This post has been self-published on Youth Ki Awaaz by Alolika A. Dutta. Just like them, anyone can publish on Youth Ki Awaaz.

Stammering And Discrimination: The Nuances Behind Invisible Disabilities

More from Alolika A. Dutta

To stammer is to speak with sudden involuntary pauses and a tendency to repeat the initial letters of words. I have had a stammer ever since I started speaking. Over time, I have made certain stylistic alterations in my speech to reduce the occurrence of a stammer. In this process, I have learned that people who stammer are complex individuals. We can be active participants at conferences and other public speaking platforms, and at the same time, we can struggle to pronounce our name on a phone call. We can be writers, leaders and excellent communicators, and at the same time, we can recoil at the sound of certain syllables. It is very normal for a Person Who Stammers (PWS) to be two things at once.

I never considered my stammer to be a disability because I never found it to be debilitating or limiting. However, everybody stammers differently and it is our collective experiences that hold significance and guide social discourse. In certain circumstances, a stammer needs to be addressed as a disability that requires as much attention as visible disabilities do.

Over time, I have noticed certain parallels between stammering and institutional as well as interpersonal oppression. And, the most frightening part is, this kind of oppression is easily internalised through self-deprecating justifications. From offices to classrooms to coffee tables, an implicit form of ableism is consistently promoted. Ableism is a form of discrimination that favours able-bodied people. However, the term has now incorporated mental health as well.

Within the South Asian community, a form of unrealisable perfectionism has fostered. This is particularly visible within academic spaces where disability is perceived through the lens of incapability, vulnerability, failure, and dependence. It is common for South Asian households to partake in sympathetic conversations around disability that often conclude on a condescending note. These conversations tend to celebrate privilege and regularly involve victim-blaming. In societies that value individuals on the basis of perfection, material success, and productivity, ableism is common and dignity is bargained.

In India, ableism is often compounded with other forms of discrimination, such as casteism, colourism, and sexism. And, these ableist narratives that pervade the workplace, society and even the constitution pose disproportionately graver consequences for certain communities, such as women and women belonging to conventionally lower caste communities.

Stammering And Sexism

Stammering and sexism share a very nuanced relationship. Women who stammer are victims of a form of dual discrimination in patriarchal and ableist societies. Hence, there is an ingredient of intersectionality as to how society responds to a stammer. Women face continual tone-policing, which leads to a greater amount of marginalisation due to their stammer. Internalised misogyny and systemic sexism have also not proven to be very helpful in the promotion of the disability rights of women. In the corporate corridors and the political arena, women are not expected to be leaders and when they do find themselves in a position of leadership, they face additional barriers. These barriers have an aggravated impact on women who have a disability.

Even academic institutions participate in sexist pedagogy because of which male students who stammer are nurtured and supported, while female students who stammer are often neglected. Added to that, men and women respond differently to any anxiety and agony stemming from dysfluency. While men tend to be more vocal and aggressive about it, women tend to go into a shell. This further complicates the process of seeking help, since stammering, being an invisible disability, becomes entirely latent if the PWS does not engage in dialogue. And, the need for a PWS to engage in active dialogue is aggravated by the fact that India has inadequate healthcare infrastructure, particularly with respect to mental disorders. Hence, unless a PWS or a person with an invisible disability addresses the issue themselves, diagnosis and medical remedy are practically unreachable. In India, healthcare infrastructure has failed people with mental disorders time and again.

School counsellors regularly overlook female students who might need help. And, the statistic claiming that men are five times more likely to stutter than women has only strengthened this practice. Women who stammer are pushed into the disability closet and compelled to express shame about their disability. Women have recurrently been encouraged to feel a sense of inferiority and the opposition to such misdirected encouragement is evident from the social reform movements of today. Body neutrality, self-care, pro-choice, and radical feminism are a few movements that have actively advocated for acceptance.

At schools, female students are asked to suppress their stammer by forcefully avoiding expression and communication at times. This is a form of intellectual and emotional abuse. A stammer is often taken seriously when it comes from a man since it can hinder communication and decelerate personality development, which will eventually cut down his career prospects because of the ableist recruitment policies of capitalist organisations. Ironically, the ableism that exists within offices is indirectly supplemented by the benevolent ableism within academic spaces. On the other side, when a woman stammers, it is dismissed as a symptom of underlying timidity which is viewed to be a feminine attribute. This notion is pushed ahead by the fact that personality, profession, and prosperity are never seen as priorities when the person concerned is a woman.

Hence, the only option left for women who stammer is to disallow their stammer from becoming a hindrance in their professional growth and when women do so, it is labelled as radical, unsanctioned, or pointless. All these complications make it much easier for men to overcome a stammer. This kind of disproportionate treatment also places men in a better position to combat the consequences of a stammer. There is a need to account for the compounded discrimination faced by the disabled, due to their sexual orientation, caste, class, and age. Ableism often adds to already existent forms of discrimination, which are often so nuanced that the struggles of those who face dual discrimination does not become a part of mainstream discourse.

Stammering And Casteism

In Indian society, with its deeply-rooted systems of casteism and Brahmanical patriarchy, it is no surprise that Dalit women are likely to face relatively greater repercussions of speech impediments. Within the Dalit community, medical support for invisible disabilities is often unavailable, inaccessible, or unaffordable due to the social ostracisation, indebtedness, and political precariousness faced by the community. The rampant discrimination against the Dalit community has deprived the community of essential financial, medical, and educational resources, thus making it significantly tougher for them to seek support and counselling for invisible disabilities, particularly mental health disorders which are often viewed as an ‘urban issue.’

When the community lacks resources to fund medication for visible illnesses, invisible and internal ailments will go unattended. And, this will eventually cripple their ability to seek employment and steady incomes, which will again force them into the marginalised position that they came from. It is a politically-motivated unending cycle of deprivation. A lack of access to necessary education and welfare services will only make them more and more deprived of these resources. Poverty is indeed not a choice, but a consequence of social structure.

There is hidden apartheid in India. Caste-based discrimination transcends public authorities and governmental institutions, it is visible even in the treatment of a Dalit person by the police and discrimination in the provision of disaster relief. The condition of Dalit communities in India is nearly as severe as the condition of African-American people in the United States, however, it is rarely brought up in discussions surrounding institutional discrimination. The reservation system has not resolved casteism and neither will the upcoming notion of ‘castelessness.’ There is a disparity in access to services, justice mechanisms, and even healthcare facilities. In India, the unavailability of mental health specialists is a reality that clearly has a greater bearing on the marginalised and the dispossessed.

Therefore, if we seek to counter ableism today, we will have to simultaneously counter sexism, classism, casteism, ageism, and other forms of oppression that act in coordination with ableism. Today, if we want to eradicate the ableist narrative that is peddled by capitalist organisations and bigoted individuals, we will have to analyse recruitment policies, workplace accessibility, artistic representation, social perception, insensitive comedy, conventions, and legislations.

The Workplace

The office is the place where implicit bias, stigma and stereotypes become increasingly evident. While gender-based discrimination and class-based discrimination have contended sufficiently, ableism still goes unchecked. Ableist narratives are common at the workplace, often fuelled by a productivity-driven, capitalist agenda that actively sidelines the fact that most of the disabled community can still make for efficient employees provided they are given a position in the organisation that empowers them to do work that falls under their capability.

For instance, a PWS is not someone who cannot partake in communication-oriented work. On the contrary, most people who stammer have a very nuanced and holistic understanding of communication since we have spent a considerable portion of our lives in silent observation. Hence, even a PWS can be engaged in vocations such as marketing, as long as the workplace is supportive of their disability. However, it is fairly common for a PWS to face discrimination even while being recruited.

Apart from hindrances during recruitment, people with a disability often get caught in the “assistant trap.” It is important to understand that not promoting employees because of their disfluency and despite their performance is blatant injustice. However, in the workplace, discriminatory behaviour is aggravated by societal predispositions.

A study by Dr Clare Butler of Newcastle University Business School found that every one of the 36 men who were interviewed experienced “routine discrimination” at the hands of employers. What you must note here is that none of the participants in the interview were women. Further, a number of capitalist organisations have an ableist recruitment policy, which deploys insensitive language towards people with a disability and a critique of such language is often unwelcome.

It is important to understand that language shapes behaviours and behaviours play a role in constructing systems of oppression. Hence, derogatory language paves the way for casual discrimination by normalising derisive references to the disabled. Even notions which imply that disability is inherently detrimental and that people with a disability are dependent and in constant need of unsolicited help, a veiled form of ableism is promoted. It is important to understand that the workplace atmosphere will have to evolve in order to maximise employee potential and create an inclusive space for a diverse workforce, which includes people with disabilities, people with a hyphenated identity, non-binary individuals, and women, among others.

The Society

A number of disabled individuals are misrepresented within society. We find ourselves being represented on stage, on screen, and on paper through insensitive descriptions and storylines. Cinema has recurrently depicted people who stammer in an inappropriate light. A stammer has been used to evoke humour or it has been used as a tool to merely decorate a character’s personality. A stammer is not something that should be used for character development because such usage is inherently ableist and derogatory. In films, a PWS is shown to use self-deprecating humour. This kind of representation has only pushed the disabled back into the disability closet.

The people who used to speak freely about their impairment have been made to question if they should continue doing so since the characters in these films are ashamed of the vulnerability that comes with disclosure. This has led to self-stigma. Certain films have attempted to associate a stammer with a lack of intelligence. However, such a portrayal could not be farther from the truth. Further, films have often appropriated the struggles of a PWS and given those struggles a comical undertone. By doing so, the film industry has merely normalised the mockery and humiliation faced by those who stammer. It is alarming how mocking a PWS continues to be a socially acceptable practice.

Hence, we collectively need to change how we respond to stammering. It is not okay to deride, humiliate, or question a PWS, especially with an ulterior motive. Even humour that uses statements such as “Did I stutter?” to infer a supposed disclarity in the speaker’s speech is an example of derogatory humour. We need to dissociate from such insensitive comedy. We, as a society, need to create an environment that is conducive for the disabled. We need to stop misrepresenting people who stammer, for the sake of superficial art and capitalist propaganda about inclusivity. We need to stop casting actors who do not stammer as characters who stammer. There are a number of actors who stammer and it would do no harm to cast them in such roles. This is what representation is. Using a stammer to compound a character’s personality and then asking an abled person to play that character, is appropriation.

The Law

In India, the only law that protects the disabled from discrimination in the workplace is the ‘Persons with Disabilities (Equal Opportunities, Protection of Rights, and Full Participation) Act’ in 1995. Additionally, India has signed the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. However, under the act, only the following categories of disability are protected:

1) Blindness;

2) Low vision;

3) Leprosy-cured;

4) Hearing impairment;

5) Locomotor disability;

6) Mental retardation, and

7) Mental illness.

The law does not cover speech disorders, despite the fact that they are very prevalent and generally treatable. This places a PWS in a place of insecurity since there is no legal framework that directly accounts for the discrimination faced due to speech disorders. The law needs to be amended. The law should specifically incorporate a category for speech impediments, albeit stammering qualifies as a pathological illness in certain situations, speech impairments also constitute a separate section under disability.

Collectively and unanimously, we must change society, we must also advocate for change in the workplace, the law, and the system as a whole. We must change our behaviour towards people who stammer and enhance our understanding of invisible disabilities. We must understand that by altering our perception and approach, we have the power to change the lives of multiple people.

A shift in thought process will force the art industry and the constitution to incorporate changes as well, which will directly remove the barriers that are faced by people who stammer. It is a step-by-step process and it is a long journey, but it is high time we started.

Note: This article was originally published on Brown Girl Magazine.

Featured image for representative purpose only.
Featured image source: Max Pixel.
You must be to comment.
  1. Regula Ram

    “These converstaions tend to CELEBRATE PRIVILEGE”… A very good description of people’s bad habits.

    With or without religion, after all we all know that a concept of “celebrating privilege” is not right, not fair, does not make sense. Personally, I’ve always been thankful for privilege of whatever type, the privilege of having enough money, the privilege of having a healthy child, and so on. Privilege is something which we clearly haven’t deserved. I admit that, like many other people, I forget it now and then. Sometimes I take it for granted that I have a home, a job, and a family.

    At the bottom you say that changes in the constitution will directly remove the barriers (for PWS).
    In this point I am a bit less optimistic. But I think there ARE ways to make society more aware of what is essential in life, what is fair, what is right. For example if more women worked. If more women had a job, a job which makes them proud, not necessarily an academic job, but any sort of skilled work. Sorry to shift the focus a little bit away from the topic, that’s not my intention. But I think the endless talk among housewives aged 50, 40, even 30 about a perfect son-in-law or a perfect daughter-in-law are an obstacle on the way to equal rights. A child whose aunties work in various professions, each in an interesting profession chosen by herself, will be curious to explore the world and all the diversity which exists in every field of the real world. A child whose aunties are housewives and keen gossippers will have a limited perception, and see a disabled or a slightly disabled person as “inferior”.
    This is only my personal opinion.

More from Alolika A. Dutta

Similar Posts

By India Development Review (IDR)

By Amrit Foundation of India

By Tara Kalra

    If you do not receive an email within the next 5 mins, please check your spam box or email us at

      If you do not receive an email within the next 5 mins, please check your spam box or email us at

        If you do not receive an email within the next 5 mins, please check your spam box or email us at

        Wondering what to write about?

        Here are some topics to get you started

        Share your details to download the report.

        We promise not to spam or send irrelevant information.

        Share your details to download the report.

        We promise not to spam or send irrelevant information.

        An ambassador and trained facilitator under Eco Femme (a social enterprise working towards menstrual health in south India), Sanjina is also an active member of the MHM Collective- India and Menstrual Health Alliance- India. She has conducted Menstrual Health sessions in multiple government schools adopted by Rotary District 3240 as part of their WinS project in rural Bengal. She has also delivered training of trainers on SRHR, gender, sexuality and Menstruation for Tomorrow’s Foundation, Vikramshila Education Resource Society, Nirdhan trust and Micro Finance, Tollygunj Women In Need, Paint It Red in Kolkata.

        Now as an MH Fellow with YKA, she’s expanding her impressive scope of work further by launching a campaign to facilitate the process of ensuring better menstrual health and SRH services for women residing in correctional homes in West Bengal. The campaign will entail an independent study to take stalk of the present conditions of MHM in correctional homes across the state and use its findings to build public support and political will to take the necessary action.

        Saurabh has been associated with YKA as a user and has consistently been writing on the issue MHM and its intersectionality with other issues in the society. Now as an MHM Fellow with YKA, he’s launched the Right to Period campaign, which aims to ensure proper execution of MHM guidelines in Delhi’s schools.

        The long-term aim of the campaign is to develop an open culture where menstruation is not treated as a taboo. The campaign also seeks to hold the schools accountable for their responsibilities as an important component in the implementation of MHM policies by making adequate sanitation infrastructure and knowledge of MHM available in school premises.

        Read more about his campaign.

        Harshita is a psychologist and works to support people with mental health issues, particularly adolescents who are survivors of violence. Associated with the Azadi Foundation in UP, Harshita became an MHM Fellow with YKA, with the aim of promoting better menstrual health.

        Her campaign #MeriMarzi aims to promote menstrual health and wellness, hygiene and facilities for female sex workers in UP. She says, “Knowledge about natural body processes is a very basic human right. And for individuals whose occupation is providing sexual services, it becomes even more important.”

        Meri Marzi aims to ensure sensitised, non-discriminatory health workers for the needs of female sex workers in the Suraksha Clinics under the UPSACS (Uttar Pradesh State AIDS Control Society) program by creating more dialogues and garnering public support for the cause of sex workers’ menstrual rights. The campaign will also ensure interventions with sex workers to clear misconceptions around overall hygiene management to ensure that results flow both ways.

        Read more about her campaign.

        MH Fellow Sabna comes with significant experience working with a range of development issues. A co-founder of Project Sakhi Saheli, which aims to combat period poverty and break menstrual taboos, Sabna has, in the past, worked on the issue of menstruation in urban slums of Delhi with women and adolescent girls. She and her team also released MenstraBook, with menstrastories and organised Menstra Tlk in the Delhi School of Social Work to create more conversations on menstruation.

        With YKA MHM Fellow Vineet, Sabna launched Menstratalk, a campaign that aims to put an end to period poverty and smash menstrual taboos in society. As a start, the campaign aims to begin conversations on menstrual health with five hundred adolescents and youth in Delhi through offline platforms, and through this community mobilise support to create Period Friendly Institutions out of educational institutes in the city.

        Read more about her campaign. 

        A student from Delhi School of Social work, Vineet is a part of Project Sakhi Saheli, an initiative by the students of Delhi school of Social Work to create awareness on Menstrual Health and combat Period Poverty. Along with MHM Action Fellow Sabna, Vineet launched Menstratalk, a campaign that aims to put an end to period poverty and smash menstrual taboos in society.

        As a start, the campaign aims to begin conversations on menstrual health with five hundred adolescents and youth in Delhi through offline platforms, and through this community mobilise support to create Period Friendly Institutions out of educational institutes in the city.

        Find out more about the campaign here.

        A native of Bhagalpur district – Bihar, Shalini Jha believes in equal rights for all genders and wants to work for a gender-equal and just society. In the past she’s had a year-long association as a community leader with Haiyya: Organise for Action’s Health Over Stigma campaign. She’s pursuing a Master’s in Literature with Ambedkar University, Delhi and as an MHM Fellow with YKA, recently launched ‘Project अल्हड़ (Alharh)’.

        She says, “Bihar is ranked the lowest in India’s SDG Index 2019 for India. Hygienic and comfortable menstruation is a basic human right and sustainable development cannot be ensured if menstruators are deprived of their basic rights.” Project अल्हड़ (Alharh) aims to create a robust sensitised community in Bhagalpur to collectively spread awareness, break the taboo, debunk myths and initiate fearless conversations around menstruation. The campaign aims to reach at least 6000 adolescent girls from government and private schools in Baghalpur district in 2020.

        Read more about the campaign here.

        A psychologist and co-founder of a mental health NGO called Customize Cognition, Ritika forayed into the space of menstrual health and hygiene, sexual and reproductive healthcare and rights and gender equality as an MHM Fellow with YKA. She says, “The experience of working on MHM/SRHR and gender equality has been an enriching and eye-opening experience. I have learned what’s beneath the surface of the issue, be it awareness, lack of resources or disregard for trans men, who also menstruate.”

        The Transmen-ses campaign aims to tackle the issue of silence and disregard for trans men’s menstruation needs, by mobilising gender sensitive health professionals and gender neutral restrooms in Lucknow.

        Read more about the campaign here.

        A Computer Science engineer by education, Nitisha started her career in the corporate sector, before realising she wanted to work in the development and social justice space. Since then, she has worked with Teach For India and Care India and is from the founding batch of Indian School of Development Management (ISDM), a one of its kind organisation creating leaders for the development sector through its experiential learning post graduate program.

        As a Youth Ki Awaaz Menstrual Health Fellow, Nitisha has started Let’s Talk Period, a campaign to mobilise young people to switch to sustainable period products. She says, “80 lakh women in Delhi use non-biodegradable sanitary products, generate 3000 tonnes of menstrual waste, that takes 500-800 years to decompose; which in turn contributes to the health issues of all menstruators, increased burden of waste management on the city and harmful living environment for all citizens.

        Let’s Talk Period aims to change this by

        Find out more about her campaign here.

        Share your details to download the report.

        We promise not to spam or send irrelevant information.

        A former Assistant Secretary with the Ministry of Women and Child Development in West Bengal for three months, Lakshmi Bhavya has been championing the cause of menstrual hygiene in her district. By associating herself with the Lalana Campaign, a holistic menstrual hygiene awareness campaign which is conducted by the Anahat NGO, Lakshmi has been slowly breaking taboos when it comes to periods and menstrual hygiene.

        A Gender Rights Activist working with the tribal and marginalized communities in india, Srilekha is a PhD scholar working on understanding body and sexuality among tribal girls, to fill the gaps in research around indigenous women and their stories. Srilekha has worked extensively at the grassroots level with community based organisations, through several advocacy initiatives around Gender, Mental Health, Menstrual Hygiene and Sexual and Reproductive Health Rights (SRHR) for the indigenous in Jharkhand, over the last 6 years.

        Srilekha has also contributed to sustainable livelihood projects and legal aid programs for survivors of sex trafficking. She has been conducting research based programs on maternal health, mental health, gender based violence, sex and sexuality. Her interest lies in conducting workshops for young people on life skills, feminism, gender and sexuality, trauma, resilience and interpersonal relationships.

        A Guwahati-based college student pursuing her Masters in Tata Institute of Social Sciences, Bidisha started the #BleedwithDignity campaign on the technology platform, demanding that the Government of Assam install
        biodegradable sanitary pad vending machines in all government schools across the state. Her petition on has already gathered support from over 90000 people and continues to grow.

        Bidisha was selected in’s flagship program ‘She Creates Change’ having run successful online advocacy
        campaigns, which were widely recognised. Through the #BleedwithDignity campaign; she organised and celebrated World Menstrual Hygiene Day, 2019 in Guwahati, Assam by hosting a wall mural by collaborating with local organisations. The initiative was widely covered by national and local media, and the mural was later inaugurated by the event’s chief guest Commissioner of Guwahati Municipal Corporation (GMC) Debeswar Malakar, IAS.

        Sign up for the Youth Ki Awaaz Prime Ministerial Brief below