This post has been self-published on Youth Ki Awaaz by Pranjali Singh. Just like them, anyone can publish on Youth Ki Awaaz.

At AUD And JNU, Redressal Systems Tell A Tale Of Disappointing Double Standards

More from Pranjali Singh

It is no news to anyone that the grievance system in the Indian varsities is flawed when it comes to dealing with sexual harassment cases. Time and again we are reminded of these cracks in our structure which show that justice in educational institutes stand on precarious ground.

However, the role of power dynamics (and the ways in which it wrongfully hampers the deliverance of justice) in sexual harassment cases on campuses is not just a crack but a gaping hole, which needs to be amended before the trust of the students in the system collapses completely.

Just this month two separate but major incidents occurring in prominent universities of the national capital highlight the double standards of the redressal system, which faltered again in the face of power and bent to the will of those in authority.

Where on one hand, a person who was found guilty of sexual harassment was appointed as the chairperson of an administrative committee in AUD, a victim and complainant of alleged sexual harassment, on the other hand, faced arbitrary penalties by the ICC (Internal Complaints Committee) in JNU.

Students Object Against The Appointment Of An Accused Teacher In AUD

Lawrence Liang, a highly decorated legal scholar, was forced to step down from his position as the dean of Ambedkar University, Delhi’s School of Law and Governance earlier this year in March. This happened following the recommendations of the university’s CPSH (Committee to Prevent Sexual Harassment) which found him guilty of sexual harassment, when a complaint was filed against him by a PhD scholar. The committee also ruled that the professor would not be allowed to hold any administrative post for the next two years. Liang challenged the verdict of the internal committee in the court and the matter is still undecided and sub judice.

However, earlier this month, on December 3, the Vice Chancellor of Ambedkar University Delhi appointed Lawrence Liang as the chairperson of the organising committee which was constituted for the 11th Ambedkar Memorial Lecture, scheduled on April 14 2019.

The decision was met with instant objection from the students; the AUD Queer Collective also issued a formal statement denouncing the action of the administration. Later, on December 7, a new notification was issued and Liang’s name was dropped from the committee, stating that Liang has requested to be excused from the duties citing “personal reasons.”

The discontent of the students echoed in Pritish Menon’s (a member of the students’ council of the university) statement, who said, “It is even more unfortunate that the university is accepting that it did not include Liang’s name in the committee by mistake. How can they appoint him to any position when the institution had itself barred him from all administrative posts for two years?”

The complete disregard shown towards the ruling of CPSH is distressing. The university failed to honour the verdict of the committee and in doing so it undermined its authority and capacity in ensuring the safety of the students. Even when Liang’s name was dropped, the issue of his guilt as a sexual offender was tactically avoided.

Just what is the use of a committee and procedure, when the penalties are not executed and the accused is not properly punished? Penalties against an accused are exercised to police and prevent such sexual misconduct, and if the accused is left off the hook, then the whole committee loses its purpose. The message that is conveyed is that those in the position of power can get away with their unacceptable behaviour, and the victims are lead to believe that they cannot trust the system to punish the guilty.

The appointment and its immediate withdrawal, and the way in which it was dealt with shows a clear attempt to protect the accused, or at least a degree of neglect towards the sensitive issue of sexual harassment and its victims.

Strict Penalties Issued Against Complainant By JNU’s ICC

While AUD regarded the verdicts of CPSH carelessly, JNU’s ICC decided to take serious actions to ensure that ‘false complaints’ of sexual harassment are not filed. The measures are severe to the point that they are cruel.

Last month, the ICC of JNU recommended extreme penalties – such as debarring the student from campus, withholding her degree and character certificate, prohibiting employment in the university and many more – against a female student who had lodged a formal complaint of sexual harassment and molestation. The allegations were made against her PhD guide on April 12 this year.

The Committee stated that the allegations were ‘frivolous’ and proceeded to issue harsh punishment against the student stating that the complaints were false. Furthermore, the ICC also went as far as to demand that the complainant apologise to the defendant.

However, ‘false complaint’ and ‘malicious intent’ on the part of the complainant are required to be proven through inquiry and due procedure, which did not happen in this case. One cannot help but feel outraged at the draconian penalties that were issued, without proper investigation. The student union of JNU and its faculty members have also expressed displeasure over the recommendation.

The imbalance in the way the accused or even a guilty accused, and a victim or even an unproven false complainant is dealt with is alarming. It clearly shows how our system does its bare minimum when it comes to prevention of sexual harassment while it goes to great lengths to discourage students from coming up and speak out about molestation and sexual harassment. The action of JNU’s ICC shows the system the error of its ways, and also render the recurring excuses which are given by such committees baseless.

The authorities often demand written complaints of sexual harassment, and refuse to go ahead with anonymous accusations. However formal complaints have, more than informal ones, made the complainant susceptible to exploitation by the system. A similar situation occurred last month in Symbiosis Law School, Hyderabad, where two students were rusticated for accusing a professor on Facebook.

Using ‘Due Procedure’ To Deny Justice

Another hindrance is ‘due procedure’ which is often tedious and lacks transparency; one never knows when they are turned from being the victim to the accused in a case. All the while the confidentiality of the identity of the victim is not taken care of. And as the proceedings drag on, the student is still vulnerable to the authorities who can take advantage of their position and exploit the student for filing the complaint, and affect their academic career.

When proceedings are complete, and if the accused is found guilty, penalties are not as severe as the crime, while students straight away face expulsion or lose their degrees, even when the ‘malicious intent’ is not established. And finally, if by any chance, one manages to overcome all these hurdles at each step, the administration fails to respect the verdict, just as it happened in the Liang case.

Seeing Through These ‘Double Standards’

The attitude towards complainants is unfavourable, discouraging, and insensitive, while the accused gets the privileges of being ‘innocent until proven guilty’ and then undue protection even when their guilt is established.

These double standards of the administration between the complainant and the accused are nauseating. It is often said that university campuses are an extension of our society. If this is true, then the inclusive learnings about the world is accompanied by the harsh realities and ugly truths of our society.

Similarly, these campuses are far from the safe spaces that they claim to be, and their dealings with misconduct are just as shady and unreliable as the rest of our corroded system which often tends to favour those in power and authority.

Featured image for representative purpose only.
Featured image source: Wikimedia Commons.
You must be to comment.

More from Pranjali Singh

Similar Posts

By Arun Kr Jaiswal

By Amrita

By Mohit Nimal

Wondering what to write about?

Here are some topics to get you started

Share your details to download the report.

We promise not to spam or send irrelevant information.

Share your details to download the report.

We promise not to spam or send irrelevant information.

An ambassador and trained facilitator under Eco Femme (a social enterprise working towards menstrual health in south India), Sanjina is also an active member of the MHM Collective- India and Menstrual Health Alliance- India. She has conducted Menstrual Health sessions in multiple government schools adopted by Rotary District 3240 as part of their WinS project in rural Bengal. She has also delivered training of trainers on SRHR, gender, sexuality and Menstruation for Tomorrow’s Foundation, Vikramshila Education Resource Society, Nirdhan trust and Micro Finance, Tollygunj Women In Need, Paint It Red in Kolkata.

Now as an MH Fellow with YKA, she’s expanding her impressive scope of work further by launching a campaign to facilitate the process of ensuring better menstrual health and SRH services for women residing in correctional homes in West Bengal. The campaign will entail an independent study to take stalk of the present conditions of MHM in correctional homes across the state and use its findings to build public support and political will to take the necessary action.

Saurabh has been associated with YKA as a user and has consistently been writing on the issue MHM and its intersectionality with other issues in the society. Now as an MHM Fellow with YKA, he’s launched the Right to Period campaign, which aims to ensure proper execution of MHM guidelines in Delhi’s schools.

The long-term aim of the campaign is to develop an open culture where menstruation is not treated as a taboo. The campaign also seeks to hold the schools accountable for their responsibilities as an important component in the implementation of MHM policies by making adequate sanitation infrastructure and knowledge of MHM available in school premises.

Read more about his campaign.

Harshita is a psychologist and works to support people with mental health issues, particularly adolescents who are survivors of violence. Associated with the Azadi Foundation in UP, Harshita became an MHM Fellow with YKA, with the aim of promoting better menstrual health.

Her campaign #MeriMarzi aims to promote menstrual health and wellness, hygiene and facilities for female sex workers in UP. She says, “Knowledge about natural body processes is a very basic human right. And for individuals whose occupation is providing sexual services, it becomes even more important.”

Meri Marzi aims to ensure sensitised, non-discriminatory health workers for the needs of female sex workers in the Suraksha Clinics under the UPSACS (Uttar Pradesh State AIDS Control Society) program by creating more dialogues and garnering public support for the cause of sex workers’ menstrual rights. The campaign will also ensure interventions with sex workers to clear misconceptions around overall hygiene management to ensure that results flow both ways.

Read more about her campaign.

MH Fellow Sabna comes with significant experience working with a range of development issues. A co-founder of Project Sakhi Saheli, which aims to combat period poverty and break menstrual taboos, Sabna has, in the past, worked on the issue of menstruation in urban slums of Delhi with women and adolescent girls. She and her team also released MenstraBook, with menstrastories and organised Menstra Tlk in the Delhi School of Social Work to create more conversations on menstruation.

With YKA MHM Fellow Vineet, Sabna launched Menstratalk, a campaign that aims to put an end to period poverty and smash menstrual taboos in society. As a start, the campaign aims to begin conversations on menstrual health with five hundred adolescents and youth in Delhi through offline platforms, and through this community mobilise support to create Period Friendly Institutions out of educational institutes in the city.

Read more about her campaign. 

A student from Delhi School of Social work, Vineet is a part of Project Sakhi Saheli, an initiative by the students of Delhi school of Social Work to create awareness on Menstrual Health and combat Period Poverty. Along with MHM Action Fellow Sabna, Vineet launched Menstratalk, a campaign that aims to put an end to period poverty and smash menstrual taboos in society.

As a start, the campaign aims to begin conversations on menstrual health with five hundred adolescents and youth in Delhi through offline platforms, and through this community mobilise support to create Period Friendly Institutions out of educational institutes in the city.

Find out more about the campaign here.

A native of Bhagalpur district – Bihar, Shalini Jha believes in equal rights for all genders and wants to work for a gender-equal and just society. In the past she’s had a year-long association as a community leader with Haiyya: Organise for Action’s Health Over Stigma campaign. She’s pursuing a Master’s in Literature with Ambedkar University, Delhi and as an MHM Fellow with YKA, recently launched ‘Project अल्हड़ (Alharh)’.

She says, “Bihar is ranked the lowest in India’s SDG Index 2019 for India. Hygienic and comfortable menstruation is a basic human right and sustainable development cannot be ensured if menstruators are deprived of their basic rights.” Project अल्हड़ (Alharh) aims to create a robust sensitised community in Bhagalpur to collectively spread awareness, break the taboo, debunk myths and initiate fearless conversations around menstruation. The campaign aims to reach at least 6000 adolescent girls from government and private schools in Baghalpur district in 2020.

Read more about the campaign here.

A psychologist and co-founder of a mental health NGO called Customize Cognition, Ritika forayed into the space of menstrual health and hygiene, sexual and reproductive healthcare and rights and gender equality as an MHM Fellow with YKA. She says, “The experience of working on MHM/SRHR and gender equality has been an enriching and eye-opening experience. I have learned what’s beneath the surface of the issue, be it awareness, lack of resources or disregard for trans men, who also menstruate.”

The Transmen-ses campaign aims to tackle the issue of silence and disregard for trans men’s menstruation needs, by mobilising gender sensitive health professionals and gender neutral restrooms in Lucknow.

Read more about the campaign here.

A Computer Science engineer by education, Nitisha started her career in the corporate sector, before realising she wanted to work in the development and social justice space. Since then, she has worked with Teach For India and Care India and is from the founding batch of Indian School of Development Management (ISDM), a one of its kind organisation creating leaders for the development sector through its experiential learning post graduate program.

As a Youth Ki Awaaz Menstrual Health Fellow, Nitisha has started Let’s Talk Period, a campaign to mobilise young people to switch to sustainable period products. She says, “80 lakh women in Delhi use non-biodegradable sanitary products, generate 3000 tonnes of menstrual waste, that takes 500-800 years to decompose; which in turn contributes to the health issues of all menstruators, increased burden of waste management on the city and harmful living environment for all citizens.

Let’s Talk Period aims to change this by

Find out more about her campaign here.

Share your details to download the report.

We promise not to spam or send irrelevant information.

A former Assistant Secretary with the Ministry of Women and Child Development in West Bengal for three months, Lakshmi Bhavya has been championing the cause of menstrual hygiene in her district. By associating herself with the Lalana Campaign, a holistic menstrual hygiene awareness campaign which is conducted by the Anahat NGO, Lakshmi has been slowly breaking taboos when it comes to periods and menstrual hygiene.

A Gender Rights Activist working with the tribal and marginalized communities in india, Srilekha is a PhD scholar working on understanding body and sexuality among tribal girls, to fill the gaps in research around indigenous women and their stories. Srilekha has worked extensively at the grassroots level with community based organisations, through several advocacy initiatives around Gender, Mental Health, Menstrual Hygiene and Sexual and Reproductive Health Rights (SRHR) for the indigenous in Jharkhand, over the last 6 years.

Srilekha has also contributed to sustainable livelihood projects and legal aid programs for survivors of sex trafficking. She has been conducting research based programs on maternal health, mental health, gender based violence, sex and sexuality. Her interest lies in conducting workshops for young people on life skills, feminism, gender and sexuality, trauma, resilience and interpersonal relationships.

A Guwahati-based college student pursuing her Masters in Tata Institute of Social Sciences, Bidisha started the #BleedwithDignity campaign on the technology platform, demanding that the Government of Assam install
biodegradable sanitary pad vending machines in all government schools across the state. Her petition on has already gathered support from over 90000 people and continues to grow.

Bidisha was selected in’s flagship program ‘She Creates Change’ having run successful online advocacy
campaigns, which were widely recognised. Through the #BleedwithDignity campaign; she organised and celebrated World Menstrual Hygiene Day, 2019 in Guwahati, Assam by hosting a wall mural by collaborating with local organisations. The initiative was widely covered by national and local media, and the mural was later inaugurated by the event’s chief guest Commissioner of Guwahati Municipal Corporation (GMC) Debeswar Malakar, IAS.

Sign up for the Youth Ki Awaaz Prime Ministerial Brief below