Climate Change is emerging as a stressor that is hindering the development of the Indian sub-continent as it is leading to the disruption in people’s lives to a large extent. It is clearly visible with increasing floods in Kerala and Assam and tsunamis in Sri Lanka, Bangladesh and India.
Global reports claim that there is a 21% decrease in global farming productivity due to climate change. Thus, it becomes very important to engage deeply in this issue to build a constructive outlook.
To deliberate upon this important and emerging global issue, the National Institute of Disaster Management, Ministry of Home Affairs, Government of India, in collaboration with the Centre for Environment, Climate Change and Sustainable Development (CECCSD), IMPRI Impact and Policy Research Institute, organised a panel discussion on 23 March, 2021 at 2:30 pm on the topic Climate Migration in Indian Sub-Continent.
Dr Simi Mehta, CEO & Editorial Director, IMPRI, initiated the deliberation by underlining that climate change is real as glaciers are melting at a faster pace; the sea level is rising and intense heat waves have become common. Net damage costs of climate change are likely to increase.
Climate change is leading to the displacement of people, which has led to the emergence of a new category called “climate migrants”. It refers to people who have shifted their indigenous inhabitants due to the adverse effects of climate change and marked environmental disruption. Climate change is a hindrance to the ecological balance of the Indian sub-continent in the longer run.
Abrupt rain, snow and heat have lead to the migration of many across the country.
Read this article by our climate fellow Chitra Rawat (@lalburaans) to know how the changing weather has impacted farming, livestock, homes and development projects.https://t.co/t1e4maLvtw
— Youth Ki Awaaz (@YouthKiAwaaz) August 11, 2021
Prof Gupta set the tone of the discussion by highlighting that climate change is a topic of wide significance. Climate migration is a new term in the environmental discourse. Therefore, according to him, it is important to understand that disasters are aggravated by environmental degradation, increasing hazards, intensity and propensity.
Disasters often create a long-term impact on the environmental ecosystem. Environmental concerns are jeopardised during disasters as the primary focus is on saving lives. Three types of environmental changes are important to understand, first is climate change, second is land-use change and third is natural resource degradation.
Prof Gupta said with conviction that “vulnerability matters” and does not fall from the sky. Environmental migration has been known for ages. Civilisations evolved near water bodies. Environmental dimensions have been closely associated with the rise and fall of civilisations.
Migration is an important part of the modern human development era. The trend of migration has undergone tremendous change, i.e. the rate of migration has increased, newer places are emerging as hotspots, additional pressure on development and governance.
City resilience and governance need more attention. Migration is an additional disaster going on during COVID-19 as cities are becoming devoid of a workforce. Thus, a planned approach can be a way forward.
Prof Bhagat focused on the relationship between climate change and migration. A lot of drivers are embedded in the process of climate change. Socio-economic drivers can’t be separated from the process. Various factors are interwoven together, for instance, poverty and employment.
He enlisted forms of migration — forced and voluntary migration. He remarked that climate refugees should also be a part of the category of refugees. Thus, it is important to understand mobility and de-mobility aspects.
Seasonal migration is becoming more prominent among construction workers like the sugarcane migration, which is common in Uttar Pradesh and Bihar. Thus, central India will be directly affected by climate change and a majority of the tribal population inhabits it, which can also lead to conflicts.
Prof Bhagat mentioned that data is lacking enormously. We need to collect systematic data to work in a holistic way towards emerging climate change issues.
View this post on Instagram
Prof Nianthi highlighted that climate change is common in every country. The government needs to be sensitive towards increasing climate change.
She contextualised it in the Sri Lankan context by citing some relevant facts and data, i.e. Sri Lanka was ranked second among the countries affected by extreme weather events — Global Climate Risk Index 2019. The vulnerability exists both in terms of fatalities and economic losses. Consequently, there is an urgent need for the sustainable global, country and regional specific models.
Temperature increase, increasing intensity of droughts and floods, irregular changes in rainfall patterns; boundary shift in climatic zones is a point of concern. Mitigation, adaptation, loss and damage need to be deeply focused upon to implement climate justice.
In Sri Lanka, permanent migration is considered as the last adaptive response (i.e. landslide resettlements). Even for migration, people require some kind of resources, and people with inadequate resources cannot migrate. Thus, an integrated approach is needed to build climate-resilient and healthy human settlements.
According to Prof Nianthi, timely intervention and robust policies are needed across the sectors. Governments should focus on developing a partnership with financial institutions handling remittances to encourage such institutions to offer opportunities to vulnerable communities in order to build back better.
Sea level rise poses many challenges to coastal communities in particular and their livelihoods, leading to inland migration in the future. Proper adaptation can prevent loss and damages. The relationship between disaster and development needs more research. She concluded by asserting that migration can itself be an adaptation failure.
Facebook serves ads denying climate change during COP26👀
(1) What happened?
As COP26 began, Facebook promoted some misleading ads on climate change.
— Youth Ki Awaaz (@YouthKiAwaaz) November 25, 2021
Prof Mangotra underlined that climate change is largely a development issue. Migration can be seen as a coping mechanism or an adaptation issue. A need basis approach is required in understanding this complex issue to comprehend long-term climatic effects.
According to him, it is important to understand where we are and where we stand today regarding climate change. Inter-border issues also need the deeper attention of all the stakeholders as migration can’t be linked to any particular factor. We need to strengthen the science to understand migration.
Capacity building and community involvement can be effective solutions in the longer run.
Dr Tarannum centred her discussion on the gendered impact of climate change and rural to urban migration. It is vital to understand women’s role, such as during provisioning water and fuelwood for which women have to travel longer due to depleting local resources. Female mortality in tsunamis is much higher, which is not just a coincidence.
Dr Tarannum contextualised the state of the problems by focusing attention on farmer suicides, unplanned migration, cities loans and increasing slums, access to schooling, water and sanitation. She asserted that the feminisation of agriculture is leading to the feminisation of poverty.
There are additional responsibilities on women, i.e. reproductive role in looking after the family. It is important to recognise the intersectionality of issues. For instance, in human trafficking in disasters, widows are more vulnerable.
Dr Tarannum appraised that women tend to show a more environment-friendly attitude. Women are more resilient by design. Many women are now engaging in solar system programs in rural areas.
Gender disaggregated data and gender-sensitive budget is the need of the hour. Also, gender-neutral policies should not be gender-blind. An online database needed and a national action plan for climate change can be a way forward.
View this post on Instagram
Prof Khan propounded that borders are becoming less porous in the contemporary era. How can we have a planned location at borders? Relocation can be started in a planned way and effectively contribute to the economy.
Prof Khan mentioned that lack of political will is a cause of concern as climate change is an emerging human security issue and can’t be under the carpet anymore.
Prof Sharma focused on the trinity of diversity, complexity and inequality. According to him, it is vital to understand the way society interacts with nature to build long-term, sustainable models. Poverty induces seasonal migration. Therefore, long-term engagement with the communities can lead to more awareness among the masses.
He highlighted that socio-political and economic factors are intertwined. Institutional structures need to be looked upon deeply to reconstruct livelihoods effectively. Reproduction of inequalities needs a structural solution.
Characterisation of processes is very important. Why marginalised is part of modern slavery is a question that needs more discussion and deliberation as it can lead to further alienation of the disadvantaged sections of society.
He concluded by underlining the increasing commodification of nature which is part of the inequality dimension.
Prof Bhagat responded to the questions related to adaptation by highlighting that there are many forms of adaptation. Resource depletion is the major cause of migration as migration results from wage inequality. There should be a mapping of the villages as there is the networking of migration. Thus, disaster management needs to be planned in a long-term manner.
Mr Karan opined that the right economic models need to be in place. A big part of implementation lies at the local level. One size fits all approach doesn’t work. Best practices need to be adopted. A deeper explanation of climate-induced migration is the need of the hour. Figuring out where we are today and then making them work locally can be an effective approach.
Related to the question of human-animal conflicts in Sunderban and how we can generate livelihood, Prof Khan highlighted needing to look more into Sunderbans and beyond its mere borders. Corrupt timber marches need to be stopped as soon as possible. Thus, collaboration is needed.
Dr Fawzia responded to questions by talking about two projects she is working on. One was with sugar mills in Uttar Pradesh, where they are training farmers and women to adopt best practices. The second was in Tamil Nadu, where her students are focusing on water management techniques.
According to her, one should collaborate with NGOs as they work closely with people, and skill-building programs can be a way forward in mitigating problems of climate change and building stronger communities.
Prof Mishra responded to the questions posed to him by asserting that enhancement of opportunities is the need of the hour to prevent migration. Policies of exclusion should be negated. An adequate institutional framework and multi-layered approach to address inequalities should be the focus of various stakeholders. According to him, universal social security can be a way forward.
The panellists concluded by giving a positive way forward for further engagement. According to them, it is important to find the root causes of the migration and there needs to be increased focus on mitigation and adaptation. It is necessary to focus on climatic drivers of migration. It should be migration by choice and not forceful. Resilient communities need to be built.
Climate change is real and it is happening. Thus, cities should have a long-term plan as most of the population will be inhabiting cities by 2050. SAARC countries need to work together in the spirit of cooperation to boost regional-based solutions. Climate justice should be an integral part of the process and a solution-oriented approach can lead to a more sustainable and equitable future.