’.

Under the Colonial rule, the logic applied was this: what makes us British, does not make them Indian; so we must make a record of and organize by what makes them Indian. The logic applied now has been reversed: what makes us Indian is something that does not make them Indian. Or what makes me an ‘Assamese’, does not make him a ‘Karbi’. The attempt now is to valorise the ‘self’. This analogy is dangerous, given the circumstances.

In Assam, the recent ‘act’ of lynching deserves a certain degree of autonomy to it. However, it attains social significance by relating identity to it. The act of lynching becomes – slayer of ‘x’ and the slain of ‘y’. Once this ascription has been made – regardless of being at the beginning of the action or at the end of its consequences – the incident is branded with a certain value. Following this, any representations or misrepresentations of it carry the same value. The lynching, thus, becomes more a social and less an inhumane ‘act’ of violence. Rumour and mob mentality benefit the most from this ascription.

‘Identity’ as identification for an individual is the State sanctioned category that the media represents as legitimate for popular use, while our commodity consumption ascribes it ‘authentic’. This trinity is unholy. For, India has multiple categories of ‘identification’ to offer: by language, region, religion, ethnicity and tribe to name a few. I do not intend to suggest that people should not be identified by their ethnicity, language or region etc. Instead, I argue that these senses of ‘identity’ must not be used to identify people in acts of violence because it instigates unrest and a sense of threat, active or passive, from an imagined ‘other’. The ‘identity’ of the victim or the perpetrator holds target the entire group and not just the individual. The category of identification becomes the ‘identity’.

The social nature of the lynching in Assam is what gives it a trans-local meaning, although it is very much a local incident. In cities across India, the ‘identity’ of the mob that lynched the victims are under threat of an attack. Messages offering refuge to ‘offender group’ are circulating across Facebook and WhatsApp. The victims are survived by an angry lot who see the death of the two youths as an attack on their ‘identity’. There emerges the need to ‘avenge’ the dead and protect ‘identity’. The incident moves towards the possibility of becoming an issue of ‘ethnic’ violence.

The argument I am hoping to make sense of is this: we must learn to see this ‘act’ of lynching as ‘x’ slaying ‘y’. This conscious localisation becomes significant in reducing implications the act may have on the social group as a whole, while inculcating a shared sense of blame or suffering.  The argument that I make is not a eureka thought. But I felt the need to explain it in a manner easy for comprehension. I do not intend to please the academic or the intellectuals. I hope to make sense to those who do not read this. And you, the reader, are an important medium.

How can we avoid identification with ‘identity’? Well, we cannot. Not without conscious thought and action, at the least. Our rationality considers it normal to identify each other based on categories our society has been ordered into. These categories are social constructions. The point is not to suggest that we dismiss the State and thus its categories to free us from the unholy trinity of State, media, and economy. This categorization, as anthropologist Veena Das would call it, at the ‘margins of the State’ is useful for us to avail State services and benefits. It is also a means of awareness of the ‘self’, of ‘personhood’. Instead, we need to be careful about how we ‘see’ and ‘represent’ action.

Political anthropologist James Scott opines that ‘seeing like a State’ helps us to know the way the State organises resource and standardizes behaviour, but adopting the same perspective into everyday lives may be detrimental. We must be careful to separate the social from the visible. To see human action objectively by separating ‘identity’ from it is not to provide partial (bias) facts or subject phenomena to partiality (incomplete). To be objective is to be conscious about separating the values that the uncle who talks news in the market and the aunty who shares her opinion on Facebook give to the incident.

Media representations play a major role in this attempt for separation. For, it is a source of legitimacy for categories of the State. Yes, such practice would make news reporting lack substance because opinion is free and not neutral. Any attempt to separate the social from the visible will lead to, thus, for lack of a better term, a hollow enterprise. Nevertheless, we benefit from this separation by escaping rumour, gossip, and conversation that target groups as a whole. Chances of misrepresentation and interpretations of the lynching incident that take ‘identity’ as identification may be avoided. We are far from attaining this goal, but we must try to take small steps. And to be aware of it is the first step. The next is yours to make.

I mourn the death of the youth. I seek justice for them. I look down upon those who committed the crime. And I discourage the mob who represent the incident with their interest. Rhetorically, that ‘actions speak louder than words’ best represents what I hope to convey.

You must be to comment.

More from Aditya Sharma

Similar Posts

By Apurv Raj

By IMPRI Impact and Policy Research Institute

By Ritwik Trivedi

Wondering what to write about?

Here are some topics to get you started

Share your details to download the report.

We promise not to spam or send irrelevant information.

Share your details to download the report.

We promise not to spam or send irrelevant information.

An ambassador and trained facilitator under Eco Femme (a social enterprise working towards menstrual health in south India), Sanjina is also an active member of the MHM Collective- India and Menstrual Health Alliance- India. She has conducted Menstrual Health sessions in multiple government schools adopted by Rotary District 3240 as part of their WinS project in rural Bengal. She has also delivered training of trainers on SRHR, gender, sexuality and Menstruation for Tomorrow’s Foundation, Vikramshila Education Resource Society, Nirdhan trust and Micro Finance, Tollygunj Women In Need, Paint It Red in Kolkata.

Now as an MH Fellow with YKA, she’s expanding her impressive scope of work further by launching a campaign to facilitate the process of ensuring better menstrual health and SRH services for women residing in correctional homes in West Bengal. The campaign will entail an independent study to take stalk of the present conditions of MHM in correctional homes across the state and use its findings to build public support and political will to take the necessary action.

Saurabh has been associated with YKA as a user and has consistently been writing on the issue MHM and its intersectionality with other issues in the society. Now as an MHM Fellow with YKA, he’s launched the Right to Period campaign, which aims to ensure proper execution of MHM guidelines in Delhi’s schools.

The long-term aim of the campaign is to develop an open culture where menstruation is not treated as a taboo. The campaign also seeks to hold the schools accountable for their responsibilities as an important component in the implementation of MHM policies by making adequate sanitation infrastructure and knowledge of MHM available in school premises.

Read more about his campaign.

Harshita is a psychologist and works to support people with mental health issues, particularly adolescents who are survivors of violence. Associated with the Azadi Foundation in UP, Harshita became an MHM Fellow with YKA, with the aim of promoting better menstrual health.

Her campaign #MeriMarzi aims to promote menstrual health and wellness, hygiene and facilities for female sex workers in UP. She says, “Knowledge about natural body processes is a very basic human right. And for individuals whose occupation is providing sexual services, it becomes even more important.”

Meri Marzi aims to ensure sensitised, non-discriminatory health workers for the needs of female sex workers in the Suraksha Clinics under the UPSACS (Uttar Pradesh State AIDS Control Society) program by creating more dialogues and garnering public support for the cause of sex workers’ menstrual rights. The campaign will also ensure interventions with sex workers to clear misconceptions around overall hygiene management to ensure that results flow both ways.

Read more about her campaign.

MH Fellow Sabna comes with significant experience working with a range of development issues. A co-founder of Project Sakhi Saheli, which aims to combat period poverty and break menstrual taboos, Sabna has, in the past, worked on the issue of menstruation in urban slums of Delhi with women and adolescent girls. She and her team also released MenstraBook, with menstrastories and organised Menstra Tlk in the Delhi School of Social Work to create more conversations on menstruation.

With YKA MHM Fellow Vineet, Sabna launched Menstratalk, a campaign that aims to put an end to period poverty and smash menstrual taboos in society. As a start, the campaign aims to begin conversations on menstrual health with five hundred adolescents and youth in Delhi through offline platforms, and through this community mobilise support to create Period Friendly Institutions out of educational institutes in the city.

Read more about her campaign. 

A student from Delhi School of Social work, Vineet is a part of Project Sakhi Saheli, an initiative by the students of Delhi school of Social Work to create awareness on Menstrual Health and combat Period Poverty. Along with MHM Action Fellow Sabna, Vineet launched Menstratalk, a campaign that aims to put an end to period poverty and smash menstrual taboos in society.

As a start, the campaign aims to begin conversations on menstrual health with five hundred adolescents and youth in Delhi through offline platforms, and through this community mobilise support to create Period Friendly Institutions out of educational institutes in the city.

Find out more about the campaign here.

A native of Bhagalpur district – Bihar, Shalini Jha believes in equal rights for all genders and wants to work for a gender-equal and just society. In the past she’s had a year-long association as a community leader with Haiyya: Organise for Action’s Health Over Stigma campaign. She’s pursuing a Master’s in Literature with Ambedkar University, Delhi and as an MHM Fellow with YKA, recently launched ‘Project अल्हड़ (Alharh)’.

She says, “Bihar is ranked the lowest in India’s SDG Index 2019 for India. Hygienic and comfortable menstruation is a basic human right and sustainable development cannot be ensured if menstruators are deprived of their basic rights.” Project अल्हड़ (Alharh) aims to create a robust sensitised community in Bhagalpur to collectively spread awareness, break the taboo, debunk myths and initiate fearless conversations around menstruation. The campaign aims to reach at least 6000 adolescent girls from government and private schools in Baghalpur district in 2020.

Read more about the campaign here.

A psychologist and co-founder of a mental health NGO called Customize Cognition, Ritika forayed into the space of menstrual health and hygiene, sexual and reproductive healthcare and rights and gender equality as an MHM Fellow with YKA. She says, “The experience of working on MHM/SRHR and gender equality has been an enriching and eye-opening experience. I have learned what’s beneath the surface of the issue, be it awareness, lack of resources or disregard for trans men, who also menstruate.”

The Transmen-ses campaign aims to tackle the issue of silence and disregard for trans men’s menstruation needs, by mobilising gender sensitive health professionals and gender neutral restrooms in Lucknow.

Read more about the campaign here.

A Computer Science engineer by education, Nitisha started her career in the corporate sector, before realising she wanted to work in the development and social justice space. Since then, she has worked with Teach For India and Care India and is from the founding batch of Indian School of Development Management (ISDM), a one of its kind organisation creating leaders for the development sector through its experiential learning post graduate program.

As a Youth Ki Awaaz Menstrual Health Fellow, Nitisha has started Let’s Talk Period, a campaign to mobilise young people to switch to sustainable period products. She says, “80 lakh women in Delhi use non-biodegradable sanitary products, generate 3000 tonnes of menstrual waste, that takes 500-800 years to decompose; which in turn contributes to the health issues of all menstruators, increased burden of waste management on the city and harmful living environment for all citizens.

Let’s Talk Period aims to change this by

Find out more about her campaign here.

Share your details to download the report.

We promise not to spam or send irrelevant information.

A former Assistant Secretary with the Ministry of Women and Child Development in West Bengal for three months, Lakshmi Bhavya has been championing the cause of menstrual hygiene in her district. By associating herself with the Lalana Campaign, a holistic menstrual hygiene awareness campaign which is conducted by the Anahat NGO, Lakshmi has been slowly breaking taboos when it comes to periods and menstrual hygiene.

A Gender Rights Activist working with the tribal and marginalized communities in india, Srilekha is a PhD scholar working on understanding body and sexuality among tribal girls, to fill the gaps in research around indigenous women and their stories. Srilekha has worked extensively at the grassroots level with community based organisations, through several advocacy initiatives around Gender, Mental Health, Menstrual Hygiene and Sexual and Reproductive Health Rights (SRHR) for the indigenous in Jharkhand, over the last 6 years.

Srilekha has also contributed to sustainable livelihood projects and legal aid programs for survivors of sex trafficking. She has been conducting research based programs on maternal health, mental health, gender based violence, sex and sexuality. Her interest lies in conducting workshops for young people on life skills, feminism, gender and sexuality, trauma, resilience and interpersonal relationships.

A Guwahati-based college student pursuing her Masters in Tata Institute of Social Sciences, Bidisha started the #BleedwithDignity campaign on the technology platform, demanding that the Government of Assam install
biodegradable sanitary pad vending machines in all government schools across the state. Her petition on has already gathered support from over 90000 people and continues to grow.

Bidisha was selected in’s flagship program ‘She Creates Change’ having run successful online advocacy
campaigns, which were widely recognised. Through the #BleedwithDignity campaign; she organised and celebrated World Menstrual Hygiene Day, 2019 in Guwahati, Assam by hosting a wall mural by collaborating with local organisations. The initiative was widely covered by national and local media, and the mural was later inaugurated by the event’s chief guest Commissioner of Guwahati Municipal Corporation (GMC) Debeswar Malakar, IAS.

Sign up for the Youth Ki Awaaz Prime Ministerial Brief below