This post has been self-published on Youth Ki Awaaz by Nilutpal Timsina. Just like them, anyone can publish on Youth Ki Awaaz.

Legal Notice To Paatal Lok For Racist Comment: How Well Do We Perceive Art?

More from Nilutpal Timsina

Warning: Spoilers ahead

Faithful representation of reality without censoring, or “putting a  raw from of life in a reel setting to portray and ‘not embolden’ discomfort in the society” through any visual art is what we understand as uncensored realism and cinematic symbolism. In India, we rarely get to watch such visual art that uses the above art techniques to address ailing issues in our society.

In less than a week of its release, Amazon Prime’s web series Paatal Lok stood at par in terms of utilising these techniques in a very captivating manner, taking the audience to a new level of noir-fiction drama with its realistic portrayal of social filth, rooted in the soul of India. However, with so much popularity that it gained, certain communities of our society are not happy with how certain things have been shown in the web series.

A viral 10-second clip from the series turned the table towards criticism, with thousands of posts and petitions being circulated on social media against the creators of the web series. The protest is for a dialogue that allegedly is a racial slur made towards the Nepali community, profiling them in poor reputation.

This happens in the second episode when, during an interrogation in one of the police stations in Delhi, a female constable (played by Nikita Grover) slaps a transgender character Cheeni or Mary Lyngdoh (played by Mairembam Ronaldo Singh), an accused of an unattempted crime, and swears her with “Nepali randi” (Nepali whore) just because the character has ‘Mongoloid’ features. The dialogue used in the scene that has been being widely circulated on social media has caused an uproar within a section of people, along with political parties joining the protest.

When I saw the clip, I was outraged and in no time, I shared it on my social media handles and joined my community members with demands such as “mute/delete the scene”, tagging everyone from the production team to seek a public apology for using such words. However, within an hour, I recalled one of my film appreciation classes.

A long time ago, not over two years, a professor had taught us about uncensored realism and cinematic symbolism in contemporary Indian cinema and said, “This technique will put you in discomfort as it highlights the reality of our social system.” Further, I recalled an interaction with noted filmmaker Adoor Gopalkrishnan back in college, when I asked him about intriguing techniques used in cinema, to which he said:

“...this might embolden if you watch a small clip, but the entire narrative will be understood when the viewer watches the visual art thoroughly. Everyone’s perception of art is different, but the message consumed will be the same. We can look at a scene in three unique ways, depending if they are an audience, a critic or creator.”

Keeping all these in mind, I watched the series to understand the context in which the derogatory words had been used. When the series ended with Inspector Haathi Ram Choudhary (played by Jaideep Ahlwat) throwing ice candy at the dog, my opinion towards the earlier discomfort changed.

I understood where we lacked and what made us misinterpret such an engrossing visual art. Throwing light on the cinematic techniques, Paatal Lok is a series intertwined with a very intriguing yet discomforting portrayal, which lifts the underlying issue of Islamophobia, casteism, racism, violence against women, child sexual abuse, press freedom, transphobia, and the corrupt system rooted in our social system.

This web series offers us an insight into the struggles of people on whom we discriminate and pass judgement on a day-to-day basis, knowingly or unknowingly. I felt that the series has a similar discourse to that used in Kamal Haasan’s enduring Tamil hit Hey Ram, released two decades ago.

paatal lok nepali comment

The scenes portrayed in the movie still stand validated in today’s setting. However, the entire symbolism is not emboldening either. If everything sets in with the cinematic technique, then what went wrong in Paatal Lok and why is the Nepali community against it? Based on a small clip, how can we judge the entire web series?

Cannot Accept Racist Slur In The Name Of Creative Freedom

Keeping the argument in perception and focusing on the Nepali audience, a certain section within the community is outraged with the usage of those two words. “Words that appear in the second episode are insulting to the entire Nepali community,” said the lawyer who served a legal notice to Anushka Sharma. One of the community members, who denied watching the entire series for projecting the community in a negative light, said, “These two words further reinstate the stereotyping of people from the Northeast”. 

“If they stereotype the community but forget to show how a member of the community feels after the slur, we do not see any intention of them other than normalising stereotype against the community,” opined another person. “Bollywood has called us with unique names and identities, but this is a new low,” expressed another member on his social media.

“It has hurt our sentiments by glorifying negativity and questioning the dignity of our daughters, mothers and sisters,” writes a member. “For the sake of creative freedom, we should never consume such content that is racist and xenophobic,” said another member of the community.

If we go by this logic, it will anger any member of the community when a community is projected with such negativity. For a community that has been victim to racial profiling through visual art in the past, scenes like these further inflict pain. Now, the community members have served a legal notice to the producer and want them to mute/delete the scene, and blur the subtitle with an unconditional public apology. It will be interesting to see how things will take turn.

The Mere Portrayal Of The Underlying Issue, But Words Could Have Been Crafted Politically

However, commentators posit that it justifies the dialogue in the scene to an extent, but the word could have been different, if there were a choice. They say that the web series is trying to portray the dark side of the Indian system. A noted film critic observes that the creators should not have used such politically incorrect words, which further crystallise the existing poor reputation of the community. However, a commentator pointed out that this web series, through many hate elements shown, is a work of fiction that lifts the stereotypes and does not encourage the audience to bring hate into play.

One Bengaluru-based writer in an opinion piece argues that, “even if you intended to uplift and raise social awareness about a vulnerable minority, you should have used carefully-crafted, politically-correct words. We [Nepali community] have been abused and labelled with so many nicknames, that every negative portrayal hurts us, demeans us and gets us terrified.” A certain section of scholars focuses on how negative branding and usage of such catchphrases can create a problem: “We recall a brand with its taglines and catchphrases, making it easier to remember,” admits one scholar.

The user who first reported about the scene through his Instagram said, “All of my past fears re-emerged because those two words were like a demeaning catchphrase, which recapitulated what females from our community were already accused of and frequently branded as. Anyone who has experienced bullies and unpleasant nicknames can understand — catchphrases are much ‘catchier’ and sink deeper than the underlying context in which they are expressed. That’s the reason all the people who shared concern, speak only one point — such targeted generalisation was not needed.”

However, one commentator centres her argument towards the politically-motivated propaganda being carried out by a certain political column against the creators of the web series and said, “Visual arts should be watched open-ended. Why are people mobilising themselves based on one small clipping? Why spread a propaganda and confuse the general Nepali population who doesn’t even have access to Amazon Prime to understand the reality? Such outrage is because of politically-motivated propaganda, and this concerns me. It roots everything in mob mentality, without being inquisitive about the issue in-depth.”

Reality Check On Subaltern Issues: Not Inciting

We cannot conclude this debate without breaking down the creators’ point-of-view and the demand of the script. The previous argument on the perception of visual art through uncensored realism and cinematic symbolism comes into course to justify their side. I reached out to my close friend who is involved in making short films in the Bengaluru circuit and started with an example of Thappad, an Indian drama that questions the complicity of women who make compromises.

He asserts, “Thappad is a movie that revolves around a legal battle by the protagonist against her husband for one slap. The slap in the movie does not encourage any husband to slap his wife. It is a mere portrayal of the issue happening for real.” He goes on to say that words used in any visual art can be perceived in two ways: first is the usage of derogatory words towards the community with a derogatory belief, and the second is pointing out the social filth with reasoning such as why this should not be a desirable form of communication.

He points out, “If you binge-watch Paatal Lok and try to analyse the words used in the second episode, you understand that it has nothing to do with projecting the Nepali community in negative light. There is nothing wrong in the script as it is only trying to break the stereotypes this community faces in reality. The entire series is based on the underlying subaltern issues through breaking down stereotypes. Nothing is encouraging.”

In the series, throughout the nine episodes, the story goes forward by breaking down the reality of the social system in India. As the story unfolds further with Inspector Haathi Ram trying to find out the past of the four accused of an unattempted assassination of left-liberal journalist Sanjeev Mehra (played by Neeraj Kabi), it brings out the layer of social stigma that every character in the web series has been a victim of.

A few examples of this are the lynching of Kabir M’s brother by right-wing activists at a railway station after a co-passenger mistakes it for beef. The scene highlights instigating mob-lynching towards a certain community for the choice of their food; or the way the last name of sub-inspector Imran Ansari (played by Ishwak Singh) is used throughout the series, getting him profiled for being a Muslim; or how Kabir M gets killed because of the confusion that arises with his last name; or how Cheeni in her childhood gets raped by a ‘beggar mafia’ — the scene is not encouraging child sexual abuse but is a portrayal of such evil treatment happening with children; or how Tope Singh’s mother gets raped by an upper-caste and how his family faces severe consequences when he kills three upper-caste bullies; or how Sanjeev Mehra faces political force for his editorial independence; or the vandalism faced by the Chitrakoot-based crime reporter for his reportage on a big-fat politician.

Each scene is an honest attempt by the writer to bring in the underlying stereotype faced by everyone in India, intertwined in the web of hate, crime and violence.

On the other hand, claiming that it has projected the Nepali community in an unpleasant light without understanding the whole context is where we lack the understanding of what is reality, and ends up making it a mob mentality. These things shown in the web series are just another day in our lives.

The symbolism used throughout the web series is a portrayal and “not an encouragement”, pointing towards the discrimination happening for real in the “other India,” different from what we see and hear. If one adds every element together, we get to see visual art, grabbing the attention of everyone, and comprehensive of classic cinematic techniques. Every scene, word, and dialogue used in the script offers us sensitisation of such day-to-day discrimination.

“The usage of the word by the lady constable is not trying to promote or put the community in an unpleasant light, but is a portrayal of what already exists. In the community’s case, it is how the women are subjected to accusation and how they are branded. Don’t we carry this tag with us in the mainland?” observes a media practitioner.

She further says how the series is a striking reality, pointing to discrimination faced by many on the basis of what they look like, what they eat, wear, how they walk, talk etc. “What is more harmful is the mobilisation towards negativity just by watching a small clip and not considering the big picture of what the series wants to convey. One cannot jump to a conclusion based on one small clipping,” she added.

The protest by a small section of the community on the dialogue from a minor scene, without trying to look into the whole context, will further fuel confusion amongst the general population. Those who do not have access to the OTT platform will then argue based on what is viral on social media. This small section within the community could have sensitised the general population on the reality instead of spreading confusion by sharing the 10-second clipping.

“These people (core protestors) know the reality. They know the enormous picture, but will still protest because it will be the best moment for them to gain political support through their baseless argument. With this act, they are inciting hate towards creators and this is what the web series is all about. Do they care for women or is it just another drama for their political gains and national headlines?” she claims.

However, differing from the protests, I hold the view that this crime thriller is an attempt to highlight the stereotypical mindset through a very intriguing odd of the socio-political filth ingrained in our system in our everyday lives, emphasising on how reality works.

The Answer Lies In The Consumption Of Art

After understanding all three sides of the argument, two questions come to my mind and they are: was it defaming or an attempt to point out the “other side” of India whom we do not give any attention to because we have never been subjected to it?Whatever remains here is the criticism on the series; the argument based on cinematic techniques and what the actual truth is.

Now, let’s get back to what Gopalkrishnan said, “Understand the context and the enormous picture.” What does he mean? Was he trying to say that negative mobilisation based on one scene is harmful? The answer to this remains how the content is being consumed. If every visual art has to release a clarification in parallel to every scene or dialogue used, we will reach to a certain point where there won’t be any art form; forget about realism and symbolism.

But again, when viewed through a community’s perspective, a certain aspect does not set up right and it feels that the “freedom of expression” is being abused by the creators, subjecting the community in bad lights. Besides, the commentators feel that words could have been better politically crafted.

But what we miss out at large is the demand of the script and the creators’ perspective. If we miss out on the symbolism used throughout the series, the creators are at loss because their audience failed to understand them. The question is about how visual art is being viewed and consumed? With so much criticism that the Paatal Lok team gained not just from the Nepali community but from other sections as well on the portrayal of various scenes and dialogues used, it seems the message of the web series didn’t reach them.

The entire argument lies on the ground of content consumption. Let’s get back to the issue and understand why there is mass opposition to the web series? With so much clarification on the dialogue being put on social media, does it still put the Paatal Lok team at fault? Is it a politically-motivated propaganda of one section of people against the creators? Does it make an argument that the audience is not yet ready to understand uncensored realism and cinematic symbolism? Has the usage of the two words put the Nepali community in poor reputation? Everything lies in how we perceive art!

Note: The article was originally published here

You must be to comment.

More from Nilutpal Timsina

Similar Posts

By Sushil Kuwar

By Arun Kr Jaiswal

By pratyush prashant

Wondering what to write about?

Here are some topics to get you started

Share your details to download the report.

We promise not to spam or send irrelevant information.

Share your details to download the report.

We promise not to spam or send irrelevant information.

An ambassador and trained facilitator under Eco Femme (a social enterprise working towards menstrual health in south India), Sanjina is also an active member of the MHM Collective- India and Menstrual Health Alliance- India. She has conducted Menstrual Health sessions in multiple government schools adopted by Rotary District 3240 as part of their WinS project in rural Bengal. She has also delivered training of trainers on SRHR, gender, sexuality and Menstruation for Tomorrow’s Foundation, Vikramshila Education Resource Society, Nirdhan trust and Micro Finance, Tollygunj Women In Need, Paint It Red in Kolkata.

Now as an MH Fellow with YKA, she’s expanding her impressive scope of work further by launching a campaign to facilitate the process of ensuring better menstrual health and SRH services for women residing in correctional homes in West Bengal. The campaign will entail an independent study to take stalk of the present conditions of MHM in correctional homes across the state and use its findings to build public support and political will to take the necessary action.

Saurabh has been associated with YKA as a user and has consistently been writing on the issue MHM and its intersectionality with other issues in the society. Now as an MHM Fellow with YKA, he’s launched the Right to Period campaign, which aims to ensure proper execution of MHM guidelines in Delhi’s schools.

The long-term aim of the campaign is to develop an open culture where menstruation is not treated as a taboo. The campaign also seeks to hold the schools accountable for their responsibilities as an important component in the implementation of MHM policies by making adequate sanitation infrastructure and knowledge of MHM available in school premises.

Read more about his campaign.

Harshita is a psychologist and works to support people with mental health issues, particularly adolescents who are survivors of violence. Associated with the Azadi Foundation in UP, Harshita became an MHM Fellow with YKA, with the aim of promoting better menstrual health.

Her campaign #MeriMarzi aims to promote menstrual health and wellness, hygiene and facilities for female sex workers in UP. She says, “Knowledge about natural body processes is a very basic human right. And for individuals whose occupation is providing sexual services, it becomes even more important.”

Meri Marzi aims to ensure sensitised, non-discriminatory health workers for the needs of female sex workers in the Suraksha Clinics under the UPSACS (Uttar Pradesh State AIDS Control Society) program by creating more dialogues and garnering public support for the cause of sex workers’ menstrual rights. The campaign will also ensure interventions with sex workers to clear misconceptions around overall hygiene management to ensure that results flow both ways.

Read more about her campaign.

MH Fellow Sabna comes with significant experience working with a range of development issues. A co-founder of Project Sakhi Saheli, which aims to combat period poverty and break menstrual taboos, Sabna has, in the past, worked on the issue of menstruation in urban slums of Delhi with women and adolescent girls. She and her team also released MenstraBook, with menstrastories and organised Menstra Tlk in the Delhi School of Social Work to create more conversations on menstruation.

With YKA MHM Fellow Vineet, Sabna launched Menstratalk, a campaign that aims to put an end to period poverty and smash menstrual taboos in society. As a start, the campaign aims to begin conversations on menstrual health with five hundred adolescents and youth in Delhi through offline platforms, and through this community mobilise support to create Period Friendly Institutions out of educational institutes in the city.

Read more about her campaign. 

A student from Delhi School of Social work, Vineet is a part of Project Sakhi Saheli, an initiative by the students of Delhi school of Social Work to create awareness on Menstrual Health and combat Period Poverty. Along with MHM Action Fellow Sabna, Vineet launched Menstratalk, a campaign that aims to put an end to period poverty and smash menstrual taboos in society.

As a start, the campaign aims to begin conversations on menstrual health with five hundred adolescents and youth in Delhi through offline platforms, and through this community mobilise support to create Period Friendly Institutions out of educational institutes in the city.

Find out more about the campaign here.

A native of Bhagalpur district – Bihar, Shalini Jha believes in equal rights for all genders and wants to work for a gender-equal and just society. In the past she’s had a year-long association as a community leader with Haiyya: Organise for Action’s Health Over Stigma campaign. She’s pursuing a Master’s in Literature with Ambedkar University, Delhi and as an MHM Fellow with YKA, recently launched ‘Project अल्हड़ (Alharh)’.

She says, “Bihar is ranked the lowest in India’s SDG Index 2019 for India. Hygienic and comfortable menstruation is a basic human right and sustainable development cannot be ensured if menstruators are deprived of their basic rights.” Project अल्हड़ (Alharh) aims to create a robust sensitised community in Bhagalpur to collectively spread awareness, break the taboo, debunk myths and initiate fearless conversations around menstruation. The campaign aims to reach at least 6000 adolescent girls from government and private schools in Baghalpur district in 2020.

Read more about the campaign here.

A psychologist and co-founder of a mental health NGO called Customize Cognition, Ritika forayed into the space of menstrual health and hygiene, sexual and reproductive healthcare and rights and gender equality as an MHM Fellow with YKA. She says, “The experience of working on MHM/SRHR and gender equality has been an enriching and eye-opening experience. I have learned what’s beneath the surface of the issue, be it awareness, lack of resources or disregard for trans men, who also menstruate.”

The Transmen-ses campaign aims to tackle the issue of silence and disregard for trans men’s menstruation needs, by mobilising gender sensitive health professionals and gender neutral restrooms in Lucknow.

Read more about the campaign here.

A Computer Science engineer by education, Nitisha started her career in the corporate sector, before realising she wanted to work in the development and social justice space. Since then, she has worked with Teach For India and Care India and is from the founding batch of Indian School of Development Management (ISDM), a one of its kind organisation creating leaders for the development sector through its experiential learning post graduate program.

As a Youth Ki Awaaz Menstrual Health Fellow, Nitisha has started Let’s Talk Period, a campaign to mobilise young people to switch to sustainable period products. She says, “80 lakh women in Delhi use non-biodegradable sanitary products, generate 3000 tonnes of menstrual waste, that takes 500-800 years to decompose; which in turn contributes to the health issues of all menstruators, increased burden of waste management on the city and harmful living environment for all citizens.

Let’s Talk Period aims to change this by

Find out more about her campaign here.

Share your details to download the report.

We promise not to spam or send irrelevant information.

A former Assistant Secretary with the Ministry of Women and Child Development in West Bengal for three months, Lakshmi Bhavya has been championing the cause of menstrual hygiene in her district. By associating herself with the Lalana Campaign, a holistic menstrual hygiene awareness campaign which is conducted by the Anahat NGO, Lakshmi has been slowly breaking taboos when it comes to periods and menstrual hygiene.

A Gender Rights Activist working with the tribal and marginalized communities in india, Srilekha is a PhD scholar working on understanding body and sexuality among tribal girls, to fill the gaps in research around indigenous women and their stories. Srilekha has worked extensively at the grassroots level with community based organisations, through several advocacy initiatives around Gender, Mental Health, Menstrual Hygiene and Sexual and Reproductive Health Rights (SRHR) for the indigenous in Jharkhand, over the last 6 years.

Srilekha has also contributed to sustainable livelihood projects and legal aid programs for survivors of sex trafficking. She has been conducting research based programs on maternal health, mental health, gender based violence, sex and sexuality. Her interest lies in conducting workshops for young people on life skills, feminism, gender and sexuality, trauma, resilience and interpersonal relationships.

A Guwahati-based college student pursuing her Masters in Tata Institute of Social Sciences, Bidisha started the #BleedwithDignity campaign on the technology platform, demanding that the Government of Assam install
biodegradable sanitary pad vending machines in all government schools across the state. Her petition on has already gathered support from over 90000 people and continues to grow.

Bidisha was selected in’s flagship program ‘She Creates Change’ having run successful online advocacy
campaigns, which were widely recognised. Through the #BleedwithDignity campaign; she organised and celebrated World Menstrual Hygiene Day, 2019 in Guwahati, Assam by hosting a wall mural by collaborating with local organisations. The initiative was widely covered by national and local media, and the mural was later inaugurated by the event’s chief guest Commissioner of Guwahati Municipal Corporation (GMC) Debeswar Malakar, IAS.

Sign up for the Youth Ki Awaaz Prime Ministerial Brief below