Made in the year 1985 and directed by Ridley Scott, the Hollywood movie Legend has a line: ‘What is light without dark?’ Similarly, what is the Congress party without Rahul Gandhi? Should it not be approved as a reality? Whatever you may tell of the Madhya Pradesh Chief Minister Shivraj Singh Chouhan, he brings the fresh, full form of (Rahul) Gandhi on the horizon. Has anyone expected this unique, detailed innovation?
It is fully raw and fresh in the field of polytricks. It comes out only during elections, when political leaders utter words more like literary figures, and also ensure their status as conscious people. They remain in the usual habit of describing other issues on the side in a better way, rather than narrating relevant issues. They are also said to have been focusing on irrelevant matters.
When a fiscal term GDP was defined as Gas, Diesel, Petrol, it attracted our ample attention. ‘Rahul’ and his name is getting a definition and some are going through it simply. But the blood pressure of genuine Congress sympathisers starts going up to dizzying heights as soon as this happens. Why do they become so tense? They need not be so. It is a piece of definition. They should better think about their befitting or appropriate acknowledgment. Who knew our politics would get stuck in critical or satirical definitions?
It has been defined in such a way as if these are pointing at the Congress leader’s five qualities. As the first name has only five letters, so only five traits are being defined. Is the act of defining five facets of an individual a matter of omen? Who knows. What has ancient guru Chanakya aid about it? Does anyone have a clue about it?
It was difficult to recollect when he was derided the last time with so many virtues. What is his reaction to these new connotations? Saffron reasoning or inquisitiveness is fundamental. It is a fact, too. Politics has failed to exemplify him in so many cases, but more than that, it’s almost limitless. Politicians have this pre-conceived perception about him being a largely unsuccessful leader at this point.
Defining his initial name, the model-meanings create the illusion that whatever he has been doing for his party is not okay, but this is not the case in actuality. He struggles with odds very uniquely. In every nook and corner of the country, he strives hard. In a political world, where he has still not been an emerging powerful leader so far, he remains, however, standing as the leading Opposition leader. That’s why this sort of portrayal comes, some guess so.
MP Chief Minister Shivraj Singh Chouhan gave a new definition to RAHUL: R for Rejected, A for Absent-minded, H for Hopeless, U for Useless and L for Liar (शिवराज सिंह ने RAHUL की नई परिभाषा गढ़ते हुए कहा- R से रिजेक्टेड, A से एब्सेंट माइंड, H से होपलेस, U से यूजलेस, L से लायर).
Tigers die and leave their skins; people die and leave their names. ~ A Japanese proverb