This post has been self-published on Youth Ki Awaaz by varun pandey. Just like them, anyone can publish on Youth Ki Awaaz.

Do Farm Laws Contradict Modi’s Vision Of “Atmanirbhar Bharat”?

More from varun pandey

Farmer unions, that are protesting against the newly introduced Farm Bills, had announced Bharat Bandh on December 8 2020. This bandh, which was largely peaceful but at times violent, came at the backdrop of the farmer agitation and the massive Dilli-Chalo Andolan initiated by farmers around the nation. While stepping at the Delhi borders, our national feeders were greeted with water cannons and some often-speculated booby traps, which obviously these farmers were strong enough to withstand. Their enthusiasm could clearly reflect their discontent with the present establishment.

However, for some, who have been highly aligned to their belief of supporting the newly amended laws, these laws were a gift to farmers and the one’s protesting are incited to do so by some cruel demagogues with crony instincts.

While stepping at the Delhi borders, our national feeders were greeted with water cannons.

A Brief Background To Farm Bills

President Ramnath Kovind, on September 2020, gave assent to the Agreement on Price Assurance and Farm Services Act, 2020 (FAPAFS), the Farmers Produce Trade and Commerce (Promotion and Facilitation) Act, 2020 (FPTC) and the Essential Commodities (Amendment) Act, 2020 (EC). It was touted as the watershed moment by our honourable Prime Minister Narendra Modi. Let’s quickly look at what each these amendments entail:

  • Price Assurance and Farm Services Act, 2020 (FAPAFS):

This act focusses on creating a national framework for “contract farming through an agreement between a farmer and a buyer before the production or rearing of any farm produce.” The act provides a three-level dispute settlement mechanism by conciliation board, Sub-Divisional Magistrate, and Appellate Authority. It was asserted that the act can help farmers to engage with agribusiness firms, processors, wholesalers, exporters, or large retailers for farm services.

However, this act was met with criticism from the side of farmers mainly because of the lack of regulations which might keep farmers in a disadvantageous position as compared to private firms. Further, the Appellate Authority is the highest level of appeal for the farmers which would therefore prevent them from moving to Supreme Court.

  • Farmers Produce Trade and Commerce (Promotion and Facilitation) Act, 2020 (FPTC):

This act permits intrastate and interstate trade of farmers’ produce beyond the scope of the Agricultural Produce Market Committee (APMC) market yards (mandis). It permits the trade of farming products in “outside trade areas” ( farm gates, factory premises, warehouses, silos, and cold storages). Further, this act imposes restrictions on the State government’s power to impose any market fee or cess on farmers, traders, and electronic-trading platforms in these trading areas. However, this gives an impression that the traders and private entities buying products from them can easily monopolise farming markets in the favour of large corporates.

  • Essential Commodities (Amendment) Act, 2020 (EC):

This is an amendment to the earlier Essential Commodities Act, 1955, which was to regulate the production, supply, and distribution of a whole host of commodities that it declares ‘essential’. Under the amendment, the government deregulated certain agricultural products like pulses, onion, potato and cereals, edible oils, and oilseeds, with the aim of realizing better prices for farmers in an attempt to realize better prices for the farmers.

The Obvious Conclusion

On the first look, it seems that the farm amendments were an attempt to help farmers break free from the shackles of the local mandis and help them gain competitive profits. This seems to be an attempt to weed out middlemen and deregulate agricultural produce so that the farmers can easily sell their products at the price they find convenient and at the place they find suitable. However, the fact that there has not been any provision for Minimum Support Price (MSP) clearly portrays the lack of structured support these bills give to the farmers and the extent to which corporates can exploit the farmers.

APMC regime did have its own faults but in those states where it wasn’t implemented properly. One example is Madhya Pradesh where the post-2016 Bumper Crop prices of farming products like potato, onion, garlic, tomato and green peas hit a record low. There were instances when farmers straight away dumped their produce and went back home. The heavy rising burden back then forced MP farmers to protest against State Government. However, only a few of their demands were met.

There were instances in APMC when middlemen and traders started hoarding the agricultural produce. Farmers also received only a part of the price paid by the final customer, while middlemen were collecting a large portion of that profit.

Another argument, in the favour of farm bills, is that it can incentivise diversification of crops like vegetable oils, edible oils and oilseeds and in a parallel, shift away from wheat and rice. There have been arguments presented that the mandi system was of British origin and the MSP was the origin of hundreds of colonial medieval centuries and such systems might not work in favour of farmers, especially in the modern times.

Representational image. Photo: Twitter

The Other Side Of The Coin

Jio came in, they gave free phones. When everyone bought those phones and got dependent on these phones, the competition was wiped out and Jio jacked up their rates. This is exactly what the corporates are going to do [with agriculture]”.

-Akali Dal leader, Harsimrat Kaur Badal (who resigned from Narendra Modi Government lately)

The state opposition towards these bills is directed so because the local mandi markets are controlled by the state. If at all these mandis are going to go insignificant, which seems very likely in the amended acts, then the state’s power on the farmers is going to go down. Further, the intrusion of the private sector into the deregulated market is in itself a signal of a threat as there have been instances in the past when the open-handedness of the private sector has been largely detrimental to the agricultural sector.

One such example is when the management of the crop insurance scheme against natural disasters, introduced in 2017, was handed over to one of Anil Ambani’s companies. Farmers however did not benefit out of it. Moreover, there are countries around the world that have been providing subsidies to their farmers, for example, US, EU to name a few. If most of the western countries are moving towards supporting their farmers and providing subsidies to them, why should India move towards liberalisation?

Farm Laws: Atmanirbhar Much?

These bills contradict the previous agricultural structures in a way that it deregulates the entire farming system. The previous regulatory frameworks created local mandis and made markets easily accessible to the farmers. However, this new framework might take mandis away from farmers. Though there have been attempts to deregulate and privatise the agricultural markets in India since 1991, the question is why do this during the post-COVID-19 coronavirus economic crisis, when every citizen of this country needs economic support and you just can’t leave anyone behind?

This farm law, however, is leaving 86.2% of all the cultivators, who are actually the “smallholder and marginal farmers” behind, as it would be inconvenient for them to carry their produce to other states or far-off places. Such an attempt that disregards the needs of small business owners clearly contradicts the vision of “Atmanirbhar Bharat” initiated and incited by our honourable Prime Minister Narendra Modi.

While India is advancing towards so-called economic liberalisation, breaking the shackles of our farming community is the first necessary step that has to be taken. When our government is pushing the idea of “Vocal for Local” deep within the country’s horizons, the question is, why is the government trying to bring in the reforms that could potentially weaken the local mandis instead of regulating them?

You must be to comment.

More from varun pandey

Similar Posts

By ED Times

By ekku patel

By EV Tech In India

Wondering what to write about?

Here are some topics to get you started

Share your details to download the report.

We promise not to spam or send irrelevant information.

Share your details to download the report.

We promise not to spam or send irrelevant information.

An ambassador and trained facilitator under Eco Femme (a social enterprise working towards menstrual health in south India), Sanjina is also an active member of the MHM Collective- India and Menstrual Health Alliance- India. She has conducted Menstrual Health sessions in multiple government schools adopted by Rotary District 3240 as part of their WinS project in rural Bengal. She has also delivered training of trainers on SRHR, gender, sexuality and Menstruation for Tomorrow’s Foundation, Vikramshila Education Resource Society, Nirdhan trust and Micro Finance, Tollygunj Women In Need, Paint It Red in Kolkata.

Now as an MH Fellow with YKA, she’s expanding her impressive scope of work further by launching a campaign to facilitate the process of ensuring better menstrual health and SRH services for women residing in correctional homes in West Bengal. The campaign will entail an independent study to take stalk of the present conditions of MHM in correctional homes across the state and use its findings to build public support and political will to take the necessary action.

Saurabh has been associated with YKA as a user and has consistently been writing on the issue MHM and its intersectionality with other issues in the society. Now as an MHM Fellow with YKA, he’s launched the Right to Period campaign, which aims to ensure proper execution of MHM guidelines in Delhi’s schools.

The long-term aim of the campaign is to develop an open culture where menstruation is not treated as a taboo. The campaign also seeks to hold the schools accountable for their responsibilities as an important component in the implementation of MHM policies by making adequate sanitation infrastructure and knowledge of MHM available in school premises.

Read more about his campaign.

Harshita is a psychologist and works to support people with mental health issues, particularly adolescents who are survivors of violence. Associated with the Azadi Foundation in UP, Harshita became an MHM Fellow with YKA, with the aim of promoting better menstrual health.

Her campaign #MeriMarzi aims to promote menstrual health and wellness, hygiene and facilities for female sex workers in UP. She says, “Knowledge about natural body processes is a very basic human right. And for individuals whose occupation is providing sexual services, it becomes even more important.”

Meri Marzi aims to ensure sensitised, non-discriminatory health workers for the needs of female sex workers in the Suraksha Clinics under the UPSACS (Uttar Pradesh State AIDS Control Society) program by creating more dialogues and garnering public support for the cause of sex workers’ menstrual rights. The campaign will also ensure interventions with sex workers to clear misconceptions around overall hygiene management to ensure that results flow both ways.

Read more about her campaign.

MH Fellow Sabna comes with significant experience working with a range of development issues. A co-founder of Project Sakhi Saheli, which aims to combat period poverty and break menstrual taboos, Sabna has, in the past, worked on the issue of menstruation in urban slums of Delhi with women and adolescent girls. She and her team also released MenstraBook, with menstrastories and organised Menstra Tlk in the Delhi School of Social Work to create more conversations on menstruation.

With YKA MHM Fellow Vineet, Sabna launched Menstratalk, a campaign that aims to put an end to period poverty and smash menstrual taboos in society. As a start, the campaign aims to begin conversations on menstrual health with five hundred adolescents and youth in Delhi through offline platforms, and through this community mobilise support to create Period Friendly Institutions out of educational institutes in the city.

Read more about her campaign. 

A student from Delhi School of Social work, Vineet is a part of Project Sakhi Saheli, an initiative by the students of Delhi school of Social Work to create awareness on Menstrual Health and combat Period Poverty. Along with MHM Action Fellow Sabna, Vineet launched Menstratalk, a campaign that aims to put an end to period poverty and smash menstrual taboos in society.

As a start, the campaign aims to begin conversations on menstrual health with five hundred adolescents and youth in Delhi through offline platforms, and through this community mobilise support to create Period Friendly Institutions out of educational institutes in the city.

Find out more about the campaign here.

A native of Bhagalpur district – Bihar, Shalini Jha believes in equal rights for all genders and wants to work for a gender-equal and just society. In the past she’s had a year-long association as a community leader with Haiyya: Organise for Action’s Health Over Stigma campaign. She’s pursuing a Master’s in Literature with Ambedkar University, Delhi and as an MHM Fellow with YKA, recently launched ‘Project अल्हड़ (Alharh)’.

She says, “Bihar is ranked the lowest in India’s SDG Index 2019 for India. Hygienic and comfortable menstruation is a basic human right and sustainable development cannot be ensured if menstruators are deprived of their basic rights.” Project अल्हड़ (Alharh) aims to create a robust sensitised community in Bhagalpur to collectively spread awareness, break the taboo, debunk myths and initiate fearless conversations around menstruation. The campaign aims to reach at least 6000 adolescent girls from government and private schools in Baghalpur district in 2020.

Read more about the campaign here.

A psychologist and co-founder of a mental health NGO called Customize Cognition, Ritika forayed into the space of menstrual health and hygiene, sexual and reproductive healthcare and rights and gender equality as an MHM Fellow with YKA. She says, “The experience of working on MHM/SRHR and gender equality has been an enriching and eye-opening experience. I have learned what’s beneath the surface of the issue, be it awareness, lack of resources or disregard for trans men, who also menstruate.”

The Transmen-ses campaign aims to tackle the issue of silence and disregard for trans men’s menstruation needs, by mobilising gender sensitive health professionals and gender neutral restrooms in Lucknow.

Read more about the campaign here.

A Computer Science engineer by education, Nitisha started her career in the corporate sector, before realising she wanted to work in the development and social justice space. Since then, she has worked with Teach For India and Care India and is from the founding batch of Indian School of Development Management (ISDM), a one of its kind organisation creating leaders for the development sector through its experiential learning post graduate program.

As a Youth Ki Awaaz Menstrual Health Fellow, Nitisha has started Let’s Talk Period, a campaign to mobilise young people to switch to sustainable period products. She says, “80 lakh women in Delhi use non-biodegradable sanitary products, generate 3000 tonnes of menstrual waste, that takes 500-800 years to decompose; which in turn contributes to the health issues of all menstruators, increased burden of waste management on the city and harmful living environment for all citizens.

Let’s Talk Period aims to change this by

Find out more about her campaign here.

Share your details to download the report.

We promise not to spam or send irrelevant information.

A former Assistant Secretary with the Ministry of Women and Child Development in West Bengal for three months, Lakshmi Bhavya has been championing the cause of menstrual hygiene in her district. By associating herself with the Lalana Campaign, a holistic menstrual hygiene awareness campaign which is conducted by the Anahat NGO, Lakshmi has been slowly breaking taboos when it comes to periods and menstrual hygiene.

A Gender Rights Activist working with the tribal and marginalized communities in india, Srilekha is a PhD scholar working on understanding body and sexuality among tribal girls, to fill the gaps in research around indigenous women and their stories. Srilekha has worked extensively at the grassroots level with community based organisations, through several advocacy initiatives around Gender, Mental Health, Menstrual Hygiene and Sexual and Reproductive Health Rights (SRHR) for the indigenous in Jharkhand, over the last 6 years.

Srilekha has also contributed to sustainable livelihood projects and legal aid programs for survivors of sex trafficking. She has been conducting research based programs on maternal health, mental health, gender based violence, sex and sexuality. Her interest lies in conducting workshops for young people on life skills, feminism, gender and sexuality, trauma, resilience and interpersonal relationships.

A Guwahati-based college student pursuing her Masters in Tata Institute of Social Sciences, Bidisha started the #BleedwithDignity campaign on the technology platform, demanding that the Government of Assam install
biodegradable sanitary pad vending machines in all government schools across the state. Her petition on has already gathered support from over 90000 people and continues to grow.

Bidisha was selected in’s flagship program ‘She Creates Change’ having run successful online advocacy
campaigns, which were widely recognised. Through the #BleedwithDignity campaign; she organised and celebrated World Menstrual Hygiene Day, 2019 in Guwahati, Assam by hosting a wall mural by collaborating with local organisations. The initiative was widely covered by national and local media, and the mural was later inaugurated by the event’s chief guest Commissioner of Guwahati Municipal Corporation (GMC) Debeswar Malakar, IAS.

Sign up for the Youth Ki Awaaz Prime Ministerial Brief below