This post has been self-published on Youth Ki Awaaz by Koshy Mammen. Just like them, anyone can publish on Youth Ki Awaaz.

Is The Freedom Of Religion Truly An Absolute Right?

Co-authored by Shabna Stephan

A few days back, Germany’s Federal Administrative Court of Germany clarified that anyone wearing a turban for religious reasons is not exempted from wearing a helmet when riding motorcycles. A man from the Sikh community filed an application for exemption from the rule to wear a safety helmet when riding a motorcycle, as it was interfering with his religious obligation to wear a turban. The court rejected this contention and stated that the exemption could only be granted for health reasons.

In case he wants to comply with the obligation to wear a turban for religious reasons, he must forego motorcycling. The court also observed that non-wearing of helmet affects the rights of third parties as well, during the rescue process. In this context, this post aims to determine if there is a coherent notion of religious freedom in international legal theory.

Article 2, Article 18 and Article 27 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, 1948 (UDHR) give all individuals the freedom of religion without being discriminated. Article 2, Article 4 and Article 18 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, 1966 (ICCPR) further elaborate on these provisions in detail. According to the above-mentioned articles of the UDHR and the ICCPR, all individuals have the freedom to manifest their religion; such freedom can be limited only by prescribed law.

However, the problematic part is that limitations on the freedom of religion in the above-mentioned articles contain vague terms such as “to protect public safety, order, health or morals or fundamental rights and freedoms of others.” There are no clear definitions for these terms, and its interpretation can very subjective. Further, it can be observed from the case laws mentioned below that it is the weaker sections of the society that are mostly affected.

In the case of Karnel Singh Bhinder v. Canada Human Rights Committee, the Human Rights Committee decided that the requirement of wearing a hardhat by removing the turban is a limitation justified by the ground – to protect public safety. This also qualified as proportionate and necessary to the aim it sought to achieve and therefore there exists no violation freedom of religion. We can see that if the limitation is justified, there is no remedy available to people.

As discussed earlier, these limitations can also be on vague and subjective terms. So, the weaker sections of the society will always be at a disadvantage. Religions which are better positioned tend to get the benefits while the minority will remain sidelined. This trend can be further seen in the other cases as well.

In Leyla Şahin v. Turkey, there was an interference with Leyla’s right to manifest her religion by wearing a headscarf in her medical school. The European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) opined that the purpose of this restriction was to preserve the secular character of educational institutions and hence this type of indirect discrimination was found to be both necessary and proportionate. This is particularly problematic because if this type of indirect discrimination is deemed to be proportional to a legitimate end, then inequality of results will be condoned.

Leyla Şahin.

As discussed above, the limitations provisions are vague and subjective. Therefore, majority religions within each society will often not be subject to any limitations, while minority religions will be at a disadvantage because of the possibility of courts finding the limitations on them necessary and proportionate.

Examining Turkey’s domestic policies, it appears that Turkish authorities believed that wearing the headscarf is a backward practice and represents political Islam. They believed that there is no space for religion in the public life. This insight helps us understand the reason for prohibiting the headscarf. Similarly, France claims to be a truly secular state. But France only maintains the places of worship that existed prior to 1910. The places of worship that existed prior to 1910 are only the churches. This clearly shows the affiliation France has with Christianity and the idea of secularism France supports.

The United States also claim to be a truly secular state with no particular association to a religion, but President Obama was required to prove that he was Christian before taking the presidential oath which shows the idea of secularism the US maintains.

In the case of Raihon Hudoyberganova v Uzbekistan, Raihon was restricted from wearing the hijab inside the university and the case was heard by the The United Nations Human Rights Committee (UNHRC). It was held that her right under Article 18 the ICCPR was violated even though this could be limited under Article 18 itself. Because Uzbekistan had asserted no justification as to why the restriction in this case would be necessary, the UNHRC held that Raihon’s freedom of religion had been violated.

There appears to be extreme similarity between the ECHR and UNHRC in the cases of Leyla Şahin and Raihon Hudoyberganova when it comes to limiting the manifestation of religion. ECHR held that if the State (Turkey) can justify its decision to limit a right holder’s freedom to manifest religion, this type of limitation can be valid. The UNHRC struck down the limitation as the State (Uzbekistan) could not justify its actions.

Thus, one may conclude that if Uzbekistan had given a valid justification for its limitation on the right holder’s freedom of religion, such a limitation would have been upheld. Therefore, the UNHRC and ECHR’s approaches in these two cases are very identical. According to UNHRC and ECHR case law, States have the power to limit one’s freedom of religion so long as they provide a valid justification for their restriction.

According to international law scholars, states typically limit the manifestation of religion on three grounds: public order, fundamental rights and freedoms of others, as well as to protect women from discrimination (Danchin, 2008).

According to the public order ground, manifestation of religious symbols increases the risk of threat and violence against the state and hence the state is justified in limiting the rights of the minority communities. This is exactly what happened in the case of Leyla Şahin where she was prohibited from wearing the hijab. According to scholars, this is not a valid ground as the right of any member of the community who takes religious manifestations seriously, like Leyla Şahin, would have to compromise on their rights.

The second ground to limit religious freedom is to protect the fundamental rights and freedom of others as the manifestation of religion might provoke, pressurize or proselytize others in the community. This is a problematic ground as it would be difficult to imagine a situation where by wearing the hijab, Leyla Şahin or Raihon would interfere with the fundamental rights and freedoms of other students in the universities.

The third ground for limiting freedom to manifest religion is gender equality. This would essentially mean that the limitation on the hijab on Leyla and Raihon was based on the concerns regarding autonomy and equality of Muslim women. Scholars raise objections against this ground as this is a blanket assumption that the hijab represents oppression.

International human rights law is supposed to be universal, and is supposed to impose obligations upon states to ensure that all people have the same basic rights and protection afforded to them. However, from the above discussion, it is evident that law does not work in isolation of culture and politics, and that different states have varying ideas of secularism, which can in turn affect the implementation of their domestic laws. In conclusion, there is no coherent notion of religious freedom in international legal theory.

[Shabna Stephan and M. Koshy Mammen are both 4th Year Students at Jindal Global Law School, Sonipat] 

Featured image for representative purpose only.
Featured image source: ree_pilots/Pixabay; Long Thiên, Anuraj Singh/Flickr.
You must be to comment.

More from Koshy Mammen

Similar Posts

By Godhuli Barat

By Kazi Jamshed

By Saira Nikhat

Wondering what to write about?

Here are some topics to get you started

Share your details to download the report.

We promise not to spam or send irrelevant information.

Share your details to download the report.

We promise not to spam or send irrelevant information.

An ambassador and trained facilitator under Eco Femme (a social enterprise working towards menstrual health in south India), Sanjina is also an active member of the MHM Collective- India and Menstrual Health Alliance- India. She has conducted Menstrual Health sessions in multiple government schools adopted by Rotary District 3240 as part of their WinS project in rural Bengal. She has also delivered training of trainers on SRHR, gender, sexuality and Menstruation for Tomorrow’s Foundation, Vikramshila Education Resource Society, Nirdhan trust and Micro Finance, Tollygunj Women In Need, Paint It Red in Kolkata.

Now as an MH Fellow with YKA, she’s expanding her impressive scope of work further by launching a campaign to facilitate the process of ensuring better menstrual health and SRH services for women residing in correctional homes in West Bengal. The campaign will entail an independent study to take stalk of the present conditions of MHM in correctional homes across the state and use its findings to build public support and political will to take the necessary action.

Saurabh has been associated with YKA as a user and has consistently been writing on the issue MHM and its intersectionality with other issues in the society. Now as an MHM Fellow with YKA, he’s launched the Right to Period campaign, which aims to ensure proper execution of MHM guidelines in Delhi’s schools.

The long-term aim of the campaign is to develop an open culture where menstruation is not treated as a taboo. The campaign also seeks to hold the schools accountable for their responsibilities as an important component in the implementation of MHM policies by making adequate sanitation infrastructure and knowledge of MHM available in school premises.

Read more about his campaign.

Harshita is a psychologist and works to support people with mental health issues, particularly adolescents who are survivors of violence. Associated with the Azadi Foundation in UP, Harshita became an MHM Fellow with YKA, with the aim of promoting better menstrual health.

Her campaign #MeriMarzi aims to promote menstrual health and wellness, hygiene and facilities for female sex workers in UP. She says, “Knowledge about natural body processes is a very basic human right. And for individuals whose occupation is providing sexual services, it becomes even more important.”

Meri Marzi aims to ensure sensitised, non-discriminatory health workers for the needs of female sex workers in the Suraksha Clinics under the UPSACS (Uttar Pradesh State AIDS Control Society) program by creating more dialogues and garnering public support for the cause of sex workers’ menstrual rights. The campaign will also ensure interventions with sex workers to clear misconceptions around overall hygiene management to ensure that results flow both ways.

Read more about her campaign.

MH Fellow Sabna comes with significant experience working with a range of development issues. A co-founder of Project Sakhi Saheli, which aims to combat period poverty and break menstrual taboos, Sabna has, in the past, worked on the issue of menstruation in urban slums of Delhi with women and adolescent girls. She and her team also released MenstraBook, with menstrastories and organised Menstra Tlk in the Delhi School of Social Work to create more conversations on menstruation.

With YKA MHM Fellow Vineet, Sabna launched Menstratalk, a campaign that aims to put an end to period poverty and smash menstrual taboos in society. As a start, the campaign aims to begin conversations on menstrual health with five hundred adolescents and youth in Delhi through offline platforms, and through this community mobilise support to create Period Friendly Institutions out of educational institutes in the city.

Read more about her campaign. 

A student from Delhi School of Social work, Vineet is a part of Project Sakhi Saheli, an initiative by the students of Delhi school of Social Work to create awareness on Menstrual Health and combat Period Poverty. Along with MHM Action Fellow Sabna, Vineet launched Menstratalk, a campaign that aims to put an end to period poverty and smash menstrual taboos in society.

As a start, the campaign aims to begin conversations on menstrual health with five hundred adolescents and youth in Delhi through offline platforms, and through this community mobilise support to create Period Friendly Institutions out of educational institutes in the city.

Find out more about the campaign here.

A native of Bhagalpur district – Bihar, Shalini Jha believes in equal rights for all genders and wants to work for a gender-equal and just society. In the past she’s had a year-long association as a community leader with Haiyya: Organise for Action’s Health Over Stigma campaign. She’s pursuing a Master’s in Literature with Ambedkar University, Delhi and as an MHM Fellow with YKA, recently launched ‘Project अल्हड़ (Alharh)’.

She says, “Bihar is ranked the lowest in India’s SDG Index 2019 for India. Hygienic and comfortable menstruation is a basic human right and sustainable development cannot be ensured if menstruators are deprived of their basic rights.” Project अल्हड़ (Alharh) aims to create a robust sensitised community in Bhagalpur to collectively spread awareness, break the taboo, debunk myths and initiate fearless conversations around menstruation. The campaign aims to reach at least 6000 adolescent girls from government and private schools in Baghalpur district in 2020.

Read more about the campaign here.

A psychologist and co-founder of a mental health NGO called Customize Cognition, Ritika forayed into the space of menstrual health and hygiene, sexual and reproductive healthcare and rights and gender equality as an MHM Fellow with YKA. She says, “The experience of working on MHM/SRHR and gender equality has been an enriching and eye-opening experience. I have learned what’s beneath the surface of the issue, be it awareness, lack of resources or disregard for trans men, who also menstruate.”

The Transmen-ses campaign aims to tackle the issue of silence and disregard for trans men’s menstruation needs, by mobilising gender sensitive health professionals and gender neutral restrooms in Lucknow.

Read more about the campaign here.

A Computer Science engineer by education, Nitisha started her career in the corporate sector, before realising she wanted to work in the development and social justice space. Since then, she has worked with Teach For India and Care India and is from the founding batch of Indian School of Development Management (ISDM), a one of its kind organisation creating leaders for the development sector through its experiential learning post graduate program.

As a Youth Ki Awaaz Menstrual Health Fellow, Nitisha has started Let’s Talk Period, a campaign to mobilise young people to switch to sustainable period products. She says, “80 lakh women in Delhi use non-biodegradable sanitary products, generate 3000 tonnes of menstrual waste, that takes 500-800 years to decompose; which in turn contributes to the health issues of all menstruators, increased burden of waste management on the city and harmful living environment for all citizens.

Let’s Talk Period aims to change this by

Find out more about her campaign here.

Share your details to download the report.

We promise not to spam or send irrelevant information.

A former Assistant Secretary with the Ministry of Women and Child Development in West Bengal for three months, Lakshmi Bhavya has been championing the cause of menstrual hygiene in her district. By associating herself with the Lalana Campaign, a holistic menstrual hygiene awareness campaign which is conducted by the Anahat NGO, Lakshmi has been slowly breaking taboos when it comes to periods and menstrual hygiene.

A Gender Rights Activist working with the tribal and marginalized communities in india, Srilekha is a PhD scholar working on understanding body and sexuality among tribal girls, to fill the gaps in research around indigenous women and their stories. Srilekha has worked extensively at the grassroots level with community based organisations, through several advocacy initiatives around Gender, Mental Health, Menstrual Hygiene and Sexual and Reproductive Health Rights (SRHR) for the indigenous in Jharkhand, over the last 6 years.

Srilekha has also contributed to sustainable livelihood projects and legal aid programs for survivors of sex trafficking. She has been conducting research based programs on maternal health, mental health, gender based violence, sex and sexuality. Her interest lies in conducting workshops for young people on life skills, feminism, gender and sexuality, trauma, resilience and interpersonal relationships.

A Guwahati-based college student pursuing her Masters in Tata Institute of Social Sciences, Bidisha started the #BleedwithDignity campaign on the technology platform, demanding that the Government of Assam install
biodegradable sanitary pad vending machines in all government schools across the state. Her petition on has already gathered support from over 90000 people and continues to grow.

Bidisha was selected in’s flagship program ‘She Creates Change’ having run successful online advocacy
campaigns, which were widely recognised. Through the #BleedwithDignity campaign; she organised and celebrated World Menstrual Hygiene Day, 2019 in Guwahati, Assam by hosting a wall mural by collaborating with local organisations. The initiative was widely covered by national and local media, and the mural was later inaugurated by the event’s chief guest Commissioner of Guwahati Municipal Corporation (GMC) Debeswar Malakar, IAS.

Sign up for the Youth Ki Awaaz Prime Ministerial Brief below