This post has been self-published on Youth Ki Awaaz by India Ink. Just like them, anyone can publish on Youth Ki Awaaz.

“Any Contributions That The British Made To India Were At Best Window-Dressing”

More from India Ink

A Review Of Shashi Tharoor’s Inglorious Empire – What The British Did To India

Conversations about the effects of colonialism in the subcontinent often play out like a Monty Python sketch. Ask  “what have the British ever done for us?” and invariably you will hear  “well absolutely nothing …except of course for the civil service….and the rule of law…and parliamentary democracy” and so the list goes. In Inglorious Empire – What the British did to India, Shashi Tharoor presents a searing critique of  exactly such justifications of the Empire, and a much needed corrective to a growing revisionist colonial historiography (most notably Niall Ferguson’s Empire, and to some extent Lawrence James’ Rise and Fall of the British Empire). Building on a speech made by Tharoor at a debate at the Oxford Union, the book argues that any contributions that the British made to India’s political, legal, economic and social institutions were at best window-dressing, and at worst a means to a more efficient way to loot the country’s resources.

Inglorious Empire is the strongest when the book is focused on the economic devastation wrecked by colonialism. When British traders arrived in the subcontinent in the 17th century, the region accounted for roughly a quarter of the world’s economy. By the time the British left in 1947, India’s share of global GDP had dropped to a paltry 3%. Tharoor  forcefully argues against the notion that India’s medieval economy would not have survived industrialization in the West, with or without colonialism. In his telling, the British strategically destroyed Indian textiles, stymied efforts at industrialization by using taxes and tariffs as weapons to weaken nascent Indian firms (most notably in steel), and bankrupted a superior ship-building industry. They engineered in its place a rural, agrarian economy focused on producing raw materials and food grains for the Empire.  Without colonialism, India, a sophisticated economy made up of highly prized textiles, skilled artisans, master ship builders and traders might have experienced its own process of industrialization. Importantly, it might have been spared decades upon decades of lethal famines and Imperial indifference to death and disease that killed millions.

In an excellent chapter titled “Divide et Impera”, Tharoor succinctly lists the many ways in which the British strategically played on caste and religious divisions within Indian society to limit opposition, leading up to the partition of India and Pakistan. At the end of the chapter Tharoor notes:

“If Britain’s greatest accomplishment was the creation of a single political unit called India, fulfilling the aspirations of visionary emperors from Ashoka to Akbar, then its greatest failure must be the shambles of that original Brexit — cutting and running from the land they had claimed to rule for its betterment, leaving behind a million dead, thirteen million displacd, billions of rupees of property destroyed, and the flames of communal hatred blazing hotly across the ravaged land. No greater indictment of the failures of British rule in India can be found than the tragic manner of its ending.” 

But what about the numerous institutions the British built in India? Where people see “law and order”, Tharoor sees a legal system created primarily for the benefit of the British and actively used by them to suppress dissent amongst Indians. Where historians see the introduction of property rights, taxation (often viewed as essential for development) and an expert civil service credited as being an “iron backbone”, he sees  racist Imperial administrators and ruthless extraction. He recounts how talented Indians, who passed difficult civil service examinations, were prevented from serving at senior levels in the colonial administration because it would require white British employees to answer to an Indian. Centuries of colonialism destroyed human capital amongst Indians.

Tharoor also discounts efforts made by the British to introduce limited self-governing institutions through the Montagu-Chelmsford reforms in 1917 (a mere paragraph is dedicated to these reforms which he views as window-dressing).  In this way, Tharoor expertly catalogues and summarily dismisses key colonial-era “accomplishments”, going so far as to say that the parliamentary style of democracy inherited by an independent India is unsuited for its people.

In presenting a highly critical account of late colonialism, Tharoor also presents a Congress-centric one. Take his dismissive attitude towards the Montagu-Chelmsford reforms. The introduction of limited self-government and the first franchise expansion set into play competitive party politics in a number of Indian provinces. In the Madras Presidency, a region where upper-caste Brahmins dominated the British bureaucracy and the nominated Morley-Minto legislative councils, the reforms gave life to the Non-Brahmin  Justice Party and served as a means for new groups to enter politics. The political leaders of the Justice Party were acutely aware of caste-based inequities in the colonial administration, actively lobbied the British to hold elections, and refused to participate in the election boycott called for by the Congress. The Justice party went on to win all four elections held under limited franchise rules, and re-merged in the post-Independence period in the guise of the Dravida Kazhagam (later Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam – DMK). This period of incubation therefore enabled the development of parties with a long-term impact on politics and presented an early challenge to Congress dominance in the Indian states.  While I take on board Tharoor’s contention that the British didn’t actively design institutions for the benefit of Indians, I also disagree that they were all created in bad faith.

Tharoor impressively brings together evidence by historians, political scientists and sociologists on the colonial manufacturing of ethnic divisions. In doing so, he takes seriously the role of the decennial census in both collecting information about a state’s subjects and in engineering its politics. But he also glosses over accounts of how upper-caste Indians were lobbying the British to adopt caste-based discrimination in Indian schools and bureaucracy.  For example, the Board for College and Public Instruction in Madras, responding to a petition by a scheduled caste student, finds:

“The Board…have not felt it right to decide of themselves whether a person of this class shall be admitted as a scholar, in consequence of the strong repugnance evinced by the native [Brahman] headmasters to give instruction to Pariahs [depressed or scheduled castes], and the knowledge that Hindoos of caste would consider their prejudices, interfered with, were Pariahs taught in the same classes, with themselves…(Public Consultations, vol 618, January 24, 1834.)”

Contentious caste politics in his telling was a linear outcome of a caste-based census, the British obsession with cataloguing race-based physical and cultural distinctions, and their willingness to let Brahmins run amok in the British bureaucracy. But by relying on such a narrative he diminishes the impact of pre-colonial social arrangements and the active agency of the upper-castes in trying to maintain their caste-based status both within and outside the colonial state.

What can social scientists take away from Tharoor’s riveting book? First, Chapter 1 aptly titled the “Looting of India” will make an excellent addition to a syllabus on the Indian political economy. Second, the book opens up several possibilities for future research.  It reinforces the importance of taking more seriously provincial and temporal variations in colonial-era institutions. Current day political science is actively working in this area through its study of land tenure systems, tax systems, the civil service, political parties, caste politics, and elections and how they shaped development in the Indian states after independence.  The book also highlights the importance of studying how contemporaneous domestic British politics shaped colonial institutions. Finally, and perhaps most importantly, the next time anyone jokingly asks “what have the British ever done for us” you can throw this book at them.

Pavithra Suryanarayan is an Assistant Professor at the School of Advanced International Studies at Johns Hopkins University. She studies ethnic inequality, bureaucratic capacity, and political behavior in the Indian states. Pavi’s papers have been accepted for publication in Comparative Political Studies, The Journal of Politics, World Politics, and the American Journal of Political Science amongst others. She is currently working on a book on how concerns about caste status shaped re-distributive politics in Colonial India.

You must be to comment.
  1. Nata Rajan

    Absolute rubbish. He suppreses the fact how the Brahmins colluded with the British and ran mini empire everywhere and crushed the Non Brahmins . Evidences are aplenty. It is the chaturvarna bent of mind of the Brahmin invaders that crushed the human capital of the sub-continent much more than the other invaders.

More from India Ink

Similar Posts

By sukanya deogam

By Simran Poptani

By Nachi

Wondering what to write about?

Here are some topics to get you started

Share your details to download the report.

We promise not to spam or send irrelevant information.

Share your details to download the report.

We promise not to spam or send irrelevant information.

An ambassador and trained facilitator under Eco Femme (a social enterprise working towards menstrual health in south India), Sanjina is also an active member of the MHM Collective- India and Menstrual Health Alliance- India. She has conducted Menstrual Health sessions in multiple government schools adopted by Rotary District 3240 as part of their WinS project in rural Bengal. She has also delivered training of trainers on SRHR, gender, sexuality and Menstruation for Tomorrow’s Foundation, Vikramshila Education Resource Society, Nirdhan trust and Micro Finance, Tollygunj Women In Need, Paint It Red in Kolkata.

Now as an MH Fellow with YKA, she’s expanding her impressive scope of work further by launching a campaign to facilitate the process of ensuring better menstrual health and SRH services for women residing in correctional homes in West Bengal. The campaign will entail an independent study to take stalk of the present conditions of MHM in correctional homes across the state and use its findings to build public support and political will to take the necessary action.

Saurabh has been associated with YKA as a user and has consistently been writing on the issue MHM and its intersectionality with other issues in the society. Now as an MHM Fellow with YKA, he’s launched the Right to Period campaign, which aims to ensure proper execution of MHM guidelines in Delhi’s schools.

The long-term aim of the campaign is to develop an open culture where menstruation is not treated as a taboo. The campaign also seeks to hold the schools accountable for their responsibilities as an important component in the implementation of MHM policies by making adequate sanitation infrastructure and knowledge of MHM available in school premises.

Read more about his campaign.

Harshita is a psychologist and works to support people with mental health issues, particularly adolescents who are survivors of violence. Associated with the Azadi Foundation in UP, Harshita became an MHM Fellow with YKA, with the aim of promoting better menstrual health.

Her campaign #MeriMarzi aims to promote menstrual health and wellness, hygiene and facilities for female sex workers in UP. She says, “Knowledge about natural body processes is a very basic human right. And for individuals whose occupation is providing sexual services, it becomes even more important.”

Meri Marzi aims to ensure sensitised, non-discriminatory health workers for the needs of female sex workers in the Suraksha Clinics under the UPSACS (Uttar Pradesh State AIDS Control Society) program by creating more dialogues and garnering public support for the cause of sex workers’ menstrual rights. The campaign will also ensure interventions with sex workers to clear misconceptions around overall hygiene management to ensure that results flow both ways.

Read more about her campaign.

MH Fellow Sabna comes with significant experience working with a range of development issues. A co-founder of Project Sakhi Saheli, which aims to combat period poverty and break menstrual taboos, Sabna has, in the past, worked on the issue of menstruation in urban slums of Delhi with women and adolescent girls. She and her team also released MenstraBook, with menstrastories and organised Menstra Tlk in the Delhi School of Social Work to create more conversations on menstruation.

With YKA MHM Fellow Vineet, Sabna launched Menstratalk, a campaign that aims to put an end to period poverty and smash menstrual taboos in society. As a start, the campaign aims to begin conversations on menstrual health with five hundred adolescents and youth in Delhi through offline platforms, and through this community mobilise support to create Period Friendly Institutions out of educational institutes in the city.

Read more about her campaign. 

A student from Delhi School of Social work, Vineet is a part of Project Sakhi Saheli, an initiative by the students of Delhi school of Social Work to create awareness on Menstrual Health and combat Period Poverty. Along with MHM Action Fellow Sabna, Vineet launched Menstratalk, a campaign that aims to put an end to period poverty and smash menstrual taboos in society.

As a start, the campaign aims to begin conversations on menstrual health with five hundred adolescents and youth in Delhi through offline platforms, and through this community mobilise support to create Period Friendly Institutions out of educational institutes in the city.

Find out more about the campaign here.

A native of Bhagalpur district – Bihar, Shalini Jha believes in equal rights for all genders and wants to work for a gender-equal and just society. In the past she’s had a year-long association as a community leader with Haiyya: Organise for Action’s Health Over Stigma campaign. She’s pursuing a Master’s in Literature with Ambedkar University, Delhi and as an MHM Fellow with YKA, recently launched ‘Project अल्हड़ (Alharh)’.

She says, “Bihar is ranked the lowest in India’s SDG Index 2019 for India. Hygienic and comfortable menstruation is a basic human right and sustainable development cannot be ensured if menstruators are deprived of their basic rights.” Project अल्हड़ (Alharh) aims to create a robust sensitised community in Bhagalpur to collectively spread awareness, break the taboo, debunk myths and initiate fearless conversations around menstruation. The campaign aims to reach at least 6000 adolescent girls from government and private schools in Baghalpur district in 2020.

Read more about the campaign here.

A psychologist and co-founder of a mental health NGO called Customize Cognition, Ritika forayed into the space of menstrual health and hygiene, sexual and reproductive healthcare and rights and gender equality as an MHM Fellow with YKA. She says, “The experience of working on MHM/SRHR and gender equality has been an enriching and eye-opening experience. I have learned what’s beneath the surface of the issue, be it awareness, lack of resources or disregard for trans men, who also menstruate.”

The Transmen-ses campaign aims to tackle the issue of silence and disregard for trans men’s menstruation needs, by mobilising gender sensitive health professionals and gender neutral restrooms in Lucknow.

Read more about the campaign here.

A Computer Science engineer by education, Nitisha started her career in the corporate sector, before realising she wanted to work in the development and social justice space. Since then, she has worked with Teach For India and Care India and is from the founding batch of Indian School of Development Management (ISDM), a one of its kind organisation creating leaders for the development sector through its experiential learning post graduate program.

As a Youth Ki Awaaz Menstrual Health Fellow, Nitisha has started Let’s Talk Period, a campaign to mobilise young people to switch to sustainable period products. She says, “80 lakh women in Delhi use non-biodegradable sanitary products, generate 3000 tonnes of menstrual waste, that takes 500-800 years to decompose; which in turn contributes to the health issues of all menstruators, increased burden of waste management on the city and harmful living environment for all citizens.

Let’s Talk Period aims to change this by

Find out more about her campaign here.

Share your details to download the report.

We promise not to spam or send irrelevant information.

A former Assistant Secretary with the Ministry of Women and Child Development in West Bengal for three months, Lakshmi Bhavya has been championing the cause of menstrual hygiene in her district. By associating herself with the Lalana Campaign, a holistic menstrual hygiene awareness campaign which is conducted by the Anahat NGO, Lakshmi has been slowly breaking taboos when it comes to periods and menstrual hygiene.

A Gender Rights Activist working with the tribal and marginalized communities in india, Srilekha is a PhD scholar working on understanding body and sexuality among tribal girls, to fill the gaps in research around indigenous women and their stories. Srilekha has worked extensively at the grassroots level with community based organisations, through several advocacy initiatives around Gender, Mental Health, Menstrual Hygiene and Sexual and Reproductive Health Rights (SRHR) for the indigenous in Jharkhand, over the last 6 years.

Srilekha has also contributed to sustainable livelihood projects and legal aid programs for survivors of sex trafficking. She has been conducting research based programs on maternal health, mental health, gender based violence, sex and sexuality. Her interest lies in conducting workshops for young people on life skills, feminism, gender and sexuality, trauma, resilience and interpersonal relationships.

A Guwahati-based college student pursuing her Masters in Tata Institute of Social Sciences, Bidisha started the #BleedwithDignity campaign on the technology platform, demanding that the Government of Assam install
biodegradable sanitary pad vending machines in all government schools across the state. Her petition on has already gathered support from over 90000 people and continues to grow.

Bidisha was selected in’s flagship program ‘She Creates Change’ having run successful online advocacy
campaigns, which were widely recognised. Through the #BleedwithDignity campaign; she organised and celebrated World Menstrual Hygiene Day, 2019 in Guwahati, Assam by hosting a wall mural by collaborating with local organisations. The initiative was widely covered by national and local media, and the mural was later inaugurated by the event’s chief guest Commissioner of Guwahati Municipal Corporation (GMC) Debeswar Malakar, IAS.

Sign up for the Youth Ki Awaaz Prime Ministerial Brief below