This post has been self-published on Youth Ki Awaaz by Areeb Uddin. Just like them, anyone can publish on Youth Ki Awaaz.

From 1860 Till 2018: Centuries Of Homophobia Have Given Us Section 377

More from Areeb Uddin

The Indian Penal Code was drafted in 1860, with little change since then. Change is a constant. Society itself is changing. Section 377 of the Code, was made to tackle against the unnatural offenses. Here we are in 2018, with an unchanged law that affects a particular community. And it shouldn’t matter if they are 50% or 0.01% of the population.

Unnatural offences—Whoever voluntarily has carnal intercourse against the order of nature with any man, woman or animal, shall be punished with imprisonment for life, or with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to ten years, and shall also be liable to fine.”

Explanation—Penetration is sufficient to constitute the carnal intercourse necessary to the offence described in this section.

‘Against The Order Of Nature’

When we read the provision, something which would be against the order of nature has not been defined in the code anywhere. It’s the 21st century we are living. Human Rights should be our apex concern, the section prohibits even consensual intercourse between two adult individuals.

The Buggery Act

In 1533, the Buggery Act was passed under the reign of King Henry VII and the topic of sodomy shifted to the powers of the State. The act targeted different aspects which were related to sex between men and men, men and women, and with animals too. The punishment under the act was death, and it was well implemented at that period.

The Legal Battle Against Section 377 

In 1991, a Non-Governmental Organization named AIDS Bedbhav Virodhi Andolan became concerned about male sexual health, particularly HIV issues. A report at that time indicated that how section 377 of the Indian Penal Code violates Article 21 of our Constitution. At that time, sexual acts between men inside Tihar jail was increasing. India Today reportedWhere does a condom belong? That’s the issue before a bench of the Delhi High Court this month. A writ petition filed by the AIDS Bhedbhav Virodhi Andolan (ABVA), an AIDS activist group, is demanding that condoms be made available to the inmates of Tihar Jail in New Delhi. The petition also challenges the notorious Section 377 of the IPC, a 160-year-old clause outlawing homosexual acts.”

In the year 2001, Naz Foundation, an NGO, filed a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) in the High Court of Delhi for the rights of queer people in the country. The PIL demanded the decriminalisation of gay sex among consenting adults. The foundation was laid.

In the year 2004, the High Court of Delhi rejected the PIL, calling it an ‘academic’ matter, requiring research. Activists filed a review petition, but it was also dismissed by the High Court later that year. The last step of the ladder was to approach the Supreme Court.

The Supreme Court of India directed the High court to reconsider. The petition was opposed by politician B. P. Singhal. His plea was accepted by the High Court to oppose the decriminalization of gay sex.

But other politicians had different views.

Rahul Gandhi said, “I personally believe that these are matters of personal freedom. I think, I would agree more with High Court verdict.” And Shashi Tharoor said, “The Supreme Court has urged Parliament to delete Section 377 from the statute book. As an MP, I am strongly in favour of doing so.” There was also Prashant Bhushan, who remarked, “It was a ‘big day’ for liberal values in the country.”

‘Naz Foundation versus Union of India’, the case in the year 2009, was a remarkable moment for the activists who were supporting the movement against the injustice done with the LGBTQ community. The Delhi High Court judgment in the case stated:

“We declare that Section 377 IPC, insofar it criminalizes consensual sexual acts of adults in private, is violative of Articles 21, 14 and 15 of the Constitution. The provisions of Section 377 IPC will continue to govern non-consensual penile non-vaginal sex and penile non-vaginal sex involving minors. By ‘adult’ we mean everyone who is 18 years of age and above. A person below 18 would be presumed not to be able to consent to a sexual act. This clarification will hold till, of course, Parliament chooses to amend the law to effectuate the recommendation of the Law Commission of India in its 172nd Report which we believe removes a great deal of confusion. Secondly, we clarify that our judgment will not result in the re-opening of criminal cases involving Section 377 IPC that have already attained finality.”

In the year 2012, the Supreme Court came into the frame and reviewed the matter once again. In 2013 the Supreme Court of India re-criminalized Section 377, stating that the High Court had given vague reasons for the infringement of rights contended by the petitioners. This decision was unexpected. The petitioners along with activists filed a review petition to look into the matter yet again. Meanwhile the central government also filed a review petition in opposition, but the apex court dismissed the review petition and rejected the plea. But ultimately, the court stated“We hold that Section 377 IPC does not suffer from the vice of unconstitutionality and the declaration made by the Division Bench of the High court is legally unsustainable.”

Justifying its ruling, it said, “The High Court overlooked that a miniscule fraction of the country’s population constitute lesbians, gays, bisexuals or transgender and in last more than 150 years, less than 200 persons have been prosecuted for committing offence under Section 377.”

But lawyer Anand Grover, who appeared for Naz Foundation was extremely disappointed with the judgment. He said“The Supreme Court has taken 21 months to tell the lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender persons that they are criminals in the eyes of the law. The movement for LGBT (lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender) equality is unstoppable, rooted as it is in the dignity and resilience of the LGBT persons. We will be filing a review of the present decision as soon as it is available.”

The year 2016 marked a positive beginning for the activists because the Supreme Court would likely hear new curative petitions, which were referred to a larger bench.

The year 2017 delivered a landmark judgment related to privacy. In August 2017, in the case of (Retired) Justice Puttaswamy versus Union of India, it was stated that Right to Privacy is a Fundamental Right. The nine judge bench stated “Right to Privacy is an integral part of Right to Life and Personal Liberty guaranteed in Article 21 of the Indian Constitution.”

Part of the judgment read: “The test of popular acceptance does not furnish a valid basis to disregard rights which are conferred with the sanctity of constitutional protection.  Discrete and insular minorities face grave dangers of discrimination for the simple reason that their views, beliefs or way of life does not accord with the ‘mainstream’. Yet in a democratic constitution founded on the rule of law, their rights are as sacred as those conferred on other citizens to protect their freedoms and liberties. Sexual orientation is an essential attribute of privacy. Discrimination against an individual on the basis of sexual orientation is deeply offensive to the dignity and self-worth of the individual.  Equality demands that the sexual orientation of each individual in society must be protected on an even platform. The right to privacy and the protection of sexual orientation lie at the core of the fundamental rights guaranteed by Articles 14, 15 and 21 of the constitution… [LGBT] rights are not so-called but are real rights founded on sound constitutional doctrine. They inhere in the right to life. They dwell in privacy and dignity. They constitute the essence of liberty and freedom. Sexual orientation is an essential component of identity. Equal protection demands protection of the identity of every individual without discrimination.”

2018 marked new hearings in the month of July. The submissions made by both of the parties were heard the Apex Court and the Supreme Court has reserved the same for the judgment.

There is still another aspect in the debate on striking down Section 377 as unconstitutionalanimal abuse. The court in this matter should keep in mind the dignity of animals too, if the whole section would be held unconstitutional, then it would be a blunder for the latter.

In January 2018, the year started with an unusual incident. Two cows were tied up with a rope and raped. Most recently, a pregnant goat was sexually abused by eight men in Haryana, which resulted in the death of the animal. It was not only one life which was taken away. Two lives were finished by men which police believed were ‘intoxicated. The accused were charged under Section 377  and Section 429 of the Indian Penal Code. These are only two cases which indicate how will the removal of Section 377 will affect lives. But, while protecting animals, Section 377 should be altered. Because consenting intercourse between two individuals in the 21st century should not be a crime anymore.

You must be to comment.

More from Areeb Uddin

Similar Posts

By Rohit Malik

By Sas3 Tranimal

By Jeet

Wondering what to write about?

Here are some topics to get you started

Share your details to download the report.

We promise not to spam or send irrelevant information.

Share your details to download the report.

We promise not to spam or send irrelevant information.

An ambassador and trained facilitator under Eco Femme (a social enterprise working towards menstrual health in south India), Sanjina is also an active member of the MHM Collective- India and Menstrual Health Alliance- India. She has conducted Menstrual Health sessions in multiple government schools adopted by Rotary District 3240 as part of their WinS project in rural Bengal. She has also delivered training of trainers on SRHR, gender, sexuality and Menstruation for Tomorrow’s Foundation, Vikramshila Education Resource Society, Nirdhan trust and Micro Finance, Tollygunj Women In Need, Paint It Red in Kolkata.

Now as an MH Fellow with YKA, she’s expanding her impressive scope of work further by launching a campaign to facilitate the process of ensuring better menstrual health and SRH services for women residing in correctional homes in West Bengal. The campaign will entail an independent study to take stalk of the present conditions of MHM in correctional homes across the state and use its findings to build public support and political will to take the necessary action.

Saurabh has been associated with YKA as a user and has consistently been writing on the issue MHM and its intersectionality with other issues in the society. Now as an MHM Fellow with YKA, he’s launched the Right to Period campaign, which aims to ensure proper execution of MHM guidelines in Delhi’s schools.

The long-term aim of the campaign is to develop an open culture where menstruation is not treated as a taboo. The campaign also seeks to hold the schools accountable for their responsibilities as an important component in the implementation of MHM policies by making adequate sanitation infrastructure and knowledge of MHM available in school premises.

Read more about his campaign.

Harshita is a psychologist and works to support people with mental health issues, particularly adolescents who are survivors of violence. Associated with the Azadi Foundation in UP, Harshita became an MHM Fellow with YKA, with the aim of promoting better menstrual health.

Her campaign #MeriMarzi aims to promote menstrual health and wellness, hygiene and facilities for female sex workers in UP. She says, “Knowledge about natural body processes is a very basic human right. And for individuals whose occupation is providing sexual services, it becomes even more important.”

Meri Marzi aims to ensure sensitised, non-discriminatory health workers for the needs of female sex workers in the Suraksha Clinics under the UPSACS (Uttar Pradesh State AIDS Control Society) program by creating more dialogues and garnering public support for the cause of sex workers’ menstrual rights. The campaign will also ensure interventions with sex workers to clear misconceptions around overall hygiene management to ensure that results flow both ways.

Read more about her campaign.

MH Fellow Sabna comes with significant experience working with a range of development issues. A co-founder of Project Sakhi Saheli, which aims to combat period poverty and break menstrual taboos, Sabna has, in the past, worked on the issue of menstruation in urban slums of Delhi with women and adolescent girls. She and her team also released MenstraBook, with menstrastories and organised Menstra Tlk in the Delhi School of Social Work to create more conversations on menstruation.

With YKA MHM Fellow Vineet, Sabna launched Menstratalk, a campaign that aims to put an end to period poverty and smash menstrual taboos in society. As a start, the campaign aims to begin conversations on menstrual health with five hundred adolescents and youth in Delhi through offline platforms, and through this community mobilise support to create Period Friendly Institutions out of educational institutes in the city.

Read more about her campaign. 

A student from Delhi School of Social work, Vineet is a part of Project Sakhi Saheli, an initiative by the students of Delhi school of Social Work to create awareness on Menstrual Health and combat Period Poverty. Along with MHM Action Fellow Sabna, Vineet launched Menstratalk, a campaign that aims to put an end to period poverty and smash menstrual taboos in society.

As a start, the campaign aims to begin conversations on menstrual health with five hundred adolescents and youth in Delhi through offline platforms, and through this community mobilise support to create Period Friendly Institutions out of educational institutes in the city.

Find out more about the campaign here.

A native of Bhagalpur district – Bihar, Shalini Jha believes in equal rights for all genders and wants to work for a gender-equal and just society. In the past she’s had a year-long association as a community leader with Haiyya: Organise for Action’s Health Over Stigma campaign. She’s pursuing a Master’s in Literature with Ambedkar University, Delhi and as an MHM Fellow with YKA, recently launched ‘Project अल्हड़ (Alharh)’.

She says, “Bihar is ranked the lowest in India’s SDG Index 2019 for India. Hygienic and comfortable menstruation is a basic human right and sustainable development cannot be ensured if menstruators are deprived of their basic rights.” Project अल्हड़ (Alharh) aims to create a robust sensitised community in Bhagalpur to collectively spread awareness, break the taboo, debunk myths and initiate fearless conversations around menstruation. The campaign aims to reach at least 6000 adolescent girls from government and private schools in Baghalpur district in 2020.

Read more about the campaign here.

A psychologist and co-founder of a mental health NGO called Customize Cognition, Ritika forayed into the space of menstrual health and hygiene, sexual and reproductive healthcare and rights and gender equality as an MHM Fellow with YKA. She says, “The experience of working on MHM/SRHR and gender equality has been an enriching and eye-opening experience. I have learned what’s beneath the surface of the issue, be it awareness, lack of resources or disregard for trans men, who also menstruate.”

The Transmen-ses campaign aims to tackle the issue of silence and disregard for trans men’s menstruation needs, by mobilising gender sensitive health professionals and gender neutral restrooms in Lucknow.

Read more about the campaign here.

A Computer Science engineer by education, Nitisha started her career in the corporate sector, before realising she wanted to work in the development and social justice space. Since then, she has worked with Teach For India and Care India and is from the founding batch of Indian School of Development Management (ISDM), a one of its kind organisation creating leaders for the development sector through its experiential learning post graduate program.

As a Youth Ki Awaaz Menstrual Health Fellow, Nitisha has started Let’s Talk Period, a campaign to mobilise young people to switch to sustainable period products. She says, “80 lakh women in Delhi use non-biodegradable sanitary products, generate 3000 tonnes of menstrual waste, that takes 500-800 years to decompose; which in turn contributes to the health issues of all menstruators, increased burden of waste management on the city and harmful living environment for all citizens.

Let’s Talk Period aims to change this by

Find out more about her campaign here.

Share your details to download the report.

We promise not to spam or send irrelevant information.

A former Assistant Secretary with the Ministry of Women and Child Development in West Bengal for three months, Lakshmi Bhavya has been championing the cause of menstrual hygiene in her district. By associating herself with the Lalana Campaign, a holistic menstrual hygiene awareness campaign which is conducted by the Anahat NGO, Lakshmi has been slowly breaking taboos when it comes to periods and menstrual hygiene.

A Gender Rights Activist working with the tribal and marginalized communities in india, Srilekha is a PhD scholar working on understanding body and sexuality among tribal girls, to fill the gaps in research around indigenous women and their stories. Srilekha has worked extensively at the grassroots level with community based organisations, through several advocacy initiatives around Gender, Mental Health, Menstrual Hygiene and Sexual and Reproductive Health Rights (SRHR) for the indigenous in Jharkhand, over the last 6 years.

Srilekha has also contributed to sustainable livelihood projects and legal aid programs for survivors of sex trafficking. She has been conducting research based programs on maternal health, mental health, gender based violence, sex and sexuality. Her interest lies in conducting workshops for young people on life skills, feminism, gender and sexuality, trauma, resilience and interpersonal relationships.

A Guwahati-based college student pursuing her Masters in Tata Institute of Social Sciences, Bidisha started the #BleedwithDignity campaign on the technology platform, demanding that the Government of Assam install
biodegradable sanitary pad vending machines in all government schools across the state. Her petition on has already gathered support from over 90000 people and continues to grow.

Bidisha was selected in’s flagship program ‘She Creates Change’ having run successful online advocacy
campaigns, which were widely recognised. Through the #BleedwithDignity campaign; she organised and celebrated World Menstrual Hygiene Day, 2019 in Guwahati, Assam by hosting a wall mural by collaborating with local organisations. The initiative was widely covered by national and local media, and the mural was later inaugurated by the event’s chief guest Commissioner of Guwahati Municipal Corporation (GMC) Debeswar Malakar, IAS.

Sign up for the Youth Ki Awaaz Prime Ministerial Brief below