Ranjan Gogoi: Can Post-Retirement Jobs Influence Pre-Retirement Judgements?

Having accepted the nomination to the Rajya Sabha, former Chief Justice of India Ranjan Gogoi has been subject to massive criticism and condemnation. Although this is not the only instance where a Supreme Court Judge has made an entry to the legislature, but the short span (four months after Justice Gogoi’s retirement) within which he has been appointed is highly questionable. In the past also, Judges including Ranganath Mishra, Baharul Islam and others have been either nominated or elected to the Parliament. But, the nomination was after a considerable gap from their retirement.

So, why am I stressing on the time-gap, and not outrightly condemning such post-retirement activities of former Judges? The rationale behind this is striking a proper balance between Article 50 and Article 80 of the Constitution.

Article 50 provides that Judiciary must be segregated from the Executive to ensure independence of the judicial system. Article 80, on the other hand, gives power to the President to nominate 12 members to the Council of States (Rajya Sabha) having special knowledge or practical experience in the field of art, science, social service etc. Conventionally, the President has been nominating at least one eminent member from the field of law.

It is only in line with this convention that Justice Gogoi has been nominated in place of Mr KTS Tulsi, whose term expired after having served for a period of six years. It is also pertinent to mention here that there is no law that prohibits a Judge, whether of the Supreme Court or any High Court to be nominated or elected, as the case may be, to the Parliament. However, if such nomination is done just after the Judge has demitted office, or within its very short period, it raises a serious question on the independence of the Judiciary.

Before his retirement, former CJI Ranjan Gogoi made many verdicts in favour of the Modi government, including the Rafale deal and Ayodhya Ramjanbhoomi case.

The independence of the Judiciary is a part of the basic structure of our Constitution, and is a very hallowed principle that ensures the Judiciary to function independently and impartially. The Supreme Court had struck down the formation of National Judicial Appointments Commission (NJAC) solely on the basis that various provisions of the Act undermined the independence of Judiciary.

Nomination to the Parliament, an offer of governorship, ambassadorship or chairmanship of various tribunals immediately or very soon after their retirement, may influence the Judge to give his judgments in a particular direction. This is because talks or negotiations regarding these nominations commence very early on. The Judge is very likely to give judgements in favour of the Executive, with little regard to the legal principles.

Therefore, only if the ‘cooling- off’ period is maintained – by not nominating or selecting them soon after their term gets over – can the directive principle of separation of the Judiciary be adhered to. This will not only repose to some extent the respect and faith of the public in the Judiciary, but also, the country will greatly benefit from the abundant knowledge and vast experience of the Judges.

Similar Posts

A former Assistant Secretary with the Ministry of Women and Child Development in West Bengal for three months, Lakshmi Bhavya has been championing the cause of menstrual hygiene in her district. By associating herself with the Lalana Campaign, a holistic menstrual hygiene awareness campaign which is conducted by the Anahat NGO, Lakshmi has been slowly breaking taboos when it comes to periods and menstrual hygiene.

A Gender Rights Activist working with the tribal and marginalized communities in india, Srilekha is a PhD scholar working on understanding body and sexuality among tribal girls, to fill the gaps in research around indigenous women and their stories. Srilekha has worked extensively at the grassroots level with community based organisations, through several advocacy initiatives around Gender, Mental Health, Menstrual Hygiene and Sexual and Reproductive Health Rights (SRHR) for the indigenous in Jharkhand, over the last 6 years.

Srilekha has also contributed to sustainable livelihood projects and legal aid programs for survivors of sex trafficking. She has been conducting research based programs on maternal health, mental health, gender based violence, sex and sexuality. Her interest lies in conducting workshops for young people on life skills, feminism, gender and sexuality, trauma, resilience and interpersonal relationships.

A Guwahati-based college student pursuing her Masters in Tata Institute of Social Sciences, Bidisha started the #BleedwithDignity campaign on the technology platform Change.org, demanding that the Government of Assam install
biodegradable sanitary pad vending machines in all government schools across the state. Her petition on Change.org has already gathered support from over 90000 people and continues to grow.

Bidisha was selected in Change.org’s flagship program ‘She Creates Change’ having run successful online advocacy
campaigns, which were widely recognised. Through the #BleedwithDignity campaign; she organised and celebrated World Menstrual Hygiene Day, 2019 in Guwahati, Assam by hosting a wall mural by collaborating with local organisations. The initiative was widely covered by national and local media, and the mural was later inaugurated by the event’s chief guest Commissioner of Guwahati Municipal Corporation (GMC) Debeswar Malakar, IAS.

Sign up for the Youth Ki Awaaz Prime Ministerial Brief below