This post has been self-published on Youth Ki Awaaz by Yash Johri. Just like them, anyone can publish on Youth Ki Awaaz.

Interview: Shivshankar Menon On His New Book ‘India And Asian Geopolitics’

More from Yash Johri

I recently got a chance to virtually interview Ambassador Shivshankar Menon on the publishing of his latest book titled India and Asian Geopolitics: The Past, Present. Ambassador Menon served as National Security Advisor to the Prime Minister of India from 2010-2014 prior to which he served as Foreign Secretary, Government of India.

Ambassador Menon has also served as India’s Ambassador to China, Pakistan, Sri Lanka and Israel. He is presently associated with a variety of institutions which include, Ashoka University, Institute of Chinese Studies, Brookings India, National University of Singapore as well as the Asia Society Policy Institute.

Yash Johri (YJ): Almost one year on from the events in the Galwan valley, what assessment do you make of China’s strategic calculation? In the book, you write on Pg. 339 that in the late 1980s there was a balance of economic, political and military power between the two countries that contributed to the normalisation of relations. However, at present, the scales vary immensely today, in China’s favour. How has this change in the balance of power contributed to our present circumstances?

Shivshankar Menon (SM): On the border itself, it is my sense that we are still to find a new equilibrium. Clearly, the Chinese changed that last year, when despite the agreements they had signed committing them to respect the status quo, they tried to change the status quo on the Line of Actual Control (LAC). They tried to prevent us from patrolling in areas we had. patrolled before.

So clearly, those agreements are no longer working, China no longer seems to respect them and we, therefore, have to get them back to the old status quo at a minimum. And I think that’s a discussion that’s going on between the governments in terms of disengagement and de-escalation by the troops. Today, my summary is that the entire line is live, and that is why we have this build-up: the Chinese built up on their side to change the situation and we have built up in response and we have to see where this goes.

“We are still early in the crisis and will have to see where it goes and how it concludes.”

So we have a live border, we will have to respond to the situation there, we are still to restore deterrence along the line because obviously deterrence broke down last year otherwise China’s actions wouldn’t have happened. Additionally, the balance of power considerations must have entered into their calculus. I am very careful about actually prognosticating where this will go. I think we are still in the middle of the crisis and have a long road ahead of us, not only when it comes to negotiating but also when it comes to our buildup, our posture, the doctrines that we apply to maintain peace on the border so that the border doesn’t distract us from more important things.

You mentioned COVID-19. That frankly didn’t prompt such Chinese behaviour, because this is not something China could have done overnight when COVID-19 struck. What COVID-19 would have done is make the distraction attractive, but the action would have been prepared over a longer time period. And it is not something that was prepared after the pandemic struck if you look at the dates. The pandemic may have just accelerated the action, but stresses in India-China relations date back to at least 2012 and we had multiple signs of stress. COVID is a contributory factor but was not causatory (sic).

YJ: In the aftermath of the border fracas, we saw a lot of moves banning apps, press notes restricting FDI from bordering nations as well as the IPL dropping Vivo as the lead sponsor. However, one year on most of these initial measures has been relaxed. What do you believe is the wisdom behind such moves and secondly to what extent can economic activity be suspended when our core interests are at stake?

Photo: File/Shivshankar Menon/Twitter

SM: It is quite clear, and the External Affairs Minister and the government say it quite often, that we cannot go back to business as usual as though nothing happened on the border. And if there isn’t peace on the border we cannot have normal relations with China.

But the fact is that we’re linked to China in many ways. Before COVID-19 hit there were 24,000 Indian students studying in China. Last year, despite what happened on the border, China became our largest trading partner overtaking the United States. And frankly, the trade and economic relationship benefit both sides.

The Indian consumer also benefits from cheap Chinese goods. We aren’t importing these goods out of compulsion, we’re importing them as a matter of choice. It contributes to running our industry. If one looks at auto parts, this is a global supply chain, it’s not as if you can just snip one end of it.

Therefore, I don’t think decoupling from China is a realistic option but I do think that we have over time developed dangerous dependencies on the Chinese economy. And, we see some of that in the pharmaceutical sector (over 60% of raw materials come from China), telecom sector as well power sector. These are relatively sensitive sectors and our dependence on China is very high.

So, I would expect a Government of India strategy that tries to diminish that dependence over the coming years but not necessarily to decouple from China. And frankly, my attitude is that we should do what is in India’s interest, but we shouldn’t put ourselves in a position where we can be manipulated by using our dependencies against us.

Therefore, I reiterate that we haven’t reached a new equilibrium in the relationship, because that equilibrium will have to include more than just the border.

It will have to include the other things that divide us as well as what unites us such as trade, climate change etc. To my mind, India-China relations will be reset and there’s no going back to what it was before, there will have to be something new.

YJ: In the book, interviews and other writings you’ve mentioned that India made a mistake not joining the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP)? Additionally, a recent ruling of the Permanent Court of Arbitration in favour of Cairn on the ground of India violating clauses of its Bilateral Investment Treaty (BIT) with the UK was also given. India has phased out many such BITs.

Are these examples of short term policymaking, where a loss isn’t acceptable for longer-term/gain and credibility. Has the approach with regard to such multilateral and bilateral economic arrangements been justified and if not what can we improve?

SM: My argument against this is two-fold. One is that India needs the world. India has done best when it has been open to the world. Look at us since 1991 when we opened up the economy, those are the high growth years when we managed to pull out the most people from poverty. So being engaged with the world is a necessary condition if we want to transform India.

Secondly, I’m not arguing about the details of the negotiations but for me when you say that I will not join RCEP after 8 years of negotiations what are you saying? In effect, you are saying that I am not competitive today and that I also don’t expect to be competitive in 20 years, which is the adjustment period that RCEP gives you. For me, this shows confusion in your external economic strategy. For me, that is the worrying thing.

We’ve raised tariffs for the last four years running and there is this increasing tendency to say that we’re special and unique and that we’ll go home and forget the world. With this approach, you then run the risk of missing the development bus and this for me is a very worrying thought.

We are the only major economy that is not part of any regional trading agreement, even the United States is part of USMCA (what was NAFTA). As the world gets more fragmented with the slowing of the world economy these blocs will start becoming more cemented. What will India do then, given that at present half our GDP is the external sector?

YJ: There have been recent reports regarding China’s plans to exploit the waters of the Brahmaputra/Yarlung Zangbo. Be it with the large 38GW dam at the Great Bend, Medog County or with their South-North water diversion project. Tibet additionally is also their largest freshwater source but also home to water systems of the subcontinent and southeast Asia.

China’s development actions are undoubtedly going to transgress an entire body of sustainable development law laid down on the principle of ‘significant harm’ as well as principles of the Stockholm convention 1972 and Rio Declaration 1992? How should India and Bangladesh, both lower riparian states deal with such a situation?

SM: It’s a serious problem, if they go through with building these dams, then India and Bangladesh will be very seriously affected. If you look at China’s behaviour as an upper riparian — you can look at the Mekong — I’m not sure that these are problems that can be solved on their own, meaning qua agreements only pertaining to water.

Given this, if a problem cannot be solved within itself to the satisfaction of everybody in a negotiating framework, the only answer when it comes to peaceful solutions is to broaden the basket, is to develop other leverages and to then add more incentives to bring all sides to the table.

So I can foresee that at some stage this is going to become very important in the broader relationship. Today you say that without a peaceful border you can’t have a normal relationship but water could soon reach that status as well unless China, India and Bangladesh sit down and come to some kind of agreement.

Importantly, you have to also remember that there is no instance that I can recall where a country has successfully used water as a weapon. There are huge technical difficulties in what the Chinese propose to do, they can well try to do it but there are arguments within China against this as well. But we have to protect our interest, this is a serious issue and one that we cannot duck.

You must be to comment.

More from Yash Johri

Similar Posts


By Uttam Singh

By Amya Roy

Wondering what to write about?

Here are some topics to get you started

Share your details to download the report.

We promise not to spam or send irrelevant information.

Share your details to download the report.

We promise not to spam or send irrelevant information.

An ambassador and trained facilitator under Eco Femme (a social enterprise working towards menstrual health in south India), Sanjina is also an active member of the MHM Collective- India and Menstrual Health Alliance- India. She has conducted Menstrual Health sessions in multiple government schools adopted by Rotary District 3240 as part of their WinS project in rural Bengal. She has also delivered training of trainers on SRHR, gender, sexuality and Menstruation for Tomorrow’s Foundation, Vikramshila Education Resource Society, Nirdhan trust and Micro Finance, Tollygunj Women In Need, Paint It Red in Kolkata.

Now as an MH Fellow with YKA, she’s expanding her impressive scope of work further by launching a campaign to facilitate the process of ensuring better menstrual health and SRH services for women residing in correctional homes in West Bengal. The campaign will entail an independent study to take stalk of the present conditions of MHM in correctional homes across the state and use its findings to build public support and political will to take the necessary action.

Saurabh has been associated with YKA as a user and has consistently been writing on the issue MHM and its intersectionality with other issues in the society. Now as an MHM Fellow with YKA, he’s launched the Right to Period campaign, which aims to ensure proper execution of MHM guidelines in Delhi’s schools.

The long-term aim of the campaign is to develop an open culture where menstruation is not treated as a taboo. The campaign also seeks to hold the schools accountable for their responsibilities as an important component in the implementation of MHM policies by making adequate sanitation infrastructure and knowledge of MHM available in school premises.

Read more about his campaign.

Harshita is a psychologist and works to support people with mental health issues, particularly adolescents who are survivors of violence. Associated with the Azadi Foundation in UP, Harshita became an MHM Fellow with YKA, with the aim of promoting better menstrual health.

Her campaign #MeriMarzi aims to promote menstrual health and wellness, hygiene and facilities for female sex workers in UP. She says, “Knowledge about natural body processes is a very basic human right. And for individuals whose occupation is providing sexual services, it becomes even more important.”

Meri Marzi aims to ensure sensitised, non-discriminatory health workers for the needs of female sex workers in the Suraksha Clinics under the UPSACS (Uttar Pradesh State AIDS Control Society) program by creating more dialogues and garnering public support for the cause of sex workers’ menstrual rights. The campaign will also ensure interventions with sex workers to clear misconceptions around overall hygiene management to ensure that results flow both ways.

Read more about her campaign.

MH Fellow Sabna comes with significant experience working with a range of development issues. A co-founder of Project Sakhi Saheli, which aims to combat period poverty and break menstrual taboos, Sabna has, in the past, worked on the issue of menstruation in urban slums of Delhi with women and adolescent girls. She and her team also released MenstraBook, with menstrastories and organised Menstra Tlk in the Delhi School of Social Work to create more conversations on menstruation.

With YKA MHM Fellow Vineet, Sabna launched Menstratalk, a campaign that aims to put an end to period poverty and smash menstrual taboos in society. As a start, the campaign aims to begin conversations on menstrual health with five hundred adolescents and youth in Delhi through offline platforms, and through this community mobilise support to create Period Friendly Institutions out of educational institutes in the city.

Read more about her campaign. 

A student from Delhi School of Social work, Vineet is a part of Project Sakhi Saheli, an initiative by the students of Delhi school of Social Work to create awareness on Menstrual Health and combat Period Poverty. Along with MHM Action Fellow Sabna, Vineet launched Menstratalk, a campaign that aims to put an end to period poverty and smash menstrual taboos in society.

As a start, the campaign aims to begin conversations on menstrual health with five hundred adolescents and youth in Delhi through offline platforms, and through this community mobilise support to create Period Friendly Institutions out of educational institutes in the city.

Find out more about the campaign here.

A native of Bhagalpur district – Bihar, Shalini Jha believes in equal rights for all genders and wants to work for a gender-equal and just society. In the past she’s had a year-long association as a community leader with Haiyya: Organise for Action’s Health Over Stigma campaign. She’s pursuing a Master’s in Literature with Ambedkar University, Delhi and as an MHM Fellow with YKA, recently launched ‘Project अल्हड़ (Alharh)’.

She says, “Bihar is ranked the lowest in India’s SDG Index 2019 for India. Hygienic and comfortable menstruation is a basic human right and sustainable development cannot be ensured if menstruators are deprived of their basic rights.” Project अल्हड़ (Alharh) aims to create a robust sensitised community in Bhagalpur to collectively spread awareness, break the taboo, debunk myths and initiate fearless conversations around menstruation. The campaign aims to reach at least 6000 adolescent girls from government and private schools in Baghalpur district in 2020.

Read more about the campaign here.

A psychologist and co-founder of a mental health NGO called Customize Cognition, Ritika forayed into the space of menstrual health and hygiene, sexual and reproductive healthcare and rights and gender equality as an MHM Fellow with YKA. She says, “The experience of working on MHM/SRHR and gender equality has been an enriching and eye-opening experience. I have learned what’s beneath the surface of the issue, be it awareness, lack of resources or disregard for trans men, who also menstruate.”

The Transmen-ses campaign aims to tackle the issue of silence and disregard for trans men’s menstruation needs, by mobilising gender sensitive health professionals and gender neutral restrooms in Lucknow.

Read more about the campaign here.

A Computer Science engineer by education, Nitisha started her career in the corporate sector, before realising she wanted to work in the development and social justice space. Since then, she has worked with Teach For India and Care India and is from the founding batch of Indian School of Development Management (ISDM), a one of its kind organisation creating leaders for the development sector through its experiential learning post graduate program.

As a Youth Ki Awaaz Menstrual Health Fellow, Nitisha has started Let’s Talk Period, a campaign to mobilise young people to switch to sustainable period products. She says, “80 lakh women in Delhi use non-biodegradable sanitary products, generate 3000 tonnes of menstrual waste, that takes 500-800 years to decompose; which in turn contributes to the health issues of all menstruators, increased burden of waste management on the city and harmful living environment for all citizens.

Let’s Talk Period aims to change this by

Find out more about her campaign here.

Share your details to download the report.

We promise not to spam or send irrelevant information.

A former Assistant Secretary with the Ministry of Women and Child Development in West Bengal for three months, Lakshmi Bhavya has been championing the cause of menstrual hygiene in her district. By associating herself with the Lalana Campaign, a holistic menstrual hygiene awareness campaign which is conducted by the Anahat NGO, Lakshmi has been slowly breaking taboos when it comes to periods and menstrual hygiene.

A Gender Rights Activist working with the tribal and marginalized communities in india, Srilekha is a PhD scholar working on understanding body and sexuality among tribal girls, to fill the gaps in research around indigenous women and their stories. Srilekha has worked extensively at the grassroots level with community based organisations, through several advocacy initiatives around Gender, Mental Health, Menstrual Hygiene and Sexual and Reproductive Health Rights (SRHR) for the indigenous in Jharkhand, over the last 6 years.

Srilekha has also contributed to sustainable livelihood projects and legal aid programs for survivors of sex trafficking. She has been conducting research based programs on maternal health, mental health, gender based violence, sex and sexuality. Her interest lies in conducting workshops for young people on life skills, feminism, gender and sexuality, trauma, resilience and interpersonal relationships.

A Guwahati-based college student pursuing her Masters in Tata Institute of Social Sciences, Bidisha started the #BleedwithDignity campaign on the technology platform, demanding that the Government of Assam install
biodegradable sanitary pad vending machines in all government schools across the state. Her petition on has already gathered support from over 90000 people and continues to grow.

Bidisha was selected in’s flagship program ‘She Creates Change’ having run successful online advocacy
campaigns, which were widely recognised. Through the #BleedwithDignity campaign; she organised and celebrated World Menstrual Hygiene Day, 2019 in Guwahati, Assam by hosting a wall mural by collaborating with local organisations. The initiative was widely covered by national and local media, and the mural was later inaugurated by the event’s chief guest Commissioner of Guwahati Municipal Corporation (GMC) Debeswar Malakar, IAS.

Sign up for the Youth Ki Awaaz Prime Ministerial Brief below