This post has been self-published on Youth Ki Awaaz by Pranav Jeevan P. Just like them, anyone can publish on Youth Ki Awaaz.

How Vivas Are Used To Maintain Brahminical Hegemony In Education

More from Pranav Jeevan P

India’s education system is no different to society when it comes to caste discrimination. The savarnas in the system often perpetuate brahminical hegemony and deny “lower-caste” students their rights.

The story of Ekalavya repeats every day in Indian society, in our academia and professions, where Dronacharyas of today use various tools to deny those coming from marginalised sections their rightful opportunities.

Two recent events show us the ways in which the casteist professors in our academic institutions exclude Dalit, Bahujan and Adivasi (DBA) students and scholars from attaining higher positions:

  1. The declaration of results of JNU PhD entrance exams shed light on the ways in which DBA students were given single-digit marks in Viva, thereby denying them admission to the institute.
  2. The publishing of results of faculty recruitment in J B Pant Social Science Institute declared every applicant from the OBC category as unsuitable.
dalit issues protest
Marginalised students are often discriminated against.

Discrimination During Viva Tests

The use of viva or interview as a tool to deny selection is an age-old tactic effectively used by savarnas in positions of power. 

Since the awarding of marks in viva is completely arbitrary and given according to the whims and fancies of the evaluators, they have complete discretion in giving more marks to candidates from similar savarna backgrounds and mannerisms and can give fewer marks to candidates from DBA backgrounds, which ultimately cause them to be rejected from the selection process.

These people who conduct the interview have the full information of the social background of the candidates and their agenda is clearly to make sure that their caste supremacy in these institutions remains unquestioned and unopposed.

A clear case of this is visible in the UPSC interview marks, where candidates from reserved categories are consistently awarded fewer marks even though they might have higher marks in the written examination. They also give higher marks to savarna candidates to ensure they get higher ranks in the final rank list.

It has been consistently observed that most students from reserved categories are rejected in the final interview round for academic admissions. The only reason we have a better implementation of reservation in undergraduate courses is due to the fact that these admissions are free from this interview process and these savarna professors do not get an opportunity to deny them their rightful seats.

The whole idea of judging a candidate’s ability from a 3–5 minute interview is ludicrous. It is even more scandalous to award a single digit mark (out of 30 or 100) for that candidate, essentially denying their chance, when you know that the candidate had scored well in the written part.

Also, the use of viva is not to merely reject a candidate. If they find the candidate cannot be rejected just using the viva marks, they will still give them fewer marks to ensure that the candidate does not get admitted in the general category, ensuring that the general category is only filled by savarna candidates.

We have been hearing reports of how candidates from marginalised backgrounds are harassed, ridiculed and shamed by the interview panels by intimidation and humiliation. They are deliberately asked questions unrelated to their field of study, sometimes rebuked for their dress or accent and their answers are completely discarded or ignored.

Similarly, we hear reports of how the same panels make a jolly and comfortable experience for the savarna candidates who they take as their own, asking them about their family and personal details rather than trying to judge their academic vigour.

students protesting
There is widespread bias against Dalit, Bahujan and Adivasi students.

No Transparency Or Accountability

This shows their casteist idea of merit where savarnas are born “meritorious”, but the DBA candidates have to prove that they are deserving. If a DBA student shows assertiveness in the interview, they see it as a threat and give them fewer marks. This demonstrates the widespread unethical bias in conducting viva.

It is this viva that ensures that their numbers in these institutions are always higher than the Bahujans and their supremacy and rule continue unopposed.

The absolute lack of transparency and accountability from the academic institutions regarding their evaluation processes has perpetuated this casteist gate-keeping. The Brahminical patriarchal attitude is also visible in STEM institutes where women are deliberately kept away from positions of research.

The entire process of admissions is kept opaque so that no one can question the process and these Dronacharyas can hide behind the curtain of “meritocracy”. When they are sometimes forced to follow reservation under political pressure, they often try to select weaker candidates from the categories ignoring the best, to reinforce the idea that people from DBA backgrounds are unmeritorious.

When they cannot find weaker candidates, they keep parroting the “not enough candidates applied” argument saying these seats will remain vacant if they keep waiting for DBA candidates.

How IITs Discriminate

IIT Delhi.
IIT Delhi.

The IITs, for instance, never publish the vacancies in PhD admissions, the marks obtained in the written and interviews are never disclosed, nor the weightage of the viva, even the final list of selected candidates are never made public.

It was only through repeated RTIs that the category wise data of PhD admission and faculty recruitment was obtained, which showed a clear bias against candidates from reserved categories.

The RTIs filed by APPSC IIT Bombay, APSC IIT Madras and Chinta Bar IIT Madras has found that the number of applicants from DBA categories far outnumbered the number of seats in PhD admissions and faculty recruitment in IITs for years.

Even after this data is available in the public domain, the directors of various IITs had the audacity to claim that positions will remain vacant if reservation is implemented properly due to lack of applicants.

It is not due to the lack of suitable applicants that the positions are vacant, but the casteist Brahminical attitude of these professors who will neither let students from DBA backgrounds in their classes nor let them become their equals as fellow instructors. 

IITs also convert these reserved vacant posts to the unreserved category so that they can fill it up with their savarna peers, which further incentivises them not to select DBA candidates and let them remain vacant.

 

View this post on Instagram

 

A post shared by Youth Ki Awaaz (@youthkiawaaz)

What Needs To Be Done?

The struggle of DBA students and faculties after securing entry into these Brahminical bubbles is far from over. We can see how they are tortured and pushed to drop out or end their lives due to the discrimination they have to undergo on a day-to-day basis from the cases of Payal Tadvi, Rohit Vemula and recently, the decade long struggle of Deepa Mohanan.

We also saw how DBA faculty are discriminated against and forced out of campuses in cases of Vipin Veetil in IIT Madras and Ritu Singh in DU, among others.

Thousands of Dalit, Bahujan and Adivasi students are forced to end their education and careers due to the rampant Brahmanism in these institutes.

The only way to overcome this issue is to agitate for the elimination of viva as an evaluation mechanism or ensure adequate representation of reserved category faculty in the panels. Viva marks cannot be arbitrary and need to be broken down into marks allotted separately for each attribute that is checked.

The option to record the viva for any future contestations or unfairness needs to be explored. The whole issue can only be solved if the hegemony of savarnas in these academic spaces is destroyed.

The only way to democratise the admission and recruitment process is through increasing the representation of Dalit, Bahujan and Adivasis in positions of power in these academic institutions.

Also, the power and impunity hoarded by these Brahminical Dronacharyas needs to be dismantled and students should have more participation in the functioning and decision making in these institutes.

We can find hope in the recent victories of anti-caste voices in bringing justice to Deepa Mohanan, forcing the government to direct IITs for mission mode recruitment of reserved posts, and even the G B Pant Social Science Institute to ensure recruitment of OBCs.

Brahminism and patriarchy are antithetical to the idea of democracy. Unless we uproot these hierarchies from our academic institutions, we can never have safe spaces of learning for our Dalit, Bahujan and Adivasi brethren.

This article was first published in Round Table India.

Featured image via maxpixel
You must be to comment.

More from Pranav Jeevan P

Similar Posts

By Priyanka

By Wajiha Zaidi

By Krishna Kant Tripathi

    If you do not receive an email within the next 5 mins, please check your spam box or email us at actnow@youthkiawaaz.com

      If you do not receive an email within the next 5 mins, please check your spam box or email us at actnow@youthkiawaaz.com

        If you do not receive an email within the next 5 mins, please check your spam box or email us at actnow@youthkiawaaz.com

        Wondering what to write about?

        Here are some topics to get you started

        Share your details to download the report.









        We promise not to spam or send irrelevant information.

        Share your details to download the report.









        We promise not to spam or send irrelevant information.

        An ambassador and trained facilitator under Eco Femme (a social enterprise working towards menstrual health in south India), Sanjina is also an active member of the MHM Collective- India and Menstrual Health Alliance- India. She has conducted Menstrual Health sessions in multiple government schools adopted by Rotary District 3240 as part of their WinS project in rural Bengal. She has also delivered training of trainers on SRHR, gender, sexuality and Menstruation for Tomorrow’s Foundation, Vikramshila Education Resource Society, Nirdhan trust and Micro Finance, Tollygunj Women In Need, Paint It Red in Kolkata.

        Now as an MH Fellow with YKA, she’s expanding her impressive scope of work further by launching a campaign to facilitate the process of ensuring better menstrual health and SRH services for women residing in correctional homes in West Bengal. The campaign will entail an independent study to take stalk of the present conditions of MHM in correctional homes across the state and use its findings to build public support and political will to take the necessary action.

        Saurabh has been associated with YKA as a user and has consistently been writing on the issue MHM and its intersectionality with other issues in the society. Now as an MHM Fellow with YKA, he’s launched the Right to Period campaign, which aims to ensure proper execution of MHM guidelines in Delhi’s schools.

        The long-term aim of the campaign is to develop an open culture where menstruation is not treated as a taboo. The campaign also seeks to hold the schools accountable for their responsibilities as an important component in the implementation of MHM policies by making adequate sanitation infrastructure and knowledge of MHM available in school premises.

        Read more about his campaign.

        Harshita is a psychologist and works to support people with mental health issues, particularly adolescents who are survivors of violence. Associated with the Azadi Foundation in UP, Harshita became an MHM Fellow with YKA, with the aim of promoting better menstrual health.

        Her campaign #MeriMarzi aims to promote menstrual health and wellness, hygiene and facilities for female sex workers in UP. She says, “Knowledge about natural body processes is a very basic human right. And for individuals whose occupation is providing sexual services, it becomes even more important.”

        Meri Marzi aims to ensure sensitised, non-discriminatory health workers for the needs of female sex workers in the Suraksha Clinics under the UPSACS (Uttar Pradesh State AIDS Control Society) program by creating more dialogues and garnering public support for the cause of sex workers’ menstrual rights. The campaign will also ensure interventions with sex workers to clear misconceptions around overall hygiene management to ensure that results flow both ways.

        Read more about her campaign.

        MH Fellow Sabna comes with significant experience working with a range of development issues. A co-founder of Project Sakhi Saheli, which aims to combat period poverty and break menstrual taboos, Sabna has, in the past, worked on the issue of menstruation in urban slums of Delhi with women and adolescent girls. She and her team also released MenstraBook, with menstrastories and organised Menstra Tlk in the Delhi School of Social Work to create more conversations on menstruation.

        With YKA MHM Fellow Vineet, Sabna launched Menstratalk, a campaign that aims to put an end to period poverty and smash menstrual taboos in society. As a start, the campaign aims to begin conversations on menstrual health with five hundred adolescents and youth in Delhi through offline platforms, and through this community mobilise support to create Period Friendly Institutions out of educational institutes in the city.

        Read more about her campaign. 

        A student from Delhi School of Social work, Vineet is a part of Project Sakhi Saheli, an initiative by the students of Delhi school of Social Work to create awareness on Menstrual Health and combat Period Poverty. Along with MHM Action Fellow Sabna, Vineet launched Menstratalk, a campaign that aims to put an end to period poverty and smash menstrual taboos in society.

        As a start, the campaign aims to begin conversations on menstrual health with five hundred adolescents and youth in Delhi through offline platforms, and through this community mobilise support to create Period Friendly Institutions out of educational institutes in the city.

        Find out more about the campaign here.

        A native of Bhagalpur district – Bihar, Shalini Jha believes in equal rights for all genders and wants to work for a gender-equal and just society. In the past she’s had a year-long association as a community leader with Haiyya: Organise for Action’s Health Over Stigma campaign. She’s pursuing a Master’s in Literature with Ambedkar University, Delhi and as an MHM Fellow with YKA, recently launched ‘Project अल्हड़ (Alharh)’.

        She says, “Bihar is ranked the lowest in India’s SDG Index 2019 for India. Hygienic and comfortable menstruation is a basic human right and sustainable development cannot be ensured if menstruators are deprived of their basic rights.” Project अल्हड़ (Alharh) aims to create a robust sensitised community in Bhagalpur to collectively spread awareness, break the taboo, debunk myths and initiate fearless conversations around menstruation. The campaign aims to reach at least 6000 adolescent girls from government and private schools in Baghalpur district in 2020.

        Read more about the campaign here.

        A psychologist and co-founder of a mental health NGO called Customize Cognition, Ritika forayed into the space of menstrual health and hygiene, sexual and reproductive healthcare and rights and gender equality as an MHM Fellow with YKA. She says, “The experience of working on MHM/SRHR and gender equality has been an enriching and eye-opening experience. I have learned what’s beneath the surface of the issue, be it awareness, lack of resources or disregard for trans men, who also menstruate.”

        The Transmen-ses campaign aims to tackle the issue of silence and disregard for trans men’s menstruation needs, by mobilising gender sensitive health professionals and gender neutral restrooms in Lucknow.

        Read more about the campaign here.

        A Computer Science engineer by education, Nitisha started her career in the corporate sector, before realising she wanted to work in the development and social justice space. Since then, she has worked with Teach For India and Care India and is from the founding batch of Indian School of Development Management (ISDM), a one of its kind organisation creating leaders for the development sector through its experiential learning post graduate program.

        As a Youth Ki Awaaz Menstrual Health Fellow, Nitisha has started Let’s Talk Period, a campaign to mobilise young people to switch to sustainable period products. She says, “80 lakh women in Delhi use non-biodegradable sanitary products, generate 3000 tonnes of menstrual waste, that takes 500-800 years to decompose; which in turn contributes to the health issues of all menstruators, increased burden of waste management on the city and harmful living environment for all citizens.

        Let’s Talk Period aims to change this by

        Find out more about her campaign here.

        Share your details to download the report.









        We promise not to spam or send irrelevant information.

        A former Assistant Secretary with the Ministry of Women and Child Development in West Bengal for three months, Lakshmi Bhavya has been championing the cause of menstrual hygiene in her district. By associating herself with the Lalana Campaign, a holistic menstrual hygiene awareness campaign which is conducted by the Anahat NGO, Lakshmi has been slowly breaking taboos when it comes to periods and menstrual hygiene.

        A Gender Rights Activist working with the tribal and marginalized communities in india, Srilekha is a PhD scholar working on understanding body and sexuality among tribal girls, to fill the gaps in research around indigenous women and their stories. Srilekha has worked extensively at the grassroots level with community based organisations, through several advocacy initiatives around Gender, Mental Health, Menstrual Hygiene and Sexual and Reproductive Health Rights (SRHR) for the indigenous in Jharkhand, over the last 6 years.

        Srilekha has also contributed to sustainable livelihood projects and legal aid programs for survivors of sex trafficking. She has been conducting research based programs on maternal health, mental health, gender based violence, sex and sexuality. Her interest lies in conducting workshops for young people on life skills, feminism, gender and sexuality, trauma, resilience and interpersonal relationships.

        A Guwahati-based college student pursuing her Masters in Tata Institute of Social Sciences, Bidisha started the #BleedwithDignity campaign on the technology platform Change.org, demanding that the Government of Assam install
        biodegradable sanitary pad vending machines in all government schools across the state. Her petition on Change.org has already gathered support from over 90000 people and continues to grow.

        Bidisha was selected in Change.org’s flagship program ‘She Creates Change’ having run successful online advocacy
        campaigns, which were widely recognised. Through the #BleedwithDignity campaign; she organised and celebrated World Menstrual Hygiene Day, 2019 in Guwahati, Assam by hosting a wall mural by collaborating with local organisations. The initiative was widely covered by national and local media, and the mural was later inaugurated by the event’s chief guest Commissioner of Guwahati Municipal Corporation (GMC) Debeswar Malakar, IAS.

        Sign up for the Youth Ki Awaaz Prime Ministerial Brief below