This post has been self-published on Youth Ki Awaaz by Shivani Gautam. Just like them, anyone can publish on Youth Ki Awaaz.

DUSU Elections: All Parties Violated These 3 Lyngdoh Committee Recommendations

More from Shivani Gautam

Elections in Delhi University are finally over and what is likely to follow (after the tell-the-world-we’ve-won celebrations by the winning party) is the cleanliness drive by the NSS of different colleges to make up for the mess that it creates every year. I had taken for granted the posters, the cards, and the banners that were hung, flung, handed and stamped over by the university students. I made my peace this year too with it until I came across the Lyngdoh Committee Recommendations.

In the year 2006, Lyngdoh Committee was formed by the HRD to suggest reforms in the student union elections at the college/university levels as it was argued that these were becoming places of political tensions escalating into violent encounters between students. Under the leadership of JM Lyngdoh, it submitted its report to the Supreme Court of India on May 26, 2006. The Supreme Court on September 22nd of the same year had issued an order directing the college/university to follow and implement the committee’s recommendations hereafter. Lyngdoh Committee aimed at making elections cleaner, non-violent, and curbing the use of money and muscle power in the elections.

Elections in Delhi University are marked by vandalized walls, littered posters, garlanded men and women (a rare figure usually present for PR purpose because feminism is trendy and marketable) and most importantly, the rallying of SUVs and Audis. Lyngdoh Committee Recommendations is to DU what Directive Principles have become to our government.

Back in 2006, Lyngdoh in a conversation with The Tribune had said that “the recommendations made by the Committee could have far-reaching consequences in reforming student body politics in the country if implemented properly.” However, the very markers of DU elections are a violation of the Lyngdoh Committee recommendations.

While one can provide a long list of flouted recommendations, the article aims at covering the ones that are popularly criticized for being flouted and most of these fall under the election-related expenditure and financial accountability section.

1) 6.6.1 The maximum permitted expenditure per candidate shall be ₹5000

The recommendation has often been a bone of contention between the major parties and the committee. While students argue that in a University as huge as Delhi University, it is absolutely impossible to spend under ₹5000 by individual candidates, the committee had argued that the rule has been made to provide a fair chance to independent candidates or parties which lack proper funding as this will curb the role of money in elections and provide a fair chance to everybody. However, the exuberance of Delhi University elections is marked by an opulence that exceeds the spending limit set by the LCR. It is very difficult to imagine how a party can afford to campaign throughout the day on campus areas in cars and even provide freebies to students under a budget of ₹5000 (both of which are illegal in the first place).

2) Clause 6.7.5: No candidate shall be permitted to make use of printed posters, printed pamphlets, or any other printed material for the purpose of canvassing. Candidates may only utilize handmade posters for the purpose of canvassing, provided that such handmade posters are procured within the expenditure limit set out herein above:

Posters, Banners and cards are in the air during election season and none of them are “handmade”. Most parties get away with this rule by utilizing the loopholes in LCR to their advantage. One of the most popular tactics is to misspell a name which would still disseminate the required information but the party would manage to escape legal action. Handmade posters are too much of a hassle for parties with the kind of money to own printing presses. Recently, a Miranda student reported how INSO party candidates in an SUV drove by the front gate, stuck out their head from the window and flung the posters up in the air and when the student confronted them and said, “aise vote nahi milenge,” they replied with an impressive sense of self righteousness “aise attitude ke sath chahiye bhi nahi.”

It is not at all surprising to find people who are not from the University, campaigning or canvassing for different parties. CYSS has been called out by the ABVP and NSUI for violating this provision by involving AAP members in the election campaigning to which CYSS retorted by saying that ABVP and NSUI have been violating this for decades (because an accusation against an accusation is how election debates work here).

3) Clause 6.7.9: During the election period the candidates may hold processions and/or public meetings, provided that they do not, in any manner, disturb classes and other academic and co-curricular activities of the college/university. Further, such procession/ public meeting may not be held without the prior written permission of the college/university authority.

While the election season is on, it is comparatively easier to enter colleges without ID cards, and if the guards don’t let you in and you’re from ABVP, you can coerce them into letting you in any way (case in point, Miranda House 2018 elections). The disruption of classes is a regular phenomenon taken for granted during elections. This is not so prevalent in the North Campus as it is in the South Campus (which this year witnessed violent clashes between students and party members).

Anahita Nanda, a student of Delhi University says, “Almost all our classes got disrupted in the last week leading up to the elections. Our teachers were welcoming but some students walked in with complete impunity, screaming their ballot numbers and distributing pamphlets even when explicitly asked not to. Once, these ABVP guys in their mob-fashion literally threw their pamphlets at my face.”

However, there is another reading of the Lyngdoh Committee – Recommendations that argue that these suggested rules are an attack on the democratic nature of the student elections and aim at limiting student activism and crippling campus politics.

Jawaharlal Nehru University has had a long history of fighting against the Lyngdoh Committee Recommendations. From 2008 to 2012, no student union elections were held in JNU due to the impasse between the students and administration regarding the Lyngdoh Committee guidelines. They went ahead with the polls after a five-point relaxation was offered as a solution after a four-year-long legal battle. Many of the recommendations by the Lyngdoh Committee aim at de-politicizing student bodies and limiting participation. For example, one of the recommendations sets an age limit for candidates contesting elections. The arbitrariness of the rule has been questioned by research scholars of different universities who argue that they’ve been excluded from political processes in the campus that has a direct bearing upon their lives.

Moreover, one of the recommendations makes it mandatory for the candidate to have minimum attendance, the committee has certainly failed to understand that the academic presence of a student in a classroom is not a measure of their political understanding. One of the most controversial recommendations has been the “Grievance Redressal Mechanism” which provides the university administration to actively interfere in campus politics.

The Lyngdoh Committee thus is not the answer to strengthening or democratizing student politics and DU is a classic example of its failure in limiting money and muscle power politics. The Delhi University elections are a microcosm of the Lok Sabha polls when it comes to the flaunting of wealth, flouting of rules or exploiting the loopholes of the legal system.

However, before we chide the University students for their delinquency during elections, we must also examine and debate the peremptorily undemocratic and restrictive nature of the Lyngdoh Committee Recommendations itself.


The image has been used for representation.
Image source: Sushil Kumar/Hindustan Times via Getty
You must be to comment.

More from Shivani Gautam

Similar Posts

By Vipashyana Dubey

By Imran Hasib

By Meemansa Narula

Wondering what to write about?

Here are some topics to get you started

Share your details to download the report.

We promise not to spam or send irrelevant information.

Share your details to download the report.

We promise not to spam or send irrelevant information.

An ambassador and trained facilitator under Eco Femme (a social enterprise working towards menstrual health in south India), Sanjina is also an active member of the MHM Collective- India and Menstrual Health Alliance- India. She has conducted Menstrual Health sessions in multiple government schools adopted by Rotary District 3240 as part of their WinS project in rural Bengal. She has also delivered training of trainers on SRHR, gender, sexuality and Menstruation for Tomorrow’s Foundation, Vikramshila Education Resource Society, Nirdhan trust and Micro Finance, Tollygunj Women In Need, Paint It Red in Kolkata.

Now as an MH Fellow with YKA, she’s expanding her impressive scope of work further by launching a campaign to facilitate the process of ensuring better menstrual health and SRH services for women residing in correctional homes in West Bengal. The campaign will entail an independent study to take stalk of the present conditions of MHM in correctional homes across the state and use its findings to build public support and political will to take the necessary action.

Saurabh has been associated with YKA as a user and has consistently been writing on the issue MHM and its intersectionality with other issues in the society. Now as an MHM Fellow with YKA, he’s launched the Right to Period campaign, which aims to ensure proper execution of MHM guidelines in Delhi’s schools.

The long-term aim of the campaign is to develop an open culture where menstruation is not treated as a taboo. The campaign also seeks to hold the schools accountable for their responsibilities as an important component in the implementation of MHM policies by making adequate sanitation infrastructure and knowledge of MHM available in school premises.

Read more about his campaign.

Harshita is a psychologist and works to support people with mental health issues, particularly adolescents who are survivors of violence. Associated with the Azadi Foundation in UP, Harshita became an MHM Fellow with YKA, with the aim of promoting better menstrual health.

Her campaign #MeriMarzi aims to promote menstrual health and wellness, hygiene and facilities for female sex workers in UP. She says, “Knowledge about natural body processes is a very basic human right. And for individuals whose occupation is providing sexual services, it becomes even more important.”

Meri Marzi aims to ensure sensitised, non-discriminatory health workers for the needs of female sex workers in the Suraksha Clinics under the UPSACS (Uttar Pradesh State AIDS Control Society) program by creating more dialogues and garnering public support for the cause of sex workers’ menstrual rights. The campaign will also ensure interventions with sex workers to clear misconceptions around overall hygiene management to ensure that results flow both ways.

Read more about her campaign.

MH Fellow Sabna comes with significant experience working with a range of development issues. A co-founder of Project Sakhi Saheli, which aims to combat period poverty and break menstrual taboos, Sabna has, in the past, worked on the issue of menstruation in urban slums of Delhi with women and adolescent girls. She and her team also released MenstraBook, with menstrastories and organised Menstra Tlk in the Delhi School of Social Work to create more conversations on menstruation.

With YKA MHM Fellow Vineet, Sabna launched Menstratalk, a campaign that aims to put an end to period poverty and smash menstrual taboos in society. As a start, the campaign aims to begin conversations on menstrual health with five hundred adolescents and youth in Delhi through offline platforms, and through this community mobilise support to create Period Friendly Institutions out of educational institutes in the city.

Read more about her campaign. 

A student from Delhi School of Social work, Vineet is a part of Project Sakhi Saheli, an initiative by the students of Delhi school of Social Work to create awareness on Menstrual Health and combat Period Poverty. Along with MHM Action Fellow Sabna, Vineet launched Menstratalk, a campaign that aims to put an end to period poverty and smash menstrual taboos in society.

As a start, the campaign aims to begin conversations on menstrual health with five hundred adolescents and youth in Delhi through offline platforms, and through this community mobilise support to create Period Friendly Institutions out of educational institutes in the city.

Find out more about the campaign here.

A native of Bhagalpur district – Bihar, Shalini Jha believes in equal rights for all genders and wants to work for a gender-equal and just society. In the past she’s had a year-long association as a community leader with Haiyya: Organise for Action’s Health Over Stigma campaign. She’s pursuing a Master’s in Literature with Ambedkar University, Delhi and as an MHM Fellow with YKA, recently launched ‘Project अल्हड़ (Alharh)’.

She says, “Bihar is ranked the lowest in India’s SDG Index 2019 for India. Hygienic and comfortable menstruation is a basic human right and sustainable development cannot be ensured if menstruators are deprived of their basic rights.” Project अल्हड़ (Alharh) aims to create a robust sensitised community in Bhagalpur to collectively spread awareness, break the taboo, debunk myths and initiate fearless conversations around menstruation. The campaign aims to reach at least 6000 adolescent girls from government and private schools in Baghalpur district in 2020.

Read more about the campaign here.

A psychologist and co-founder of a mental health NGO called Customize Cognition, Ritika forayed into the space of menstrual health and hygiene, sexual and reproductive healthcare and rights and gender equality as an MHM Fellow with YKA. She says, “The experience of working on MHM/SRHR and gender equality has been an enriching and eye-opening experience. I have learned what’s beneath the surface of the issue, be it awareness, lack of resources or disregard for trans men, who also menstruate.”

The Transmen-ses campaign aims to tackle the issue of silence and disregard for trans men’s menstruation needs, by mobilising gender sensitive health professionals and gender neutral restrooms in Lucknow.

Read more about the campaign here.

A Computer Science engineer by education, Nitisha started her career in the corporate sector, before realising she wanted to work in the development and social justice space. Since then, she has worked with Teach For India and Care India and is from the founding batch of Indian School of Development Management (ISDM), a one of its kind organisation creating leaders for the development sector through its experiential learning post graduate program.

As a Youth Ki Awaaz Menstrual Health Fellow, Nitisha has started Let’s Talk Period, a campaign to mobilise young people to switch to sustainable period products. She says, “80 lakh women in Delhi use non-biodegradable sanitary products, generate 3000 tonnes of menstrual waste, that takes 500-800 years to decompose; which in turn contributes to the health issues of all menstruators, increased burden of waste management on the city and harmful living environment for all citizens.

Let’s Talk Period aims to change this by

Find out more about her campaign here.

Share your details to download the report.

We promise not to spam or send irrelevant information.

A former Assistant Secretary with the Ministry of Women and Child Development in West Bengal for three months, Lakshmi Bhavya has been championing the cause of menstrual hygiene in her district. By associating herself with the Lalana Campaign, a holistic menstrual hygiene awareness campaign which is conducted by the Anahat NGO, Lakshmi has been slowly breaking taboos when it comes to periods and menstrual hygiene.

A Gender Rights Activist working with the tribal and marginalized communities in india, Srilekha is a PhD scholar working on understanding body and sexuality among tribal girls, to fill the gaps in research around indigenous women and their stories. Srilekha has worked extensively at the grassroots level with community based organisations, through several advocacy initiatives around Gender, Mental Health, Menstrual Hygiene and Sexual and Reproductive Health Rights (SRHR) for the indigenous in Jharkhand, over the last 6 years.

Srilekha has also contributed to sustainable livelihood projects and legal aid programs for survivors of sex trafficking. She has been conducting research based programs on maternal health, mental health, gender based violence, sex and sexuality. Her interest lies in conducting workshops for young people on life skills, feminism, gender and sexuality, trauma, resilience and interpersonal relationships.

A Guwahati-based college student pursuing her Masters in Tata Institute of Social Sciences, Bidisha started the #BleedwithDignity campaign on the technology platform, demanding that the Government of Assam install
biodegradable sanitary pad vending machines in all government schools across the state. Her petition on has already gathered support from over 90000 people and continues to grow.

Bidisha was selected in’s flagship program ‘She Creates Change’ having run successful online advocacy
campaigns, which were widely recognised. Through the #BleedwithDignity campaign; she organised and celebrated World Menstrual Hygiene Day, 2019 in Guwahati, Assam by hosting a wall mural by collaborating with local organisations. The initiative was widely covered by national and local media, and the mural was later inaugurated by the event’s chief guest Commissioner of Guwahati Municipal Corporation (GMC) Debeswar Malakar, IAS.

Sign up for the Youth Ki Awaaz Prime Ministerial Brief below