The Light of Asia: The Poem that Defined the Buddha is a compelling and comprehensive account of the epic poem of the same name authored by Sir Edwin Arnold that was first published in 1879. The book goes into intricate details to unearth the nuances present in one of the richest narrative poems ever written.
The distinguished panellists included:
Jairam Ramesh’s book The Light of Asia: The Poem that Defined the Buddha is a compelling and comprehensive account of the epic poem of the same name authored by Sir Edwin Arnold that was first published in 1879.https://t.co/0MNa7VErRq
— The Telegraph (@ttindia) June 27, 2021
The moderator of the session, Prof Amita Singh, initiated the discussion by stating that The Light of Asia: The Poem that Defined The Buddha covers a wide range of issues including the colonial and caste segregated society which is the inception for the light of Asia and the evolution of academic institutions, the monopoly of the cast over the right of others.
Talking about the inspiration for the book, Jairam Ramesh stated that it was a fascination with the life of the Buddha-like every Indian, irrespective of their religious affiliation and the cause behind the poem going viral during 1879.
Alongside the poet’s personality, Sir Edwin Arnold, who, despite being a traditional British, was inspired by the works of Indian Philosophers, also inspired Ramesh to comprehend the poem better.
Believing in the universality of religions, Sir Edwin Arnold translated other texts into English and enhanced the reach of philosophies despite being an agnostic.
Jairam Ramesh further states that the poem by Arnold talks not about the divinity of Buddha but his humanity which gave the poem an extraordinary appeal, not just to the English but Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi, Rabindranath Tagore, and other leaders alike.
And given that India is a divinity surplus humanity deficit country, the poem’s impact becomes all the more important.
Prof Amita stated that the last part of the book takes us to the important point of Hinduism—Buddhism interface and its effect on each other.
Though Hinduism eventually managed to assimilate Buddhism into its fold by tactfully recognising Buddha as an avatar of Vishnu, Hinduism, too, was not the same again as many of the doctrines of Buddhism like ahimsa, vegetarianism, emphasis on inner realisation, ethical living and equality of all human beings became an integral part of Indian society which are cherished even today.
Prof Tansen Sen, Professor of History, Director, Center for Global Asia, NYU Shanghai, addressed the audience by emphasising about three things:
Delving deeper into the discussion, Prof Sen enquired why the translations had a greater social impact than the English original in India.
To this, Jairam Ramesh replies by stating that the Indian languages did not have biographies of Buddha before this. The English version would have been popular only amongst the Bengali and Tamil Brahmins, but with translations, the reach widens. These translations eventually became tools in the hands of social reformers, which enhanced the social impact of translations as compared to the English version.
Alongside, there was a political agenda behind these translations to challenge the Brahmanical orthodoxy.
He further stated that the author had highlighted the issue of the control of the Mahabodhi temple in Bodh Gaya, which was with the Hindu mahants. The dogged persistence of Arnold, who was one of the first to raise the issue with his fellow Englishmen in power, eventually culminated in the mahants’ partial sharing of responsibilities with Buddhists in 1954.
Prof Wasantha Seneviratne, Professor, and Head of Department of Public and International Law, Faculty of Law, University of Colombo, Sri Lanka, remarked that the book was enlightening and intricately linked the life of the Lord Buddha with the contemporary world.
Responding to this, Jairam Ramesh stated that Sri Lanka plays a major role in the revival of Buddhism and the philosophies of Buddha as it withheld sources used by scholars alike to understand Buddhism.
Prof Kancha stated that Arnold’s poem and Ashvaghosa’s Buddhacharita were very similar to each other. In Arnold’s poem, he underlines that Buddha is not a tribal but a fully Kshatriya prince like Rama. He questions the reaction of Arnold’s poem in English or translations to Hindu icon communities.
Responding to this, Shri Jairam said that the poem had a huge impact on Swami Vivekananda and he described the poem as a tribute of advaitik Hinduism.
Dr Kokila agrees with Jairam Naresh’s effort to highlight the humanity part of Buddhism and states that Buddhism was a daily practice of life. In her opinion, Lord Buddha was a rebellion who went against all the conventional traditions and beliefs. She further commented that anyone could be Buddhist despite their belief in God.
Prof Singh sums up the entire book by stating, “Teaching how fair this earth would be if all living beings were linked bloodless and pure, the golden grain bright fruits seeing that knowledge grows life is one and mercy committed to the merciful.”
Jairam Ramesh concludes by urging Indians to give up their obsession with divinity and discover the roots of humanity which are to be sought in the life of the Buddha. He also reiterated that he is unsure if Buddhism is the answer to today’s world, but to him, Buddha is the answer.
Acknowledgement: Srimedha Bandi is a Research intern at IMPRI
By Simi Mehta, Arjun Kumar, Anshula Mehta, Rithika Gupta, Swati Solanki, Sakshi Sharda at IMPRI
Featured Image via Wikimedia Commons