This post has been self-published on Youth Ki Awaaz by GAYATRI MISRA. Just like them, anyone can publish on Youth Ki Awaaz.

How Can We Have Gender Equality When Sex-Selective Abortions Continue?

The question of fertility and reproductive freedom are intertwined. Especially for the third world population, the issue of reproduction occupies a central place in feminist movements and debates. The UN report in July 2020 shows that approximately 4.6 lakh girls are missing at birth in India. India, along with China, contributes majorly to this statistic globally. This number in India has doubled over the last 50 years since 1970. Unlike the US, Europe or Japan where women outnumber men substantially, this is usually not the case in most Asian and African countries.

In most Asian countries in particular, women are deprived of basic healthcare and food services resulting in their higher death rates, immediately after birth, although the mortality rate for women and men across all age groups thereafter usually remain the same. The result is therefore a lower proportion of women than would be the case if they had equal care.

In India, in particular, gender discrimination surfaces most explicitly in terms of sex selective abortion.

What “missing women” calculates are the number of women who would otherwise have existed in these countries owing to the equal ratio of women to men. So, what is the reason for these excessive death rate of women and the resulting national and global statistics? The most important factor attributed to the death rate of women at birth are differences in stages of economic development that deprive women of equal access to healthcare and other basic services.

However, there is a larger system of inequality and hierarchy that governs this deprivation. Socio-cultural factors influence these differences across societies. In India, in particular, gender discrimination surfaces most explicitly in terms of sex selective abortion. For women in the third world, the question of reproductive freedom has been complicated due to overpopulation. Women in India are seen as the key to stability and reproduction of not only the society but also the patriarchal family. What is essential to this are the ways in which production and reproduction interact to create conditions that influence decisions of fertility.

For the woman in India, the decision to bear or not to bear or even the right to space childbearing is not entirely upon her. In fact, it’s her family, the one which she is married into, who decides this. This is where we need to understand the interaction between the production and reproduction spheres and how this creates preference for the male child over the female thus leading to pre-natal and post-natal abortion in India.

Family systems with patriarchal arrangements and cultural injunctions largely decide mortality rates of children within the household. Especially in families who have patrilineal descent, which is mostly the case in Northern India, sex selective abortion is considerably high. Under the internal labour market system, it is the male child who is understood to be the one contributing to the production sphere and the wages of the household. This self-regulatory practice of the production sphere and economic rationality of the individual household puts tremendous pressure on the woman to bear a male child.

The kinship model predominant in patrilineal societies further shows that because women marry out of the family, therefore it is only the son who is left behind to provide for economic and social support. This patrilineal descent is crucial to the social organization of families in India, which is why the preference for the male child is also high.

The female is considered a liability in so far as kinship arrangements in a patrilineal group requires exogamy, where the female is married outside the group but more importantly because of dowry at marriage. The Dowry system requires the family of the bride to transfer wealth to the groom’s family. Being on the giving end of this extremely exploitative system, the girl is usually considered to be a burden on the household property and resources.

The Dowry system requires the family of the bride to transfer wealth to the groom’s family.

Complicating this situation is the way in which state policy and family planning engage with the issue of female foeticide. That the public and the private is so intertwined is clearly visible through state policy of family planning. Given the overpopulation of the country, the Indian state used various measures to curb this population growth. And abortion was one of them. In India, abortion was decriminalized in 1971. Thus, while in the rest of the world, most feminists had to fight against various orthodoxies to legalize abortion, in India, this was not the case.

However, what have been the implications of this? The most important result of this legalisation has been female foeticide – the killing of the foetus in the womb itself. Because there already exists a strong patriarchal structure in the Indian society and thus a stronger preference for the male, it became easier to conduct sex selective abortion in India.

At this intersection of the private and the public was also an increasing body of international programs and organizations that marketed contraceptives and birth control services for women in India. For most of these programs and services were expensive, it only catered to the needs of the upper-class women. For the majority of those belonging to the lower strata, sterilization (forced) became the only instrument for curbing population growth along lines that were not coherent with their needs and demands.

As a result of feminist movements, the Pre-Conception and Pre-Natal Diagnostic Techniques Act was passed in 1994 to place restrictions on pre-natal testing and sex pre-selection rather than on abortion directly. Which is why it has not been successful in particular to curb sex selective abortion. Further, the 1971 Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act has been changed to allow the maximum gestational period for abortion from 20 weeks to 24 weeks. This change has been another milestone with respect to the question of reproductive freedom of the woman and rights over their own body.

Therefore, there exists contradictory places with regard to abortion in India. Although the government provided various schemes like registering pregnancies and allowing abortion for only ‘valid reasons’, yet this has not helped solve the problem of sex selective abortion. For the government, the declining sex ratio is a matter of numbers that will decide its place in the list of global powers.

The attempt to improve these numbers is a goal in itself and not the effort to improves the lives of women or resolve the question of reproductive rights. Even now women, especially from the lower strata are forced into aborting their foetuses by her in-laws and frequently under conditions that are extremely dangerous and puts the women at risk.

There exist conflict of interests with regard to abortion not only between the feminists and state discourses but also in the narratives of different sections of women whose access to it is weighed by differential circumstances and often for most, the reluctance to perform it. The normative patriarchal structures and practices continue to strip women of the right to reproductive freedom and birth control. Sex selective abortion is not the only factor that contributes to this skewed sex ratio but also the relative neglect of the girl child when she is born resulting in death before completion of one year. Most of these numbers are not even recorded.

A power structure exists not merely between the woman and her patriarchal household with respect to decisions of fertility but also the different classes of women whose idea of reproductive freedom may not align with each other. Therefore, there is a need to understand what these challenges mean for different sections of women for they connote different ideas of empowerment for all and further to go beyond the state discourses to engage in a more socio-cultural understanding of female foeticide and reproductive freedom.

You must be to comment.


Similar Posts

By Shubhi Srivastava

By Soumya Sinha

By Saras Jaiswal

Wondering what to write about?

Here are some topics to get you started

Share your details to download the report.

We promise not to spam or send irrelevant information.

Share your details to download the report.

We promise not to spam or send irrelevant information.

An ambassador and trained facilitator under Eco Femme (a social enterprise working towards menstrual health in south India), Sanjina is also an active member of the MHM Collective- India and Menstrual Health Alliance- India. She has conducted Menstrual Health sessions in multiple government schools adopted by Rotary District 3240 as part of their WinS project in rural Bengal. She has also delivered training of trainers on SRHR, gender, sexuality and Menstruation for Tomorrow’s Foundation, Vikramshila Education Resource Society, Nirdhan trust and Micro Finance, Tollygunj Women In Need, Paint It Red in Kolkata.

Now as an MH Fellow with YKA, she’s expanding her impressive scope of work further by launching a campaign to facilitate the process of ensuring better menstrual health and SRH services for women residing in correctional homes in West Bengal. The campaign will entail an independent study to take stalk of the present conditions of MHM in correctional homes across the state and use its findings to build public support and political will to take the necessary action.

Saurabh has been associated with YKA as a user and has consistently been writing on the issue MHM and its intersectionality with other issues in the society. Now as an MHM Fellow with YKA, he’s launched the Right to Period campaign, which aims to ensure proper execution of MHM guidelines in Delhi’s schools.

The long-term aim of the campaign is to develop an open culture where menstruation is not treated as a taboo. The campaign also seeks to hold the schools accountable for their responsibilities as an important component in the implementation of MHM policies by making adequate sanitation infrastructure and knowledge of MHM available in school premises.

Read more about his campaign.

Harshita is a psychologist and works to support people with mental health issues, particularly adolescents who are survivors of violence. Associated with the Azadi Foundation in UP, Harshita became an MHM Fellow with YKA, with the aim of promoting better menstrual health.

Her campaign #MeriMarzi aims to promote menstrual health and wellness, hygiene and facilities for female sex workers in UP. She says, “Knowledge about natural body processes is a very basic human right. And for individuals whose occupation is providing sexual services, it becomes even more important.”

Meri Marzi aims to ensure sensitised, non-discriminatory health workers for the needs of female sex workers in the Suraksha Clinics under the UPSACS (Uttar Pradesh State AIDS Control Society) program by creating more dialogues and garnering public support for the cause of sex workers’ menstrual rights. The campaign will also ensure interventions with sex workers to clear misconceptions around overall hygiene management to ensure that results flow both ways.

Read more about her campaign.

MH Fellow Sabna comes with significant experience working with a range of development issues. A co-founder of Project Sakhi Saheli, which aims to combat period poverty and break menstrual taboos, Sabna has, in the past, worked on the issue of menstruation in urban slums of Delhi with women and adolescent girls. She and her team also released MenstraBook, with menstrastories and organised Menstra Tlk in the Delhi School of Social Work to create more conversations on menstruation.

With YKA MHM Fellow Vineet, Sabna launched Menstratalk, a campaign that aims to put an end to period poverty and smash menstrual taboos in society. As a start, the campaign aims to begin conversations on menstrual health with five hundred adolescents and youth in Delhi through offline platforms, and through this community mobilise support to create Period Friendly Institutions out of educational institutes in the city.

Read more about her campaign. 

A student from Delhi School of Social work, Vineet is a part of Project Sakhi Saheli, an initiative by the students of Delhi school of Social Work to create awareness on Menstrual Health and combat Period Poverty. Along with MHM Action Fellow Sabna, Vineet launched Menstratalk, a campaign that aims to put an end to period poverty and smash menstrual taboos in society.

As a start, the campaign aims to begin conversations on menstrual health with five hundred adolescents and youth in Delhi through offline platforms, and through this community mobilise support to create Period Friendly Institutions out of educational institutes in the city.

Find out more about the campaign here.

A native of Bhagalpur district – Bihar, Shalini Jha believes in equal rights for all genders and wants to work for a gender-equal and just society. In the past she’s had a year-long association as a community leader with Haiyya: Organise for Action’s Health Over Stigma campaign. She’s pursuing a Master’s in Literature with Ambedkar University, Delhi and as an MHM Fellow with YKA, recently launched ‘Project अल्हड़ (Alharh)’.

She says, “Bihar is ranked the lowest in India’s SDG Index 2019 for India. Hygienic and comfortable menstruation is a basic human right and sustainable development cannot be ensured if menstruators are deprived of their basic rights.” Project अल्हड़ (Alharh) aims to create a robust sensitised community in Bhagalpur to collectively spread awareness, break the taboo, debunk myths and initiate fearless conversations around menstruation. The campaign aims to reach at least 6000 adolescent girls from government and private schools in Baghalpur district in 2020.

Read more about the campaign here.

A psychologist and co-founder of a mental health NGO called Customize Cognition, Ritika forayed into the space of menstrual health and hygiene, sexual and reproductive healthcare and rights and gender equality as an MHM Fellow with YKA. She says, “The experience of working on MHM/SRHR and gender equality has been an enriching and eye-opening experience. I have learned what’s beneath the surface of the issue, be it awareness, lack of resources or disregard for trans men, who also menstruate.”

The Transmen-ses campaign aims to tackle the issue of silence and disregard for trans men’s menstruation needs, by mobilising gender sensitive health professionals and gender neutral restrooms in Lucknow.

Read more about the campaign here.

A Computer Science engineer by education, Nitisha started her career in the corporate sector, before realising she wanted to work in the development and social justice space. Since then, she has worked with Teach For India and Care India and is from the founding batch of Indian School of Development Management (ISDM), a one of its kind organisation creating leaders for the development sector through its experiential learning post graduate program.

As a Youth Ki Awaaz Menstrual Health Fellow, Nitisha has started Let’s Talk Period, a campaign to mobilise young people to switch to sustainable period products. She says, “80 lakh women in Delhi use non-biodegradable sanitary products, generate 3000 tonnes of menstrual waste, that takes 500-800 years to decompose; which in turn contributes to the health issues of all menstruators, increased burden of waste management on the city and harmful living environment for all citizens.

Let’s Talk Period aims to change this by

Find out more about her campaign here.

Share your details to download the report.

We promise not to spam or send irrelevant information.

A former Assistant Secretary with the Ministry of Women and Child Development in West Bengal for three months, Lakshmi Bhavya has been championing the cause of menstrual hygiene in her district. By associating herself with the Lalana Campaign, a holistic menstrual hygiene awareness campaign which is conducted by the Anahat NGO, Lakshmi has been slowly breaking taboos when it comes to periods and menstrual hygiene.

A Gender Rights Activist working with the tribal and marginalized communities in india, Srilekha is a PhD scholar working on understanding body and sexuality among tribal girls, to fill the gaps in research around indigenous women and their stories. Srilekha has worked extensively at the grassroots level with community based organisations, through several advocacy initiatives around Gender, Mental Health, Menstrual Hygiene and Sexual and Reproductive Health Rights (SRHR) for the indigenous in Jharkhand, over the last 6 years.

Srilekha has also contributed to sustainable livelihood projects and legal aid programs for survivors of sex trafficking. She has been conducting research based programs on maternal health, mental health, gender based violence, sex and sexuality. Her interest lies in conducting workshops for young people on life skills, feminism, gender and sexuality, trauma, resilience and interpersonal relationships.

A Guwahati-based college student pursuing her Masters in Tata Institute of Social Sciences, Bidisha started the #BleedwithDignity campaign on the technology platform, demanding that the Government of Assam install
biodegradable sanitary pad vending machines in all government schools across the state. Her petition on has already gathered support from over 90000 people and continues to grow.

Bidisha was selected in’s flagship program ‘She Creates Change’ having run successful online advocacy
campaigns, which were widely recognised. Through the #BleedwithDignity campaign; she organised and celebrated World Menstrual Hygiene Day, 2019 in Guwahati, Assam by hosting a wall mural by collaborating with local organisations. The initiative was widely covered by national and local media, and the mural was later inaugurated by the event’s chief guest Commissioner of Guwahati Municipal Corporation (GMC) Debeswar Malakar, IAS.

Sign up for the Youth Ki Awaaz Prime Ministerial Brief below