Triple Talaq Bill: Was It Right To Make Instant Talaq A Criminal Offence?

Note: The Prime Ministerial Brief podcast is now live! Head here to listen and subscribe to the latest episode on issues that young India wants the Prime Minister to pay attention to.
SansadUnplugged logoEditor’s Note: This post is a part of #SansadUnplugged, a campaign by Young Leaders for Active Citizenship India and Youth Ki Awaaz where your elected representatives engage directly with you on key policy issues that matter. Find out more and engage with those you vote for here.

After going through the provisions of The Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Marriage) Bill, 2018, the first question which strikes my mind is—will it serve the purpose for which it is introduced?

From the preamble of this bill, I concluded that the purpose of this bill is to protect the rights of married Muslim women and to abolish the practice of instant talaq, i.e. Talaq-e-biddat.

Image via Getty

To give effect to the judgment of Honourable Supreme Court in ‘Shayara Bano vs. Union of India‘, declaring the practice of talaq-e-biddat unconstitutional, discriminatory and against the dignity of women, and to redress the grievances of victims of this practice, this bill was tabled in the parliament and now it has been passed by both the houses.

Now, to what extent will this protect the rights of married Muslim women? The answer lies in the future only. But clearly, one can point out a lot of uncertainty around this bill, and it looks like it has been passed hastily.

There are many reasons why I say so. These are:

1. On the one hand, by pronouncing talaq in any form as void, the bill has tried to protect the institution of marriage, and thus, the right of women, but on the other hand, by making the act of pronouncement of talaq an offence, lawmakers have somehow tried to damage the same institution of marriage. No one can imagine a situation in which a husband is convicted for the offence of pronouncing talaq, and after his release, reconciling with his spouse.

2. The second issue which strikes my mind is—what will happen in those cases where the husband is the sole earner of the family, and he doesn’t have any other means other than his monthly income? If in this case, he is convicted of the offence mentioned above, then again, the woman will be forced into the same situation which would arise in the case when she was the victim of triple talaq, i.e. the state of destitution and vagrancy.

3. One point which has been left untouched by the lawmakers is the situation where the husband gets separated from his wife without pronouncing talaq. Neither it has been made punishable under this bill, nor it is punishable under any other act. There is still discrimination under our laws as an act of pronouncing talaq has been made criminal, but deserting one’s wife is not. Both these acts result in the same situation, i.e. the state of destitution and vagrancy. Moreover, under this bill, lawmakers have only provided a window for getting away from the clutches of law by not dealing with the situation under which a husband deserts his wife.

I would conclude by saying, there is no doubt that the practice of talaq-e-biddat was discriminatory and against the constitutional principles, and it violates the dignity of woman. Therefore, it should be abolished, but at the same time, introducing a rational law is necessary.

Tell us your thoughts and observations on this Bill. Your article will contribute to the way your elected representatives are presenting bills, defining policies and creating change in the Parliament. Response article will be shared with respective Member of Parliament, and in many cases - suggestions are included in the drafting of future policies.

Similar Posts

A former Assistant Secretary with the Ministry of Women and Child Development in West Bengal for three months, Lakshmi Bhavya has been championing the cause of menstrual hygiene in her district. By associating herself with the Lalana Campaign, a holistic menstrual hygiene awareness campaign which is conducted by the Anahat NGO, Lakshmi has been slowly breaking taboos when it comes to periods and menstrual hygiene.

A Gender Rights Activist working with the tribal and marginalized communities in india, Srilekha is a PhD scholar working on understanding body and sexuality among tribal girls, to fill the gaps in research around indigenous women and their stories. Srilekha has worked extensively at the grassroots level with community based organisations, through several advocacy initiatives around Gender, Mental Health, Menstrual Hygiene and Sexual and Reproductive Health Rights (SRHR) for the indigenous in Jharkhand, over the last 6 years.

Srilekha has also contributed to sustainable livelihood projects and legal aid programs for survivors of sex trafficking. She has been conducting research based programs on maternal health, mental health, gender based violence, sex and sexuality. Her interest lies in conducting workshops for young people on life skills, feminism, gender and sexuality, trauma, resilience and interpersonal relationships.

A Guwahati-based college student pursuing her Masters in Tata Institute of Social Sciences, Bidisha started the #BleedwithDignity campaign on the technology platform, demanding that the Government of Assam install
biodegradable sanitary pad vending machines in all government schools across the state. Her petition on has already gathered support from over 90000 people and continues to grow.

Bidisha was selected in’s flagship program ‘She Creates Change’ having run successful online advocacy
campaigns, which were widely recognised. Through the #BleedwithDignity campaign; she organised and celebrated World Menstrual Hygiene Day, 2019 in Guwahati, Assam by hosting a wall mural by collaborating with local organisations. The initiative was widely covered by national and local media, and the mural was later inaugurated by the event’s chief guest Commissioner of Guwahati Municipal Corporation (GMC) Debeswar Malakar, IAS.

Sign up for the Youth Ki Awaaz Prime Ministerial Brief below