This post has been self-published on Youth Ki Awaaz by Azam Danish. Just like them, anyone can publish on Youth Ki Awaaz.

Why Does Contemporary Politics Ask Muslims To Mend Their Ways Instead Of Mending Its Own?

This essay is in response to an article by Najmul Hoda, IPS, titled Indian Muslims must rewrite their victim mindset to be indispensable in India’s rise in ThePrint, published on August 17, 2020.

In this essay, I will not only refute Hoda’s claim about the “victim mindset” among Muslims, but also deconstruct his self-contradictory formulations that have been articulated in his article, which asserts his privileged worldview and the prejudices he carries with it.

Systemic Deconstruction

Indian Muslims are not in a state of despair after the pujan. If anything, the pujan confirmed their long-standing doubts about the rise of majoritarianism in the country, along with judicial prejudices that have been inflicted upon them for a long time now. The kind of despondency Muslims are experiencing is certainly new, and there are two primary reasons for it since 2014: the first is consistent dehumanisation of Muslims, and second is the long-standing perception among politicians, elected lawmakers and supporters of the ruling party of Muslims as “traitors”, questioning their “loyalty”.

India’s independence was a high point for Indian Muslims, when many of them consciously made a decision to stay on their birthland — this decision was based not on narrow-minded sectarian goals, fear and hopelessness, but founded on renewed enthusiasm and hope in the secularism that Gandhi, Nehru and Azad promised them.

The assertion of IPS Hoda that Muslims’ “cultural trope” drove them to their “favourite dope”, that of “victimhood”, is not only poor in literary rhyming, but also in taste and scope from the perspective of discussion. This line of thought has always been one of the concerns that political theorists have expressed about democratic societies, where complex injustices pass as “misfortunes” and the state and society do not see themselves as responsible.

An Old Tomb at Sundar Nursery, New Delhi.

Secondly, the arguments reduce the diverse Muslim identity into a monolith identity, which IPS Hoda himself acknowledges, Muslims are not. It reduces their agency, not only as individuals but also as a community incapable of fruitful political and social action. However, the most obscure line of thought is “identitarianism, insofar as it privileges community over individual, conflicts with democracy and, eventually, harms the minority.”

No explanation or theoretical background is provided on how minorities and other oppressed identities — including women, tribal communities and Dalits — asserting their identities as a means of survival and practising collective political rights is harmful to democracy, especially in India where the Constitution itself guarantees special rights based on marginal identities.

On the contrary, collective rights is the way forward for the marginalised communities. Past experience suggests that it has been successful to a large extent for strengthening labour laws and unions, LGBTQIA+ and other systemically depressed groups. These collective rights, easily dismissed by IPS Hoda, challenge the prevalent hegemonic discourses where the accumulation of wealth and power has become a rule rather than an exception.

The claim about “the power theology” is also obsolete if analysed from the perspective of political actions and rhetoric. For example, M K Gandhi has always been more popular than what M A Jinnah ever was or will be among the Muslims in India across the states, so is J L Nehru among the Muslim youth in the contemporary times. Nehru, in fact, is currently more popular than M M A Jauhar, Dr Zakir Hussain and Maulana Azad. In Uttar Pradesh and Bihar, Muslims have shown their trust in the socialist/secular politics of J P Narayan, Kanshi Ram, Mayawati, Mulayam Singh Yadav, Akhilesh Yadav and Lalu Prasad Yadav and are inspired by their methods.

Here, I am insisting on the inapplicability of the said “power theology” and its limited significance in the context of post-independence Indian politics. The same is applicable for politics based on secularism and socialism in some states including Kerala, Tamil Nadu, Karnataka, Telangana and Maharashtra.

Harmful Analytical Tools

The whole idea of “self-introspection” from a modernist lens negates the agency and moral capacities of a given community. To assume that the only way to “progress” is through socio-religious reforms and having “modern” learning methods resonates with the same idea that was propagated in the 19th century by privileged bourgeoisie ideologues including Raja Ram Mohan Roy and Sir Syed Ahmad Khan, without undertaking the day-to-day oppression and moral dilemmas faced by ordinary Hindus and Muslims of their day.

The whole idea of reform is grounded in privilege and in fact underestimates the ongoing social and political actions and agency of the people who are being subjected to that. Here, we have an IPS officer who is well-educated, with more means and prospects looking down upon the “non-reformed” ordinary Muslim artisans’ families and vendors’ families, or for that matter, the professional and working-class Muslim citizens who are already struggling in their daily lives against prejudices that have real-time consequences in their lives.

Only a successful Muslim administrative officer is in the position to downplay the efforts, struggles and political actions by fellow non-privileged and uneducated Muslims. The ironical part, however, is that he is falling into the trap of his own analysis of the Ashraf-Ajlaf dichotomy. What we basically find in his article is a mix of modernist and postmodernist assumption, which makes the opinion piece inconsistent on the basis of argument and does more harm than good to the readers.

A Poster from Shaheen Bagh Anti CAA Protests, February 2020. Muslims have been successfully defining the contours of their politics.

Not to mention that Muslims have remarkably progressed in terms of literacy, the standard of living (as already written in the opinion piece) and have contributed to the nation-building in the same capacity in the field of academics, administration, judiciary, mass media, print media, etc. as their “reformed” compatriots.

Indian Muslims Post Hindutva

It was indeed the Constitution that made equality possible, irrespective of caste and religion, although the ruling party partakes in manufacturing “ill-will” towards people of a certain religion. The present government ignores and negates the whole paradigm where lynching of Muslims has become a part of its cultural ethos. Dehumanisation of the Muslim identity through mainstream Hindi and English news channels and numerous other ways supported by social media cannot be more apparent. The dignity and improvements that Muslims have experienced so far are at risk in contemporary times, and this applies to Muslims irrespective of their caste, states, linguistic regions and political inclinations.

The BJP formed its government twice without a single representative from the Muslim community. Has this ever happened in the history of Lok Sabha? The self-claimed proponents of “gender equality” (the triple talaq debate) vehemently denied political representation to Muslim women from the Panchayat level to the Parliament. I often wonder what purpose these non-contextualised references to “Muslim countries” mean in the prospect of India.

On the hollow narrative of Muslim women, I would like to highlight the incidents of violence in Jamia Millia Islamia in December 2019, the North East Delhi pogrom in February and activist Safoora Zargar’s custody, when women were systemically targeted, often in obscene ways for voicing their dissent.

Thus, there is an urgent need for an elaborate understanding of the term “cultural ethos of India” in the present context, where the ruling party is playing a major role in manipulating and mobilising the country against Muslims through various media.

Spinning False Narratives And Compulsion of Binaries

The concept of loss is seldom a result of an “outdated theology”, but rather the everyday lived experiences of ordinary Muslims in urban and rural areas. Without dwelling upon the Islamic metaphysics and its epistemological understanding of IPS Hoda, I would like to narrate some of my own lived experiences, because that is how politics and social narratives are formulated, unlike in a rigid theoretical way.

While on a house-hunting expedition in South Delhi’s Saket, I encountered landlords from the likes who openly objected to “giving the flat to a Mohammaden” and some who’d secretly tell my broker that they “can’t have a non-vegetarian in the house”. Vegetarianism was a subtle way to reject me on the basis of my Muslim identity, since the tenants who lived there consumed non-veg food and alcohol. The broker, who seemed disappointed by these conversations, told me, “You know how it is, but don’t worry we will keep looking,” indicating how discrimination on the basis of caste and religion is implicit and taken for granted in everyday life.

This experience is not an outlier — most young Muslim students and professionals are denied houses in certain neighbourhoods, after which they choose to live in what IPS Hoda and his privileged friends might call “ghettos” and complain about its “improper sanitation, lack of space” etc., while further stereotyping Muslims.

The opinion piece IPS Hoda authored is not critical of the system that leads to the increasing marginalisation and insecurities among Muslims; ironically he asks Muslims to go into deep meditation and implies choosing political inaction in the face of growing challenges. My privileged non-Muslim friends often tell me that I am “not like other Muslims.” The “other Muslims”, according to certain privileged Muslims and non-Muslims, are those who do not adhere to the stereotypical notions shown in various media representations and other widely accepted public opinions. Other forms of overt systemic injustices include limited political representation and institutionalisation of Muslim criminality.

Lastly, Hindutva is neither an ethno-nationalist movement nor does it anchor itself in nationalism. The supposed “ethnonationalism” claim has historically obscure origins, is politically and philosophically insufficient, and is incompatible with democracy and the present underlining of the Constitution. The Hindutva narrative has always tried to scribe internal and external spheres for Muslims in India, including whom they can love or marry and what they can eat, and has recently included where they can pray.

The interesting part here is that an administrative/public officer is comfortable and remorseless while issuing ill-informed, ahistorical, politically incorrect and academically irrelevant “advisory” for “reformation”. Now, dare I say the proponents of this ideology need serious “reform” and a much broader understanding of everyday experiences of ordinary Indians, especially Muslims? The Muslim community, like every other community, operates in a moral sphere. This sphere is guided by their own struggles and negotiations and they should not be condoned but admired for their perseverance, patience and hard work.

The “other” does not exist in a vacuum, but is, in fact, created through rhetoric by overlooking their practices. False pride, prejudices and self-delusion dictate how the “other” is formed. India’s multiethnic, multiclass, multilingual Muslim identity, at the end of the day, is simply dismissed in opinion columns of the “reformed” and “good” Muslims. Their identity is constructed through already prescribed formulas of neoliberal traditions in a grand narrative. This narrative is highly dichotomised in which Muslims worldwide are either “radicals or extremist”, or they are insignificant and in urgent need of internal reform.

The overarching discourse in politics and governance is a range of narratives that one follows without even realising that it traps and narrows down the scope of discussion. It often dehumanises, demeans and objectifies a community that it assumes as the “other”. Indian Muslims are the others; and there could be another group immured into it if one does not realise the fallacies of the whole idea of constructing binaries.

The dominant argument of “self-reflection” and “reform” needs to be turned on its head and instead of asking the systemically oppressed to mend their ways, the government and body politic should transform itself. The legitimate recognition of institutional injustices and highlighting the struggles of marginalised people are indispensable to the discourse of a democratic and an equal India. This has to be complemented with accommodating a multitude of aspirations for equal acknowledgement, and not othering their socio-cultural and religious characteristics.

You must be to comment.
  1. Pragati Sharma

    As a person, I can tell you that your points are valid. But if your are talking about Indian society, you still did not discuss the real issue as to why Muslims face discriminations. Truth is whenever hindustan want to address the real problems they have with Muslims, the issue ends up with each community hating each other more. The real issue is Muslims in India face discrimination not because they are minority or different from Hindus. It is because of history Hindus see Muslims from the lens of distrust or fear. Whether you want to deal with this thinking or not, most Hindus think if given a slightest chance the Muslims will repeat the behaviour of the Muslim ancestors. They will again try to rule Hindus and oppress them. They may be wrong or may be right. But Muslims never try to disprove this thinking with valid reasons or never try reassure Hindus that they will not oppress them. If Hindus have been against Muslims, then shahrukh khan, aamir khan or other prominent Muslims would not been able to make their place in Indian society. The bitter truth is Muslims never make an effort to earn trust. Today’s reality, most Muslims directly or indirectly tries to communicate that we have Muslim Brotherhood around the world, so you can do nothing to us. If any country is doing injustice to Muslims, the Muslims living in that country should stand against that and not the Muslims from around the world start shouting, they are brothers and you have to treat them well. Muslims are creating paradox for themselves.

    1. Azam Danish

      Dear Pragati, your response contains fragments of truth, but I will explain why your comment is a mere perception, and is in fact far from lived-reality. You said, “It is because of history Hindus see Muslims from the lens of distrust or fear”, I can tell you that is mistrust and fear is based out of political insecurities of mainstream parties, the fear is manufactured as I see it. Manufactured by a section of male ideologues, who see empowerment of Muslim women and Hindu women as a threat to their own status and power. The “real issue” is something I have tried to cover in the long essay I wrote and you can read them, along with their sources for a more profound picture.

      “the Muslims will repeat the behaviour of the Muslim ancestors. They will again try to rule Hindus and oppress them”, and may I ask what behavior are we referring to? If you talking about Delhi Sultanate and Mughal Empire, you must know that all the empires in the subcontinent existed because they were supported by the elite castes, namely the Brahmins and Rajputs. Any empire in the subcontinent from the Mauryan regime till the British era was not only supported, but Brahmins advisors and Rajput warrior generals/kings wholeheartedly endorsed respective empires. That is the reason we see that Aurangzeb, who has been perceived as a fanatic (literary evidence suggest he was more secular than Akbar actually) made a Rajput as the general of the Mughal Army. The British were aided by aristocratic elite Hindus and Muslims to rule in India. So the “behavior” you are suggesting is an imaginary one, in fact there is no evidence of riot before the 18th century. This perceived atrocious behavior is a propaganda by the current ruling party and since pre independence, the Hindu Mahasabha and RSS have been propagating blatant lies in the name of history.

      “The bitter truth is Muslims never make an effort to earn trust.” Quite frankly, no one needs to prove their “trust” to bigoted, ignorant, unwilling to learn people like yourself. I mean, any decent person would not indulge in debate and discussion with someone as vile and reactionary as you. But I believe in dialogue and discussion. No one needs to earn trust for believing in their faith, or showing their love for one’s culture and country.

      On the closing note, the whole concept of “Muslim brotherhood” is a farce, always has been. I don’t mean to insult your predicament and knowledge, but you seem propagandized to the extent that its utterly impossible to redeem yourself as a decent human being, watch your language. But I will explain how its a farce to keep poor and desperate Muslims into more poverty. The greatest example is the war in Yemen and Syria, do you know that Saudi plays a huge role in both the wars? So according to your perception (I cant say “logic” to your arguments, because they are incoherent), Muslims stand with each other? How is it that most wars in Muslim countries are funded by rich Muslim countries? How do explain the partition of Pakistan and Bangladesh? Aren’t both nations Muslims? How do you explain Saudi’s and Pakistan’s silence on the treatment of Uighur Muslims in China? I can recommend books on International Relations, so that you understand the idea of “geostrategic” relevance and basic stuff like that before being vile to strangers on the internet.

      You don’t offend me, you make me reconsider my own wits about what it is to be a decent human being. But I will try to stick to my wits, let me also point at how Hindus and Muslims have a syncretic culture in India developed over a thousand year now. Hindus in Lucknow, Andhra, Telangana celebrate Moharram with great fervor, Muslims in Delhi and elsewhere celebrate Vasant Panchami, Diwali with the same spirit as Eid. Now, if you cant acknowledge the syncretic nature of our coexistence, then sadly you are irredeemable and a simple stooge of RSS and BJP IT cell.

      Hint: Try and think about “culture” and “evolution”, maybe that would knock some decency into you. Rather than terming things as “Hindu” “Muslim” “Nationalist” “Anti Nationalist”.
      Try not thinking in dichotomy, that definitely helps.

More from Azam Danish

Similar Posts

By shakeel ahmad

By Nandini priya

By Charkha Features

Wondering what to write about?

Here are some topics to get you started

Share your details to download the report.

We promise not to spam or send irrelevant information.

Share your details to download the report.

We promise not to spam or send irrelevant information.

An ambassador and trained facilitator under Eco Femme (a social enterprise working towards menstrual health in south India), Sanjina is also an active member of the MHM Collective- India and Menstrual Health Alliance- India. She has conducted Menstrual Health sessions in multiple government schools adopted by Rotary District 3240 as part of their WinS project in rural Bengal. She has also delivered training of trainers on SRHR, gender, sexuality and Menstruation for Tomorrow’s Foundation, Vikramshila Education Resource Society, Nirdhan trust and Micro Finance, Tollygunj Women In Need, Paint It Red in Kolkata.

Now as an MH Fellow with YKA, she’s expanding her impressive scope of work further by launching a campaign to facilitate the process of ensuring better menstrual health and SRH services for women residing in correctional homes in West Bengal. The campaign will entail an independent study to take stalk of the present conditions of MHM in correctional homes across the state and use its findings to build public support and political will to take the necessary action.

Saurabh has been associated with YKA as a user and has consistently been writing on the issue MHM and its intersectionality with other issues in the society. Now as an MHM Fellow with YKA, he’s launched the Right to Period campaign, which aims to ensure proper execution of MHM guidelines in Delhi’s schools.

The long-term aim of the campaign is to develop an open culture where menstruation is not treated as a taboo. The campaign also seeks to hold the schools accountable for their responsibilities as an important component in the implementation of MHM policies by making adequate sanitation infrastructure and knowledge of MHM available in school premises.

Read more about his campaign.

Harshita is a psychologist and works to support people with mental health issues, particularly adolescents who are survivors of violence. Associated with the Azadi Foundation in UP, Harshita became an MHM Fellow with YKA, with the aim of promoting better menstrual health.

Her campaign #MeriMarzi aims to promote menstrual health and wellness, hygiene and facilities for female sex workers in UP. She says, “Knowledge about natural body processes is a very basic human right. And for individuals whose occupation is providing sexual services, it becomes even more important.”

Meri Marzi aims to ensure sensitised, non-discriminatory health workers for the needs of female sex workers in the Suraksha Clinics under the UPSACS (Uttar Pradesh State AIDS Control Society) program by creating more dialogues and garnering public support for the cause of sex workers’ menstrual rights. The campaign will also ensure interventions with sex workers to clear misconceptions around overall hygiene management to ensure that results flow both ways.

Read more about her campaign.

MH Fellow Sabna comes with significant experience working with a range of development issues. A co-founder of Project Sakhi Saheli, which aims to combat period poverty and break menstrual taboos, Sabna has, in the past, worked on the issue of menstruation in urban slums of Delhi with women and adolescent girls. She and her team also released MenstraBook, with menstrastories and organised Menstra Tlk in the Delhi School of Social Work to create more conversations on menstruation.

With YKA MHM Fellow Vineet, Sabna launched Menstratalk, a campaign that aims to put an end to period poverty and smash menstrual taboos in society. As a start, the campaign aims to begin conversations on menstrual health with five hundred adolescents and youth in Delhi through offline platforms, and through this community mobilise support to create Period Friendly Institutions out of educational institutes in the city.

Read more about her campaign. 

A student from Delhi School of Social work, Vineet is a part of Project Sakhi Saheli, an initiative by the students of Delhi school of Social Work to create awareness on Menstrual Health and combat Period Poverty. Along with MHM Action Fellow Sabna, Vineet launched Menstratalk, a campaign that aims to put an end to period poverty and smash menstrual taboos in society.

As a start, the campaign aims to begin conversations on menstrual health with five hundred adolescents and youth in Delhi through offline platforms, and through this community mobilise support to create Period Friendly Institutions out of educational institutes in the city.

Find out more about the campaign here.

A native of Bhagalpur district – Bihar, Shalini Jha believes in equal rights for all genders and wants to work for a gender-equal and just society. In the past she’s had a year-long association as a community leader with Haiyya: Organise for Action’s Health Over Stigma campaign. She’s pursuing a Master’s in Literature with Ambedkar University, Delhi and as an MHM Fellow with YKA, recently launched ‘Project अल्हड़ (Alharh)’.

She says, “Bihar is ranked the lowest in India’s SDG Index 2019 for India. Hygienic and comfortable menstruation is a basic human right and sustainable development cannot be ensured if menstruators are deprived of their basic rights.” Project अल्हड़ (Alharh) aims to create a robust sensitised community in Bhagalpur to collectively spread awareness, break the taboo, debunk myths and initiate fearless conversations around menstruation. The campaign aims to reach at least 6000 adolescent girls from government and private schools in Baghalpur district in 2020.

Read more about the campaign here.

A psychologist and co-founder of a mental health NGO called Customize Cognition, Ritika forayed into the space of menstrual health and hygiene, sexual and reproductive healthcare and rights and gender equality as an MHM Fellow with YKA. She says, “The experience of working on MHM/SRHR and gender equality has been an enriching and eye-opening experience. I have learned what’s beneath the surface of the issue, be it awareness, lack of resources or disregard for trans men, who also menstruate.”

The Transmen-ses campaign aims to tackle the issue of silence and disregard for trans men’s menstruation needs, by mobilising gender sensitive health professionals and gender neutral restrooms in Lucknow.

Read more about the campaign here.

A Computer Science engineer by education, Nitisha started her career in the corporate sector, before realising she wanted to work in the development and social justice space. Since then, she has worked with Teach For India and Care India and is from the founding batch of Indian School of Development Management (ISDM), a one of its kind organisation creating leaders for the development sector through its experiential learning post graduate program.

As a Youth Ki Awaaz Menstrual Health Fellow, Nitisha has started Let’s Talk Period, a campaign to mobilise young people to switch to sustainable period products. She says, “80 lakh women in Delhi use non-biodegradable sanitary products, generate 3000 tonnes of menstrual waste, that takes 500-800 years to decompose; which in turn contributes to the health issues of all menstruators, increased burden of waste management on the city and harmful living environment for all citizens.

Let’s Talk Period aims to change this by

Find out more about her campaign here.

Share your details to download the report.

We promise not to spam or send irrelevant information.

A former Assistant Secretary with the Ministry of Women and Child Development in West Bengal for three months, Lakshmi Bhavya has been championing the cause of menstrual hygiene in her district. By associating herself with the Lalana Campaign, a holistic menstrual hygiene awareness campaign which is conducted by the Anahat NGO, Lakshmi has been slowly breaking taboos when it comes to periods and menstrual hygiene.

A Gender Rights Activist working with the tribal and marginalized communities in india, Srilekha is a PhD scholar working on understanding body and sexuality among tribal girls, to fill the gaps in research around indigenous women and their stories. Srilekha has worked extensively at the grassroots level with community based organisations, through several advocacy initiatives around Gender, Mental Health, Menstrual Hygiene and Sexual and Reproductive Health Rights (SRHR) for the indigenous in Jharkhand, over the last 6 years.

Srilekha has also contributed to sustainable livelihood projects and legal aid programs for survivors of sex trafficking. She has been conducting research based programs on maternal health, mental health, gender based violence, sex and sexuality. Her interest lies in conducting workshops for young people on life skills, feminism, gender and sexuality, trauma, resilience and interpersonal relationships.

A Guwahati-based college student pursuing her Masters in Tata Institute of Social Sciences, Bidisha started the #BleedwithDignity campaign on the technology platform, demanding that the Government of Assam install
biodegradable sanitary pad vending machines in all government schools across the state. Her petition on has already gathered support from over 90000 people and continues to grow.

Bidisha was selected in’s flagship program ‘She Creates Change’ having run successful online advocacy
campaigns, which were widely recognised. Through the #BleedwithDignity campaign; she organised and celebrated World Menstrual Hygiene Day, 2019 in Guwahati, Assam by hosting a wall mural by collaborating with local organisations. The initiative was widely covered by national and local media, and the mural was later inaugurated by the event’s chief guest Commissioner of Guwahati Municipal Corporation (GMC) Debeswar Malakar, IAS.

Sign up for the Youth Ki Awaaz Prime Ministerial Brief below