Explained: What We Know About The Nobel-Winning Randomised Controlled Trial

By Kaustav K. Sarkar and Rukmini Thapa

Esther Duflo, Michael Kremer and Abhijit Banerjee received the Sveriges Riksbank Prize in Economic Sciences in Memory of Alfred Nobel (or the Economic Nobel Prize) in 2019. The mainstream print, broadcast and social media in India (and across the globe) have been full of praise for the Nobel laureates.

As Indians, it is indeed a moment of pride that has been written in the glorious pages of our history. Esther Duflo needs special mention for being the second woman to win a Nobel Prize in Economics. It is also good news that after a long time the Nobel committee has decided to confer the award to economists who have been working very closely to poverty and development issues.

However, a section of development economics, especially experts from the heterodox school of thought (like Naila Kabeer, Ingrid H. Kvangraven, Sanjay Reddy, Jean Dreze, Angus Deaton, to name a few) have been expressing their concerns and reservations about Randomised Controlled Trial (RCT). The jubilation and hullabaloo over the award seem to be overlooking key issues in RCT that must be flagged at this opportune moment. This piece is an effort to highlight some key aspects by drawing from the writings and arguments from the Heterodox School of economics.

RCT borrows the concept from the field of medicine where the effect of a drug needs to be evaluated before it is to be released for the masses. Therefore, in medical research, two identical groups are identified among which only the ‘treatment group’ is given the medicine while the ‘control group’ is not.

Later, researchers find out the impact of the medicine by comparing the treatment and control groups. Esther Duflo and her team implemented this concept in the field of economics, to be very specific in development economics. They have widely used RCTs to measure the impact of various policies in the fields of micro-credit, health, education, nutrition, poverty etc.

Since the announcement of the award, a lot has already been written on RCTs, its methodology and the implications over the past few days. So, to spare the readers from the boredom of repetition, we will skip the theory and only discuss some concerns that make RCTs less appealing to a certain section of academia.

  • First and foremost, there are serious ethical issues related to RCTs. In the case of medicine, there is much written on the harmful impacts of clinical trials. In comparison to that, the ethical impacts of RCTs are rarely discussed in the field of economics. When a society and its members face an intervention introduced by researchers (as is particularly the case in RCTs), it leaves behind an impact that cannot be erased from the memory and experience of the subject. Such interventions transfer subjects temporarily to a situation that is far from their lived reality.Even though the intervention is temporary in nature (only during the study period), the impact may leave a permanent imprint on the society and the people intervened (treatment group), even beyond a point of no return. The subject is given a taste of something that they may later never be able to afford by their own means but also not forget it. This is completely different from other non-intervention type survey-based research which doesn’t intervene or artificially alter the existing context through their surveys but collects information to understand the problem.
  • RCT originates from neoclassical microeconomics and individual maximisation. The idea behind RCTs are not ‘guided by theory or values’ to understand over-lapping factors behind chronic crises and systemic problems but aim to provide a quick fix using a purely technical approach to larger issues like poverty, low income, illiteracy, poor health, women empowerment, unemployment, etc. through a dose of measures that do not emerge out of sustained and relentless socio-economic progress. It is externally administered and is thus neither sustainable nor relatable to the lived reality of those from low-income groups.Drawing heavily from the behavioural branch of economics, RCTs believe that the individual behaviour, biases, and judgements are to be fixed to solve socio-economic, development-related problems of the ‘Global South’. This essentially reduces the larger problems of development economics, like poverty, to individualistic nudge and technical fixes. This method undermines the merits of survey methods by limiting its use to focus narrowly on what can be ‘fixed’ sans a holistic assessment of deep-seated systemic issues that need to be corrected through a bottom-up process of change.The focus of RCTs remains on the effects rather than the process and the agencies behind the processes. Its prescriptions derived through lab-replicated experimentation cannot be considered superior to and/or suitable in comparison to policies that are the result of demands driven by political and social mobilisation at the grass-root level.
  • As a result of keeping an individualistic focus, RCTs have little acknowledgement of the larger socio-economic context that individuals and households are part of. Thus, studies other than RCTs, which can and do come out with different results and policy prescriptions, are rarely acknowledged by the RCTs. ‘There is always one truth’ may not be a realistic approach in understanding larger socio-economic problems of human societies. Because society and human behaviours are inter-weaved in a very complicated manner, straightforward external interventions are not really in a position to bring out the diverse social, economic, cultural factors in a society.
  • Lastly, the validation of RCTs by the Nobel Committee has over-rated its methodological superiority which may confine the field of development research to one single approach. Does this not ring a bell? We have witnessed how micro-credit, has been termed as the “silver bullet” in removing poverty, soon after Muhammad Yunus of ‘Grameen Bank’ (the poster boy of micro-credit) in Bangladesh was conferred the Nobel Peace Prize in 2007.The mushrooming of predatory micro-credit institutions world-wide was more conspicuous than its success. Yunus, who still has high hopes in abolishing world poverty through the expansion of micro-credit and visualisedsending poverty in a museum”, is actually fighting an almost lost battle. Latest research has raised serious doubts about whether micro-credit has any positive and sustainable impact on the lives of people from low-income groups. The contentious idea of micro-credit, as an instrument of poverty-eradication, deserves a separate write-up.

Scholars like Naila Kabeer (who have engaged in field-based research on development economics for quite a long time) expressed that the moment experiments like the RCTs move from a laboratory into a real-world, things perhaps turn upside down. The diverse behaviour of humans, their continuously changing interactions and the evolving culture and society make RCT-like experiments really difficult to carry out in the real world and even replicate it.

To conclude, we hope that the field of development economics welcomes a heterodox academy and remains generously open to a plurality of viewpoints where scholars are encouraged to engage in constructive disagreement. While experiments like RCTs may bring issues like poverty and survey-based research into discourse and limelight again, it also might polarise views and debates. The quest, finally, should be to aim for a sustainable pathway driven by masses themselves as the agents of change.

Note: The authors are a PhD student at the Tata Institute of Social Sciences (Mumbai), and an independent researcher.

Featured Image Credit: Eric Fougere/VIP Images/Corbis/Getty, Jon Chase/Harvard University, Saumya Khandelwal/Hindustan Times/Getty
Similar Posts

Share your details to download the report.

We promise not to spam or send irrelevant information.

Share your details to download the report.

We promise not to spam or send irrelevant information.

An ambassador and trained facilitator under Eco Femme (a social enterprise working towards menstrual health in south India), Sanjina is also an active member of the MHM Collective- India and Menstrual Health Alliance- India. She has conducted Menstrual Health sessions in multiple government schools adopted by Rotary District 3240 as part of their WinS project in rural Bengal. She has also delivered training of trainers on SRHR, gender, sexuality and Menstruation for Tomorrow’s Foundation, Vikramshila Education Resource Society, Nirdhan trust and Micro Finance, Tollygunj Women In Need, Paint It Red in Kolkata.

Now as an MH Fellow with YKA, she’s expanding her impressive scope of work further by launching a campaign to facilitate the process of ensuring better menstrual health and SRH services for women residing in correctional homes in West Bengal. The campaign will entail an independent study to take stalk of the present conditions of MHM in correctional homes across the state and use its findings to build public support and political will to take the necessary action.

Saurabh has been associated with YKA as a user and has consistently been writing on the issue MHM and its intersectionality with other issues in the society. Now as an MHM Fellow with YKA, he’s launched the Right to Period campaign, which aims to ensure proper execution of MHM guidelines in Delhi’s schools.

The long-term aim of the campaign is to develop an open culture where menstruation is not treated as a taboo. The campaign also seeks to hold the schools accountable for their responsibilities as an important component in the implementation of MHM policies by making adequate sanitation infrastructure and knowledge of MHM available in school premises.

Read more about his campaign.

Harshita is a psychologist and works to support people with mental health issues, particularly adolescents who are survivors of violence. Associated with the Azadi Foundation in UP, Harshita became an MHM Fellow with YKA, with the aim of promoting better menstrual health.

Her campaign #MeriMarzi aims to promote menstrual health and wellness, hygiene and facilities for female sex workers in UP. She says, “Knowledge about natural body processes is a very basic human right. And for individuals whose occupation is providing sexual services, it becomes even more important.”

Meri Marzi aims to ensure sensitised, non-discriminatory health workers for the needs of female sex workers in the Suraksha Clinics under the UPSACS (Uttar Pradesh State AIDS Control Society) program by creating more dialogues and garnering public support for the cause of sex workers’ menstrual rights. The campaign will also ensure interventions with sex workers to clear misconceptions around overall hygiene management to ensure that results flow both ways.

Read more about her campaign.

MH Fellow Sabna comes with significant experience working with a range of development issues. A co-founder of Project Sakhi Saheli, which aims to combat period poverty and break menstrual taboos, Sabna has, in the past, worked on the issue of menstruation in urban slums of Delhi with women and adolescent girls. She and her team also released MenstraBook, with menstrastories and organised Menstra Tlk in the Delhi School of Social Work to create more conversations on menstruation.

With YKA MHM Fellow Vineet, Sabna launched Menstratalk, a campaign that aims to put an end to period poverty and smash menstrual taboos in society. As a start, the campaign aims to begin conversations on menstrual health with five hundred adolescents and youth in Delhi through offline platforms, and through this community mobilise support to create Period Friendly Institutions out of educational institutes in the city.

Read more about her campaign. 

A student from Delhi School of Social work, Vineet is a part of Project Sakhi Saheli, an initiative by the students of Delhi school of Social Work to create awareness on Menstrual Health and combat Period Poverty. Along with MHM Action Fellow Sabna, Vineet launched Menstratalk, a campaign that aims to put an end to period poverty and smash menstrual taboos in society.

As a start, the campaign aims to begin conversations on menstrual health with five hundred adolescents and youth in Delhi through offline platforms, and through this community mobilise support to create Period Friendly Institutions out of educational institutes in the city.

Find out more about the campaign here.

A native of Bhagalpur district – Bihar, Shalini Jha believes in equal rights for all genders and wants to work for a gender-equal and just society. In the past she’s had a year-long association as a community leader with Haiyya: Organise for Action’s Health Over Stigma campaign. She’s pursuing a Master’s in Literature with Ambedkar University, Delhi and as an MHM Fellow with YKA, recently launched ‘Project अल्हड़ (Alharh)’.

She says, “Bihar is ranked the lowest in India’s SDG Index 2019 for India. Hygienic and comfortable menstruation is a basic human right and sustainable development cannot be ensured if menstruators are deprived of their basic rights.” Project अल्हड़ (Alharh) aims to create a robust sensitised community in Bhagalpur to collectively spread awareness, break the taboo, debunk myths and initiate fearless conversations around menstruation. The campaign aims to reach at least 6000 adolescent girls from government and private schools in Baghalpur district in 2020.

Read more about the campaign here.

A psychologist and co-founder of a mental health NGO called Customize Cognition, Ritika forayed into the space of menstrual health and hygiene, sexual and reproductive healthcare and rights and gender equality as an MHM Fellow with YKA. She says, “The experience of working on MHM/SRHR and gender equality has been an enriching and eye-opening experience. I have learned what’s beneath the surface of the issue, be it awareness, lack of resources or disregard for trans men, who also menstruate.”

The Transmen-ses campaign aims to tackle the issue of silence and disregard for trans men’s menstruation needs, by mobilising gender sensitive health professionals and gender neutral restrooms in Lucknow.

Read more about the campaign here.

A Computer Science engineer by education, Nitisha started her career in the corporate sector, before realising she wanted to work in the development and social justice space. Since then, she has worked with Teach For India and Care India and is from the founding batch of Indian School of Development Management (ISDM), a one of its kind organisation creating leaders for the development sector through its experiential learning post graduate program.

As a Youth Ki Awaaz Menstrual Health Fellow, Nitisha has started Let’s Talk Period, a campaign to mobilise young people to switch to sustainable period products. She says, “80 lakh women in Delhi use non-biodegradable sanitary products, generate 3000 tonnes of menstrual waste, that takes 500-800 years to decompose; which in turn contributes to the health issues of all menstruators, increased burden of waste management on the city and harmful living environment for all citizens.

Let’s Talk Period aims to change this by

Find out more about her campaign here.

Share your details to download the report.

We promise not to spam or send irrelevant information.

A former Assistant Secretary with the Ministry of Women and Child Development in West Bengal for three months, Lakshmi Bhavya has been championing the cause of menstrual hygiene in her district. By associating herself with the Lalana Campaign, a holistic menstrual hygiene awareness campaign which is conducted by the Anahat NGO, Lakshmi has been slowly breaking taboos when it comes to periods and menstrual hygiene.

A Gender Rights Activist working with the tribal and marginalized communities in india, Srilekha is a PhD scholar working on understanding body and sexuality among tribal girls, to fill the gaps in research around indigenous women and their stories. Srilekha has worked extensively at the grassroots level with community based organisations, through several advocacy initiatives around Gender, Mental Health, Menstrual Hygiene and Sexual and Reproductive Health Rights (SRHR) for the indigenous in Jharkhand, over the last 6 years.

Srilekha has also contributed to sustainable livelihood projects and legal aid programs for survivors of sex trafficking. She has been conducting research based programs on maternal health, mental health, gender based violence, sex and sexuality. Her interest lies in conducting workshops for young people on life skills, feminism, gender and sexuality, trauma, resilience and interpersonal relationships.

A Guwahati-based college student pursuing her Masters in Tata Institute of Social Sciences, Bidisha started the #BleedwithDignity campaign on the technology platform Change.org, demanding that the Government of Assam install
biodegradable sanitary pad vending machines in all government schools across the state. Her petition on Change.org has already gathered support from over 90000 people and continues to grow.

Bidisha was selected in Change.org’s flagship program ‘She Creates Change’ having run successful online advocacy
campaigns, which were widely recognised. Through the #BleedwithDignity campaign; she organised and celebrated World Menstrual Hygiene Day, 2019 in Guwahati, Assam by hosting a wall mural by collaborating with local organisations. The initiative was widely covered by national and local media, and the mural was later inaugurated by the event’s chief guest Commissioner of Guwahati Municipal Corporation (GMC) Debeswar Malakar, IAS.

Sign up for the Youth Ki Awaaz Prime Ministerial Brief below