This post has been self-published on Youth Ki Awaaz by Gurpreet Singh. Just like them, anyone can publish on Youth Ki Awaaz.

Deep Dive Into The History Of The Right To Privacy In India

More from Gurpreet Singh

The aim of this piece is to take the readers through the development of the right to privacy in India, through the prism of different avenues attached to it, and what lies ahead of us in respect of this right.

The concept of privacy is not alien to Indian society. The difference between public and private (baahar and ghar) has existed since the advent of Indian civilisation.

“Ladies Of The Zenana On A Roof Terrace” by Ustaad (master) Ruknuddin. Zenana refers to a part of the house meant exclusively for the women of the house. Representational image. Photo credit:

Privacy is difficult to define due to the variations in the context in which different societies perceive privacy, but the first attempt to formally define privacy was made in 1890, by Warren and Brandeis through an article published in Harvard Law Review, titled: “Right to Privacy”, in which they defined right to be left alone as privacy.

Furhter, they advocated for the right to be declared as a separate right due to change in the society due to technological advancements.

Right to Privacy in India

Hindu texts: The concept of privacy can be traced back to the Dharmashastras and ancient texts like the “Hitopadesha”, where it is specifically mentioned that certain matters in relation to worship, family, and sex should be protected from disclosure.

There is a famous saying articulated by lawmakers at that point in time: “sarvas swe swe grihe raja” (every man is a king in his own house). Thus, essentially inculcating the difference between public and private.

It laid emphasis on the personal autonomy of a person (more specifically, a man) within his household and that of being left alone.

The colonial period: The concept of privacy was refurbished from ancient times through the Constitution of India Bill (1895 ), in one of the first attempts at constitution-making by Indians.

It mentions that every citizen has in his house inviolable asylum. Then came the Commonwealth of India bill (1925) which advocated for no interference in an individual’s dwelling, without the due process of law being adhered to.

The Indian constitution: During the debates that took place during the drafting of the constitution, the matter of privacy came up and Dr BR Ambedkar advocated for the right.

He observed that:

“The right of the people to be secure in their persons, house, papers, and effects against unreasonable searches and seizures shall not be violated; and no warrants shall issue but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched and the persons or things to be seized in the state and Minority Report.”

But, there was a difference of opinion among the members of the assembly on privacy being inculcated as a fundamental right. Stalwarts like BN Rau, AK Ayyar, MK Panikkar and Alladi Krishnaswami Ayyar strongly opposed this proposal, as they felt the right would interfere with investigative powers of the police authorities.

Therefore, the right to privacy was not inculcated in the list of fundamental rights of the Indian constitution.

Advent Of The Constitution

This section deals with a plethora of cases that were dealt with by the Supreme Court on  different aspects of privacy before declaring it to be a fundamental right.

Status of privacy as a ground against search and seizure –

P Sharma v Satish Chandra: In this case, a warrant was issued under section 96(1) of the Code of Criminal Procedure to search the premises of the Dalmia group, who were allegedly being charged for fraud and other allied offences.

The Dalmia’s group challenged the search warrant on the premise of being violative of Article 20(2) of the constitution against self-incrimination where the court held that search cannot be held to be self-incriminated and observed that:

“A power of search and seizure is in any system of jurisprudence an overriding power of the state for the protection of social security and that power is necessarily regulated by law. When the constitution makers have thought fit not to subject such regulation to constitutional limitations by recognition of a fundamental right to privacy, analogous to the American Fourth Amendment, we have no justification to import it, into a totally different fundamental right by some process of strained construction.”

Thus, the court upheld the right of search and seizure; and held that invocation of privacy against search and seizure is not available.

 Status of privacy and state surveillance – 

Kharak Singh v State of Uttar Pradesh: Under this case, Kharak Singh was charge-sheeted in case of dacoity and was later released due to lack of evidence. But, the police put him under surveillance under chapter XX of the UP police regulations.

Representational image. Photo credit:

Surveillance involved secret picketing of the house or approaches to the house of the suspects, domiciliary visits at night, periodical inquiries by officers not below the rank of sub-inspector into repute, habits, association, income, expenses, and occupation of the accused.

The petitioner challenged these provisions as an infringement to his fundamental right under Article 19 (1)(f) and Article 21. The court ruled against domiciliary visits by the police regulations, but held that there is no right of privacy enshrined in the constitution.

Justice Subba Rao dissented and held that privacy is part and parcel of personal liberty that is enshrined under Article 21 of the constitution. Thus, the Supreme Court conveyed that privacy is not a constitutional right and authorised state surveillance.

Govind v State of Madhya Pradesh: Similar to the Kharak Singh case, surveillance orders authorized under rules 855 and 866 of Madhya Pradesh police regulations formulated by the Government against Police Act, 1961.

The court in this particular case ruled privacy to be associated with personal liberty and freedom of movement emanating from Article 19 and 21 of the constitution but also observed that it would be against judicial discipline to declare the right in broad terms that is explicitly not mentioned in the constitution.

The court upheld that right of privacy pervades in the constitution, though not explicitly mentioned, but cannot be given a broad definition and will be examined on a case-to-case basis. The problem that arose was that it could not overrule the decision rendered in MP Sharma Case as it was an 8-judge-bench decision and this was a 3-judge-decision.

The court upheld surveillance owing to the fact that the petitioner is a habitual offender and surveillance can be construed as a reasonable restriction.

Status of mental privacy –

Selvi v State of Karnataka: In this case, techniques such as narco-analysis, polygraph examination, and the Brain Electrical Activation Profile (BEAP), that force an individual to incriminate themselves, were challenged. The court for the first time established a relationship between article 20 (3) and privacy.

The court held that criminal law allows the authorities to invade the physical privacy of individuals by conducting interrogations and an individual has a choice to respond to the questions posed by the investigation authorities.

The same cannot be allowed when an individual cannot accord his consent during the tests such as of narco-analysis, polygraph analysis, and brain mapping techniques.

The court held that the state cannot be allowed to enter into the brains of individuals and gather information. The court upheld the right to mental privacy and prohibited the state to use these techniques.  ·

 Status of informational privacy –

R Rajagopal v State of Tamil Nadu: In this case, the petitioners were looking to publish the autobiography of auto Shankar, a serial killer lodged in prison that revealed his connection with several state authorities.

The inspector general of police issued a warning that the convict hadn’t written his autobiography and if published legal action would ensue. The issue arose whether any person writing a biography of a person without their consent, would it infringe their right of privacy?

The court opined that it would be an infringement of privacy if something is published in relation to an individual’s private affairs without their consent.

However, the court created an exception that if something is published from the public record in relation to an individual: that would not be considered an infringement of privacy.

 Status of privacy and health –

Mr X v Hospital Z: In this case, the hospital leaked the confidential information that the petitioner was suffering from Aids which led to his marriage being called off.

The court held that the petitioner had the right to confidentiality in relation to his heath records, but in the present case it was not violated as the information was released in public interest, so that the fiancé of the petitioner was informed about the communicable disease that her to be partner was suffering from.         

Modern Developments Vis-À-Vis Privacy

Privacy as a fundamental right –

Justice KS Puttaswamy (retd.) v Union of India: In a landmark judgment delivered in 2017, the Supreme Court cleared the confusion regarding the status of the right to privacy by ruling that it is a fundamental right emanating from Article 21 of the constitution.

The court expanded the meaning of privacy to include privacy of body, mind, decisions, and information. However, the court laid down that the right is not absolute and it can be intruded upon by the state by passing the test of legality, a test of a legitimate aim, and a test of proportionality as enumerated by the court through this judgment. 

After examining the development of privacy as a right in India with its different facets, this section deals with new avenues and facets that opened up due to privacy being elevated to the status of fundamental rights.

Sexual orientation –

Navtej Singh Johar v Union of India: In this case, the validity of Section 377 which criminalised consensual sexual relations between the same sexes was challenged.

The court decriminalised consensual sex between queer adults, by observing sexual orientation is an integral aspect of privacy, which is a fundamental right that cannot be violated at any cost.

Navtej Singh Johar is a Sangeet Natak Akademi award-winning Bharatnatyam exponent and choreographer. Representational image. Photo credit: The Hindu, via

The court further invoked Puttaswamy judgment and observed:

“Given our judgment in Puttaswamy, in particular, the right of every citizen of India to live with dignity and the right to privacy that includes the right to make intimate choices regarding the manner in which such individual wishes to live being protected by Articles 14, 19 and 21.”

Right to be forgotten – 

Jorawer Singh Mundy v Union of India: In this case, an American citizen was acquitted in a case registered against him under the NDPS (Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances) Act, 1985, but was facing troubles in employment because his name was still being presented in judgment delivered by means of a simple google search.

The court invoked the right to be forgotten emanating from the privacy and ordered Google and Indian Kanoon to take down the judgments, as they were causing great harm and prejudice to the petitioner.

Privacy Is Pivotal

In the light of the above discussion, the right to privacy in India has evolved from the ancient period to be elevated as a fundamental right in modern India. With the data protection around the corridors, it will open up avenues for privacy in the information age.

Keeping that part in abeyance it would be interesting to witness new avenues to privacy such as abortion rights or “love jihad” laws being tested on the anvils of the right to privacy.


  2.      J1002015358.pdf (
Featured image is for representational purposes only. Photo credit: Alberto Adán, Pixabay.
You must be to comment.

More from Gurpreet Singh

Similar Posts

By Harsh verma

By Wajiha Zaidi

By GetLegal India

    If you do not receive an email within the next 5 mins, please check your spam box or email us at

      If you do not receive an email within the next 5 mins, please check your spam box or email us at

        If you do not receive an email within the next 5 mins, please check your spam box or email us at

        Wondering what to write about?

        Here are some topics to get you started

        Share your details to download the report.

        We promise not to spam or send irrelevant information.

        Share your details to download the report.

        We promise not to spam or send irrelevant information.

        An ambassador and trained facilitator under Eco Femme (a social enterprise working towards menstrual health in south India), Sanjina is also an active member of the MHM Collective- India and Menstrual Health Alliance- India. She has conducted Menstrual Health sessions in multiple government schools adopted by Rotary District 3240 as part of their WinS project in rural Bengal. She has also delivered training of trainers on SRHR, gender, sexuality and Menstruation for Tomorrow’s Foundation, Vikramshila Education Resource Society, Nirdhan trust and Micro Finance, Tollygunj Women In Need, Paint It Red in Kolkata.

        Now as an MH Fellow with YKA, she’s expanding her impressive scope of work further by launching a campaign to facilitate the process of ensuring better menstrual health and SRH services for women residing in correctional homes in West Bengal. The campaign will entail an independent study to take stalk of the present conditions of MHM in correctional homes across the state and use its findings to build public support and political will to take the necessary action.

        Saurabh has been associated with YKA as a user and has consistently been writing on the issue MHM and its intersectionality with other issues in the society. Now as an MHM Fellow with YKA, he’s launched the Right to Period campaign, which aims to ensure proper execution of MHM guidelines in Delhi’s schools.

        The long-term aim of the campaign is to develop an open culture where menstruation is not treated as a taboo. The campaign also seeks to hold the schools accountable for their responsibilities as an important component in the implementation of MHM policies by making adequate sanitation infrastructure and knowledge of MHM available in school premises.

        Read more about his campaign.

        Harshita is a psychologist and works to support people with mental health issues, particularly adolescents who are survivors of violence. Associated with the Azadi Foundation in UP, Harshita became an MHM Fellow with YKA, with the aim of promoting better menstrual health.

        Her campaign #MeriMarzi aims to promote menstrual health and wellness, hygiene and facilities for female sex workers in UP. She says, “Knowledge about natural body processes is a very basic human right. And for individuals whose occupation is providing sexual services, it becomes even more important.”

        Meri Marzi aims to ensure sensitised, non-discriminatory health workers for the needs of female sex workers in the Suraksha Clinics under the UPSACS (Uttar Pradesh State AIDS Control Society) program by creating more dialogues and garnering public support for the cause of sex workers’ menstrual rights. The campaign will also ensure interventions with sex workers to clear misconceptions around overall hygiene management to ensure that results flow both ways.

        Read more about her campaign.

        MH Fellow Sabna comes with significant experience working with a range of development issues. A co-founder of Project Sakhi Saheli, which aims to combat period poverty and break menstrual taboos, Sabna has, in the past, worked on the issue of menstruation in urban slums of Delhi with women and adolescent girls. She and her team also released MenstraBook, with menstrastories and organised Menstra Tlk in the Delhi School of Social Work to create more conversations on menstruation.

        With YKA MHM Fellow Vineet, Sabna launched Menstratalk, a campaign that aims to put an end to period poverty and smash menstrual taboos in society. As a start, the campaign aims to begin conversations on menstrual health with five hundred adolescents and youth in Delhi through offline platforms, and through this community mobilise support to create Period Friendly Institutions out of educational institutes in the city.

        Read more about her campaign. 

        A student from Delhi School of Social work, Vineet is a part of Project Sakhi Saheli, an initiative by the students of Delhi school of Social Work to create awareness on Menstrual Health and combat Period Poverty. Along with MHM Action Fellow Sabna, Vineet launched Menstratalk, a campaign that aims to put an end to period poverty and smash menstrual taboos in society.

        As a start, the campaign aims to begin conversations on menstrual health with five hundred adolescents and youth in Delhi through offline platforms, and through this community mobilise support to create Period Friendly Institutions out of educational institutes in the city.

        Find out more about the campaign here.

        A native of Bhagalpur district – Bihar, Shalini Jha believes in equal rights for all genders and wants to work for a gender-equal and just society. In the past she’s had a year-long association as a community leader with Haiyya: Organise for Action’s Health Over Stigma campaign. She’s pursuing a Master’s in Literature with Ambedkar University, Delhi and as an MHM Fellow with YKA, recently launched ‘Project अल्हड़ (Alharh)’.

        She says, “Bihar is ranked the lowest in India’s SDG Index 2019 for India. Hygienic and comfortable menstruation is a basic human right and sustainable development cannot be ensured if menstruators are deprived of their basic rights.” Project अल्हड़ (Alharh) aims to create a robust sensitised community in Bhagalpur to collectively spread awareness, break the taboo, debunk myths and initiate fearless conversations around menstruation. The campaign aims to reach at least 6000 adolescent girls from government and private schools in Baghalpur district in 2020.

        Read more about the campaign here.

        A psychologist and co-founder of a mental health NGO called Customize Cognition, Ritika forayed into the space of menstrual health and hygiene, sexual and reproductive healthcare and rights and gender equality as an MHM Fellow with YKA. She says, “The experience of working on MHM/SRHR and gender equality has been an enriching and eye-opening experience. I have learned what’s beneath the surface of the issue, be it awareness, lack of resources or disregard for trans men, who also menstruate.”

        The Transmen-ses campaign aims to tackle the issue of silence and disregard for trans men’s menstruation needs, by mobilising gender sensitive health professionals and gender neutral restrooms in Lucknow.

        Read more about the campaign here.

        A Computer Science engineer by education, Nitisha started her career in the corporate sector, before realising she wanted to work in the development and social justice space. Since then, she has worked with Teach For India and Care India and is from the founding batch of Indian School of Development Management (ISDM), a one of its kind organisation creating leaders for the development sector through its experiential learning post graduate program.

        As a Youth Ki Awaaz Menstrual Health Fellow, Nitisha has started Let’s Talk Period, a campaign to mobilise young people to switch to sustainable period products. She says, “80 lakh women in Delhi use non-biodegradable sanitary products, generate 3000 tonnes of menstrual waste, that takes 500-800 years to decompose; which in turn contributes to the health issues of all menstruators, increased burden of waste management on the city and harmful living environment for all citizens.

        Let’s Talk Period aims to change this by

        Find out more about her campaign here.

        Share your details to download the report.

        We promise not to spam or send irrelevant information.

        A former Assistant Secretary with the Ministry of Women and Child Development in West Bengal for three months, Lakshmi Bhavya has been championing the cause of menstrual hygiene in her district. By associating herself with the Lalana Campaign, a holistic menstrual hygiene awareness campaign which is conducted by the Anahat NGO, Lakshmi has been slowly breaking taboos when it comes to periods and menstrual hygiene.

        A Gender Rights Activist working with the tribal and marginalized communities in india, Srilekha is a PhD scholar working on understanding body and sexuality among tribal girls, to fill the gaps in research around indigenous women and their stories. Srilekha has worked extensively at the grassroots level with community based organisations, through several advocacy initiatives around Gender, Mental Health, Menstrual Hygiene and Sexual and Reproductive Health Rights (SRHR) for the indigenous in Jharkhand, over the last 6 years.

        Srilekha has also contributed to sustainable livelihood projects and legal aid programs for survivors of sex trafficking. She has been conducting research based programs on maternal health, mental health, gender based violence, sex and sexuality. Her interest lies in conducting workshops for young people on life skills, feminism, gender and sexuality, trauma, resilience and interpersonal relationships.

        A Guwahati-based college student pursuing her Masters in Tata Institute of Social Sciences, Bidisha started the #BleedwithDignity campaign on the technology platform, demanding that the Government of Assam install
        biodegradable sanitary pad vending machines in all government schools across the state. Her petition on has already gathered support from over 90000 people and continues to grow.

        Bidisha was selected in’s flagship program ‘She Creates Change’ having run successful online advocacy
        campaigns, which were widely recognised. Through the #BleedwithDignity campaign; she organised and celebrated World Menstrual Hygiene Day, 2019 in Guwahati, Assam by hosting a wall mural by collaborating with local organisations. The initiative was widely covered by national and local media, and the mural was later inaugurated by the event’s chief guest Commissioner of Guwahati Municipal Corporation (GMC) Debeswar Malakar, IAS.

        Sign up for the Youth Ki Awaaz Prime Ministerial Brief below