Kashmir: Why I Believe The Sense Of Separation Has To Go

India was cut into two, rather three, by a bizarre logic that its Hindus and Muslims were two different nations who could not live in the same polity. At the insistence of the Muslim League, which styled itself, with tenable justification, as the sole spokesman of the Muslims, the Muslim majority areas were hived off. This so called solution, like every coercive solution, engendered myriad problems.

The foremost of which was that the minorities in both the countries were left at the mercy of respective sullen majorities. Since the nationhood was premised on religion, not territory, the communal argument, too clever by half as it was, didn’t envision the fate to befall the religious minorities in the countries ruled by their respective religious majorities. What would be the nation of the minorities post-Partition? Would they belong to the nation constituted by their religion or to where they lived?

How the two, and later three, countries treated their religious minorities bore the imprint of the ideologies which had gone into shaping their political discourses. The Indian National Congress, true to its professed creed, kept India secular where the minorities were accorded equal citizenship. Pakistan, inevitably, had to become a theocratic state where the minorities would, ipso facto, be relegated to second class and subordinate status.

Since the Muslim majority areas of the British India became Pakistan, the same was expected of a Muslim majority princely state as well, but the complication came with the lapse of the Paramountcy of the British Crown, and the restoration of the sovereignty of the ruling prince who was given the right to join either of the two dominions or none. A Hindu Maharaja in a Muslim majority state was a real twist in the tale, a tale which was doomed to remain twisted for seemingly ever.

A scene from Srinagar. Civilian life has been dotted with the presence of armed forces for decades in the valley, serving as a pressing reminder that the state is under constant siege. (Photo: Kashmir Global/Flickr)

Pakistan expected Kashmir to become its part as a natural corollary of the logic of Partition, but the Maharaja, having absolute right to join either, or none, would keep his own interest paramount. Moreover, there had been a mass movement in Kashmir against the systemic wrongs, exploitation and discrimination which the Maharaja’s feudal monarchy represented. The movement’s charismatic leader felt a natural affinity with the progressive ideals of the Congress led India rather than the dystopian fortress of fanaticism Pakistan was bound to become. Above all, he wanted to abolish feudal relations and institute land reforms in order to drag his people out of the abject poverty which had been their lot. It was not possible in Pakistan, a country made by the zamindars and for the zamindars.

Pakistan became impatient, and sent troops. The Maharaja sought India’s help which was given only after he agreed to accede his state to India. A war happened. Ceasefire followed. Pakistan kept a slice of Kashmir. UN mediation was sought. The plebiscite couldn’t be held as Pakistan didn’t give up what it occupied. The story became stale.

To cut a long story short, Pakistan considered Kashmir’s accession to India a freakish anomaly which undermined its ideological foundation that if Muslims were in majority in any part of India, they should become a separate nation and carve out a separate country and merge the same with it.

It was a great challenge for India too. Whether it was going to make Kashmir an organic part of its body politic, or accommodate it as a foreign element which would need special provisions and safeguards. The Nehru-led India — liberal, accommodating and indulgent —Fabian not only in economy but in socio-political policies for minorities too — chose the latter.

It looked beautiful. India at its secular best insofar as secularism meant letting the minorities preserve and celebrate their religious distinction. But, since religion and politics had been reincarnated as Siamese twins in how the nation was often imagined and conceptualised in India, it effectively meant that they could continue working with the same old premise which legitimised separatism, i.e. a Muslim majority state was different from others.

So, in essence, special provisions for Kashmir were mainly because its majority was Muslim. This implied a tacit acceptance on part of India that there would be valid reasons if the state were to go for secession, and merge with Pakistan. And, therefore, the special provisions were the sops to keep it from going over the other side. Article 370 had essentially been the continuation of the two nation theory.

Anyway, things didn’t go well. An unending series mistrusts and betrayals from both sides never let democracy take roots in Kashmir. Elections never had much credibility, and the rulers they threw up couldn’t claim for themselves any representative status. Pakistan was on the look out to avenge 1971, and raring to inflict a thousand cuts to bleed India to death.

The Afghan War, the Saudi Wahabi petro dollars and the Western support for Islamic radicalism had changed the ideological landscape of the area. Thus, the grievances which in most other parts of India would have led to agitations, led to insurgency in Kashmir. An insurgency which, both by design and default, became Pakistan’s war on India. Many Kashmiris fought it, and lots of them supported it. Kashmir bled. India bled. The Muslim minority in India became anaemic.

Growing up in the 1980s, we never felt like lesser beings. The wounds of Partition had healed, a new generation had grown up, and 1971 had majorly assuaged the hurt of 1947. We disdained and derided the diffidence and and circumspection of our elders. We were equals. Fully. The word terrorism was linked to Sikhs, not Muslims. But, as the Kashmir insurgency intensified, and bombs went off in temples, markets, streets and parliament — for Kashmir, by Pakistan, in the name of Islam — terrorist became the byword for Muslim.

The Muslim minority — the flotsam and jetsam, the discarded and the dispensable collaterals of the Partition, became guilty by association once again & they lost their standing in the national discourse as the nationalist narrative insinuated suspicion, stoked hatred and incited aggression against them.

The war on India has to stop. The sense of separation has to go. 370, eviscerated as it was, had to go. However, Kashmir is not going anywhere, and Kashmiris are there to stay. And so, the loss of statehood is an abasement as hurtful as thrusting puerility on an adult. That every progress attained, every stage reached, everything taken as a natural state of being can be reversed in a trice, is a distressing devaluation of every ideal and every value held sacred.

Making a plaything of sanctities disturbs the equilibrium of the nature. It leads to a crisis of legitimacy. If Kashmir can be reduced from a state to a union territory, so can be every other state. Everything can cease to be what it has been. Article 370 might have gone, but Article 1 is alive, and it says, “India, that is Bharat, is a union of states.” It means that an India minus a state is that much less.

There is another diminution, that of decency and morality. The extremely sexualised, obscene and offensive triumphalism of religious fanaticism masked as jingoistic hubris masked as patriotic pride is an unwitting admission of illegitimacy.

Lastly, a nation is an imagination which is made a reality when a sea of humanity dreams the same dream at the same time. If some of those dreams turn into a nightmare, the sleep gets disturbed and the spell is broken.

Featured image for representative purpose only.
Featured image source: Kashmir Global/Flickr.
Similar Posts

Share your details to download the report.

We promise not to spam or send irrelevant information.

Share your details to download the report.

We promise not to spam or send irrelevant information.

An ambassador and trained facilitator under Eco Femme (a social enterprise working towards menstrual health in south India), Sanjina is also an active member of the MHM Collective- India and Menstrual Health Alliance- India. She has conducted Menstrual Health sessions in multiple government schools adopted by Rotary District 3240 as part of their WinS project in rural Bengal. She has also delivered training of trainers on SRHR, gender, sexuality and Menstruation for Tomorrow’s Foundation, Vikramshila Education Resource Society, Nirdhan trust and Micro Finance, Tollygunj Women In Need, Paint It Red in Kolkata.

Now as an MH Fellow with YKA, she’s expanding her impressive scope of work further by launching a campaign to facilitate the process of ensuring better menstrual health and SRH services for women residing in correctional homes in West Bengal. The campaign will entail an independent study to take stalk of the present conditions of MHM in correctional homes across the state and use its findings to build public support and political will to take the necessary action.

Saurabh has been associated with YKA as a user and has consistently been writing on the issue MHM and its intersectionality with other issues in the society. Now as an MHM Fellow with YKA, he’s launched the Right to Period campaign, which aims to ensure proper execution of MHM guidelines in Delhi’s schools.

The long-term aim of the campaign is to develop an open culture where menstruation is not treated as a taboo. The campaign also seeks to hold the schools accountable for their responsibilities as an important component in the implementation of MHM policies by making adequate sanitation infrastructure and knowledge of MHM available in school premises.

Read more about his campaign.

Harshita is a psychologist and works to support people with mental health issues, particularly adolescents who are survivors of violence. Associated with the Azadi Foundation in UP, Harshita became an MHM Fellow with YKA, with the aim of promoting better menstrual health.

Her campaign #MeriMarzi aims to promote menstrual health and wellness, hygiene and facilities for female sex workers in UP. She says, “Knowledge about natural body processes is a very basic human right. And for individuals whose occupation is providing sexual services, it becomes even more important.”

Meri Marzi aims to ensure sensitised, non-discriminatory health workers for the needs of female sex workers in the Suraksha Clinics under the UPSACS (Uttar Pradesh State AIDS Control Society) program by creating more dialogues and garnering public support for the cause of sex workers’ menstrual rights. The campaign will also ensure interventions with sex workers to clear misconceptions around overall hygiene management to ensure that results flow both ways.

Read more about her campaign.

MH Fellow Sabna comes with significant experience working with a range of development issues. A co-founder of Project Sakhi Saheli, which aims to combat period poverty and break menstrual taboos, Sabna has, in the past, worked on the issue of menstruation in urban slums of Delhi with women and adolescent girls. She and her team also released MenstraBook, with menstrastories and organised Menstra Tlk in the Delhi School of Social Work to create more conversations on menstruation.

With YKA MHM Fellow Vineet, Sabna launched Menstratalk, a campaign that aims to put an end to period poverty and smash menstrual taboos in society. As a start, the campaign aims to begin conversations on menstrual health with five hundred adolescents and youth in Delhi through offline platforms, and through this community mobilise support to create Period Friendly Institutions out of educational institutes in the city.

Read more about her campaign. 

A student from Delhi School of Social work, Vineet is a part of Project Sakhi Saheli, an initiative by the students of Delhi school of Social Work to create awareness on Menstrual Health and combat Period Poverty. Along with MHM Action Fellow Sabna, Vineet launched Menstratalk, a campaign that aims to put an end to period poverty and smash menstrual taboos in society.

As a start, the campaign aims to begin conversations on menstrual health with five hundred adolescents and youth in Delhi through offline platforms, and through this community mobilise support to create Period Friendly Institutions out of educational institutes in the city.

Find out more about the campaign here.

A native of Bhagalpur district – Bihar, Shalini Jha believes in equal rights for all genders and wants to work for a gender-equal and just society. In the past she’s had a year-long association as a community leader with Haiyya: Organise for Action’s Health Over Stigma campaign. She’s pursuing a Master’s in Literature with Ambedkar University, Delhi and as an MHM Fellow with YKA, recently launched ‘Project अल्हड़ (Alharh)’.

She says, “Bihar is ranked the lowest in India’s SDG Index 2019 for India. Hygienic and comfortable menstruation is a basic human right and sustainable development cannot be ensured if menstruators are deprived of their basic rights.” Project अल्हड़ (Alharh) aims to create a robust sensitised community in Bhagalpur to collectively spread awareness, break the taboo, debunk myths and initiate fearless conversations around menstruation. The campaign aims to reach at least 6000 adolescent girls from government and private schools in Baghalpur district in 2020.

Read more about the campaign here.

A psychologist and co-founder of a mental health NGO called Customize Cognition, Ritika forayed into the space of menstrual health and hygiene, sexual and reproductive healthcare and rights and gender equality as an MHM Fellow with YKA. She says, “The experience of working on MHM/SRHR and gender equality has been an enriching and eye-opening experience. I have learned what’s beneath the surface of the issue, be it awareness, lack of resources or disregard for trans men, who also menstruate.”

The Transmen-ses campaign aims to tackle the issue of silence and disregard for trans men’s menstruation needs, by mobilising gender sensitive health professionals and gender neutral restrooms in Lucknow.

Read more about the campaign here.

A Computer Science engineer by education, Nitisha started her career in the corporate sector, before realising she wanted to work in the development and social justice space. Since then, she has worked with Teach For India and Care India and is from the founding batch of Indian School of Development Management (ISDM), a one of its kind organisation creating leaders for the development sector through its experiential learning post graduate program.

As a Youth Ki Awaaz Menstrual Health Fellow, Nitisha has started Let’s Talk Period, a campaign to mobilise young people to switch to sustainable period products. She says, “80 lakh women in Delhi use non-biodegradable sanitary products, generate 3000 tonnes of menstrual waste, that takes 500-800 years to decompose; which in turn contributes to the health issues of all menstruators, increased burden of waste management on the city and harmful living environment for all citizens.

Let’s Talk Period aims to change this by

Find out more about her campaign here.

Share your details to download the report.

We promise not to spam or send irrelevant information.

A former Assistant Secretary with the Ministry of Women and Child Development in West Bengal for three months, Lakshmi Bhavya has been championing the cause of menstrual hygiene in her district. By associating herself with the Lalana Campaign, a holistic menstrual hygiene awareness campaign which is conducted by the Anahat NGO, Lakshmi has been slowly breaking taboos when it comes to periods and menstrual hygiene.

A Gender Rights Activist working with the tribal and marginalized communities in india, Srilekha is a PhD scholar working on understanding body and sexuality among tribal girls, to fill the gaps in research around indigenous women and their stories. Srilekha has worked extensively at the grassroots level with community based organisations, through several advocacy initiatives around Gender, Mental Health, Menstrual Hygiene and Sexual and Reproductive Health Rights (SRHR) for the indigenous in Jharkhand, over the last 6 years.

Srilekha has also contributed to sustainable livelihood projects and legal aid programs for survivors of sex trafficking. She has been conducting research based programs on maternal health, mental health, gender based violence, sex and sexuality. Her interest lies in conducting workshops for young people on life skills, feminism, gender and sexuality, trauma, resilience and interpersonal relationships.

A Guwahati-based college student pursuing her Masters in Tata Institute of Social Sciences, Bidisha started the #BleedwithDignity campaign on the technology platform Change.org, demanding that the Government of Assam install
biodegradable sanitary pad vending machines in all government schools across the state. Her petition on Change.org has already gathered support from over 90000 people and continues to grow.

Bidisha was selected in Change.org’s flagship program ‘She Creates Change’ having run successful online advocacy
campaigns, which were widely recognised. Through the #BleedwithDignity campaign; she organised and celebrated World Menstrual Hygiene Day, 2019 in Guwahati, Assam by hosting a wall mural by collaborating with local organisations. The initiative was widely covered by national and local media, and the mural was later inaugurated by the event’s chief guest Commissioner of Guwahati Municipal Corporation (GMC) Debeswar Malakar, IAS.

Sign up for the Youth Ki Awaaz Prime Ministerial Brief below