Site icon Youth Ki Awaaz

Even Aid Looks At Caste: Structural Inequality In Disaster Risk Reducation Policies

An aerial view of a flooded river island in the Brahmaputra river in Majuli, in the northeastern Indian state of Assam September 24, 2012. Floods and landslides caused by relentless rain in northeast India have killed at least 33 people and displaced more than a million over the past week, officials said on Monday. REUTERS/Stringer (INDIA - Tags: DISASTER ENVIRONMENT) - RTR38CZ2

Caste hierarchy and discrimination are inextricably linked within Indian society. Disaster management in disaster-prone areas is no exception in any way. Many case studies and ethnographic evidence introduces us to the horrible social realities of casteism.

India is a very diverse country with different castes, cultural groups and language groups, where all these groups evidently do not enjoy equal rights and facilities as everyone else, and hence, due to this vast diversity, representational policies are of the utmost necessity to address and satisfy the needs of different caste groups. This is especially because of the fact that the social needs of different groups differ in context, quality, and quantity.

The structural inequality persisting in the multilayered caste-based hierarchical society is one of the reasons for these differentiated requirements, demands, and responsibilities. A disaster risk reduction policy, which is framed and formulated keeping in mind the needs of only one section of society or by generalising the needs of people, will prove to be inefficient and unsatisfactory when implemented.

Landless Dalits were the worst hit during Cyclone Fani in 2019 as well.||Credits: Business Standard

The state authorities, in their Disaster Risk Reduction policies and the Disaster Management Act, have not been able to address the issues and concerns of underprivileged, of those belonging to the so-called lower castes, especially the Dalits and tribal groups in disaster-prone areas. The poor Dalits, or the ‘untouchables’ due to societal pressure which is mainly exerted by the upper caste, have to settle on the outskirts of villages and other marginalised areas despite being aware of the fact that such areas might be at risk of facing natural hazards.

During post-disaster rebuilding or reconstruction process, such classes are not able to provide documents of land ownership or even citizenship mainly because of their illiteracy, lack of awareness and impoverished condition. The Disaster Risk Reduction policies refuse to give compensation, reconstruction facilities and insurance to such people who aren’t able to show land ownership documents. For example, share-croppers are not covered in crop insurance. In places such as Tamil Nadu and Gujarat where casteism is reported to be higher in function, lower caste people were not able to take advantage of basic facilities such as safe drinking water provided by UNICEF for all, irrespective of caste, due to social caste discrimination. Another instance is of the discrimination faced by Dewar Caste at the hands of upper caste people in Odisha during Super Cyclone in 1999.

Since lack of documents remains to be the prime cause of the problems in reclamation of land, compensation, insurance and also mass discrimination faced by lower caste poor people during the post-disaster period, state authorities and NGOs must take steps and initiatives to educate the illiterate and assist them in making new documents, because they, as a governing body, are responsible for the implementation of relief policies and provision of basic facilities to all the people residing in the boundary of their state territory, irrespective of caste and lack of citizenship documents (as laid down by Article 14 and Article 15 of the Indian Constitution).

There is a need to revise the Disaster Management Act 2005 which excludes the role and responsibility of state authorities in ensuring equal access to relief materials and facilities by lower caste people, by specifically only acknowledging the role of NGOs in the functional process. There is also a need to employ special task officials at the ground level to ensure an egalitarian model of implementation of the Disaster Risk Reduction policies and to ensure implementation section 61 of the Disaster Management Act. Another big need of such DRR policies is the involvement of local people in decision making and making the frameworks of these policies. Since they are the ones residing in disaster-prone areas and are capabable of coping with the natural hazards in their own local ways, their input and suggestions play a valuable role in the framework of such policies.

Exit mobile version