Know Your Law: All You Need To Know About Sec. 151 Of The Criminal Procedure Code

Visakhapatnam has become a hotbed of Andhra Pradesh politics. In January 2017, the then opposition leader Sri Y.S. Jagan Mohan Reddy, who is the present Chief Minister of Andhra Pradesh, was prevented from entering into the city of Visakhapatnam by the police. He was arrested at the airport. The current opposition party, i.e., Telugu Desam Party, was in power back then. Ironically, Sri N. Chandrababu Naidu, the present leader of the opposition, was recently refused in the same manner to enter the city.

Photo: New Indian Express

Sri Y.S. Jagan Mohan Reddy, while he was the leader of the opposition, was given ‘Y’ category security, and the present opposition leader Sri N. Chandrababu Naidu is enjoying ‘Z+’ category of protection. Both of them, at relevant times, were under police supervision in terms of their security and their movement was systematically programmed. There was no scope for indulging in any offence overtly which is punishable for more than three years to make it cognizable offence.

In this backdrop, it has become necessary to examine the scope of Sec.151 of the Criminal Procedure Code 1973, which is often invoked by the ruling party to prevent the leaders from opposition parties to campaign against the policies of the ruling party.

What Does Sec. 151 CrPC Say?

Section 151 in The Code Of Criminal Procedure, 1973 says

Arrest to prevent the commission of cognizable offences.

1. A police officer knowing of a design to commit any cognizable crime may arrest, without orders from a Magistrate and a warrant, the person so designing, if it appears to such officer that the commission of the offence cannot be otherwise prevented.

2. No person arrested under subsections (1) shall be detained in custody for a period exceeding twenty- four hours from the time of his arrest unless his further detention is required or authorised under any other provisions of this Code or of any other law for the time being in force.

Section 151 CrPC is a provision contemplating the preventive action of the police. The said provision can be invoked by the police officer even before a person commits a crime. Generally, a person who is alleged to have committed a cognizable offence can be arrested by the police following the procedure contemplated under Sec.41A of Cr.P.C. in case if the offence is punishable up to 7 years and without the same for the offences punishable for more than seven years.

The power under Section 151 Cr.P.C. is akin to the State Preventive Detention Laws. A reading of the said provision shows that a police officer has to invariably conclude that design to commit a cognizable offence cannot be prevented without arrest.

Article 19(1)(d) of the Constitution of India confers a right upon the citizens to move freely throughout the territory of India. Article 21 of the Constitution stipulates that no person shall be deprived of his life or personal liberty except according to the procedure established by law. Article 19(1)(d) is subject to Article 19(5), which contemplates that the State is not precluded from making any law imposing reasonable restrictions concerning freedom of movement.

A reading of Article 21 of the Constitution shows that if the procedure established by law is followed in curtailing certain liberty of a person, the same does not constitute a violation of the said right.

Supreme Court’s Stance On Section 151

The Hon’ble Supreme Court in Ahmed Noor Mohammed Bhatti’s case while examining Section 151, has held that the safeguard is provided in the statute itself. Therefore, the said provision cannot be held to be unreasonable or arbitrary.

The Hon’ble Supreme court in Rajender Singh Pathania & Ors vs. State Of Nct Of Delhi & Ors had held that Sec.151 of Code of Criminal Procedure itself stipulates conditions under which a police officer may arrest a person without an order from a magistrate and a warrant. The Apex Court further held that a police officer could arrest solely if he comes to know of a design of the person concerned to commit a cognizable offence.

The Hon’ble Supreme Court in Menaka Gandhi’s case held that the procedure established by law as contemplated under Article 21 of the Constitution should be reasonable, just and fair and should be free from unreasonableness and arbitrariness. The Hon’ble Supreme Court also held that the scope of “personal liberty” is not to be construed in a narrow and stricter sense. The Apex Court said that personal liberty should be understood in the broader and liberal sense by giving an expansive interpretation of Article 21 of the Constitution.

Conditions of Arrest Under Section 151 CrPC

  • A further condition for the exercise of such power is that the arrest should be made only if it appears to the police officer concerned that the commission of offence cannot be otherwise prevented. Any breach of these conditions constitutes a violation of fundamental rights inherent in Article 21 & 22 of the Constitution.
  • While invoking Section 151 Cr.P.C., the police officer invariably has to record reasons concerning his knowledge of a design to commit any cognizable offence by a person. In cases where the political leaders are given a ‘Y’ category and ‘Z+’ category security, more burden is cast upon the police officer to record reasons about the said aspect.

Sec.41A was incorporated in the Criminal Procedure Code by amendment, w.e.f., 1.11.2010. When the legislature, by including such a provision had protected rights of a person who is alleged to have committed a crime in relation to his arrest, the police should be more responsible when a person is being arrested even before commissioning a crime on the ground of preventive action.

In such type of cases, police should not lose sight of the fact that the persons are provided with security and the scope of the commission of a cognizable offence overtly is remote. Service of notice of arrest under Sec.151 Cr.P.C. without material evidence relating to the probability of commission of the crime by the said person constitutes a deprivation of personal liberty under Article 21 of the Constitution.

Such an exercise would be arbitrary exercise, and merely because the Code empowers to arrest, the police cannot resort to the same.

The police officer invoking Sec.151 Cr.P.C. should always be conscious of the fact that any arbitrary invocation would violate Article 19(1)(d) and Article 21 of the Constitution.

Similar Posts

A former Assistant Secretary with the Ministry of Women and Child Development in West Bengal for three months, Lakshmi Bhavya has been championing the cause of menstrual hygiene in her district. By associating herself with the Lalana Campaign, a holistic menstrual hygiene awareness campaign which is conducted by the Anahat NGO, Lakshmi has been slowly breaking taboos when it comes to periods and menstrual hygiene.

A Gender Rights Activist working with the tribal and marginalized communities in india, Srilekha is a PhD scholar working on understanding body and sexuality among tribal girls, to fill the gaps in research around indigenous women and their stories. Srilekha has worked extensively at the grassroots level with community based organisations, through several advocacy initiatives around Gender, Mental Health, Menstrual Hygiene and Sexual and Reproductive Health Rights (SRHR) for the indigenous in Jharkhand, over the last 6 years.

Srilekha has also contributed to sustainable livelihood projects and legal aid programs for survivors of sex trafficking. She has been conducting research based programs on maternal health, mental health, gender based violence, sex and sexuality. Her interest lies in conducting workshops for young people on life skills, feminism, gender and sexuality, trauma, resilience and interpersonal relationships.

A Guwahati-based college student pursuing her Masters in Tata Institute of Social Sciences, Bidisha started the #BleedwithDignity campaign on the technology platform Change.org, demanding that the Government of Assam install
biodegradable sanitary pad vending machines in all government schools across the state. Her petition on Change.org has already gathered support from over 90000 people and continues to grow.

Bidisha was selected in Change.org’s flagship program ‘She Creates Change’ having run successful online advocacy
campaigns, which were widely recognised. Through the #BleedwithDignity campaign; she organised and celebrated World Menstrual Hygiene Day, 2019 in Guwahati, Assam by hosting a wall mural by collaborating with local organisations. The initiative was widely covered by national and local media, and the mural was later inaugurated by the event’s chief guest Commissioner of Guwahati Municipal Corporation (GMC) Debeswar Malakar, IAS.

Sign up for the Youth Ki Awaaz Prime Ministerial Brief below