This post has been self-published on Youth Ki Awaaz by Poornima Mandpe. Just like them, anyone can publish on Youth Ki Awaaz.

New Adaptation Of Little Women: How Does It Compare To The Book?

More from Poornima Mandpe

I read the novel Little Women for the first time when I was almost eight years old.

I read the novel Little Women for the first time when I was almost eight years old. It was an old, abridged copy, rather a children’s version of the classic that my dad had brought along with a copy of David Copperfield. Little Women however had beautiful illustrations of the different incidents in the story, and I could picture Jo and the March sisters in my mind even before I saw the 1994 movie.

As I grew up, I read and re-read the original novel, watched and re-watched the original film, till every scene, every dialogue, the smallest of details were lodged in my memory irreversibly. If I took up writing, it was because Jo March made me believe so. Every time Beth approached her death, I cried. It felt like losing a loved one in my own life, and coming to terms with its quiet grace and acceptance. “The ones that love us, never really leave us”, writes a writer, years later, who was also inspired by Lousia May Alcott.

Needless to say, the novel and the movie both had a huge impact on my life. So, when it was announced that a new version was being re-created by Greta Gerwig, and with a stellar star cast nonetheless, I was determined not to watch it. I couldn’t believe that an attempt to replicate the novel would be possible with the same tenderness and finesse as that of the 1994 movie. It was a silly block in my mind of course, but I was quite firm not to betray the old version. Until peer pressure made me do otherwise.

A comparison with the old version and the book followed naturally after watching the new one. I do not endorse the new one, for sure. However, before I delve into the reasons on why it’s best to stick to the book and the 1994 movie, a few things that the new movie did manage to show differently also merit discussion. After all, if it is a critique that I want to offer to my readers, I should not let my bias get the better of me.

2019 movie||Credits: NY Times

First off, the new movie is more vocal about its feminist views. Of course, Louisa May Alcott was herself a feminist, far ahead of her times, and in the novel, the March’s unusual way of raising their daughters, Jo and Amy chasing their dreams in foreign lands, the girls making their own choices about marriage were all the makings of a strong statement towards women empowerment. The old movie follows that. The new movie however takes it a step forward and actually gives dialogues to the sisters who defiantly endorse the particular choices they make as young women in their deeply patriarchal world.

“I just want to enjoy this one night”, Meg tells Laurie, when he censures her choice of decking up for the party. Again, in the later half, Amy says, “Marriage is an economic proposition”, to Laurie and vents out about the unfairness of the legal system that leaves little choice for women to marry for love.

Secondly, Meg’s character is given more justice in the new version. In the 1994 movie, she seemed to be overshadowed by Jo’s strong personality. The trials of her domestic life with John Brook that feature in the book do not find a place in the movie. Here, just like the novel, she is the most beautiful of all the sisters, virtuous but somewhat demure and commonplace. In the new movie, she is more confident and at ease with the choices she makes.

Her dilemma of wanting to own “all the pretty things” and dealing with the paltry income generated by her husband is also given its space. I do believe Emma Watson, who plays Meg in the movie has something to do with it. Even when Jo is cajoling her to run away from the marriage, she says, “just because my dreams are different from yours, that doesn’t mean they are unimportant”.

2019 movie||Credits: San Mateo County Library

Aunt March is given more shades (again, how can they not, when Meryl Streep steps into her shoes!). Her wish that her nieces should marry into a wealthy family stems from pragmatism, however misplaced; Jo feels it to be so. Watching her sister-in-law struggle to raise four daughters in the absence of her idealistic husband has convinced her of the consequence of marrying in a ‘morally different’ family like the March’s. In both the above examples, the new movie inches closer to the novel than the old one by picking up the essence of the women’s struggles that Louisa May Alcott tried to highlight.

The new movie also addresses the issue of slavery on which the Civil War (where Mr March had gone) was fought, and a tiny glimpse of the March’s standing for equal rights for all at a small cost of being different in their social circles is given.

Finally, the scene in the book in which Jo and Beth go off to the seaside for their little holiday is beautifully captured by the new film. This one thing they have nailed (or rather sketched for the use of a better word) to perfection.

Can I safely turn to bashing the new movie for everything it took away from the loyal readers now? Facts first.

The Laurence and the March houses were not miles apart as shown in the new movie, but so close that Laurie knew the name of each of the sisters by heart even before he met Jo at the ball.

Again, in the novel and the old movie, Mr Bhaer was 15 years senior to Jo, a fact that had much to do with Jo falling in love with ‘a man who has seen the world’ rather than a young lad of her own age and station.

In the book, Jo did express to her mother that she wanted to say yes to Laurie’s proposal, but never proceeded to write a letter to him. She always held to her reasons in rejecting him, even if she was sad about losing a friend (as she thought she would) when he married Amy. This part in the new movie was perhaps based on the popular sentiment among a lot of Little Women’s fans of shipping Laurie and Jo together (against the writer’s will, of course).

In fact, the whole part in the new movie where Amy rants at being second fiddle to Jo was also added on. There was plenty that the sisters disagreed on and consequently took opposite paths, but the disagreement translating into jealousy and resentment between them was simply forced.

The 1994 movie sticks to these facts, as given in the book, and there is a sense of comfort in not losing the Alcott’s thoughts in the interpretations of the director.

Going ahead, I also felt that more space should have been given to the development of Laurie and Mr Bhaer in the film, especially introspecting the reasons why Amy and Jo fell in love with them, respectively. Greta Gerwig took great liberties in trying to bring the thought process of Jo as she re-considered Laurie’s proposal in the aftermath of Beth’s death. She could have taken the same liberty in bringing to the audience her own interpretation of why the men fell in love — and out of — with the sisters.

In the book (as per my own analysis), Jo was something of an idealist (like her father) and headstrong (like her mother). Mr Bhaer’s company allows her to live an unconventional life and chase her dreams like she always desired. On the contrary, Laurie was always worldly and a connoisseur of all the beautiful things, just as his privilege allowed him, and Amy was the one who could complement both his social position and appreciation of art. I do feel that something of this is attempted to be showcased in the 1994 movie. However, in Greta’s version, both the male protagonists appear to be lacklustre, serving only as objects of love for Jo and Amy.

I was also not in the favour of the disrupted timeline; somewhere in the back and forth of the story, things got rushed and we missed the evolution of the girls into little women.

1994 Movie|| Credits: NY Times

Finally, the end. I gave a lot of thought, measuring the pros and cons till I decided it is best to confess that it left me disappointed. It is a known fact that the novel is based on Lousia May Alcott’s own life, and that she remained a good old spinster until the end. In the book, however, Jo finds a perfect match and settles down to matrimonial bliss with Mr Bhaer. Greta Gerwig explores one such possibility of why the writer took the decision to let her beloved character, in which she embodies her own self, marry. According to her interpretation, in the end, Jo (who is representing Alcott now) decides to make the final edit after her editor convinces her that the masses would never accept an unmarried female protagonist.

Now, it is possible that this happened.

Or it is also possible that Alcott wanted Jo to have what she herself could never find, true love and an equal partner. Who are we to say either? The novel, though based on her own story, is but a piece of fiction. Wouldn’t it have been more appropriate to create a biopic of Alcott and merge the story of how she was inspired to write Little Women? Something like the film, Shakespeare In Love?

I personally recall the minutest detail when Jo chases after Mr Bhaer in the rain in the 1994 film. “My hands are empty”, he says. “Now they are not”, Jo says by placing her hands into his before they steal a kiss under the umbrella. The old romantic in me wants to believe this fairy tale and wants the movie to end just like the writer chose it to end.

It will be bad for those who only saw the latest version and may not consider reading or watching the original Little women. The incarnate detailing of the story of each sister’s life, their desires and their dreams in the book will be lost to them. Something of the magic, something of the beauty, something of the charm of Winona Ryder and Christian Bale will also be lost to them. I would say, like a die-hard fan would, reading and watching all the three will also leave you wanting for more. Every version after all opens a new window of thought in mind, and once again we are lost in the lives of the March sisters.

You must be to comment.

More from Poornima Mandpe

Similar Posts

By Anirban Dutta Choudhury

By Saraf Ali

By Subhajit Murmu

Wondering what to write about?

Here are some topics to get you started

Share your details to download the report.

We promise not to spam or send irrelevant information.

Share your details to download the report.

We promise not to spam or send irrelevant information.

An ambassador and trained facilitator under Eco Femme (a social enterprise working towards menstrual health in south India), Sanjina is also an active member of the MHM Collective- India and Menstrual Health Alliance- India. She has conducted Menstrual Health sessions in multiple government schools adopted by Rotary District 3240 as part of their WinS project in rural Bengal. She has also delivered training of trainers on SRHR, gender, sexuality and Menstruation for Tomorrow’s Foundation, Vikramshila Education Resource Society, Nirdhan trust and Micro Finance, Tollygunj Women In Need, Paint It Red in Kolkata.

Now as an MH Fellow with YKA, she’s expanding her impressive scope of work further by launching a campaign to facilitate the process of ensuring better menstrual health and SRH services for women residing in correctional homes in West Bengal. The campaign will entail an independent study to take stalk of the present conditions of MHM in correctional homes across the state and use its findings to build public support and political will to take the necessary action.

Saurabh has been associated with YKA as a user and has consistently been writing on the issue MHM and its intersectionality with other issues in the society. Now as an MHM Fellow with YKA, he’s launched the Right to Period campaign, which aims to ensure proper execution of MHM guidelines in Delhi’s schools.

The long-term aim of the campaign is to develop an open culture where menstruation is not treated as a taboo. The campaign also seeks to hold the schools accountable for their responsibilities as an important component in the implementation of MHM policies by making adequate sanitation infrastructure and knowledge of MHM available in school premises.

Read more about his campaign.

Harshita is a psychologist and works to support people with mental health issues, particularly adolescents who are survivors of violence. Associated with the Azadi Foundation in UP, Harshita became an MHM Fellow with YKA, with the aim of promoting better menstrual health.

Her campaign #MeriMarzi aims to promote menstrual health and wellness, hygiene and facilities for female sex workers in UP. She says, “Knowledge about natural body processes is a very basic human right. And for individuals whose occupation is providing sexual services, it becomes even more important.”

Meri Marzi aims to ensure sensitised, non-discriminatory health workers for the needs of female sex workers in the Suraksha Clinics under the UPSACS (Uttar Pradesh State AIDS Control Society) program by creating more dialogues and garnering public support for the cause of sex workers’ menstrual rights. The campaign will also ensure interventions with sex workers to clear misconceptions around overall hygiene management to ensure that results flow both ways.

Read more about her campaign.

MH Fellow Sabna comes with significant experience working with a range of development issues. A co-founder of Project Sakhi Saheli, which aims to combat period poverty and break menstrual taboos, Sabna has, in the past, worked on the issue of menstruation in urban slums of Delhi with women and adolescent girls. She and her team also released MenstraBook, with menstrastories and organised Menstra Tlk in the Delhi School of Social Work to create more conversations on menstruation.

With YKA MHM Fellow Vineet, Sabna launched Menstratalk, a campaign that aims to put an end to period poverty and smash menstrual taboos in society. As a start, the campaign aims to begin conversations on menstrual health with five hundred adolescents and youth in Delhi through offline platforms, and through this community mobilise support to create Period Friendly Institutions out of educational institutes in the city.

Read more about her campaign. 

A student from Delhi School of Social work, Vineet is a part of Project Sakhi Saheli, an initiative by the students of Delhi school of Social Work to create awareness on Menstrual Health and combat Period Poverty. Along with MHM Action Fellow Sabna, Vineet launched Menstratalk, a campaign that aims to put an end to period poverty and smash menstrual taboos in society.

As a start, the campaign aims to begin conversations on menstrual health with five hundred adolescents and youth in Delhi through offline platforms, and through this community mobilise support to create Period Friendly Institutions out of educational institutes in the city.

Find out more about the campaign here.

A native of Bhagalpur district – Bihar, Shalini Jha believes in equal rights for all genders and wants to work for a gender-equal and just society. In the past she’s had a year-long association as a community leader with Haiyya: Organise for Action’s Health Over Stigma campaign. She’s pursuing a Master’s in Literature with Ambedkar University, Delhi and as an MHM Fellow with YKA, recently launched ‘Project अल्हड़ (Alharh)’.

She says, “Bihar is ranked the lowest in India’s SDG Index 2019 for India. Hygienic and comfortable menstruation is a basic human right and sustainable development cannot be ensured if menstruators are deprived of their basic rights.” Project अल्हड़ (Alharh) aims to create a robust sensitised community in Bhagalpur to collectively spread awareness, break the taboo, debunk myths and initiate fearless conversations around menstruation. The campaign aims to reach at least 6000 adolescent girls from government and private schools in Baghalpur district in 2020.

Read more about the campaign here.

A psychologist and co-founder of a mental health NGO called Customize Cognition, Ritika forayed into the space of menstrual health and hygiene, sexual and reproductive healthcare and rights and gender equality as an MHM Fellow with YKA. She says, “The experience of working on MHM/SRHR and gender equality has been an enriching and eye-opening experience. I have learned what’s beneath the surface of the issue, be it awareness, lack of resources or disregard for trans men, who also menstruate.”

The Transmen-ses campaign aims to tackle the issue of silence and disregard for trans men’s menstruation needs, by mobilising gender sensitive health professionals and gender neutral restrooms in Lucknow.

Read more about the campaign here.

A Computer Science engineer by education, Nitisha started her career in the corporate sector, before realising she wanted to work in the development and social justice space. Since then, she has worked with Teach For India and Care India and is from the founding batch of Indian School of Development Management (ISDM), a one of its kind organisation creating leaders for the development sector through its experiential learning post graduate program.

As a Youth Ki Awaaz Menstrual Health Fellow, Nitisha has started Let’s Talk Period, a campaign to mobilise young people to switch to sustainable period products. She says, “80 lakh women in Delhi use non-biodegradable sanitary products, generate 3000 tonnes of menstrual waste, that takes 500-800 years to decompose; which in turn contributes to the health issues of all menstruators, increased burden of waste management on the city and harmful living environment for all citizens.

Let’s Talk Period aims to change this by

Find out more about her campaign here.

Share your details to download the report.

We promise not to spam or send irrelevant information.

A former Assistant Secretary with the Ministry of Women and Child Development in West Bengal for three months, Lakshmi Bhavya has been championing the cause of menstrual hygiene in her district. By associating herself with the Lalana Campaign, a holistic menstrual hygiene awareness campaign which is conducted by the Anahat NGO, Lakshmi has been slowly breaking taboos when it comes to periods and menstrual hygiene.

A Gender Rights Activist working with the tribal and marginalized communities in india, Srilekha is a PhD scholar working on understanding body and sexuality among tribal girls, to fill the gaps in research around indigenous women and their stories. Srilekha has worked extensively at the grassroots level with community based organisations, through several advocacy initiatives around Gender, Mental Health, Menstrual Hygiene and Sexual and Reproductive Health Rights (SRHR) for the indigenous in Jharkhand, over the last 6 years.

Srilekha has also contributed to sustainable livelihood projects and legal aid programs for survivors of sex trafficking. She has been conducting research based programs on maternal health, mental health, gender based violence, sex and sexuality. Her interest lies in conducting workshops for young people on life skills, feminism, gender and sexuality, trauma, resilience and interpersonal relationships.

A Guwahati-based college student pursuing her Masters in Tata Institute of Social Sciences, Bidisha started the #BleedwithDignity campaign on the technology platform, demanding that the Government of Assam install
biodegradable sanitary pad vending machines in all government schools across the state. Her petition on has already gathered support from over 90000 people and continues to grow.

Bidisha was selected in’s flagship program ‘She Creates Change’ having run successful online advocacy
campaigns, which were widely recognised. Through the #BleedwithDignity campaign; she organised and celebrated World Menstrual Hygiene Day, 2019 in Guwahati, Assam by hosting a wall mural by collaborating with local organisations. The initiative was widely covered by national and local media, and the mural was later inaugurated by the event’s chief guest Commissioner of Guwahati Municipal Corporation (GMC) Debeswar Malakar, IAS.

Sign up for the Youth Ki Awaaz Prime Ministerial Brief below