Considering SC Stand In Kanojia’s Case, Was The Demand For Priyanka Sharma’s Apology Fair?

On 11th June 2019, the vacation bench of the Supreme Court consisting of Justices Indira Banerjee and Ajay Rastogi passed the order for the immediate release of Prashant Kanojia, a UP-based journalist arrested for his tweet about the CM Yogi Adityanath.

Prashant Kanojia, alumni of Indian Institute of Mass communication Delhi was arrested by the UP police a few days ago over the “objectionable comment” made by him about the CM – Yogi Adityanath on his twitter handle. Prashant shared an article about a female claiming a relationship with the CM accompanied by a remark that supposedly maligns the CM.

After hearing arguments from both the parties, Justice Indira Banerjee stated that “the right to liberty of a citizen has been infringed”. Though the court made it clear that the social media post was inappropriate, it was stated that the arrest was unwarranted and went against personal liberty.

I think a contradiction arises if we compare this judgment with the judgment delivered by Justice Indira Banerjee along with Justice Sanjiv Khanna in the case of “Rajib Sharma versus The state of West Bengal and Ors” on 14th May 2019.

In this famous case, the accused, Priyanka Sharma, was arrested for sharing a picture (meme) in which Mamta Banerjee’s face was morphed onto actress Priyanka Chopra’s at the Met Gala.

Priyanka Sharma was arrested by West Bengal police on a complaint lodged by a local TMC Leader and was charged for defamation under section 500 of the Indian penal code along with section 66-A of IT Act. The matter was listed before the vacation bench of the Supreme Court on the filing of a habeas corpus petition against the arrest.

The Hon’ble bench of the supreme court while deciding the matter ordered for the immediate release of the accused declaring the action against the personal liberty and fundamental rights under article 19 and 21 of Indian constitution. But the real controversy is not regarding this part of the judgment, the problematic part is the further order of the court in which Priyanka Sharma was asked to apologise for the picture posted on her Facebook account.

Further, the court stated that this apology order could not be taken as a precedent. But with all respect towards the Hon’ble court, I believe that the apology order was unnecessary. When it was clearly declared that there was no statutory breach of provisions, what was the reason for the apology order?

In my opinion, the order depicts that Justice Indira Banerjee allowed her sentiments to play a role which was not justified. Comparing both the cases, I believe the Supreme Court has displayed hypocrisy.


Do you find online payments safe?

Take this survey and help companies and the government make online payments safer for you.

Take the Survey
Similar Posts

A former Assistant Secretary with the Ministry of Women and Child Development in West Bengal for three months, Lakshmi Bhavya has been championing the cause of menstrual hygiene in her district. By associating herself with the Lalana Campaign, a holistic menstrual hygiene awareness campaign which is conducted by the Anahat NGO, Lakshmi has been slowly breaking taboos when it comes to periods and menstrual hygiene.

A Gender Rights Activist working with the tribal and marginalized communities in india, Srilekha is a PhD scholar working on understanding body and sexuality among tribal girls, to fill the gaps in research around indigenous women and their stories. Srilekha has worked extensively at the grassroots level with community based organisations, through several advocacy initiatives around Gender, Mental Health, Menstrual Hygiene and Sexual and Reproductive Health Rights (SRHR) for the indigenous in Jharkhand, over the last 6 years.

Srilekha has also contributed to sustainable livelihood projects and legal aid programs for survivors of sex trafficking. She has been conducting research based programs on maternal health, mental health, gender based violence, sex and sexuality. Her interest lies in conducting workshops for young people on life skills, feminism, gender and sexuality, trauma, resilience and interpersonal relationships.

A Guwahati-based college student pursuing her Masters in Tata Institute of Social Sciences, Bidisha started the #BleedwithDignity campaign on the technology platform, demanding that the Government of Assam install
biodegradable sanitary pad vending machines in all government schools across the state. Her petition on has already gathered support from over 90000 people and continues to grow.

Bidisha was selected in’s flagship program ‘She Creates Change’ having run successful online advocacy
campaigns, which were widely recognised. Through the #BleedwithDignity campaign; she organised and celebrated World Menstrual Hygiene Day, 2019 in Guwahati, Assam by hosting a wall mural by collaborating with local organisations. The initiative was widely covered by national and local media, and the mural was later inaugurated by the event’s chief guest Commissioner of Guwahati Municipal Corporation (GMC) Debeswar Malakar, IAS.

Sign up for the Youth Ki Awaaz Prime Ministerial Brief below