Oh God, something went wrong at the World Economic Forum at Davos in Switzerland suddenly. Of course, it was not as if it spontaneously happened, but it was indeed automatic. Moreover, it lasted for a short duration.
So far, everything was going good, and everyone appreciated the speaking acumen. But who can not afford to accept now that machines fail often and we continue to wander in utter shock and surprise at the critical moment?
In a way, the machine leaves support or backing, and thus we realise the device helps but does not remain reliable all the while.
If the teleprompter goes wrong, suddenly, the sharper brain loses quick accepting clues. So the speaker looks left and towards that direction until the improvement enters. Instantly nothing appropriate looks reasonable at that unfortunate worst moment.
The abnormal condition becomes so tight as the buzz of the conversation appears like ignoble scorn. The sky turns blackish, and the people around only look at it with ridicule until the favourable normalcy does not return.
Such a bleak situation comes in everyone’s life, but how do the political leaders deal with it? This can also be discerned by the circumstances formulating tardily or speedily. We have constantly been noticing such scenes during the speeches at the International arenas.
Jotting down images and bits of language used in describing the unusual sight prominently grab our highest interest or make us shout in awe or remain mute or speechless. And when we come back to look at those different scenes afterwards, we remain ever amazed by the ugliness of the occurrence.